Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-07T01:42:01.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Terrorism and TV news coverage of the 2001 Australian election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2009

Werner G. K. Stritzke
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Stephan Lewandowsky
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
David Denemark
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Joseph Clare
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Frank Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia, Perth
Get access

Summary

The terrorist attacks of September 11 and the ensuing War on Terror both reflect an essential role for the mass media as the conduit of information through which the public at large evaluate the politics of terror. On the one hand, it seems clear that terrorists routinely utilize the mass media to convey their agendas to a worldwide audience – a “symbiotic relationship” in which the media's publicity represents the “oxygen of terrorism” (Carruthers, 2000, p. 168). But equally, on the other hand, the War on Terror, perhaps the highest-profile military policy in a generation, has depended on media news coverage as its informational vehicle to the public and to voters charged with judging the efficacy of governments and their policies. Both, then, reflect the adage that “politics is increasingly conducted via the mass media” and war, as Clausewitz argued long ago, is merely an extension of politics (in Brown, 2003, p. 43). This chapter, relying on several of my research studies into these dynamics, examines voters' utilization of mass media coverage of terrorism and national security issues in their issue and vote choice evaluations during the 2001 Australian federal election. Called on October 5, just six weeks after an asylum-seeker incident in the waters off of Australia, and three weeks after the terrorist attacks of September 11, this election affords a unique opportunity to explore voters' reliance on media cues in their assessment of the War on Terror and a government whose electoral fortunes rested on the issues of terrorism and national security.

Type
Chapter
Information
Terrorism and Torture
An Interdisciplinary Perspective
, pp. 265 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bean, C., and McAllister, I. (2002). From impossibility to certainty: explaining the Coalition's victory in 2001. In Warhurst, J. and Simms, M. (eds.), 2001: The Centenary Election (pp. 271–286). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Bean, C., McAllister, I., and Gow, D. (2001). Australian Election Study, 2001. Computer file. Canberra: Social Science Data Archive, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Brody, R., and Sniderman, P. M. (1977). From life space to polling place: the relevance of personal concerns for voting behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 7, 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (2003). Clausewitz in the age of CNN: rethinking the military–media relationship. In Norris, P.Kern, M., and Just, M. (eds.), Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public (pp. 43–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carruthers, S. (2000). The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charlton, P. (2002). Tampa: the triumph of politics. In Solomon, D. (ed.), Howard's Race: Winning the Unwinnable Election (pp. 79–107). Sydney: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Converse, P. (1966). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. In Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. and Stokes, D. (eds.), Elections and the Political Order Election (pp. 136–158). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Denemark, D. (2002). Television effects and voter decision making in Australia: a re-examination of the Converse Model. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 663–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denemark, D. (2005a). Information flow and voter decision making in the 2001 Australian federal election: the role of international and domestic issues. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denemark, D. (2005b). Mass media and media power in Australia. In Wilson, S.Meagher, , G., Gibson, R., Denemark, D., and Western, M. (eds.), Australian Social Attitudes: The First Report (pp. 220–239). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Denemark, D., and Devereux, J. (2002). TV coverage and international issues in the 2001 Australian federal election. AQ: Journal of Contemporary Analysis, 74, 8–16, 40.Google Scholar
Denemark, D., Ward, I., and Bean, C. (2007). Election campaigns and television news coverage: the case of the 2001 Australian election. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, D. (1989). Media impact on attitudes and behavior. Mass Media and American Politics (3rd edn.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., Peters, M., and Kinder, D. (1982). Experimental demonstrations of “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 76, 848–858.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M. (1984). Exposure to information, belief integration, and individual responsiveness to agenda change. American Political Science Review, 78, 372–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, I. (1992). Party performance. In Political Behaviour (pp. 173–197). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
McAllister, I. (2003). Border protection, the 2001 Australian election and the Coalition victory. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38, 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M., and Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H.., and Grant, A. E. (eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., and Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCombs, M., and Shaw, D. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., and Semetko, H. (1999). On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Price, V., Tewsbury, D., and Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. Communication Research, 24, 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, I. (1995). Agenda setting and other theories of media effect. In Politics of the Media (pp. 43–70). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Ward, I., and Stewart, R. G. (2006). Politics One (3rd edn.). South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Warhurst, J. (2002). International versus domestic issues. In Warhurst, J. and Simms, M. (eds.), 2001: The Centenary Election (pp. 9–17). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E., and Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media Agenda-Setting in a Presidential Election: Issues, Images, and Interest. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1991). Information, values and opinion. American Political Science Review, 85, 1215–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×