Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T04:06:50.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - The Role of Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Scratch in Improving Endometrial Receptivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

By
Yuval Or  and
Zeev Shoham
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs  and
Lois Salamonsen
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash IVF, Victoria
Lois Salamonsen
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Endometrium to Maximize Implantation Rates and IVF Success , pp. 73 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Taylor, E, Gomel, V. The uterus and fertility. Fertility and Sterility 2008;89: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, TJ, Gupta, JK. Handbook of Outpatient Hysteroscopy. A Complete Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy. Hodder Education 2005.Google Scholar
Campo, R, Van Belle, Y, Rombauts, L, Brosens, I, Gordts, S. Office mini-hysteroscopy. Human Reproduction Update 1999;5: 73–81.Google Scholar
Fritz Marc, A, Speroff, Leon. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, 8th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2011:1172.Google Scholar
Jansen, FW, Vredevoogd, CB, van Ulzen, K et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;96: 266–70.Google Scholar
Bosteels, Jan, Kasius, Jenneke, Weyers, Steven et al. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2015.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. RCOG Press 2004.Google Scholar
Smit, JG, Kasius, JC, Eijkemans, MJC et al. Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2016;387, Issue 10038: 2622–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Toukhy, T, Campo, R, Khalaf, Y et al. Hysteroscopy in recurrent in-vitro fertilisation failure (TROPHY): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2016;387, Issue 10038: 2614–1.Google Scholar
Silberstein, T, Saphier, O, van Voorhis, BJ, Plosker, SM. Endometrial polyps in reproductive-age fertile and infertile women. The Israel Medical Association Journal 2006;8: 192–5.Google Scholar
Pérez-Medina, T, Bajo-Arenas, J, Salazar, F et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Human Reproduction 2005;20: 1632–5.Google Scholar
Fritz Marc, A, Speroff, Leon. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility, 8th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2011: 148–51.Google Scholar
Casini, ML, Rossi, F, Agostini, R, Unfer, V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecological Endocrinology 2006;22: 106–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimbizis, GF. Camus, M, Tarlatzis, BC, Bontis, JN, Devroey, P, Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Human Reproduction Update 2001;7: 161–74.Google Scholar
Mollo, A, De Franciscis, P, Colacurci, N et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertility and Sterlility 2009;91: 2628–31.Google Scholar
Nouri, K, Ott, J, Huber, JC et al. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic septoplasty in patients with septate uterus – a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of the literature. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2010;8: 52.Google Scholar
Sui, L, Wan, Q, Zheng, RL et al. Transcervical incision of septa: 447 cases. Surg Endosc 2009;23: 2078–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Or, Y, Appelman, Z. Is Prophylactic hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus justified? J Gynecol Surg. 2014;30: 325–8.Google Scholar
Raziel, A, Schachter, M, Strassburger, D et al. Favorable influence of local injury to the endometrium in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients with high-order implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2007;87: 198–201.Google Scholar
Zhou, L, Li, R, Wang, R, Huang, HX, Zhong, K. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2008;89: 1166–76.Google Scholar
Karimzadeh, MA, Ayazi Rozbahani, M, Tabibnejad, N. Endometrial local injury improves the pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: A randomised clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49: 677–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almog, B, Shalom-Paz, E, Dufort, D, Tulandi, T. Promoting implantation by local injury to the endometrium. Fertility and Sterility 2010;94: 2026–9.Google Scholar
Narvekar, SA, Gupta, N, Shetty, N et al. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF?. A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010;3: 15–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nastri, CO, Teixeira, DM, Martins, WP. Endometrial injury in the menstrual cycle prior to assisted reproduction techniques to improve reproductive outcomes. Gynecological Endocrinology 2013;25: 401–2.Google Scholar
Guven, S, Kart, C, Unsal, M et al. Endometrial injury may increase the clinical pregnancy rate in normoresponders underwent long agonist protocol intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;96: 277–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inal, ZHO, Görkemli, H, Inal, HA. The effect of local injury to the endometrium for implantation and pregnancy rates in ICSI-ET cycles with implantation failure: a randomized controlled study. European Journal of General Medicine 2012;9: 223–9.Google Scholar
Shohayeb, A, El-Khayat, W. Does a single endometrial biopsy regimen (S-EBR) improve ICSI outcome in patients with repeated implantation failure? A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2012;164: 176–9.Google Scholar
Karim Zadeh Meybodi, M, Ayazi, M, Tabibnejad, N. Effect of endometrium local injury on pregnancy outcome in patients with IVF/ICSI. Human Reproduction 2008;23 (Suppl 1): i126.Google Scholar
Safdarian, L, Movahedi, S, Aleyasine, A et al. Local injury to the endometrium does not improve the implantation rate in good responder patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2011;9: 285–8.Google Scholar
Yeung, TW, Chai, J, Li, RH et al. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2014;29: 2474–81.Google Scholar
Baum, M, Yerushalmi, GM, Maman, E et al. Does local injury to the endometrium before IVF cycle really affect treatment outcome? Results of a randomized placebo controlled trial. Gynecological Endocrinology 2012;28: 933–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nastri, CO, Lensen, SF, Gibreel, A et al. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3: CD009517.Google Scholar
Granot, I, Gnainsky, Y, Dekel, N. Endometrial inflammation and effect on implantation improvement and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction. 2012 December;144: 661–8.Google Scholar
Gnainsky, Y, Granot, I, Aldo, P et al. Biopsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: the mechanism of action. Reproduction 2015;149: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×