Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T10:35:50.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - What explains torture coverage during war-time? A search for realistic answers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Werner G. K. Stritzke
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Stephan Lewandowsky
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
David Denemark
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Joseph Clare
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Frank Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

The international community no longer condones torture. Pressure by various groups of people throughout the world has led to multiple legal prohibitions of the practice. For example, torture is forbidden by the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the 1984 United Nations Convention against Torture (United Nations, 1984), and by multiple regional treaties (Nagan and Atkins, 2001). Many of these treaties have monitoring mechanisms. For example, the UN has a Committee against Torture, consisting of ten experts charged with monitoring states' compliance with anti-torture conventions. Likewise, the UN Commission on Human Rights has had a Special Rapporteur on Torture office since 1985. Individual countries also have their private and public monitoring bodies. For instance, Israel has a Public Committee against Torture that investigates torture allegations, and Amnesty International, a non-governmental privately funded organization, uses its worldwide membership to fight against human rights abuses wherever they may occur.

The persistence of torture

Despite these institutional constraints, torture continues essentially unabated, judging from Amnesty International's Annual Reports. That makes the use of torture a true paradox because it is simultaneously widely practiced and yet is a universal taboo. Torture is particularly common during war-time when governments attempt to extract strategically salient information from captured enemies. Torture is easier to justify when countries can claim that it is done for a noble cause – the protection of the country's citizens during war (see also Bellamy, this volume).

Type
Chapter
Information
Terrorism and Torture
An Interdisciplinary Perspective
, pp. 221 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Amnesty International (2007). Report. Retrieved May 10, 2007, from http://thereport.amnesty.org/eng/Homepage.
Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., and Livingston, S. (2006). None dare call it torture: indexing and limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56, 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., and Livingston, S. (2007). When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, S. M., and Gibney, M. P. (2006). American Print Media Coverage of Human Rights Violations. August 31–September 3. Paper presented at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
,CBS News (2004). Abuse at Abu Ghraib. 60 Minutes II, April 28. Dan Rather (reporter), Jeff Fager (producer).
,Columbia Journalism Review staff (2004). Out of sight, out of mind: the Abu Ghraib story broke when we saw visual proof of torture. Why not sooner?Columbia Journalism Review, 43, 6.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A. (2007a). Media Power in Politics (5th edn.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Graber, D. A. (2007b). The road to public surveillance: breeching attention thresholds. In Crigler, A., MacKuen, M., Marcus, G. E., and Neuman, W. R. (eds.), The Affect Effect (pp. 265–290). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. (2006). Political Language, Policy Formulation and the Practice of Torture in the War on Terrorism: Implications for Human Rights. August 31–September 3. Paper presented at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Livingston, S., and Eachus, T. (1995). Humanitarian crisis and US foreign policy: Somalia and the CNN effect reconsidered. Political Communication, 12, 413–429.CrossRef
Lukes, S. (2005). Liberal democratic torture. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzetti, M. (2007). Rules lay out CIA's tactics in questioning. July 21. New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from www.nytimes.com/2007/07/21/washington/21intel.html.
Mutz, D. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagan, W. P., and Atkins, L. (2001). The international law of torture: from universal proscription to effective application and enforcement. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 14, 87–123.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. (1993). Out of Order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Powell, G. B. (1976). Political cleavage structure, cross-pressure processes, and partisanship: an empirical test of the theory. American Journal of Political Science, 20, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) (2006). World Citizens Reject Torture, BBC Global Poll Reveals. October 18. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from www.worldpublicopinion.org/.
Rejali, D. M. (2007). Torture and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ricchiardi, S. (2004). Missed signals: why did it take so long for the news media to break the story of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib? American Journalism Review, 26. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from www.ajr.org/article.asp?id=3716.
Umansky, E. (2006). Failures of imagination. Columbia Journalism Review, 5. Retrieved February 11, 2008, from http://cjrarchives.org/issues/2006/5/Umansky.asp.
,United Nations (1984). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Treaty Series, 1465, 85. December 10. Retrieved May 10, 2007, from www.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.html.
Zernike, K., and Lewis, N. A. (2006). Proposal for new tribunals for terror suspects would hew to the first series. September 7. New York Times, A27.
Danner, M.Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror. New York: New York Review of Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Greenberg, K. J. (ed.). The Torture Debate in America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Greenberg, K. J., and Dratel, J. L. (eds.). The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRef
Harbury, J. K. Truth, Torture, and the American Way: The History and Consequences of US Involvement in Torture. Boston: Beacon Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kull, S. American and International Opinion on the Rights of Terrorism Suspects. Knowledge Networks poll. July 17, 2007. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from www.worldpublicopinion.org.
Levinson, S. (ed.). Torture: A Collection. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
McCoy, A. W. A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt and Co., 2006.Google Scholar
Roth, K., Worden, M., and Bernstein, A. D. (eds.). Torture: Does it Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK?: A Human Rights Perspective. New York: New Press, distributed by W. W. Norton, 2005.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×