Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T01:11:22.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block

from Section 4 - Truncal blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Attila Bondár
Affiliation:
Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Gabriella Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork, Ireland
Stephen Mannion
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Gabrielle Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Arjunan Ganesh
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Clinical use

The paravertebral block was first described in 1905 by Hugo Sellheim in an attempt to find an alternative to spinal anesthesia. This new approach, which targeted the spinal nerves at the emergence from the spinal column, was found to be safer than spinal anesthesia, having less adverse cardiovascular effects. However, the technique was largely abandoned until 1979, when Eason and Wyatt reintroduced the paravertebral block into modern-day regional anesthesia practice (Eason and Wyatt, 1979).

Paravertebral blocks can provide excellent post-operative analgesia in children for thoracic and abdominal procedures. Both unilateral single injection blocks (thoracoscopy, renal surgery, inguinal hernia) and bilateral single injection blocks (small umbilical hernia) have been described. While the efficacy of single injection blocks is limited (Hill et al., 2006), the insertion of a catheter can prolong post-operative analgesia up to several days (Boretsky et al., 2013). Unilateral continuous blocks are commonly performed for thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, rib resection, rib fractures, thoracoscopic aortopexy, patent ductus arteriosus ligation, abdominal wall mass excision, and renal surgery. Bilateral continuous blocks are also performed for laparotomy, bowel resection, Wilms tumor resection, pancreatectomy, and splenectomy (Visoiu and Yang, 2011; Ali and Akbar, 2013; Boretsky et al., 2013). Paravertebral blocks may have a role in the management of chronic pain in children.

Paravertebral blocks are associated with a high success rate, while placement of a thoracic epidural is often difficult and is associated with frequent failure (Chelly, 2012). Compared to thoracic epidurals, patients having paravertebral blocks experience less hypotension (especially if unilateral), no urinary retention, no motor weakness, and no opioid-related side effects; they also need less nursing resources and less monitoring (Pintaric et al., 2011). Serious complications related to epidurals, such as spinal haematoma and spinal cord injury, can be avoided. Paravertebral blocks (bilateral continuous) were successfully used in a mildly coagulopathic child, where the use of a thoracic epidural would have been strictly contraindicated (Visoiu and Yang, 2011). Advantages of ultrasound guidance over landmark-based and nerve stimulator techniques include: higher success rate, reduced local anesthetic (LA) volumes, and decreased time of block performance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albokrinov, AA, Fesenko, UA. (2014). Spread of dye after single thoracolumbar paravertebral injection in infants. A cadaveric study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 31,305–9.Google Scholar
Ali, MA, Akbar, AS. (2013) Report of a case of ultrasound guided continuous thoracic paravertebral block for post thoracotomy analgesia in a child. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 22,107–8.Google Scholar
Ben-Ari, A, Moreno, M, Chelly, JE, et al.. (2009) Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block using an intercostal approach. Anesth Analg. 109,1691–4.Google Scholar
Berta, E, Spanhel, J, Smakal, O, et al. (2008) Single injection paravertebral block for renal surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 18,593–7.Google Scholar
Bhalla, T, Sawardekar, A, Dewhirst, E, et al. (2013) Ultrasound-guided trunk and core blocks in infants and children. J Anesth. 27,109–23.Google Scholar
Bondár, A, Szűcs, S, Iohom, G. (2010) Thoracic paravertebral blockade. Med Ultrason. 12,223–7.Google Scholar
Boretsky, K, Visoiu, M, Bigeleisen, P. (2013) Ultrasound-guided approach to the paravertebral space for catheter insertion in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 23,1193–8.Google Scholar
Burlacu, CL, Buggy, DJ. (2005) Coexisting Harlequin and Horner syndromes after high thoracic paravertebral anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 95,822–4.Google Scholar
Chelly, JE. (2012) Paravertebral blocks. Anesthesiol Clin. 30,75–90.Google Scholar
Coté, CJ, Lerman, J, Anderson, BJ. (2013) A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and Children, . Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders.
Eason, MJ, Wyatt, R. (1979) Paravertebral thoracic block – a reappraisal. Anaesthesia. 34,638–42.Google Scholar
Gerard, C, Roberts, S. (2012) Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia in the paediatric population. ISRN Anesthesiology. Article ID 169043.
Hill, SE, Keller, RA, Stafford-Smith, M. et al. (2006) Efficacy of singe-dose, multilevel paravertebral nerve blockade for analgesia after thoracoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology. 104,1047–53.Google Scholar
Lang, SA. (2002) The use of a nerve stimulator for thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 97,521.Google Scholar
Lönnqvist, PA, Hesser, U. (1993) Radiological and clinical distribution of thoracic paravertebral blockade in infants and children. Paediatr Anaesth. 3,83–7.Google Scholar
Lönnqvist, PA, MacKenzie, J, Soni, AK, et al. (1995) Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 50,813–15.Google Scholar
Luyet, C, Eichenberger, U, Greif, R. et al. (2009) Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 102,534–9.Google Scholar
Luyet, C, Herrmann, G, Ross, S. et al. (2011) Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: where do catheters go? Br J Anaesth. 106,246–54.Google Scholar
Marhofer, P, Kettner, SC, Hajbok, L, et al. (2010) Lateral ultrasound-guided paravertebral blockade: an anatomical-based description of a new technique. Br J Anaesth. 105,526–32.Google Scholar
Merkel, S. (1997) The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurse. 23,293–7.Google Scholar
Naja, MZ, Lönnqvist, PA. (2001) Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade: incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 56,1184–8.Google Scholar
O'Riain, SC, Donnell, BO, Cuffe, T, et al. (2010) Thoracic paravertebral block using real-time ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg. 110,248–51.Google Scholar
Pintaric, TS, Potocnik, I, Hadzic, A, et al. (2011) Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural with paravertebral block on perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability in patients having open lung surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 36,256–60.Google Scholar
Ponde, VC, Desai, AP. (2012) Echo-guided estimation of formula for paravertebral block in neonates, infants and children till 5 years. Indian J Anaesth. 56,382–6.Google Scholar
Renes, SH, Bruhn, J, Gielen, MJ, et al. (2010) In-plane ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: a preliminary report of 36 cases with radiologic confirmation of catheter position. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 35,212–16.Google Scholar
Renes, SH, van Geffen, GJ, Snoeren, MM, et al. (2011) Ipsilateral brachial plexus block and hemidiaphragmatic paresis as adverse effect of a high thoracic paravertebral block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 36,198–201.Google Scholar
Richardson, J, Lönnqvist, PA. (1998) Thoracic paravertebral block. Br J Anaesth. 81,230–8.Google Scholar
Visoiu, M, Yang, C. (2011) Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral continuous nerve blocks for a mildly coagulopathic patient undergoing exploratory laparotomy for bowel resection. Paediatr Anaesth. 21,459–62.Google Scholar
Visoiu, M, Joy, LN, Grudziak, JS, et al. (2014) The effectiveness of ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth. 24,1141–8.Google Scholar
Yoo, SH, Lee, DH, Moon, DE, et al. (2012) Anatomical investigations for appropriate needle positioning for thoracic paravertebral blockade in children. J Int Med Res. 40,2370–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×