Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T04:20:42.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Female pelvic imaging at 3T

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Ihab R. Kamel
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Elmar M. Merkle
Affiliation:
Duke University School of Medicine, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a well-established modality for the evaluation of the female pelvis. Accepted clinical applications at 1.5T include staging of gynecologic malignancies, evaluation of congenital uterine anomalies, evaluation pre and post uterine artery embolization, evaluation of adnexal masses, and problem-solving difficult cases. As 3T MR imaging systems become increasingly available for routine clinical use, female pelvic imaging applications are emerging. This chapter will discuss 3T female pelvic imaging to include the advantages and disadvantages, commonly used sequences, and current clinical applications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schindera, STMerkle, EMDale, BMAbdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3T: what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?Acad Radiol 2006 13 1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, DRFriel, HTDanrad, RApproach to abdominal imaging at 1.5Tesla and optimization at 3.0 TeslaMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005 13 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz-Brull, RRofsky, NMLenkinski, REBreathhold abdominal and thoracic proton MR spectroscopy at 3TMagn Reson Med 2003 50 461CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanwell, PRussell, PCarter, JEvaluation of ovarian tumors by proton magnetic spectroscopy at three TeslaInvest Radiol 2008 43 745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FDA Guidance of Industry and FDA Staffhttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072688.pdf 2010
Hussain, Svan den Bos, IOliveto, JMR imaging of the female pelvis at 3TMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007 14 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornfeld, DWeinred, JSimple changes to 1.5-T MRI abdomen and pelvis protocols to optimize results at 3 TAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 190 W140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morakkabati-Spitz, NGieseke, JKuhl, C3.0-T high-field magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: preliminary experiencesEur Radiol 2005 15 639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morakkabati-Spitz, NGieseke, JKuhl, CMRI of the pelvis at 3 T: very high spatial resolution with sensitivity encoding and flip-angle sweep technique in clinically acceptable scan timeEur Radiol 2006 16 634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kataoka, MKido, AKoyama, TMRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation of high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE imagesJ Magn Reson Imaging 2007 25 527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichy, MPWietek, BMMugler, JPMagnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling frequency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiencesInvest Radiol 2005 40 754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, RPLee, VSBennett, GLImaging the female pelvis at 3.0 TTop Magn Reson Imaging 2006 17 427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Namimoto, TYamashita, YAwai, KCombined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomasEur Radiol 2009 19 2756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozsarlako, OTjalma, WSchepens, EThe correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical (FIGO) staging with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinomaEur Radiol 2003 13 2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, DGSnyder, BCoakley, FEarly invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup StudyJ Clin Oncol 2006 24 5687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Togashi, KNishimura, DSagoh, TCarcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imagingRadiology 1989 171 245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hricak, HLacey, CGSandles, LGInvasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findingsRadiology 1988 166 623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hori, MKim, TMurakami, TUterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0T-MRI imaging – comparison with 1.5T MR imagingRadiology 2009 251 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hricak, HRubinstein, LVGherman, GMKarstaedt, NMR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative studyRadiology 1991 179 829CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hori, MKim, TMurakami, TMR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0T: comparison with imaging at 1.5TJ Magn Reson Imaging 2009 30 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, GNg, KKChang, CJMyometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging–initial experienceRadiology 2009 250 784CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, SKHricak, HStern, JLOvarian lesions: detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5TRadiology 1991 181 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semelka, RCLawrence, PHShoenut, JPPrimary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre- and post-contrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging with histologic correlationJ Magn Reson Imaging 1993 3 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, SJTurnbull, LWPoole, DRThe accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging–a realistic optionBJOG 2008 115 894CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sala, EPriest, ANKataoka, MApparent diffusion coefficient and vascular signal fraction measurements with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility in metastatic ovarian cancer at 3 Tesla: technical developmentEur Radiol 2010 20 491CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanwell, PRussell, PCarter, JEvaluation of ovarian tumors by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at three TeslaInvest Radiol 2008 43 745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morakkabati-Spitz, NGieseke, JWillinek, WADynamic pelvic floor MR imaging at 3 T in patients with clinical signs of urinary incontinence-preliminary resultsEur Radiol 2008 18 2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hottat, NLarrousse, CAnaf, VEndometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment–initial resultsRadiology 2009 253 126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×