Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- 8 Networked Expertise, Relational Agency, and Collective Creativity
- 9 Relational Agency and the Development of Tools in Service Networks
- 10 Creating a System of Distributed Expertise: The Oxford Education Deanery Narrative
- 11 Common Knowledge: The Missing Link in Hybrid Value Chains?
- 12 The Relational Agency Framework as a Tool for Supporting the Establishment, Maintenance, and Development of Multidisciplinary Networks of Professionals
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
12 - The Relational Agency Framework as a Tool for Supporting the Establishment, Maintenance, and Development of Multidisciplinary Networks of Professionals
from Part Two - Working Relationally in Networks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- 8 Networked Expertise, Relational Agency, and Collective Creativity
- 9 Relational Agency and the Development of Tools in Service Networks
- 10 Creating a System of Distributed Expertise: The Oxford Education Deanery Narrative
- 11 Common Knowledge: The Missing Link in Hybrid Value Chains?
- 12 The Relational Agency Framework as a Tool for Supporting the Establishment, Maintenance, and Development of Multidisciplinary Networks of Professionals
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Working Relationally in and across PracticesA Cultural-Historical Approach to Collaboration, pp. 209 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. London: Granada Learning.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, G., Moss, P. & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern Perspectives. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Duhn, I., Fleer, M. & Harrison, L. (2014). Review and Evaluation of the Inquiry to Implementation Project. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2004). The new multi-agency working: collaborating to prevent the social exclusion of children and families. Journal of Integrated Care, 12(5), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving Inter-Professional Collaborations: Multi-Agency Working for Children’s Wellbeing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvis, S., Penderegast, D., Twigg, D., Fluckiger, B., Kanasa, H., Phillips, C., Bishop, M., Lockett, K. & Leach, D. (2013). The Victorian early years learning and development framework: managing change in a complex environment. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, L. J. (2014). Intrapersonal and interpersonal influences on school transition. In Perry, B., Docket, S. & Petriwskyj, A. (Eds.), Transitions to School: International Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 61–74). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD/CERI (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Centre for Educational Research and Information) ( 2008) Assessment for learning – formative assessment. Available online at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/31/40600533.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M. & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi: 10.1146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD) & Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) (2009). Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework for All Children from Birth to Eight Years. East Melbourne, Australia: DEECD.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar