Agnew, N. M., Ford, K. M. & Hayes, P. J. (1994). Expertise in context: personally constructed, socially selected and reality relevant? International Journal of Expert Systems, 7, 65–88.Google Scholar

Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Simons, R. J. & Niessen, T. (2006). Considering diversity: multivoicedness in international academic collaboration. Culture & Psychology, 12, 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing Ourselves. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts characteristics. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P., & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 21–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. & Odette, P. (2000). The Doctoral Experience. London: Falmer.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2009). From the systemic to the relational: relational agency and activity theory. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2005). Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fluid organizational fields. In Beyerlein, M., Beyerlein, S. T. & Kennedy, F. A. (Eds.), Collaborative Capital: Creating Intangible Value (pp. 307–336). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction 5, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683–704). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Enhancing the development of professional performance: implications from the study of deliberate practice. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), Development of Professional Expertise: Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments (pp. 405–431). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, A. & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: integrating organizational and personal development. In Rainbird, H., Fuller, A. & Munro, A. (Eds.), Workplace Learning in Context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Mapping the research ground: expertise, collective creativity, and shared knowledge practices. In Gaunt, H. & Westerlund, H. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning in Higher Music Education (pp. 13–26). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Lonka, K. & Makkonen, J. (2014b). How does collaborative authoring in doctoral programs socially shape practices of academic excellence. Talent Development and Excellence, 6, 11–30.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Makkonen, J. & Lehtinen, E. (2014a). Extending collective practices of doctoral education from natural to educational sciences. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Makkonen, J., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. & White, H. (2013). Interagency, collective creativity, and academic knowledge practices. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Socio-Cultural Studies (pp. 77–98). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Lallimo, J., Toikka, S. & White, H. (2011). Cultivating collective expertise within innovative knowledge-practice networks. In Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I. & Säljö, R. (Eds.), Learning across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices (pp. 69–86). Earlier series: New Perspectives on Learning and Instruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of Networked Expertise: Professional and Educational Perspectives. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, K., Wires, S., Stubb, J., Paavola, S., Pohjola, P., Lonka, K. & Pyhältö, K. (2014c). On personal and collective dimensions of agency in doctoral training: medicine and natural science programs. Studies in Continuing Education, 36, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In Light, P. & Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Context and Cognition: Ways of Knowing and Learning (pp. 115–130). New York: Harvester.Google Scholar

Howells, J. (1999). Management and hybridization of expertise in network design. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., & Fleck, J. (Eds.), Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives (pp. 265–285). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hytönen, K., Hakkarainen, K. & Palonen, T. (2011). Young diplomats’ socialization to the networked professional cultures of their workplace communities. Vocations and Learning, 4, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hytönen, K., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014b). Cognitively central actors and their personal networks in an energy efficiency training program. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 15–37.Google Scholar

Hytönen, K., Palonen, T., Lehtinen, E. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014a). Does academic apprenticeship increase networking ties among participants? A case study of an energy efficiency training program. Higher Education, 68, 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P., Heimann, V. L. & O’Neill, K. (2000). The wolf pack: team dynamics for the 21st century. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(4), 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamler, B. (2009). Rethinking doctoral publication practices. Higher Education, 33, 283–294.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knorr Cetina, K. (2001) Objectual practices. In Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K. & Von Savigny, E. (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K. & Palonen, T. (2014). Understanding learning for the professions: how theories of learning explain coping with rapid change. In Billett, S., Gruber, H. & Harteis, C. (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional Practice-Based Learning (pp. 199–224). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, C. (2002). Measuring structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3(1).Google Scholar

McCarty, C., Molina, J. L., Aguilar, C. & Rota, L. (2007). A comparison of social network mapping and personal network visualization. Field Methods, 19(2), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mieg, H. A. (2006). Social and sociological factors in the development of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. & Hoffman, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 743–760). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miettinen, R. (2006). The sources of novelty: a cultural and systemic view of distributed creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreland, R. L. & Levine, J. M. (2002). Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mustonen, V. & Hakkarainen, K. (2015). Tracing two apprentices’ trajectories toward adaptive professional expertise in fingerprint examination. Vocations and Education. doi: 10.1007/s12186-015-9130-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwartz, H. (2000). It‘s not what you know, it‘s who you know: Work in the information age. First Monday, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S. & Schwartz, H. (2002). Networkers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nersessian, N. (2006). The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory. Organization Studies, 27, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (2004). Introduction: toward a practice-based view of knowledge and learning in organization. In Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. & Yanow, D. (Eds.), Knowing in Organization: A Practice-based Approach (pp. 3–31). London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Paavola, S., Engeström, R. & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Trialogical approach as a new form of mediation. In Morsh, A., Moen, A., & Paavola, S. (Eds.), Collaborative Knowledge Creation: Practices, Tools, and Concepts (pp. 9–23). KP-Lab project. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In Tan, S-C., Jo, H.-J & Yoe, J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation in Education (pp. 53–72). Education Innovation Series. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Social network analyses of learning at workplaces. In Harteis, C., Rausch, A. & Seifried, J. (Eds.), Discourses on Professional Learning: On the Boundary between Learning and Working (pp. 293–315). Netherlands: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palonen, T., Hakkarainen, K., Talvitie, J. & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Network ties, cognitive centrality, and team interaction within a telecommunication company. In Gruber, H., Boshuizen, E. & Bromme, R. (Eds.), Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert (pp. 273–294). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J. & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rissanen, O., Pitkänen, P., Juvonen, A., Kuhn, G. & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Expertise among professional magicians: an interview study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13 (article 1484).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ryymin, E., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Networking relations of using ICT within a teacher community. Computer & Education, 5, 1264–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K. & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuomainen(Vekkaila), J., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). A special education teacher’s networks: a Finnish case. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 46–58.Google Scholar

Tuomainen(Vekkaila), J., Palonen, T. & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Special educators’ social networks: a multiple case study in a Finnish part-time special education context. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., Hakkarainen, K., Stubb, J. & Lonka, K (2012). Doctoral students’ key learning experiences in a top-level natural sciences research community. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3, 154–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention and the Arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Béguin, P. & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173–190.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2009). From the systemic to the relational: relational agency and activity theory. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds.), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, R. (2009). Who is acting in an activity system? In Sannino, A., Daniels, H. & Gutierrez, K. D. (Eds.), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 257–273). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Engeström, Y., Kajamaa, A., Lahtinen, P. & Sannino, A. (2015). Toward a grammar of collaboration. Mind, Culture and Activity, 22(2), 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practical theory: illuminating the development of a conflict monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2000). Amédée and how to get rid of it: social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture and Psychology, 6(4), 419–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: the case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 423–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nummijoki, J. & Engeström, Y. (2010). Towards co-configuration in home care of the elderly: cultivating agency by designing and implementing the mobility agreement. In Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T. & Ludvigsen, S. R. (Eds.), Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning across Boundaries and Agencies (pp. 49–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Paasivaara, M. & Lassenius, C. (2003). Collaboration practices in global inter-organizational software development projects. Software Process Improvement and Practice 8, 183–199. doi: 10.1002/spip.187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruotsala, R. (2014). Developing a tool for cross-functional collaboration: the trajectory of an annual clock. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 15(2), 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seppänen, L., Ala-Laurinaho, A. & Piispanen, P. (2015). Logics of fluency in the transformation of the Finnish rail traffic control network. Production, 25(2), 278–288. www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010365132015000200278&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=enCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seppänen, L., Cerf, M. & Toiviainen, H. (2013). Multi-voiced customer understanding in the zone of proximal development of public service networks. Paper presented at the EGOS conference 2013, Montreal.Google Scholar

Seppänen, L., Heikkilä, H., Kira, M., Lallimo, J., Ruotsala, R., Schaupp, M., Toiviainen, H., Uusitalo, H. & Ala-Laurinaho, A. (2014). Palveluverkostojen muuttuvat toimintakonseptit. Asiakasymmärrys, välineet ja työhyvinvointi verkostoyhteistyössä. Series “Tietoa työstä” edited by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. www.ttl.fi/fi/verkkokirjat/Documents/Palveluverkostojen%20muuttuvat%20toimintakonseptit.pdfGoogle Scholar

Seppänen, L. & Kloetzer, L. (2014). A micro-analysis of concepts for developing networking in social work. In Hansson, T. (Ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Activity Theory: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Behavior (pp. 162–181). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toiviainen, H. (2007). Interorganizational learning across levels – an object-oriented approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(4), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toiviainen, H. (2015). Interventions for learning at global workplaces. In Hansson, T. (Ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Activity Theory: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Behavior (pp. 214–227). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toiviainen, H., Lallimo, J. & Hong, J. (2012). Emergent learning practices in globalizing work – the case of a Finnish-Chinese project in a Finnish technology consulting firm. Journal of Workplace Learning, 24(7/8), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, P., Edwards, A., Fancourt, N. & Menter, I. (2014). Raising and Sustaining Aspiration in City Schools: Research Report. Oxford, UK: Department of Education, University of Oxford.Google Scholar

Allen, J., Belfield, C., Greaves, E., Sharp, C. & Walker, M. (2014). The Costs and Benefits of Different Initial Teacher Training Routes. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bamberg, M. (2012). Identity and narration. In Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W. & Schönert, J. (Eds.) Handbook of Narratology (pp. 132–143). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bamberg, M. & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baroni, R. (2012). Tellability. In Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W. & Schönert, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 447–454). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, S. & Sandholtz, J. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beauchamp, G., Clarke, L., Hulme, M. & Murray, J. (2013). Research and Teacher Education: The BERA-RSA Inquiry. Policy and Practice within the United Kingdom. London: BERA.Google Scholar

Benton, P. (Ed.) (1990). The Oxford Internship Scheme: Integration and Partnership in Initial Teacher Education. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar

BERA (British Education Research Association) 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: BERA.Google Scholar

Boje, D. (2001). Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boje, D. (2007). From Wilda to Disney. In Clandinin, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology (pp. 330–354). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boje, D. & Baskin, K. (2011). Our organizations were never disenchanted. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(4), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1996). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Callahan, J. & Martin, D. (2007). The spectrum of school–university partnerships: a typology of organizational learning systems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Childs, A., Edwards, A. & McNicholl, J. (2014). Developing a multi-layered system of distributed expertise: what does cultural-historical theory bring to understandings of workplace learning in school-university partnerships? In McNamara, O., Murray, J. & Jones, M. (Eds.), Teacher Learning in the Workplace: Widening Perspectives on Practice and Policy (pp. 29–45). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collison, P. (2011). Oxford: Town and Gown. Stroud, UK: Amberley.Google Scholar

Cuenca, A., Schmeichel, M., Butler, B., Dinkelman, T. & Nichols, J. Jr. (2011). Creating a ‘third space’ in student teaching: implications for the university supervisor’s status as outsider. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1068–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czarniawska, B. (2007). Narrative inquiry in and about organizations. In Clandinin, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology (pp. 383–404). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: pyramids or anthills? Organization Studies, 30, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czarniawska, B. & Gagliardi, P. (Eds.) (2003). Narratives We Organise By. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, H. & Edwards, A. (2012). Leading for Learning: How the Intelligent Leader Builds Capacity. Nottingham, UK: National College.Google Scholar

Daniels, H. & Warmington, P. (2007). Analysing third generation activity systems: labour-power, subject position and personal transformation. Journal of Workplace Learning,19(6), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denzin, N. (1997). Triangulation in educational research. In Keeves, J. (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (pp. 318–322). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Department for Children, Families and Schools (2009). City Challenge. Available online at webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090810164750/http://dcsf.gov.uk/citychallenge/index.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Doecke, B., Brown, J. & Loughran, J. (2000). Teacher talk: the role of story and anecdote in constructing professional knowledge for beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(3), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (1995). Teacher education: partnerships in pedagogy? Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2014). Learning from experience in teaching; a cultural-historical critique. In Ellis, V. & Orchard, J. (Eds.), Learning Teaching from Experience: Multiple Perspectives, International Contexts (pp. 47–61). London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. & Collison, J. (1996). Mentoring and Developing Practice in Primary Schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56(2), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. & Kinti, I. (2010). Working relationally at organisational boundaries: negotiating expertise and identity. In Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y. & Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.), Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning across Boundaries and Agencies (pp. 126–139). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Edwards, A., Lunt, I. & Stamou, E. (2010). Inter-professional work and expertise: new roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. & Thompson, M. (2013). Resourceful leadership: revealing the creativity of organizational leaders. In Sannino, A. & Ellis, V. (Eds.), Learning and Collective Creativity: Activity-Theoretical and Socio-Cultural Studies (pp. 49–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, V. (2010). Impoverishing experience: the problem of teacher education in England. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, V., Edwards, A. & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.) (2010). Cultural-Historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward and activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fancourt, N., Edwards, A. & Menter, I. (2015). Reimagining a school–university partnership: the development of the Oxford Education Deanery narrative. Education Inquiry [S.l.], 6(3). Available online at www.education-inquiry.net/index.php/edui/article/view/27724CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C. & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher Education in Transition: Re-Forming Professionalism? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in Organisations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gioia, D. & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gioia, D., Hamilton, A., Thomas, J. & Price, K. (2010). Forging an identity: an insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagger, H. & McIntyre, A. (2006). Learning Teaching from Teachers. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A. (2014). Oration by the vice-chancellor. University of Oxford Gazette, 145(5072, supplement [1]). Available online at www.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwoxacuk/localsites/gazette/documents/supplements2014-15/Oration_by_the_Vice-Chancellor_-_(1)_to_No_5072.pdfGoogle Scholar

Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D. & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W. & Schönert, J. (Eds.) (2012). Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jannidis, F. (2012). Character. In Hühn, P., Pier, J., Schmid, W. & Schönert, J.. (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology, (pp. 14–29), Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1979). The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A. (1978) Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

McIntyre, A. (2009). The difficulties of inclusive pedagogy for initial teacher education and some thoughts on the way forward. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 602–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, A., Abbott, L. & Clarke, L. (2009). Re-conceptualizing partnerships across the teacher education continuum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 951–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orr, J. (1996). Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Reinhard Lupton, J. (2008). Philadelphia dreaming: discovering citizenship between the university and the schools. In Mitchell, K. (Ed.), Practising Public Scholarship: Experiences and Possibilities beyond the Academy (pp. 49–58). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schultz, M., Hatch, M. J. & Hotlen Larson, M. (2000). The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L., Moore, C., Jackson, A. & Fry, P. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Søderberg, A.-M. (2003). Sensegiving and sensemaking in an integration process: a narrative approach to the study of an international acquisition. In Czarniawska, B. & Gagliardi, P., (Eds.), Narratives We Organise By (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tatto, M. (2013). Research and Teacher Education: The BERA-RSA Inquiry. The Role of Research in International Policy and Practice in Teacher Education. London: BERA.Google Scholar

Tsui, A. & Law, D. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1289–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waitoller, F. & Kozleski, E. (2013). Working in boundary practices: identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31(3), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeichner, K., Payne, K. & Brayko, K. (2015). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baur, D. & Palazzo, G. (2011). The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, (50), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar

Hahn, R. & Gold, S. (2014). Resources and governance in “base of the pyramid”-partnerships: Assessing collaborations between businesses and non-business actors. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1321–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karamchandani, A., Kubzansky, M. & Lalwani, N. (2011). Is the bottom of the pyramid really for you? Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 107–111.Google Scholar

London, T., Sheth, S. & Hart, S. (2014). A Roadmap for the Base of the Pyramid Domain: Reenergizing for the Next Decade. Ann Arbor: William Davison Institute, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Luscher, L. & Lewis, M. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, J. & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: a case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves company: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. (2007). The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win through Integrative Thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Delhi: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Purnell, L. S. & Freeman, R. E. (2012). Stakeholder theory, fact/value dichotomy, and the normative core: how Wall Street stops the ethics conversation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simanis, E., Hart, S. & Duke, D. (2008). The base of the pyramid protocol: beyond ‘basic needs’ business strategies. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 3(1), 57–84.Google Scholar

Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, W., Besharov, M., Wessels, A. & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11, 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar

Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W. & Tushman, M. (2011). Organizational sustainability: organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In Cameron, K. & Spreitzer, G. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 798–810). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundaramurthy, C. & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tracey, P., Phillips, N. & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London: Granada Learning.Google Scholar

Dahlberg, G., Moss, P. & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Duhn, I., Fleer, M. & Harrison, L. (2014). Review and Evaluation of the Inquiry to Implementation Project. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. (2004). The new multi-agency working: collaborating to prevent the social exclusion of children and families. Journal of Integrated Care, 12(5), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garvis, S., Penderegast, D., Twigg, D., Fluckiger, B., Kanasa, H., Phillips, C., Bishop, M., Lockett, K. & Leach, D. (2013). The Victorian early years learning and development framework: managing change in a complex environment. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, L. J. (2014). Intrapersonal and interpersonal influences on school transition. In Perry, B., Docket, S. & Petriwskyj, A. (Eds.), Transitions to School: International Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 61–74). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD/CERI (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Centre for Educational Research and Information) ( 2008) Assessment for learning – formative assessment. Available online at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/31/40600533.pdfGoogle Scholar

Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M. & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi: 10.1146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD) & Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) (2009). Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework for All Children from Birth to Eight Years. East Melbourne, Australia: DEECD.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar