May 11, 2023, marked the end of the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE). During the PHE, regulatory flexibilities allowed telehealth to more effectively connect physicians providing care and patients seeking it. This paper discusses the implications of the end of the PHE on telehealth coverage, payment, reimbursement, and licensure, and exposes inconsistencies and inequities in extant state regulations.

The end of the federal COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) on May 11, 2023, marked a pivotal shift in the landscape of telehealth regulation in the US. Kwan, Jolin, and Shachar analyze the implications of this transition by exposing inconsistencies in access to care. We agree that we now face a “convoluted patchwork of permanent and temporary changes to telehealth law and policy.”1

Changing practice patterns caused by the pandemic have created an urgent need for guidance in prescribing stimulants using telepsychiatry for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A notable spike in the prescribing of stimulants accompanied the suspension of the Ryan Haight Act, allowing the prescribing of stimulants without a face-to-face meeting. Competing forces both for and against prescribing ADHD stimulants by telepsychiatry have emerged, requiring guidelines to balance these factors. On the one hand, factors weighing in favor of increasing the availability of treatment for ADHD via telepsychiatry include enhanced access to care, reduction in the large number of untreated cases, and prevention of the known adverse outcomes of untreated ADHD. On the other hand, factors in favor of limiting telepsychiatry for ADHD include mitigating the possibility of exploiting telepsychiatry for profit or for misuse, abuse, and diversion of stimulants. This Expert Consensus Group has developed numerous specific guidelines and advocates for some flexibility in allowing telepsychiatry evaluations and treatment without an in-person evaluation to continue. These guidelines also recognize the need to give greater scrutiny to certain subpopulations, such as young adults without a prior diagnosis or treatment of ADHD who request immediate-release stimulants, which should increase the suspicion of possible medication diversion, misuse, or abuse. In such cases, nonstimulants, controlled-release stimulants, or psychosocial interventions should be prioritized. We encourage the use of outside informants to support the history, the use of rating scales, and having access to a hybrid model of both in-person and remote treatment.

Telehealth overcomes common geographical barriers to community/clinic-based healthcare and lifestyle interventions, (1,2) but whether it is a feasible and safe mode of healthcare service delivery for lifestyle-based interventions in those with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains unknown. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of a home exercise program with dietary advice to increase plant-based protein delivered and monitored by healthcare professionals via telehealth in adults with NAFLD. Secondary aims were to assess changes in macronutrient intake including protein from plant and animal sources, body weight, physical activity and physical function. This was a 12-week pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial conducted in 28 inactive adults (>45 years) with NAFLD. Participants were randomly allocated to receive: 1) a home-based, muscle strengthening exercise program (3 days/week) delivered and monitored remotely by an exercise physiologist using the TeleHab exercise platform/app (VALD Health) plus support from a nutritionist to increase daily protein intake to ~1.2-1.5 g/kg/day from predominately plant-based sources and behavioural change support delivered via 3-4 weekly text messages (Pro-Ex, n = 14) or 2) usual care (UC, n = 14). Feasibility was assessed via retention (defined as ≤10% attrition), adherence [≥66% to the muscle strengthening program and ≥80% to the recommended daily protein serves [total (≥3-3½), plant (≥2) and animal (≤1-1½) per day (via protein checklist)] and safety (intervention-related adverse events). Secondary outcomes included macronutrient intake (3x24-hour records), weight (self-reported), habitual physical activity (PA) [moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA), minutes/week via the Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire], and physical function [30-second sit-to-stand (STS) performance]. Since this was a pilot feasibility study, mean group differences (6 and 12-weeks) were estimated, with 95% confidence intervals, and standardised effects [Cohen D, effect size (ES)] reported for secondary outcomes. Overall, 25 participants (89%) completed the intervention. In Pro-Ex, mean adherence to the exercise program was 52%, while adherence to the recommended plant, animal and total protein serves/day was 32%, 42% and 14% of participants, respectively. One minor exercise-related adverse event occurred from 241 completed sessions over 12 weeks. Relative to UC, Pro-Ex experienced a mean 2.7 (95%CI: 0.9, 4.4; large ES d = 1.29) increase in 30-sec STS number, 46 minute (95%CI: −153, 245; small ES d = 0.19) increase in MVPA, 1.7kg (95%CI: −3.5, 0.2; moderate ES d = 0.54) decrease in body weight, 35.2g (95%CI: 11.0, 59.3; large ES d = 1.23) increase in protein and 8.3g (95%CI:-20.5, 4.0; moderate ES d=-0.57) reduction in saturated fat. In middle-aged and older adults with NAFLD, a home exercise and plant-based dietary protein intervention delivered via telehealth was safe, but not feasible in terms of achieving the desired level of adherence. Despite this, exploratory analysis indicates this mode of healthcare service delivery could play a role to support weight management and improve physical activity and physical function in adults with NAFLD.

Global mental health services face challenges such as stigma and a shortage of trained professionals, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, which hinder access to high-quality care. Mobile health interventions, commonly referred to as mHealth, have shown to have the capacity to confront and solve most of the challenges within mental health services. This paper conducted a comprehensive investigation in 2024 to identify all review studies published between 2000 and 2024 that investigate the advantages of mHealth in mental health services. The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and ProQuest. The quality of the final papers was assessed and a thematic analysis was performed to categorize the obtained data. 11 papers were selected as final studies. The final studies were considered to be of good quality. The risk of bias within the final studies was shown to be in a convincing level. The main advantages of mHealth interventions were categorized into four major themes: ‘accessibility, convenience and adaptability’, ‘patient-centeredness’, ‘data insights’ and ‘efficiency and effectiveness’. The findings of the study suggested that mHealth interventions can be a viable and promising option for delivering mental health services to large and diverse populations, particularly in vulnerable groups and low-resource settings.

This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of a telehealth delivered exercise plus plant-based protein diet in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This was a 12-week, randomised controlled feasibility trial including twenty-eight adults aged > 45 years with NAFLD randomised to a home muscle strengthening program (3 d/week) with increased protein intake (target ∼1·2–1·5 g/kg/d) from predominately plant-based sources and behavioural change support (3–4 text messages/week) (Pro-Ex n 14) or usual care (UC, n 14). Feasibility was assessed via retention (≤ 10 % attrition), adherence (exercise ≥ 66 %; recommended daily protein serves ≥ 80 %) and safety (adverse events). Secondary outcomes included macronutrient intake (3 × 24-h records), weight, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and 30 s sit-to-stand (STS) performance. Study retention was 89 %. Mean exercise adherence (Pro-Ex) was 52 % with one adverse event from 241 sessions. In Pro-Ex, mean daily plant protein serves increased (0·9 to 1·4/d) and animal protein decreased (1·5 to 1·2/d) after 12-weeks, but overall adherence (serves/day) was 32[RD1] % (plant) and 42 % (animal). Relative to UC, Pro-Ex experienced a mean 2·7 (95 % CI: 0·9, 4·4) increase in 30 s STS number, 46-minute (95 % CI: −153, 245) increase in MVPA, 1·7 kg (95 % CI: −3·5, 0·2) decrease in weight, 35·2 g (95 % CI: 11·0, 59·3) increase in protein. In adults with NAFLD a telehealth home exercise and dietary intervention was safe and improved habitual plant and animal protein intake, but overall adherence was modest suggesting more intensive healthcare support may be required.

Telemedicine enables critical human communication and interaction between researchers and participants in decentralized research studies. There is a need to better understand the overall scope of telemedicine applications in clinical research as the basis for further research. This narrative, nonsystematic review of the literature sought to review and discuss applications of telemedicine, in the form of synchronous videoconferencing, in clinical research. We searched PubMed to identify relevant literature published between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2023. Two independent screeners assessed titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by single-reviewer full-text screening, and we organized the literature into core themes through consensus discussion. We screened 1044 publications for inclusion. Forty-eight publications met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified six core themes to serve as the structure for the narrative review: infrastructure and training, recruitment, informed consent, assessment, monitoring, and engagement. Telemedicine applications span all stages of clinical research from initial planning and recruitment to informed consent and data collection. While the evidence base for using telemedicine in clinical research is not well-developed, existing evidence suggests that telemedicine is a potentially powerful tool in clinical research.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated a rapid uptake of remote health care services. This qualitative descriptive study was designed to gain an understanding of older adults’ experiences of remote care (telephone or online video conference appointments) for specialized health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Twenty-one older adults (ages 65 years and older; 8 men and 13 women) living in eastern Canada participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The vast majority of older adults were overall satisfied with their remote experiences of specialist care. Advantages to remote care for specialized services included convenience, safety during the pandemic, comfort, efficiency, and ease of visit. Disadvantages included communication not as effective, feeling depersonalized or disembodied, missing the human relationship, and wanting reassurance of physical assessment. It is important that health professionals understand the disadvantages for older adults of remote care visits in order to mitigate them.

Despite the increasing use of telehealth platforms to deliver cognitive behavioural group therapy programs, few studies have been conducted that explore the experience of using telehealth platforms for those living with bipolar disorder. The present study aimed to explore the impact of the telehealth platform on the delivery of a recovery-orientated well-being plan group program for participants living with bipolar disorder. A total of 19 participants completed the qualitative interviews (3 male, 16 female). Using content analysis, data were deductively coded in line with pre-existing codes and matrix categories with unexpected data that discussed the telehealth experience being coded using an inductive content analysis framework. Two themes were identified: (1) Social inclusion, which included the subthemes of (a) connection to others via telehealth and (b) feeling safe using telehealth; and (2) Barriers and engagement, which included the subthemes of (a) removing barriers by using telehealth and (b) symptom impacts to engagement using the telehealth platform. Participants reported increased connection with others using telehealth and feeling greater safety overall when using the telehealth platform; however, some noted that dominant personalities could contribute to feeling unsafe within the group at times. Overall, the platform reduced barriers and was easy to use with this being a convenient way to attend, even if in some instances the platform highlighted differences between the members.