Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:08:54.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Cleavage Stage or Blastocyst Transfer

Which Is Better?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

By
Jason Kasraie
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs  and
Lois Salamonsen
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash IVF, Victoria
Lois Salamonsen
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Endometrium to Maximize Implantation Rates and IVF Success , pp. 91 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gardner, DK. The impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2016, Volume 32, Issue 2, 137–141.Google Scholar
Johnson, N, Blake, D, Farquhar, C. Blastocyst or cleavage-stage embryo transfer? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2007, Volume 21, Issue 1, 21–40.Google Scholar
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Fertility Treatment in 2014: Trends and Figures. Authority (www.hfea.gov.uk/10243.html).Google Scholar
Croxatto, HB, Fuentealba, B, Diaz, S, Pastene, L, Tatum, HJ. A simple nonsurgical technique to obtain unimplanted eggs from human uteri. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1972, Volume 112, Issue 5, 662–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munné, S, Sandalinas, M, Escudero, T, Márquez, C, Cohen, J. Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2002, Volume 4, Issue 3, 223–232.Google Scholar
Marston, JH, Penn, R, and Sivelle, PC. Successful autotransfer of tubal eggs in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). J Reprod Fertil, 1977, Volume 49, Issue 1, 175–176.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S. Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2016, Volume 32, Issue 2, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glujovsky, D, Farquhar, C, Quinteiro Retamar, AM, Alvarez Sedo, CR, Blake, D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016, Issue 6.Google Scholar
Staessen, C, Platteau, P, Van Assche, E et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2004, Volume 19, Issue 12, 2849–2858.Google Scholar
Harbottle, S, Hughes, C, Cutting, R, Roberts, S, Brison, D, and On Behalf Of The Association Of Clinical Embryologists & The (ACE) British Fertility Society (BFS). Elective single embryo transfer: an update to UK best practice guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015 Sep;18(3):165–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahdouh, EM, Balayla, J, García-Velasco, JA. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2015, Volume 30, Issue 3, 281–289.Google Scholar
Gleicher, N, Kushnir, VA, Barad, DH. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Mar 15;12:22.Google Scholar
The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 2013, Volume 99, Issue 3, 667–672.Google Scholar
Schwärzler, P, Zech, H, Auer, M et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004, Volume 19, Issue 9, 2097–2102.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, A, Kalampokas, T, Davidson, J, Bhattacharya, S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 2013, Volume 100, Issue 6, 1615–1621.e10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharara, FI, Abdo, G. Incidence of monozygotic twins in blastocyst and cleavage stage assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 2010, Volume 93, Issue 2, 642–645.Google Scholar
Franasiak, JM, Dondik, Y, Molinaro, TA et al. Blastocyst transfer is not associated with increased rates of monozygotic twins when controlling for embryo cohort quality. Fertility and Sterility, 2015, Volume 103, Issue 1, 95–100.Google Scholar
The British Fertility Society and the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Scientific Impact Paper No. 8. In Vitro Fertilisation: Perinatal Risks and Early Childhood Outcomes. May 2012. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/scientific-impact-papers/sip_8.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dar, S, Lazer, T, Shah, PS, Librach, CL. Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2014, Volume 20, Issue 3, 439–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginstrom-Ernstad, E, Bergh, C, Khatibi, A et al. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, Volume 214, Issue 3, 378.e1–378.e10.Google Scholar
Lazaraviciute, G, Kauser, M, Bhattacharya, S, Haggarty, P, Bhattacharya, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of DNA methylation levels and imprinting disorders in children conceived by IVF/ICSI compared with children conceived spontaneously. Hum Reprod Update 2014, Volume 20, Issue 6, 840–852.Google Scholar
White, CR, Denomme, MM, Tekpetey, FR et al. High Frequency of Imprinted Methylation Errors in Human Preimplantation Embryos. Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 17311 (2015).Google Scholar
Chang, HJ, Lee, JR, Jee, BC, Suh, CS, Kim, SH. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 2009, Volume 91, Issue 6, 2381–2390.Google Scholar
Griesinger, G. Beware of the ‘implantation rate’! Why the outcome parameter ‘implantation rate’ should be abandoned from infertility research. Hum Reprod 2016, Volume 31, Issue 2, 249–251.Google ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Shaw, S, Cercas, R, Braña, C, Villas, C, Pons, I. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results. J Assist Reprod Genet (2015), Volume 32, 177.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×