Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T15:27:17.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

54 - A Conceptual and Empirical Bridge

from Section B - Social/Personality Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Susan T. Fiske
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Donald J. Foss
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access

Summary

Much of my work has addressed two issues. One is the development of empathy-related responding in children and its relation to prosocial behavior (e.g., helping and sharing) and to moral judgment and behavior. The other is emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to individuals’ positive social functioning and indices of maladjustment, including externalizing problems (e.g., aggression, defiance, and delinquency) and internalizing problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal). Perhaps my most important findings are those that emerged from my work on empathy and led to my work on differences among people in the degree to which they regulate their emotions and associated behavior.

In my early work on prosocial behavior, I found that preschool children who spontaneously shared with other children at a cost to themselves (e.g., giving up toys they were using) were more likely than their peers to experience empathy or sympathy. Empathy is experiencing an emotion similar to that of another in response to comprehending what the other is feeling or is likely to experience (e.g., observers feeling sad when exposed to someone who is sad or likely to experience sadness). Sympathy is feelings of concern for another based on some understanding of their emotional state or situation (akin to compassion – e.g., feeling concern for a person who is sad rather than solely feeling sadness).

Those children who engaged in spontaneous prosocial behavior also were relatively likely to refer to others’ needs or feelings when discussing hypothetical moral dilemmas in which children had to decide whether to assist others at a cost to the self. Moreover, they engaged in more neutral and positive social interactions with peers and were assertive when they needed to be; their peers also reacted positively to them when they did engage in prosocial actions.

In contrast, children who were high in prosocial behavior mainly in response to peers’ requests (verbal or often non-verbal, e.g., reaching for an object) tended to be non-assertive and less social with peers than those who were spontaneously prosocial. Peers often would state or non-verbally indicate that they wanted help or reach for what children high in such requested or compliant prosocial behavior were playing with; thus, children high in requested prosocial behavior frequently seemed to be easy targets for peers wanting objects or assistance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Scientists Making a Difference
One Hundred Eminent Behavioral and Brain Scientists Talk about Their Most Important Contributions
, pp. 256 - 259
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M., & Spinrad, T. L. (2014). Effortful control and its socioemotional consequences. In Gross, J. J. (ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (edn., 157–172). New York: Guilford Press.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 495–525. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131208.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In Lamb, M. (vol. ed.) and Lerner, R. M. (series ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Socioemotional processes (edn, vol. 3, pp. 610–656). New York: Wiley.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×