Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T10:47:31.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - Arbitration Awards: Issues of Finality and Res Judicata

from PART II - ARBITRATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2017

Get access

Summary

ENGLISH PRACTICE

In Nomihold Securities Inc v. Mobile Telesystems Finance SA (2012) Andrew Smith J held that an anti-suit injunction (10.23 ff) should be granted to prevent a party from pursuing a second arbitration designed to undermine and contradict the award in an earlier arbitration between the same parties. The judge held:

‘It is a breach of an arbitration agreement to bring proceedings to make an unlawful attempt to invalidate the award or to make a collateral attack on a binding judgment or award of a properly constituted tribunal.’

This decision is sound because the re-litigation would run contrary to the parties’ implied undertaking to adhere to the result of the arbitration in the first reference. Andrew Smith J noted Lord Hobhouse's statement in Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd v. European Reinsurance Co of Zurich (2003: see also on this case 18.11 to 18.13): ‘It is an implied term of an arbitration agreement that the parties agree to perform the award’.

The Privy Council in Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd v. European Reinsurance Co of Zurich (2003) held that issue estoppel can arise in arbitration, and this will be binding on a second arbitration panel seised with a matter on a related topic between the same parties. There had been earlier cases on issue estoppel in arbitration proceedings (see also 16.27, vol I). It should also be noted that issue estoppel is not quite as exacting as cause of action estoppel: unlike cause of action estoppel, issue estoppel can be relaxed in either of these situations: (i) there has been a retrospective change in the law which renders the point covered by issue estoppel ‘plainly’ wrong; or (ii) new evidence has emerged which ‘entirely changes the aspect of the case’, provided that, even if he had displayed ‘reasonable diligence’, the relevant party could not have discovered this evidence at the time of the earlier litigation (see also 15.73, vol I).

In Nomihold Securities Inc v. Mobile Telesystems Finance SA (2012) Andrew Smith J assumed that the rule in Henderson v. Henderson (16.55 ff, vol I) will apply if in arbitration X between A and B, B could have readily raised issue P, but did not do so; and then in arbitration Y between A and B, B attempted to raise issue P.

Type
Chapter
Information
Andrews on Civil Processes
Arbitration and Mediation
, pp. 319 - 330
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×