Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T10:16:49.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.10 - E.M., Ashrea (1665)

from PART V - Religion and devotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

William E. Engel
Affiliation:
University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee
Rory Loughnane
Affiliation:
Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis
Grant Williams
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa
Get access

Summary

About the author

E.M., appearing at the end of the dedicatory epistle (A3v), refers probably to Edward Manning, a pamphleteer, or Edward Mico (d. 1678), an English Jesuit.

About the text

Although relatively short on images, this work shares many features with typical emblem books, especially Henry Hawkins's Partheneia sacra (1633) and The Devout Heart (1634), which establish distinct points of sustained meditation following Ignatius Loyola's ‘spiritual exercises’.

The arts of memory

The dominant metaphor guiding this devotional manual is a grove of trees, represented visually and followed by a poem and interpretive exposition linking each tree to one of the Beatitudes from the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5:1–12; Luke 6:20–6), which in turn are read with respect to eight mnemonic sites placed on the crucified body of Christ. The preface gives ‘a particular account of the design and title of this little work, as also of the advantage of artificial memory therein’ (A4r). The explicitly expressed principles of the art of memory distinguish this work from other emblem books of the period.

Textual notes

Ashrea: or, the grove of beatitudes, represented in emblems: and, by the art of memory (London, 1665), A4r–B1v.

Ashrea

I do here present thee with a little grove of beatitudes, or happinesses, which may be entitled Ashrea, a word, in the Hebrew tongue, signifying a wood or grove; derived from Ashar, which signifies to beatify or make blessed. May it be God's good pleasure, that this our grove may produce the like effect in all those who shall devoutly walk into it. […]

I foresee an objection which some of my readers may make; and therefore I will endeavour to satisfy it. It may be questioned to what end artificial memory should be inserted here, to render a man mindful of beatitude since Aristotle affirms it to be a good, which all men desire; nay, so great a one, according to St Augustine, that both good and evil men are desirous of it? […] To open therefore the eyes and ears of mortals, that they might hear and behold true beatitude, the Son of God incarnate is said to have opened his own mouth, when he preached to his Apostles the Eight Beatitudes.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Memory Arts in Renaissance England
A Critical Anthology
, pp. 269 - 272
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Horowitz, Maryanne, Seeds of Virtue and Knowledge (Princeton University Press, 1998), chapter 3.
Salonius, Pippa and Worm, Andrea (eds.), The Tree: Symbol, Allegory and Mnemonic Device (Turnhout: Brepols, 2014), introduction.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • E.M., Ashrea (1665)
  • Edited by William E. Engel, University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee, Rory Loughnane, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Grant Williams, Carleton University, Ottawa
  • Book: The Memory Arts in Renaissance England
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091722.061
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • E.M., Ashrea (1665)
  • Edited by William E. Engel, University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee, Rory Loughnane, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Grant Williams, Carleton University, Ottawa
  • Book: The Memory Arts in Renaissance England
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091722.061
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • E.M., Ashrea (1665)
  • Edited by William E. Engel, University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee, Rory Loughnane, Indiana University–Purdue University, Indianapolis, Grant Williams, Carleton University, Ottawa
  • Book: The Memory Arts in Renaissance England
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091722.061
Available formats
×