Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T13:20:14.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Medical pain relief revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2009

Paul Reuwer
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Hein Bruinse
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
Arie Franx
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Proactive Support of Labor
The Challenge of Normal Childbirth
, pp. 163 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caton, D, Corry, MP, Frigoletto, FD, et al. The nature and management of labor pain: Executive summary. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, M. Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. New York: Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar
Hawkins, JL, Beaty, BR. Update on obstetric anesthesia practices in the US. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: A1060.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G, Wraight, A, Steer, P. Pain and Its Relief in Childbirth. The results of a National Survey Conducted by the National Birthday Trust. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993.Google Scholar
Bricker, L, Lavender, T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S94–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornfield, D, Pearson, JW, Lasagna, L. Methotrimeprazine in the treatment of labor pain. N Engl J Med 1964; 270: 391–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paech, M. Newer techniques of labor analgesia. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003; 21(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nimmo, WS, Wilson, J, Prescott, LF. Narcotic analgesics and delayed gastric emptying during labour. Lancet 1975; 1: 890–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Box, D, Cochran, D. Safe reduction in the administration of naloxone to newborn infants. Royal College of Paediatricians and Child Health, Fourth Spring Meeting, York, UK, April 10–13, 2000. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82(Suppl 1): A31.
Caldwell, J, Wakile, , Notarianni, LJ, et al. Maternal and neonatal disposition of pethidine in childbirth – a study using quantitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Life Sci 1978; 22(7): 589–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, PC, Hogg, MI, Rosen, M. Neonatal respiration, feeding and neurobehavioural state. Effects of intrapartum bupivacaine, pethidine and pethidine reversed by naloxone. Anaesthesia 1979; 34(10): 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnider, SM, Moya, F. Effects of Meperidine on the newborn infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964; 89: 1009–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, JE, Moreland, TA, Walker, CH. Effects of pethidine and its antagonists on the newborn. Arch Dis Child 1979; 54(5): 356–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rooth, G, Lysikiewicz, A, Huch, R, Huch, A. Some effects of maternal pethidine administration on the newborn. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90(1): 28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kron, RE, Stein, M, Goddard, KE. Newborn sucking behaviour affected by obstetric medication. Paediatrics 1966; 37: 1012–16.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, R, Bhatt, M, Wang, CN. Double-blind comparison of the neurobehaviour of neonates following the administration of different doses of meperidine to the mother. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978; 25(5): 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsey, EM, Rosenblatt, DB, Lieberman, BA, et al. The influence of maternal analgesia on neonatal behaviour: I. Pethidine. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88(4): 398–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Righard, L, Alade, MO. Effect of delivery room routines on success of first breast-feed. Lancet 1990; 336(8723): 1105–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, E, Lilja, G, Matthiesen, AS, et al. Effects of maternal pethidine on infants’ developing breast feeding behaviour. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84(2): 140–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, MK. The relationship between maternal labour analgesia and delay in the initiation of breastfeeding in healthy neonates in the early neonatal period. Midwifery 1989; 5: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowell, MK, Hill, PD, Humenick, SS. Relationship between obstetric analgesia and time of effective breast feeding. J Nurse Midwifery 1994; 39(3): 150–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonta, BW, Gagliardi, JV, Williams, V, Warshaw, JB. Naloxone reversal of mild neurobehavioral depression in normal newborn infants after routine obstetric analgesia. J Pediatr 1979; 94(1): 102–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welles, B, Belfrage, P, Chateau, P. Effects of naloxone on newborn infant behavior after maternal analgesia with pethidine during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63(7): 617–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, PC, Wallace, S. Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. Br Med J 1980; 280(6209): 252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, B, Eklund, G, Hamberger, L, et al. Perinatal origin of adult self-destructive behavior. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 76: 364–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, B, Nyberg, K, Eklund, G, Bygdeman, M, Rydberg, U. Obstetric pain medication and eventual adult amphetamine addiction in offspring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 677–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, B, Nyberg, K, Gronbladh, L, et al. Opiate addiction in adult offspring through possible imprinting after obstetric treatment. BMJ 1990; 301(6760): 1067–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyberg, K, Buka, SL, Lipsitt, LP. Perinatal medication as a potential risk factor for adult drug abuse in a North American cohort. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 715–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, JA, Laxton, CH, Dick, A, et al. Remifentanil by patient-controlled analgesia compared with intramuscular meperidine for pain relief in labour. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88(3): 374–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evron, S, Glezerman, M, Sadan, O, et al. Remifentanil: a novel systematic analgetic for labor pain. Anesth Analg 2005; 100(1): 233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, JM, Dobson, GT, Hill, DA, et al. Patient controlled analgesia for labour: a comparison of remifentanil with pethidine. Anaesthesia 2005; 60(1): 22–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volikas, I, Male, D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 2001; 10(2): 86–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volmanen, P, Akural, EI, Raudaskoski, T, Alahuhta, S. Remifentanil in obstetric analgesia: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg 2002; 94(4): 913–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kan, RE, Hughes, SC, Rosen, MA, et al. Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology 1998; 88(6): 1467–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, JE, D'Alessio, J, Ramanathan, J. Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate: a review. Paediatr Drugs 2003; 5(9): 615–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alran, S, Sibony, O, Oury, JF, et al. Differences in management and results in term-delivery in nine European referral hospitals: a descriptive study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 103: 4–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmor, TR, Krol, DM. Labor pain management in the United States: Understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, RG, Olsson, SS. The lumbar epidural space in patients examined with epiduroscopy. Anesth Analg 1998; 68: 157–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althaus, J, Wax, J. Analgesia and anesthesia in labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005; 32: 231–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemmerly, JR, Lambard, WW, Russell, RC. Epidural anesthesia performed during labor by obstetricians: outcome analysis. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 1998; 5(4): 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al. Obstetric Anesthesia. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005: 484.Google Scholar
,American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Practice Bulletin 36, July 2002.
Sharma, SK, Sidawi, JE, Ramin, SM, et al. Cesarean delivery: A randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 487–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anim-Somuah, M, Smyth, R, Howell, C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4): CD000331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, LJ, Clemmens, D, De, A. Epidural analgesia side-effects, co-interventions, and care of women during childbirth: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, E, O'Donoghue, C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S31–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, T, Shapiro, T, Glass, B, Foster-Payne, D, Oriol, N. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 919–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, BL, Halpern, SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S69–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Impey, L, MacQuillan, K, Robson, MS. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotaska, AJ, Klein, MC, Liston, RM. Epidural analgesia associated with low-dose oxytocin augmentation increases cesarean births: A critical look at the external validity of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 809–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C, Macario, A. Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20(5): 305–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al. Chapter 19: Obstetric Anesthesia. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005: 483.Google Scholar
Cagnon, AJ, Waghorn, K. Supportive care by maternity nurses: a work sampling study in an intrapartum unit. Birth 1996; 23: 1–6.Google Scholar
McNiven, P, Hodnett, E, O'Brian-Pallas, LL. Supporting women in labor: a work sampling of the activities of labor and delivery nurses. Birth 1992; 19: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, J, Fothergill-Bourbonnais, F, Chamberlain, M. Measuring nursing support during childbirth. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2001; 26: 264–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, WD, Marcoux, S, Krauss, I, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia: the PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182(5): 1165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×