Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: November 2016

7 - Ever-Broadening Conceptions of Creativity in the Classroom

from PART II - VOICES FROM THE RESEARCH

Summary

In the time since we wrote the first version of this chapter, conceptions of creativity in the classroom have continued to broaden. These include both our own conceptions and those of others. Whereas it was once safe to say that creativity in the classroom seemed to belong on the endangered species list (next to the Mantled howler monkey), we have seen changes in recent years. Many people now recognize that classroom creativity is much more than a distracting tangent, something to be explored “later,” or even a behavior problem. Indeed, creativity has become a hot topic in education (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2013).

This, of course, does not mean that creativity has become the centerpiece of the everyday curriculum. There are still instances where creativity is squeezed out of the curriculum. Indeed, this can happen anytime schools turn to extreme measures such as scripted or “teacher-proof” curricula (Sawyer, 2004) in pursuit of boosting performance on standardized learning assessments. Although persistent concerns remain, creativity has been recognized as a core 21st Century skill (J. C. Kaufman, 2016). Moreover, there is growing understanding of how creativity can compliment external content standards and enhance academic learning (Beghetto, Kaufman, & Baer, 2014).

Some advocates of creativity, however, have perhaps gone too far in making claims about creativity. Consider, for instance, the claim that “creativity now is as important in education as literacy” (Robinson, 2006). Such claims strike us as rhetorically compelling but problematic in practice. One problem is that they can result in conceptions that separate creativity from academic subject matter and academic skills. Instead of stressing the importance of how teachers might teach literacy more creatively or how teachers can support students’ creative learning of literacy, they effectively split creativity and literacy into two separate, competing, and even interchangeable goals. Imagine a second grade teacher saying, “I'm not going to develop my students’ literacy skills this year. But don't worry, I'll be cultivating their creative imagination instead.” Would you want your child to have this teacher?

Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Beghetto, R. A. (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, 69, 254–263.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.
Beghetto, R. A. (2007a). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Prospective teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 1–9.
Beghetto, R. A. (2007b). Ideational code-switching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29, 265–270.
Beghetto, R. A. (2008). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 210–223.
Beghetto, R. A. (2009). In search of the unexpected: Finding creativity in the micro-moments of the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 2–5.
Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Beghetto, R. A. (2015). Learning as a creative act. In Kettler, T. (Ed.), Modern curriculum for gifted and advanced learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
Beghetto, R. A. (2016a). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.
Beghetto, R. A. (2016b). Big wins, Small steps: How to lead for and with creativity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 13–79.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–15.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can't get there from here?” In Kaufman, J. C. & Bear, J. (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195.
Cohen, L. M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.
Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 313–338). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dawson, V. L. (1997). In search of the Wild Bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19, 148–152.
Duckworth, E. (1996). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321–349). Oxford: Wiley.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Tan, M., & Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Something new in the garden: Assessing creativity in academic domains. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 295–307.
Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Güncer, B., & Oral, G. (1993). Relationship between creativity and nonconformity to school discipline as perceived by teachers of Turkish elementary school children, by controlling for their grade and sex. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 208–214.
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of creativity, Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013a). Do people recognize the Four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 229–236.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013b). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R A., & Watson, C. (forthcoming). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences.
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.
Lofing, N. (2009, January 10). Davis sixth-grader's science experiment breaks new ground. Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, CA). Retrieved January 13, 2009 from www.sacbee.comeducationv-printstory1530953.html.
McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York: Basic Books.
Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky's contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.
Myhill, D., & Wilson, A. (2013). Playing it safe: Teachers’ views of creativity in poetry writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 101–111.
Nandy, A. (1995). Alternative sciences: Creativity and authenticity in two Indian scientists. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 392–430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. 1, No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In Richards, R. (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature (pp. 25–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity? [Transcript]. Retreived from www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity/transcript?language=en
Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30
Runco, M. A. (2005). Motivation, competence, and creativity. In Elliott, A. & Dweck, C. (Eds.), Handbook of achievement motivation and competence (pp. 609–623). New York: Guilford.
Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children's creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–439.
Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12–20.
Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–337.
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Greatness 101. New York: Springer.
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Citation measures as criterion variables in predicting scientific eminence. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 10, 170–171.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). When your race is almost run, but you feel you're not yet done: Application of the Propulsion Theory of Creative Contributions to late-career challenges. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 66–76.
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum. New York: Psychology Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677–688.
Tan, A. G. (2003). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 233–240.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. (Sharpe, M. E., Inc., Trans.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.
Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.