Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:22:10.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

5 - From Vienna Station to Boston Terminus

Daniel Cohnitz
Affiliation:
University of Tartu
Get access

Summary

Now that we have introduced some of the formal machinery that Goodman developed to approach philosophical problems, we are almost ready to understand his chief work. A Study of Qualities, which was first published in revised form as The Structure of Appearance, is certainly the most difficult piece Goodman ever wrote. It is full of technical subtleties and philosophically relevant observations. To understand its significance, however, we first have to look back at the philosophical context in which it was developed. We have emphasized in the previous chapters that Goodman's work is best understood as situated within a certain branch of analytic philosophy, departing from Frege's conception of ideal-language philosophy. Goodman's 1941 dissertation A Study of Qualities is in large part a thorough analysis and further elaboration of the work of Carnap, his most famous predecessor in this tradition. Therefore we shall first characterize Carnap's project in the Aufbau ([1928] 1961). Although Goodman's work is usually classified as being an anti-foundationalist version of Carnap's project, Carnap and Goodman in fact agreed on many more issues than is usually recognized. In fact, the main characteristics of Carnap's philosophy of the 1930s also characterize Goodman's philosophy:

  1. • the methodological outlook of constructionalism;

  2. • an anti-foundationalist epistemology;

  3. • the emphasis on multiple systems and starting-points adequate to their respective purposes (i.e. methodological and ontological pluralism);

  4. • the view that what are often taken as “ultimate” metaphysical questions are pointless except when relativized to a system (i.e. metaphysical and ontological relativism).

Type
Chapter
Information
Nelson Goodman , pp. 99 - 139
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×