Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:21:27.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Labor pain in broader perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2009

Paul Reuwer
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Hein Bruinse
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
Arie Franx
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A significant feature of customary birth care is the emphasis placed on the physical element of labor pain and its relief. “Many maternity units seem to operate from the belief that the most important contribution caregivers can make to the comfort of women in labor is to ensure that their pain is relieved by epidural analgesia or opioid drugs.” In effect, only a minority of women in western countries currently give birth without pain medication; in the USA fewer than 17%. The overall results, however, are far from impressive, even in the short-term sense of immediate consumer satisfaction.

The nature of labor pain

Giving birth is the only physiological process in nature that causes pain, and the reasons for this have been “explained” with philosophical and religious arguments. Even so, the biological functions of pain in childbirth are clear: pain provides the warning sign to search for a safe birth environment, and endorphins promote effective and mutual mother–child bonding (Chapter 7).

Most women instinctively feel that pain in childbirth is part of life and are justifiably proud of their achievement. Being a link in procreation since Genesis, women know that they are responsible for the continued existence of the human species. Moreover, birth increases their pain threshold for the rest of their lives to an unequalled level; if men had to bear birth pain humankind would have become extinct long ago.

Type
Chapter
Information
Proactive Support of Labor
The Challenge of Normal Childbirth
, pp. 150 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O'Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, . Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar
Marmor, TR, Krol, DM. Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, NK. Differences in first and second stage labor pain between nulliparous and multiparous women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 13: 243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astbury, J. Labour pain: the role of childbirth education, information and expectation. In: Peck, C, Wallace, M, eds. Problems in Pain. London: Pergamon; 1980: 245–52.Google Scholar
Connolly, AM, Pancheri, P, Lucchetti, , et al. Labor as a psychosomatic condition: a study on the influence of personality on self-reported anxiety and pain. In: Pancheri, P, Zighella, L, eds. Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology in Reproduction. London: Academic Press; 1978: 369–79.Google Scholar
Lowe, NK. Individual variation in childbirth pain. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 7: 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reading, AE, Cox, DN. Psychosocial predictors of labor pain. Pain 1985; 22: 309–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldenstrom, U, Bergmann, V, Vasell, G. The complexity of labor pain: experiences of 278 women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 17: 215–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowlands, S, Permezel, M. Physiology of pain in labour. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 12: 347–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, Neilson, J, et al. Control of pain in labor. In: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, L, Lavender, T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S94–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, LJ, Clemmens, D, De A. Epidural analgesia side effects, co-interventions, and care of women during childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebermann, E, O'Donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia on labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, B, Halpern, SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S69–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Lowe, NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S16–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, DC. Just take it out. Mt Vernon, IL: Topiary Publishing; 1998.Google Scholar
Simkin, P, O'Hara, M. Nonpharmacological relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S131–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, CA, Collins, CT, Cyna, AM, Crowther, CA. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD003521. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simkin, P. Just another day in a woman's life? Women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience. Part I. Birth 1991; 18: 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkin, P. Just another day in a woman's life? Women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience. Part II. Birth 1991; 19: 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodnett, ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S160–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Lavender, T, Alfirevic, Z, Walkinshaw, S. Partogram action line study: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105(9): 976–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavender, T, Wallymahmed, AH, Walkinshaw, SA. Managing labor using partograms with different action lines: a prospective study of women's views. Birth 1999; 26(2): 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×