Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:06:06.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Legal aspects of independent and supplementary prescribing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Molly Courtenay
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Matt Griffiths
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Get access

Summary

This chapter sets out to give a precise account of the history of changes brought about by the desire to change prescribing authority, and give definitions of independent and supplementary prescribing, patient group directions (PGDs) and their possible implications for non-medical prescribers (NMPs).

There is a short introduction to how the law is formulated, the differences between civil and criminal law, and how issues such as duty of care, negligence, consent and accountability might affect interactions with patients. Professional issues, such as teamwork and communication, are also addressed. Cases that have gone before the courts are highlighted in an attempt to illustrate how the law has been previously applied. The role of regulatory bodies, such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the Health Professions Council, are also noted throughout.

It appears that legal issues are a constant source of worry and fascination for many healthcare practitioners. During the years 2007–2008 some 5400 claims of clinical negligence and 3380 claims of non-clinical negligence were received by the National Health Service Litigation Authority (NHSLA). This resulted in a cost of £633 million paid out in clinical negligence claims (NHSLA 2009). The National Patient Safety Agency report, Safety in Doses: Medication Safety Incidents in the NHS (NPSA 2007), indicates that over 736 million items were prescribed in England, at a cost of £8 billion, in 2006. The scale of activity is enormous.

Type
Chapter
Information
Independent and Supplementary Prescribing
An Essential Guide
, pp. 29 - 41
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Department of Health (1989). Report of the Advisory Group on Nurse Prescribing (Crown Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
,Department of Health (1999). Review of Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines (Crown Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
,Department of Health (2003a). Patient Group Directions (PGDs). www.dh.gov.uk/nonmedicalprescribing (accessed 1 June 2009).
,Department of Health (2003b). Clinical Management Plans (CMPs) www.dh.gov.uk/supplementaryprescribing (accessed 1 June 2009).
,Department of Health (2006). Medicine Matters. A Guide to the Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
,Department of Health and Social Security (1986). Neighbourhood Nursing: a Focus for Care (Cumberlege Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dimond, B. (2002). Legal Aspects of Nursing (third edition). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall Publishing.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. (2001). Legal and professional accountability for nurse prescribing. In: Courtenay, M. (2001). Current Issues in Nurse Prescribing. London: GMM Ltd.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. (2006). Accountability and the nurse prescriber. Nurse Prescriber 4(9): 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, J. (2000). Law and Ethics in Nursing and Health Care. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
,National Health Service Litigation Authority (2009). www.nhsla.com (accessed 1 June 2009).
,National Patient Safety Agency (2007). Safety in Doses: Medication Safety Incidents in the NHS. London: NPSA.Google Scholar
,National Prescribing Centre (2003). Supplementary Prescribing. A Resource to Help Healthcare Professionals to Understand the Framework and Opportunities. Liverpool: NPC.Google Scholar
,Nursing and Midwifery Council (2005). Circular 30/2005. V100 nurse prescribers. London: NMC Publications.Google Scholar
,Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006). Standards of Proficiency for Nurse and Midwife Prescribers. London: NMC Publications.Google Scholar
,Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008). The Code Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: NMC Publications.Google Scholar
Pennels, C. (1999). Nurse prescribing. When is prescribing not prescribing?Nursing Times 95(23 Suppl): 10–11.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×