No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mary Wollstonecraft, Social Constructivism, and the Idea of Freedom
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2018
Abstract
This article considers Mary Wollstonecraft as a theorist of freedom for women through the lens of social constructivism. Previous republican readings of Wollstonecraft as promoting a vision of freedom as independence or non-domination are compromised by their underpinnings in liberal individualism. Instead, we suggest her theory displays elements of positive liberty and particularly what we call “subjectivity freedom.” Reading Wollstonecraft as an early social constructivist, we show her grappling with how women's subjectivity is constructed in patriarchal societies such that they desire the conditions of their own subordination. This troubles the very notion of domination and its putative opposite, freedom-as-independence. Paradoxically, while noting how women's sense of self was profoundly and intimately shaped by the patriarchal structures they inhabited, Wollstonecraft's own argument was limited by these same constructions. Nonetheless, she struggled to conceive a radically emancipatory vision of women's lives, aspirations, and desires from within the confines of a context and discourse premised on their devaluation. A social constructivist approach shows that Wollstonecraft sought not simply to change women or specific structures of male dominance, but rather the processes within which men and women defined gender, the family, and personal identity: in short, their subjectivity.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018
Footnotes
This essay was first presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Thanks to the conference participants, and particularly Eileen Hunt Botting and Alan Coffee for their comments and suggestions. Thanks also to Mary Caputi. Nancy Hirschmann also wishes to thank the American Council of Learned Societies, the National Humanities Center, and the European University Institute, for support at various points in this article's composition.
References
REFERENCES
Abbey, Ruth. 1999. “Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Hypatia 14 (3): 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1986. “Reflections on Marriage.” In The First English Feminist: Reflections Upon Marriage and other writings by Mary Astell, ed. Hill, Bridget. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Benn, Stanley. 1988. A Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berges, Sandrine. 2017. “Wet-Nurses and Political Participation: The Republican Approaches to Motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy.” In The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Berges, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan M. S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2006. Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2016. Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Human Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coffee, Alan. 2013. “Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination,” European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2): 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, Alan. 2014. “Freedom as Independence: Mary Wollstonecraft and the Grand Blessing of Life.” Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 29 (4): 908–24.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1993. The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Moira. 1992. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Problematic of Slavery,” Feminist Review, 42 (Autumn): 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1987. The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1898. Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard & Co.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. 1996. “Mary Wollstonecraft's ‘Wild Wish:’ Confounding Sex in the Discourse of Political Rights.” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. 1999. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft on the Sexual Politics of Republican Motherhood.” Southeastern Political Review 27 (3): 469–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldenius, Lena. 2007. “The Primacy of Right: On the Triad of Liberty, Equality and Virtue in Wollstonecraft's Political Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15 (1):75–99.10.1080/09608780601087988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldenius, Lena. 2015. Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism. London: Pickering & Chatto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Bridget. 1994. Women, Work and Sexual Politics in Eighteenth Century England. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Gender, Class, & Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1986. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan B. 1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. The Subjection of Women in On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Grey, John. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Virginia L. 1996. “What Can Liberals Learn from Mary Wollstonecraft?” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2017. “Republican Elements in the Thought of Mary Wollstonecraft.” In The Social and Political Philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Berges, Sandrine and Coffee, Alan M. S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1992. A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1996. “Wollstonecraft, Feminism and Democracy: ‘Being Bastilled.’” In Feminist Interpretations of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Falco, Maria J.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barbara. 2003. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Feminist Imagination. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979. “What's Wrong with Negative Liberty.” In The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin, ed. Ryan, Alan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1975. Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman, ed. Ferguson, Moira. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2008a. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and A Vindication of the Rights of Men, ed. Todd, Janet, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2008b. A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and A Vindication of the Rights of Men, ed. Todd, Janet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2009. Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, ed. Brekke, and Mee, . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar