Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T16:29:52.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - From the terrorists' point of view: toward a better understanding of the staircase to terrorism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Werner G. K. Stritzke
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Stephan Lewandowsky
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
David Denemark
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Joseph Clare
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Frank Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

Terrorism is “politically motivated violence, perpetrated by individuals, groups, or state-sponsored agents, intended to instill fear and helplessness in a population in order to influence decision-making and to change behavior” (Moghaddam, 2005a, p. 161). Particularly since the 1990s, there has been a sharp rise in Islamic terrorism (Bloom, 2005; Oliver and Steinberg, 2005; McDermott, 2005; Pape, 2005), coupled with a radicalization of Islamic communities around the world (Pew Research Center, 2006). Of course, non-Islamic societies also continue to serve as a source of terrorism (Coogan, 2002; Linenthal, 2001), but since the tragedy of 9/11, the devastating mismanagement of Iraq after the US-led invasion in 2003, and the disastrous foreign policy of the Bush administration in the Near and Middle East, terrorism emanating from Islamic communities has become a greater international challenge.

Complex historical, economic, cultural, social, and psychological factors are associated with the increase in Islamic terrorism (Bongar et al., 2006; Moghaddam, 2006a). Enormous resources have been invested by the United States and other countries to better understand these factors, and a vast amount and variety of information is being gathered to develop more effective tactics and weapons in the seemingly endless “War on Terror.” Indeed, despite claims of a “lack of information about terrorism,” we are increasingly in danger of being swamped by a tsunami of data about terrorism around the world, but without adequate conceptual models that allow us effectively to interpret this data.

Type
Chapter
Information
Terrorism and Torture
An Interdisciplinary Perspective
, pp. 106 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskin, Y. (2002). A Plague of Rats and Rubber Vines. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, M. (2005). Dying to Kill: The Allure of Suicide Terror. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bongar, B., Brown, L. M., Beutler, L. E., Breckenridge, J. N., and Zimbardo, P. (2006) (eds.). Psychology of Terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Coogan, T.P. (2002). The IRA. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalby, A. (2003). Language in Danger: The Loss of Linguistic Diversity and the Threat to Our Future. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fina, A. (2003). Identity in Narrative: A Study of Immigrant Discourse. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., and Mangun, G.R. (2002). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (2nd edn.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Linenthal, E.T. (2001). The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma City in American Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, T. (2005). Perfect Soldiers: The Hijackers – Who They Were, Why They Did It. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (1987). Psychology in the Three Worlds: as reflected by the “crisis” in social psychology and the move towards indigenous Third World psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 912–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (1998). Social Psychology: Exploring Universals in Social Behavior. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2002). The Individual and Society: A Cultural Integration. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2005a). The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moghaddam, F.M. (2005b). Psychological processes and “The Staircase to Terrorism.”American Psychologist, 60, 1039–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2005c). Great Ideas in Psychology: A Historical and Cultural Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2006a). From the Terrorists' Point of View: What They Experience and Why They Come to Destroy. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2006b). Interobjectivity: the collective roots of individual consciousness and social identity. In Postmes, T. and Jetten, J. (eds.), Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity (pp. 155–174). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2006c). Catastrophic evolution, culture, and diversity management policy. Culture and Psychology, 12, 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F.M. (2008). Multiculturalism and Intergroup Relations: Psychological Implications for Democracy in Global Context. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, A. M., and Steinberg, P. F. (2005). The Road to Martyr's Square: A Journey into the World of the Suicide Bomber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pape, R. A. (2005). Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Bombing. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Center, Pew Research (2006). Conflicting Views in a Divided World: How Global Public Views Muslim–Western Relations, Global Issues, US Role in the World, Asian Rivalries. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Ryan, L. (1981). The Aboriginal Tasmanians. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Dominance and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1976 [1948]). Walden Two (reissued version). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Weinreich, P., and Saunderson, W. (eds.) (2003). Analysing Identity: Cross-Cultural, Societal and Clinical Contexts. London: Routledge.
Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×