At present, a significant portion of rare-earth elements (REEs) are sourced from weathering profiles. The mineralogy of the protolith plays an important role in controlling the fate of REEs during weathering, as accessory minerals contain the bulk the REE budget in most rocks, and different minerals vary in their susceptibilities to weathering processes. REE supergene deposits (‘adsorption clay deposits’) are associated with deep weathering in tropical environments, which often precludes characterisation of the incipient steps in REE liberation from their host minerals in the protolith. Here we have targeted a weathered REE-enriched lithology from a sub-arid environment undergoing relatively rapid uplift, namely the Yerila Gneiss from the Northern Flinders Ranges, Australia, where regolith was shallow or absent and parent rock material had yet to completely break down. Results from X-ray fluorescence mapping, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SEM-focussed ion beam milling (FIB-SEM), inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and laser ablation ICP-MS highlight the migration pathways of REEs and associated U and Th from allanite-(Ce) grains that are the main REE host within Yerila Gneiss material. Migration of light REEs and Th away from the allanite-(Ce) grains via radial cracks resulting from allanite-(Ce) metamictisation was interpreted to result from weathering, as Ce is partially present in its tetravalent oxidation state and Th mobility is most easily explained by the involvement of organic ligands. FIB-SEM provides further evidence for the importance of biogenic processes in REE+U/Th mobility and fractionation in uranothorite-associated spheroidal structures associated with the weathering of allanite-(Ce). Organic carbon was also found in association with a xenotime-(Y) grain; in this case, REE liberation is most likely a by-product of biogenic phosphate utilisation. These results highlight that local controls (at mineral interfaces) mediated by biota and/or biogenic organic matter can control the initiation of REE (+Th,U) mobilisation during weathering.

The crystal structure of nikmelnikovite, Ca12Fe2+Fe3+3Al3(SiO4)6(OH)20, a new member of the garnet supergroup from Kovdor massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia (R$\bar{3}$, a = 17.2072(6), c = 10.5689(4) Å, V = 2710.1(2) Å3 and Z = 3) has been refined to R1 = 0.046 on the basis of 1184 unique observed reflections. Nikmelnikovite is the first mineral species in the garnet supergroup that has a trigonal (rhombohedral) symmetry. The relationship between its unit cell and the pseudocubic (ideal garnet) unit cell can be described by the transformation matrix [1$\bar{1}$0 | 01$\bar{1}$ | ½½½]. The crystal-chemical relations between the ideal Ia$\bar{3}$d garnet and the nikmelnikovite structure type can be described by the following series of imaginary modifications: (1) the symmetry is lowered according to the Ia$\bar{3}$d → R$\bar{3}$ group–subgroup relationship; (2) the cation sites are split according to the following sequences: X → {X1, X2}; Y → {Y1, Y2, Y3, Y4}; Z → {Z1, Z2}; (3) the X sites remain fully occupied by Ca; (4) each Y site is occupied predominantly by a distinct chemical species: Y1 → Al (Al site), Y2 → Fe2+ (Fe1 site), Y3 → Fe3+ (Fe2 site), Y4 → vacancy (Mn site); (5) one of the Z sites (Z1) is occupied by Si, whereas the other site (Z2) is predominantly vacant. The crystal-chemical formula that takes into account the transition between the archetype and the nikmelnikovite structure type can be described as X{Ca12}Y[Fe2+Al4Fe3+2□]Z(Si6□6)O24(OH)20□4. The structural complexity of nikmelnikovite (4.529 bit/atom and 434.431 bit/cell, after H-correction) is higher than those for andradite, grossular and katoite, which is typical for low-temperature minerals formed after primary minerals with simpler structures.

Amphibole and biotite were the principal mafic minerals precipitated during the magmatic and post-magmatic (including hydrothermal) crystallisation stages of coeval metaluminous to slightly peraluminous syenogranites and peralkaline alkali-feldspar granites of the Mandira Granite Massif, in the post-collisional A-type Graciosa Province, S-SE Brazil. Magmatic calcic (ferro-ferri-hornblende and hastingsite) amphiboles occur in the metaluminous syenogranites, whereas calcic (ferro-edenite), sodic–calcic (ferro-ferri-winchite) and sodic (arfvedsonite and riebeckite) amphiboles occur in peralkaline alkali-feldspar granites. Rare earth element (REE) contents decrease from hornblende to winchite and riebeckite, and the partition coefficients indicate increasing compatibility from light rare earth elements (LREE) to heavy rare earth elements (HREE), with a marked preference for the HREE over the LREE in the sodic–calcic and, particularly, the sodic amphiboles. Post-magmatic calcic- (ferro-actinolite) and sodic- (riebeckite) amphiboles are also present in the peralkaline granites. Magmatic biotite (annite) is dominant in syenogranites, whereas post-magmatic annite and late-to post-magmatic annite evolving to siderophyllite occurs in the peralkaline granites. Typical hydrothermal phyllosilicates are chlorite (chamosite) in syenogranites and related greisens, and ferri-stilpnomelane which is present in both peralkaline granites and metaluminous syenogranites. Lithostatic pressure estimates suggest that the main granites were emplaced under pressures of ~93–230 MPa, with close-to-liquidus temperatures varying from ~830°C for syenogranites to ~900°C for the peralkaline granites. The original magmas crystallised mainly under relatively reduced (buffered at ~ –1 ≤ QFM ≤ 0), and more oxidising (somewhat above QFM) environments, respectively. Chlorite, replacing biotite in syenogranites and as the main mineral in the related greisens, permits the temperature of the main hydrothermal event to have taken place between 250 and 272°C. Estimated log (fHF/fHCl) values from biotite compositions vary from ~ –2 to –1 (syenogranites) and ~ –3.5 to –2 (peralkaline granites) and indicate F preference over Cl in the hydrothermal fluid phase.

Myrmekites occurring in monzodiorite from the Meichuan pluton in the Dabie ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt were investigated. The petrographic evidence demonstrates a metasomatic origin for myrmekite formation at the scale of individual alkali feldspar grains, and that the myrmekitic quartz and plagioclase matrix are generated simultaneously replacing precursor feldspar. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and electron microprobe analysis indicate a low anorthite content in the narrow rim of host plagioclase near the myrmekite–alkali-feldspar interface. The Ca2+, Na+ proportion of hydrothermal fluids replacing precursor alkali feldspar is 1:5.4, calculated from the anorthite content of the inner part of the host plagioclase and the neighbouring alkali feldspar. Electron back-scattered diffraction was used to identify the crystallographic orientation of the myrmekitic quartz, plagioclase matrix and the precursor alkali feldspar. The crystallographic orientation relationships (110)Kfs//(11$\bar{2}\bar{1}$)Qtz, (20$\bar{1}$)Kfs//(11$\bar{2}$1)Qtz and [11$\bar{2}3]$Qtz//[001]Kfs between myrmekitic quartz and adjacent alkali feldspar were obtained from statistical analysis. No clear crystallographic orientation relationship between quartz and plagioclase was found. The growth of myrmekitic quartz is constrained by the precursor alkali feldspar rather than the simultaneously crystallised plagioclase. This research is helpful for understanding the intergrowth mechanism during metasomatism.

Dobrovolskyite, Na4Ca(SO4)3, is a new sulfate mineral from the Great Tolbachik fissure eruption, Kamchatka peninsula, Russia. It occurs as aggregates of tabular crystals up to 1–2 mm in maximum dimension, with abundant gas inclusions. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of O = 12 is (Na3.90K0.10)Σ4(Ca0.45Mg0.16Cu0.12Na0.10)Σ0.83S3.08O12. The crystal structure of dobrovolskyite was determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data as: trigonal, R3, a = 15.7223(2), c = 22.0160(5) Å, V = 4713.1(2) Å3, Z = 18 and R1 = 0.072. The Mohs’ hardness is 3.5. The mineral is uniaxial (+), with ω = 1.489(2) and ɛ = 1.491(2) (λ = 589 nm). The seven strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d, Å (I, %)(hkl)] are: 11.58(40)(101); 5.79(22)(202); 4.54(18)(030); 3.86(88)(033); 3.67(32)(006); 2.855(50)(306); and 2.682(100)(330). The mineral is named in honour of Prof. Dr. Vladimir Vitalievich Dolivo-Dobrovolsky (1927–2009), one of the leading Russian scientists in the field of petrology, crystal optics and crystal chemistry. The crystal structure of dobrovolskyite can be described as composed of three symmetrically independent rods running parallel to the c axis. The rods consist of six octahedral–tetrahedral [Na(SO4)6]11– or [Ca(SO4)6]10– clusters of central octahedra sharing common corners with six adjacent SO4 tetrahedra. Alternatively, the crystal structure of the mineral can be described as a 12-layer ABACABACABAC eutactic array of Na+ and Ca2+ cations, and vacancies with disordered (SO4) tetrahedra in interstices. Dobrovolskyite and similar minerals probably formed upon cooling of a high-temperature phase with disordered cation and anion arrangements.

The new beudantite-group mineral oberwolfachite, ideally SrFe3+3(AsO4)(SO4)(OH)6, was discovered in two localities: Clara mine, Oberwolfach, Schwarzwald, Baden-Württemberg, Germany (holotype) and Monterniers mine, Lantignié, Rhône, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France (cotype). The associated minerals are quartz, baryte, hematite, illite, goethite, beudantite and dussertite (Clara) and arsenogoyazite, jarosite, graulichite-(Ce), goethite and hematite (Monterniers). Oberwolfachite forms yellow to brown platy crystals up to 1 mm across or thick outer zones of mixed (oberwolfachite–beudantite) crystals up to 3 mm across. The lustre is adamantine and the streak is yellow. A distinct cleavage on {0001} is observed. Calculated density is 3.874 g⋅cm–3. The infrared spectra are given. The chemical composition of the holotype/cotype samples are (wt.%, b.d.l. = below detection limit): K2O 1.25/1.86, SrO 6.41/11.15, BaO 8.13/0.45, PbO 2.18/b.d.l., Al2O3 0.16/0.23, Fe2O3 38.99/39.98, La2O3 1.68/not determined, Ce2O3 1.28/2.06, P2O5 0.12/b.d.l., As2O5 17.55/16.55, SO3 12.86/14.99, H2O (calculated) 8.72/9.05, total 99.33/96.62. The empirical formula of the holotype sample is (Sr0.38Ba0.33K0.16Pb0.06La0.06Ce0.05)Σ1.04(Fe3+3.03Al0.02)Σ3.05[(SO4)1.00(AsO4)0.95(PO4)0.01](O6.16H6.00). The crystal structures of both samples were determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and refined to R = 3.13% (holotype, 293 K) and 2.65% (cotype, 170 K). Oberwolfachite is trigonal, R${\bar 3}$m, with a = 7.3270(3) Å, c = 17.0931(9) Å and V = 794.70(8) Å3 (holotype), and a = 7.298(2) Å, c = 16.908(3) Å and V = 779.8(4) Å3 (cotype); Z = 3. The strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern of holotype [d, Å (I, %)(hkl)] are: 5.95 (56)(101), 3.664 (37)(110), 3.117 (16)(021), 3.082 (100)(113), 2.548 (15)(024), 2.280 (22)(107), 1.983 (26)(303) and 1.832 (19)(220).

We report on the crystal structures of three novel synthetic SrM-arsenates (M = Ni and Fe3+), isostructural or structurally related to the minerals from tsumcorite, carminite and brackebuschite groups. They were synthesised under mild hydrothermal conditions and further characterised using single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SXRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) and Raman spectroscopy. SXRD and SEM-EDS yielded formulae: (I) SrNi2(AsO4)2⋅2H2O, (II) Sr1.4Fe3+1.6(AsO4)2(OH)1.6 and (III) SrFe3+(AsO4)(AsO3OH). All three structures are built up of slightly distorted MO6 octahedra and AsO4 tetrahedra that are linked by Sr2+ with different coordination geometries and hydrogen bonds. I represent a basic structure type typical for tsumcorite-group minerals (space group C2/m) while II has a new intermediate structure between carminite, PbFe3+2(AsO4)2(OH)2 and arsenbrackebuschite, Pb2Fe3+(AsO4)2(OH) (s.g. Pm). III is triclinic and adopts a new structure-type (s.g. P$\bar{1}$). The structure of I is built up of infinite linear edge-sharing NiO4(OH2)2 octahedral chains, extending along [010] and linked by AsO4 tetrahedra, SrO8 polyhedra and hydrogen bonds. The structure of II is characterised by the carminite-like FeO4(OH)2 octahedral chains and Edshammar-polyhedral chains, which involves SrO11 coordination polyhedra similar to that of PbO11 in arsenbrackebuschite. Both chains in II are aligned parallel to the b axis of the monoclinic unit cell and connected together by the arsenate AsO4 tetrahedra, SrO8 polyhedra and the hydrogen-bonding network. The compound III has a new type of crystal structure based on the unusual corrugated octahedral–tetrahedral-quadruple chains. These are made up of a central double-sided chain linked to two single-sided chains into a quadruple chain extended along the a axis. The chains in III are built up of FeO6 octahedra and AsO4 tetrahedra further linked to each other by shared vertices. The quadruple chains are interconnected by additional AsO4 tetrahedra forming a heteropolyhedral 3D open framework. Strontium atoms are situated in the two channels. The structural connections to related minerals and inorganic compounds are discussed.

A gem-quality purplish-red tourmaline sample of alleged liddicoatitic composition from the Anjanabonoina pegmatite, Madagascar, has been fully characterised using a multi-analytical approach to define its crystal-chemical identity. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, chemical and spectroscopic analysis resulted in the formula: X(Na0.41□0.35Ca0.24)Σ1.00Y(Al1.81Li1.00Fe3+0.04Mn3+0.02Mn2+0.12Ti0.004)Σ3.00ZAl6 [T(Si5.60B0.40)Σ6.00O18] (BO3)3 (OH)3W[(OH)0.50F0.13O0.37]Σ1.00 which corresponds to the tourmaline species elbaite having the typical space group R3m and relatively small unit-cell dimensions, a = 15.7935(4) Å, c = 7.0860(2) Å and V = 7.0860(2) Å3.

Optical absorption spectroscopy showed that the purplish-red colour is caused by minor amounts of Mn3+ (Mn2O3 = 0.20 wt.%). Thermal treatment in air up to 750°C strongly intensified the colour of the sample due to the oxidation of all Mn2+ to Mn3+ (Mn2O3 up to 1.21 wt.%). Based on infrared and Raman data, a crystal-chemical model regarding the electrostatic interaction between the X cation and W anion, and involving the Y cations as well, is proposed to explain the absence or rarity of the mineral species ‘liddicoatite’.

An unusual highly hydrated and Na-depleted variety of elpidite was identified in a hydrothermally altered peralkaline pegmatite at Mt. Yukspor in the Khibiny alkaline complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia. It differs from ‘ordinary’ elpidite, ideally Na2ZrSi6O15⋅3H2O, in its crystal chemical features, infrared spectrum and optical characteristics. The chemical composition (wt.%, electron microprobe, H2O by TGA) is: Na2O 5.45, K2O 0.67, CaO 0.05, SiO2 60.32, TiO2 1.34, ZrO2 18.43, Nb2O5 0.65, H2O 12.80, total 99.71. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 6 Si and 15 O atoms is [(Na1.05K0.08Ca0.01)Σ1.14(H3O)0.74]Σ1.88(Zr0.89Ti0.10Nb0.03)Σ1.02Si6O15⋅3.47H2O; the H2O:H3O ratio was calculated from the charge balance requirement, taking into account the results of crystal structure refinement. The highly hydrated variety of elpidite is orthorhombic, Pma2, a = 14.5916(6), b = 7.3294(3), c = 7.1387(2) Å, V = 763.47(5) Å3 and Z = 2. The crystal structure was solved from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, R1 = 3.43%. The structure is based upon an elpidite-type heteropolyhedral Zr–Si–O framework with Na+ and H3O+ cations and H2O molecules in the zeolitic channels. Hydronium cations substitute for water molecules in one of the extra-framework sites. This variety of elpidite could be considered as an intermediate product of natural ion-exchange reaction between ‘ordinary’ elpidite and a low-temperature hydrothermal fluid.

The biogeochemical cycling of gold has been proposed from studies focusing on gold particle morphology, surface textures and associated bacteria living on the surface of gold particles. Additionally, it has been suggested that metabolically active bacteria on particles catalyse gold dissolution and gold re-precipitation processes, i.e. fluid–bacterial–mineral interaction within microenvironments surrounding particles. Therefore, the isolation and characterisation of viable bacteria from gold particles can be used as a model to improve the understanding of bacterial–gold interactions. In this study, classical microbiology methods were used to isolate a gold-tolerant bacterium (Acinetobacter sp. SK-43) directly from gold particles. The genome of this isolate contained diverse (laterally acquired) heavy-metal resistance genes and stress tolerance genes, suggesting that gene expression would confer resistance to a wide range of potentially toxic metals that could occur in the surrounding microenvironment. The presence of these genes, along with genes for nutrient cycling under nutrient-limited conditions highlights the genomic capacity of how Acinetobacter sp. SK-43 could survive on gold particles and remain viable. Laboratory experiments demonstrated that this isolate could grow in the presence of soluble gold up to 20 μM (AuCl3) and that >50% of soluble gold was reduced upon exposure. Collectively, these results suggest that Acinetobacter sp. SK-43 (and presumably similar bacteria) could survive the cytotoxic effects of soluble Au from particles undergoing dissolution. This study provides comprehensive insight on the possible bacterial contributions to gold biogeochemical cycling in natural environments.

A nomenclature scheme has been set up for the nordite supergroup of minerals, which have the general formula A2BXYZT6O17 and where A = Na; B = Na, Ca; X = Sr, Ca, Ba; Y = REE, Sr; Z = Zn, Fe, Mn, Mg and T = Si. The nordite supergroup includes nordite-(La), nordite-(Ce), ferronordite-(La), ferronordite-(Ce) and manganonordite-(Ce), as well as meieranite which is considered as an unassigned member of the nordite supergroup. In the known nordite-group minerals the Y site is occupied by rare earth elements (REE), while in meieranite the Y site is occupied by Sr. The dominant element on the tetrahedral Z site determines the prefix used in the mineral name. New rootnames must be given to species with a different dominant element on the A, B or X sites. Nordite supergroup minerals are orthorhombic, although nordite-group minerals and meieranite crystallise in the Pcca and P21nb space groups, respectively. The proposed nomenclature scheme for the nordite supergroup has been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA). In addition, new chemical and structural investigations were performed on nordite-(Ce) from Illutalik (Igdlutalik), South Greenland, leading to the first crystal structure refinement for nordite-(Ce).

Kufahrite, PtPb, is a new mineral (IMA2020-045) from the Ledyanoy Creek placer, Koryak Highlands, Russia. The mineral was found in isoferroplatinum (Pt3Fe) grains extracted from a heavy-mineral concentrate, together with tetraferroplatinum (PtFe), tulameenite (Pt2FeCu), native iridium, hollingworthite (RhAsS) and Cr-rich spinel. Kufahrite occurs as part of alteration rims which are formed together with tetraferroplatinum after isoferroplatinum, or as grains up to 150 μm in size. According to powder X-ray diffraction analyses kufahrite is isotypic to its synthetic analogue, it is hexagonal and crystallises in space group P63/mmc adopting the nickeline structure type. Its unit-cell parameters are: a = 4.2492(6) Å; c = 5.486(6) Å; V = 85.78 Å3 and Z = 2. The calculated density is 14.80 g/cm–3. The strongest diffraction lines are [d, Å (I, %) (hkl)]: 3.052 (80) (101), 2.197 (100) (102), 2.125 (28) (110), 1.747 (18) (210), 1.528 (35) (202), 1.240 (18) (212) and 0.958 (22) (312). The Vickers hardness is 295 kg/mm2 (range 262–320, n = 5), corresponding to a Mohs hardness of 4. The empirical formula of kufahrite, calculated from a mean value of 23 electron-microprobe analyses is (Pt0.94Rh0.04)Σ0.98(Pb0.83Sb0.19)Σ1.02. The name (pronounced as [ku fa rait]) honours Fahrid Shakirovitch Kutyev (1943‒1993), a geologist from the Institute of Volcanology of USSR Academy of Sciences, who played a key role in the discovery of the Koryak–Kamchatka Platinum Belt, including the Ledyanoy Creek placer platinum deposit, where the new mineral has been discovered.

The new wermlandite-group mineral erssonite, ideally CaMg7Fe3+2(OH)18(SO4)2⋅12H2O (or [Mg7Fe3+2(OH)18][Ca(SO4)2]⋅12H2O), was discovered in a late-stage, low-temperature assemblage in cavities of a magnetite-bearing dolomitic rock from the Långban deposit, Värmland county, Bergslagen ore province, Sweden. The associated minerals are dolomite, calcite, members of the magnetite–magnesioferrite solid-solution series, phlogopite, chrysotile, pyroaurite and norbergite. Erssonite has a vitreous lustre and forms colourless, platy hexagonal crystals flattened on [0001], up to 0.5 mm across and up to 10 μm thick, occurring mainly as aggregates in cavities of dolomitic rock. Erssonite is malleable; separate crystals are flexible and non-elastic, with a perfect, mica-like cleavage on {0001}. The calculated density is equal to 2.02 g⋅cm–3. Raman spectroscopy shows the presence of typical bands for S–O bonds attributed to intercalated SO42– anions and structural OH– anions together with the absence of C–O bonds, attributed to carbonate anions. The chemical composition is (wt.%, electron microprobe, H2O content is calculated from structure data): MgO 28.67, CaO 2.76, Al2O3 0.23, Cr2O3 0.23, Fe2O3 16.00, SiO2 0.48, SO3 14.80, H2O 35.58, total 98.75. The empirical formula based on 38 O atoms is H41.48Ca0.52Mg7.47Fe3+2.11Al0.05Cr0.03S1.94Si0.08O38. The ideal formula is CaMg7Fe3+2(OH)18(SO4)2⋅12H2O or {Mg7Fe3+2(OH)18}{[Ca(H2O)6](SO4)2(H2O)6}. The crystal structure was determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and refined to R = 0.093. Erssonite is trigonal, P$\bar{3}$c1, with a = 9.3550(6), c = 22.5462(14) Å, V = 1708.8(2) Å3 and Z = 2. The strongest lines of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d, Å (I, %)(hkl)] are: 11.22 (90)(002), 5.63 (64)(004), 4.670 (100)(110, 104, 014), 2.626 (64)(032, 302), 2.435 (66)(034, 304) and 1.951 (45)(038, 308). The mineral is named in honour of the Swedish amateur mineralogist Dr. Anders Ersson (b. 1971).

The new mineral uranoclite (IMA2020-074), (UO2)2(OH)2Cl2(H2O)4, was found in the Blue Lizard mine, San Juan County, Utah, USA, where it occurs as tightly intergrown aggregates of irregular yellow crystals in a secondary assemblage with gypsum. The streak is very pale yellow and the fluorescence is bright green–white under 405 nm ultraviolet light. Crystals are translucent with vitreous lustre. The tenacity is brittle, the Mohs hardness is ~1½, the fracture is irregular. The mineral is soluble in H2O and has a calculated density of 4.038 g⋅cm–3. Electron microprobe analyses provided (UO2)2(OH)2.19Cl1.81(H2O)4. The six strongest powder X-ray diffraction lines are [dobs Å(I)(hkl)]: 8.85(38)(002), 5.340(100)(200, 110), 5.051(63)($\bar{2}$02), 4.421(83)(112, 004, 202), 3.781(38)($\bar{2}$12) and 3.586(57)(014, $\bar{2}$04). Uranoclite is monoclinic, P21/n, a = 10.763(8), b = 6.156(8), c = 17.798(8) Å, β = 95.656(15)°, V = 1173.5(18) Å3 and Z = 4. The structure is the same as that of synthetic (UO2)2(OH)2Cl2(H2O)4 in which the structural unit is a dimer consisting of two pentagonal bipyramids that share an equatorial OH–OH edge. The dimers are linked to one another only by hydrogen bonding. This is the second known uranyl mineral containing essential Cl and the first in which Cl coordinates to U6+.