Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T00:38:19.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block

from Section 4 - Truncal blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Sinead O'Shaughnessy
Affiliation:
Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
Charles Youngblood
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Stephen Mannion
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Gabrielle Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Arjunan Ganesh
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Clinical uses

The ilioinguinal nerve is blocked in conjunction with the iliohypogastric nerve in the pediatric population to provide ipsilateral analgesia for inguinal and scrotal surgery. The technique is utilized for procedures including inguinal hernia repair, orchidopexy, or varicocelectomy. It is used as an analgesic adjunct to general anesthesia. The successful ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block (ILIHB) provides long-lasting analgesia as well as reducing opioid consumption and opioid-related side effects. However, it is not sufficient to completely eliminate the visceral pain associated with peritoneal traction or manipulation of the spermatic cord or testes.

Developed in the 1980s, ILIHB was initially performed using anatomic landmarks and the “fascial click” method. However, a failure rate of up to 40% is reported with the landmark technique. This is mainly as a result of the high variability of pediatric anatomy, poorly defined landmarks, and intramuscular deposition of local anesthetic (LA). The introduction of ultrasound-guided techniques has achieved success rates of up to 95% and it is now regarded as the gold standard (Willschke et al., 2005). Ultrasound-guided ILIHBs also lower the dose required to achieve appropriate analgesia and reduce the complication rate. The use of lower doses of LA has particular relevance in neonates because of their increased risk of toxicity resulting from lower levels of alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) with subsequent reduced protein binding (Polaner and Drescher, 2011).

ILIHB can be as effective as the caudal block for post-operative analgesia and is accepted as a useful alternative (Markham at al., 1986). It has also been shown to establish superior levels of analgesia compared to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for inguinal surgery (Bhalla et al., 2013).

ILIHB in children appears to be very safe. Overall, a complication rate of 1:1000 with no long-term consequences has been reported (Lönnqvist, 2010; Willschke at al., 2010). General complications include intravascular injection, infection, intraneural injection with subsequent nerve damage, and failure of the block to achieve the required analgesia. Specific complications are intraperitoneal injection, bowel perforation, hepatic injury, femoral nerve palsy, and pelvic hematoma. The distance between the deepest muscle layer, the transversus abdominis, and the bowel is minimal, further stressing the importance of an ultrasound-guided technique.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhalla, T, Sawardekar, A, Dewhirst, E, Jagannathan, N, Tobias, JD. (2013) Ultrasound-guided trunk and core blocks in infants and children. J Anesth. 27,109–23.Google Scholar
Bosenberg, A. (2012) Regional anesthesia in children: the future. Paediatr Anaesth. 22,564–9.Google Scholar
Broen, TCK. (2012) History of pediatric regional anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 22,3–9.Google Scholar
Lönnqvist, P. (2010) Regional anaesthesia and analgesia in the neonate. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 24,309–21.Google Scholar
Markham, SJ, Tomlinson, J, Hain, WR. (1986) Ilioinguinal nerve block in children. A comparison with caudal block for intra and postoperative analgesia. Anaesthesia. 41,1098–103.Google Scholar
Mosseti, V, Ivani, G. (2012) Controversial issues in pediatric regional anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 22,109–14.Google Scholar
Polaner, D, Drescher, J. (2011) Paediatric regional anaesthesia: what is the current safety record? Paediatr Anaesth. 21,737–42.Google Scholar
Shah, RD, Suresh, S. (2013) Applications of regional anaesthesia in paediatrics. Br J Anaesth. 111,114–24.Google Scholar
van Schoor, AN, Boon, JM, Bosenberg, AT, Abrahams, PH, Meiring, JH. (2005) Anatomical considerations of the pediatric ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,371–7.Google Scholar
Weintraud, M, Marhofer, P, Bösenberg, A, et al. (2008) Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blocks in children: where do we administer the local anesthetic without direct visualization? Anesth Analg. 106 (1),89–93.Google Scholar
Willschke, H, Marhofer, P, Bösenberg, A, et al. (2005). Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 95 (2),226–30.Google Scholar
Willschke, H, Bösenberg, A, Marhofer, P, et al. (2006). Ultrasonographic-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block in pediatric anesthesia: what is the optimal volume? Anesth Analg. 102,1680–4.Google Scholar
Willschke, H, Marhofer, P, Machata, AM, Lönnqvist, PA. (2010). Current trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 65,97–104.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×