Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:10:22.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Estrogen and Progesterone Support in ART

Optimizing Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

By
Jamie Stanhiser  and
Steven L. Young
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs  and
Lois Salamonsen
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash IVF, Victoria
Lois Salamonsen
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Endometrium to Maximize Implantation Rates and IVF Success , pp. 65 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Van Steirteghem, AC, Smitz, J, Camus, M et al. The luteal phase after in-vitro fertilization and related procedures. Hum Reprod 1988;3:161–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckers, NGM, Macklon, NS, Eijkemans, MJ et al. Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2003;88:4186–4192.Google Scholar
Bergh, PA, Navot, D. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril 1992;58:537–542.Google Scholar
Andersen, AN, Devroey, P, Arce, JC. Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3217–3227.Google Scholar
Bosch, E, Labarta, E, Crespo, J et al. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod 2010;25:2092–2100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venetis, CA, Kolibianakis, EM, Bosdou, JK, Tarlatzis, BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:433–457.Google Scholar
Melo, MA, Meseguer, M, Garrido, N et al. The significance of premature luteinization in an oocyte-donation programme. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1503–1507.Google Scholar
van der Linden, M, Buckingham, K, Farquhar, C, Kremer, JA, Metwally, M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 October 5;(10):CD009154.doi(10):CD009154.Google Scholar
Yanushpolsky, E, Hurwitz, S, Greenberg, L, Racowsky, C, Hornstein, M. Crinone vaginal gel is equally effective and better tolerated than intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2596–2599.Google Scholar
Sohn, SH, Penzias, AS, Emmi, AM et al. Administration of progesterone before oocyte retrieval negatively affects the implantation rate. Fertil Steril 1999;71:11–14.Google Scholar
Williams, SC, Oehninger, S, Gibbons, WE, Van Cleave, WC, Muasher, SJ. Delaying the initiation of progesterone supplementation results in decreased pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: a randomized, prospective study. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1140–1143.Google Scholar
Kohls, G, Ruiz, F, Martinez, M et al. Early progesterone cessation after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2012;98:858–862.Google Scholar
Licciardi, FL, Kwiatkowski, A, Noyes, NL et al. Oral versus intramuscular progesterone for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 1999;71:614–618.Google Scholar
Kahraman, S, Karagozoglu, SH, Karlikaya, G. The efficiency of progesterone vaginal gel versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase supplementation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a prospective clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:761–763.Google Scholar
Zarutskie, PW, Phillips, JA. A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril 2009;92:163–169.Google Scholar
Casper, RF, Yanushpolsky, EH. Optimal endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer cycles: window of implantation and progesterone support. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:867–872.Google Scholar
Simón, C, Cano, F, Valbuena, D, Remohí, J, Pellicer, A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2432–2437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukaszuk, K, Liss, J, Lukaszuk, M, Maj, B. Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2005;83:1372–1376.Google Scholar
Ghanem, ME, Sadek, EE, Elboghdady, LA et al. The effect of luteal phase support protocol on cycle outcome and luteal phase hormone profile in long agonist protocol intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2009;92:486–493.Google Scholar
Tonguc, E, Var, T, Ozyer, S, Citil, A, Dogan, M. Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective randomised study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2011;154:172–176.Google Scholar
Gelbaya, TA, Kyrgiou, M, Tsoumpou, I, Nardo, LG. The use of estradiol for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2116–2125.Google Scholar
Ghobara, T, Vandekerckhove, P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 January 23;(1):CD003414.doi(1): CD003414.Google Scholar
Noyes, RW, Hertig, AT, Rock, J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril 1950;1:3–25.Google Scholar
Murray, MJ, Meyer, WR, Zaino, RJ et al. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1333–1343.Google Scholar
Coutifaris, C, Myers, ER, Guzick, DS et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1264–1272.Google Scholar
Prappas, N, Jones, EE, Duleba, AJ et al. Window for embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:720–723.Google Scholar
Wilcox, AJ, Baird, DD, Weinberg, CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1796–1799.Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno, P, Ruiz-Alonso, M, Blesa, D et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2013;99:508–517.Google Scholar
Evans, GE, Martínez-Conejero, JA, Phillipson, GTM et al. Gene and protein expression signature of endometrial glandular and stromal compartments during the window of implantation. Fertil Steril 2012;97:1365–1373.e2.Google Scholar
Haouzi, D, Assou, S, Mahmoud, K et al. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1436–1445.Google Scholar
Mahajan, N. Endometrial receptivity array: Clinical application. J Hum Reprod Sci 2015;8:121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans-Hoeker, EA, Young, SL. Endometrial receptivity and intrauterine adhesive disease. Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32:392–401.Google Scholar
Nagori, CB, Panchal, SY, Patel, H. Endometrial regeneration using autologous adult stem cells followed by conception by in vitro fertilization in a patient with severe Asherman’s syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci 2011;4:43–48.Google Scholar
Fox, C, Morin, S, Jeong, JW, Scott, RT Jr, Lessey, BA. Local and systemic factors and implantation: what is the evidence? Fertil Steril. 2016;105:873–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×