Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:55:25.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Ethical issues in independent and supplementary prescribing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Molly Courtenay
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Matt Griffiths
Affiliation:
University of the West of England, Bristol
Get access

Summary

Ethics is concerned with the promotion of the high standards of conduct by which the public rightly expects healthcare practitioners to abide. The relationship between law and ethics in a democratic society should always be a close one. Legislators and judges create laws and legal decisions which can be enforced through the courts. Ethicists, on the other hand, spend their time reflecting on the implications of legal decisions and exploring the ways in which conduct can be guided by rational and coherent principles. There is a constant dialogue between legal scholars and ethicists as each seek to use the other's discipline to shed light on their own concerns. So it is not surprising that most textbooks for the healthcare professions, like this one, combine discussion of both law and ethics.

At the heart of ethics lies the process of reflecting on the dilemmas raised by professional practice. The contribution that ethics makes is to provide a range of possible theoretical tools or frameworks which may help to elucidate the issues that are at stake, and which may provide consistent guidance on which principles should be given the most weight. Ethics does not, therefore, provide a simple system which will provide the ‘right’ answer when faced with any dilemma in prescribing practice. It is the starting point for the debate rather than its neat and tidy conclusion. Professional practice in healthcare in the modern world requires the balancing of complex competing needs and interests.

Type
Chapter
Information
Independent and Supplementary Prescribing
An Essential Guide
, pp. 42 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Association of British Pharmaceutical Industries (2008). ABPI Code of Practice for the Pharmaceutical Industry. http://www.abpiorguk/publications/pdfs/pmpca_code2008.pdf (accessed 10 December 2009).Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F. (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. (sixth edition). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,Department of Health (2005). Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (second edition). London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
,Department of Health/Home Office (2007). Learning from Tragedy, Keeping Patients Safe. Cm 7014. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Gibbons, R.V., Landry, F.J., Blouch, D.L. et al. (1998). A comparison of physicians' and patients' attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts. J Gen Int Med 13: 151–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R. (2007). Rationing in the NHS. BMJ 334: 1068–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, R. (2003a). Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: Entanglement. BMJ 326: 1189–1192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moynihan, R. (2003b). Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies 2: Disentanglement. BMJ 326: 1193–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008). The Code: Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics for Nurses and Midwives. London: NMC.Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliari, C., Detmer, D., Singleton, P. (2007). Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ 335: 330–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roper, N., Logan, W.W., Tierney, A.J. (2000). The Roper-Logan-Tierney Model of Nursing: Based on Activities of Living. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
,Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2007). Code of ethics for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. London: RPSGB.Google Scholar
Wager, E. (2003). How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors' relations with drug companies. BMJ 326: 1196–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A.W. (1999). Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×