Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:55:11.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Networked Expertise, Relational Agency, and Collective Creativity

from Part Two - Working Relationally in Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

By
Kai Hakkarainen ,
Kaisa Hytönen ,
Jenna Vekkaila  and
Tuire Palonen
Edited by
Anne Edwards
Anne Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Working Relationally in and across Practices
A Cultural-Historical Approach to Collaboration
 , pp. 133 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, N. M., Ford, K. M. & Hayes, P. J. (1994). Expertise in context: personally constructed, socially selected and reality relevant? International Journal of Expert Systems, 7, 65–88.Google Scholar
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Simons, R. J. & Niessen, T. (2006). Considering diversity: multivoicedness in international academic collaboration. Culture & Psychology, 12, 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing Ourselves. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts characteristics. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 21–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. & Odette, P. (2000). The Doctoral Experience. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2009). From the systemic to the relational: relational agency and activity theory. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2005). Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organizational fields. In Beyerlein, M., Beyerlein, S. T. & Kennedy, F. A. (Eds.), Collaborative Capital: Creating Intangible Value (pp. 307–336). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction 5, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683–704). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Enhancing the development of professional performance: implications from the study of deliberate practice. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments (pp. 405–431). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, A. & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: integrating organizational and personal development. In Rainbird, H., Fuller, A. & Munro, A. (Eds.), Workplace Learning in Context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Mapping the research ground: expertise, collective creativity, and shared knowledge practices. In Gaunt, H. & Westerlund, H. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning in Higher Music Education (pp. 13–26). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Lonka, K. & Makkonen, J. (2014b). How does collaborative authoring in doctoral programs socially shape practices of academic excellence. Talent Development and Excellence, 6, 11–30.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Makkonen, J. & Lehtinen, E. (2014a). Extending collective practices of doctoral education from natural to educational sciences. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Makkonen, J., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. & White, H. (2013). Interagency, collective creativity, and academic knowledge practices. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Socio-Cultural Studies (pp. 77–98). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Lallimo, J., Toikka, S. & White, H. (2011). Cultivating collective expertise within innovative knowledge-practice networks. In Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I. & Säljö, R. (Eds.), Learning across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices (pp. 69–86). Earlier series: New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Wires, S., Stubb, J., Paavola, S., Pohjola, P., Lonka, K. & Pyhältö, K. (2014c). On personal and collective dimensions of agency in doctoral training: medicine and natural science programs. Studies in Continuing Education, 36, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In Light, P. & Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Context and Cognition: Ways of Knowing and Learning (pp. 115–130). New York: Harvester.Google Scholar
Howells, J. (1999). Management and hybridization of expertise in network design. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., & Fleck, J. (Eds.), Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives (pp. 265–285). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hytönen, K., Hakkarainen, K. & Palonen, T. (2011). Young diplomats’ socialization to the networked professional cultures of their workplace communities. Vocations and Learning, 4, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytönen, K., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014b). Cognitively central actors and their personal networks in an energy efficiency training program. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 15–37.Google Scholar
Hytönen, K., Palonen, T., Lehtinen, E. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014a). Does academic apprenticeship increase networking ties among participants? A case study of an energy efficiency training program. Higher Education, 68, 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Heimann, V. L. & O’Neill, K. (2000). The wolf pack: team dynamics for the 21st century. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(4), 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamler, B. (2009). Rethinking doctoral publication practices. Higher Education, 33, 283–294.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001) Objectual practices. In Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K. & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K. & Palonen, T. (2014). Understanding learning for the professions: how theories of learning explain coping with rapid change. In Billett, S., Gruber, H. & Harteis, C. (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional Practice-Based Learning (pp. 199–224). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, C. (2002). Measuring structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3(1).Google Scholar
McCarty, C., Molina, J. L., Aguilar, C. & Rota, L. (2007). A comparison of social network mapping and personal network visualization. Field Methods, 19(2), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieg, H. A. (2006). Social and sociological factors in the development of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 743–760). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, R. (2006). The sources of novelty: a cultural and systemic view of distributed creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreland, R. L. & Levine, J. M. (2002). Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustonen, V. & Hakkarainen, K. (2015). Tracing two apprentices’ trajectories toward adaptive professional expertise in fingerprint examination. Vocations and Education. doi: 10.1007/s12186-015-9130-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwartz, H. (2000). It‘s not what you know, it‘s who you know: Work in the information age. First Monday, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S. & Schwartz, H. (2002). Networkers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nersessian, N. (2006). The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies, 27, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (2004). Introduction: toward a practice-based view of knowledge and learning in organization. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in Organization: A Practice-based Approach (pp. 3–31). London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Paavola, S., Engeström, R. & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Trialogical approach as a new form of mediation. In Morsh, A., Moen, A., & Paavola, S. (Eds.), Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Practices, Tools, and Concepts (pp. 9–23). KP-Lab project. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In Tan, S-C., Jo, H.-J & Yoe, J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation in Education (pp. 53–72). Education Innovation Series. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Social network analyses of learning at workplaces. In Harteis, C., Rausch, A. & Seifried, J. (Eds.), Discourses on Professional Learning: On the Boundary between Learning and Working (pp. 293–315). Netherlands: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., Talvitie, J. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Network ties, cognitive centrality, and team interaction within a telecommunication company. In Gruber, H., Boshuizen, E. & Bromme, R. (Eds.), Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert (pp. 273–294). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J. & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, O., Pitkänen, P., Juvonen, A., Kuhn, G. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Expertise among professional magicians: an interview study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13 (article 1484).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryymin, E., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Networking relations of using ICT within a teacher community. Computer & Education, 5, 1264–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K. & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomainen(Vekkaila), J., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). A special education teacher’s networks: a Finnish case. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 46–58.Google Scholar
Tuomainen(Vekkaila), J., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Special educators’ social networks: a multiple case study in a Finnish part-time special education context. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., Hakkarainen, K., Stubb, J. & Lonka, K (2012). Doctoral students’ key learning experiences in a top-level natural sciences research community. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3, 154–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention and the Arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×