Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Hypatia
  4. Volume 24
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 24 - Summer 2009

Contents

Page 4 of 5

Symposium on Standpoint Theory

Front matter

  • HYP volume 24 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 March 2020, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Front matter

  • HYP volume 24 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    25 March 2020, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Musings

  • The Poetry of Genetics: On the Pitfalls of Popularizing Science

  • Anita L. Allen
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. 247-257

  • The role genetic inheritance plays in the way human beings look and behave is a question about the biology of human sexual reproduction, one that scientists connected with the Human Genome Project dashed to answer before the close of the twentieth century. This is also a question about politics, and, it turns out, poetry, because, as the example of Lucretius shows, poetry is an ancient tool for the popularization of science. “Popularization” is a good word for successful efforts to communicate elite science to non-scientists in non-technical languages and media. According to prominent sociobiologist E. O. Wilson, “sexual dominance is a human universal.” He meant, of course, that men dominate women. Like sociobiology, genetic science is freighted with politics, including gender politics. Scientists have gender perspectives that may color what they “see” in nature. As the late Susan Okin Miller suggested in an unpublished paper tracing the detrimental impact of Aristotle's teleology on Western thought, scientists accustomed to thinking that men naturally dominate women might interpret genetic discoveries accordingly. Biologists have good, scientific reasons to fight the effects of bias. One must be critical of how scientists and popularizers of science, like Genome author Matt Ridley, frame truth and theory. Ridley's “battle of the sexes” metaphor and others have a doubtful place in serious explanations of science.

Notes on Contributors

Book Reviews

Front matter

  • HYP volume 24 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    11 March 2020, pp. f1-f3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Book Notes

Musings

Page 4 of 5