Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:51:46.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Strategic Platforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Monroe E. Price
Affiliation:
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I turn to the 2008 Beijing Olympics to demonstrate how strategic communicators shape opportunities to project their messages and how others then try to wrest control, piggy-back or hijack those opportunities. The Beijing Olympics is a useful case study because it represented a huge investment by China in establishing its story of itself globally. The very idea of China as an international actor – what it is, what role it should play, how it would exercise its power – was and remains a subject over which there is global contestation. Before and during the Olympics, China recognized the potential for a large-scale narrative transformation. The Beijing Summer Games is an example of massive investment to alter attitudes: to reposition China, by changing perceptions both of the domestic population and a global public. How successful this effort was is beyond the scope of this book. In this chapter, I explore a strategic nuance: how the process of projection and counter-projection took place. I consider the Olympics to be an example of a “platform,” a locus (often informal) where contests for attention occur.

Creating and exploiting platforms is often a response to the complexity of modern communications flows. Much of the work in Daniel Dayan and Elihu Katz’s canonical work, Media Events, is about the communications-related aspects of creating and exploiting such platforms. Thinking about these scaffolds for performance is also a way of understanding the complex relationship between infrastructure and freedom of expression discourse. The effectiveness of expression depends, frequently, on access to a platform where the organizer has a substantial capacity to control entry and use and produce access to sympathetic receivers. Platforms may be a way of finding an effective space to consolidate a state’s vision of itself and to crowd out the competition of alternate statements. But global civil society groups and others also have an understandable hunger to exploit such platforms, either to create them or to take advantages of already existing fora to advance their own political and commercial messages.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brownell, Susan, What the Olympic Games Mean to Beijing (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008)Google Scholar
Price, Monroe E. and Dayan, Daniel, eds., Owning the Olympics, Narratives of the New China (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008)CrossRef
Caffrey, Kevin, ed., The Beijing Olympics: Promoting China: Soft and Hard Power in Global Politics (London: Routledge, 2011)
Montgomery, Kathryn C., Target, Prime Time: Advocacy Groups and the Struggle over Entertainment Television (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Payne, Michael, Olympic Turnaround: How the Olympic Games Stepped Back from the Brink of Extinction to Become the World’s Best Known Brand (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2006)Google Scholar
Schmitz, Jason K., “Ambush Marketing: The Off-Field Competition at the Olympic Games,” Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 3, no. 2 (2005)Google Scholar
Morgan, William J., “Cosmopolitanism, Olympism, and Nationalism: A Critical Interpretation of Coubertin’s Ideal of International Sporting Life,” OLYMPIKA: The International Journal of Olympic Studies IV (1995)Google Scholar
Hoberman, John, Darwin’s Athletes: How Sport Has Damaged Black America and Preserved the Myth of Race (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1997)Google Scholar
Barney, Robert K. et al., eds., Global and Cultural Critique: Problematizing the Olympic Games. Fourth International Symposium for Olympic Research (London, Ontario: International Centre for Olympic Studies, The University of Western Ontario, 1998)
House of Commons, London Olympics Bill, Session 2005–2006
Davis, Robert N., “Ambushing the Olympic Games,” Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal 3, no. 2 (1996)Google Scholar
Nafziger, James A. R., “International Sports Law: A Replay of Characteristics and Trends,” American Journal of International Law 86, no. 3 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olympic Charter, International Olympic Committee (Laussane, Switzerland: International Olympic Committee, 2013), 11
“Olympic Spirit: North, South Korea March Together in Ceremonies,” Sports Illustrated, Sept. 15, 2000
Sang-Hun, Choe, “Two Koreas to Compete as Single Nation at Olympics,” New York Times, November 1, 2005Google Scholar
“One More Step Towards Joint Korean Team,” People’s Daily Online, Sept. 7, 2006
McDonald, Mark, “In Olympic Infighting, The Koreas Take the Gold,” New York Times, July 2, 2012Google Scholar
Mexico Declaration, Association of National Organizing Committees (1984)
Mastrocola, Paul, “The Lords of the Rings: The Role of Olympic Site Selection as a Weapon Against Human Rights Abuses: China’s Bid For the 2000 Olympics,” Boston College Third World Law Journal 15, no. 1 (1995)Google Scholar
Large, David Clay, Nazi Games: The Olympics of 1936 (New York: W.W. Norton, 2007)Google Scholar
BBC Sport, August 27, 2001
Hutzler, Charles, “Hunger Strike Sends IOC into Tough Situation,” AP, February 26, 2006Google Scholar
Xiaoying, Qin, “Harmonious Confluence of Ideas at Olympics,” China Daily, July 18, 2007Google Scholar
“The Persecution of the Underground Roman Catholic Church in China: Testimony of Joseph M. C. Kung,” Cardinal Kung Foundation, January 31, 2007
“Two Priests Arrested in China,” Catholic News Agency, February 27, 2006
“Two Years Until Beijing 2008: IOC Fails, Activists Call on Athletes, Sponsors to Act,” Olympic Watch, August 7, 2006
“Beijing 2008 Olympic Games Licensing Programme,” Chinese Olympic Committee, March 27, 2004
“Security Council Expands Mandate of UN Mission in Sudan to Include Darfur,” United Nations Security Council, August 31, 2006
“Concepts of the Beijing Olympic Games: Green Olympics, Hi-tech Olympics, People’s Olympics,” BOCOG, August 5, 2005
“China and Darfur: The Genocide Olympics,” Washington Post, December 14, 2006
Cullen, Kevin, “Genocide Games,” Boston Globe, March 25, 2007Google Scholar
Reeves, Eric, “An Open Letter to Darfur Activists and Advocates,” Sudan Tribune, February 11, 2007Google Scholar
Keaton, Jamey, “Olympics Boycott Call Made at Rally, 3 candidates in France Seek to Pressure China,” AP/South Florida Sun Sentinel, Broward edition, March 22, 2007, 17AGoogle Scholar
Farrow, Mia and Farrow, Ronan, “The Genocide Olympics,” Wall Street Journal, March 28, 2007Google Scholar
“Khartoum’s Enablers in Beijing,” Washington Times, April 16, 2007
“Fidelity Prunes its Stake in PetroChina,” Wall Street Journal, May 17, 2007
Beck, Howard, “Cavalier Seeks Players’ Support for Darfur,” New York Times, May 16, 2007Google Scholar
Araton, Harvey, “Good Guy is Forgotten in Bad Week for Sports,” New York Times, July 31, 2007Google Scholar
Cooper, Helene, “Darfur Collides With Olympics, and China Yields,” New York Times, Diplomatic Memo, April 13, 2007Google Scholar
Reeves, Eric, “Artists Abetting Genocide,” Boston Globe, April 16, 2007Google Scholar
LaFranchi, Howard, “Why Sudan is Now Allowing UN Troops in Darfur,” Christian Science Monitor, April 18, 2007Google Scholar
Qian, Jason and Wu, Anne, “Playing the Blame Game in Africa,” International Herald Tribune, July 24, 2007Google Scholar
Dickie, Mure, “China Defends its Stance on Darfur,” Financial Times, July 28, 2007Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Strategic Platforms
  • Monroe E. Price
  • Book: Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680486.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Strategic Platforms
  • Monroe E. Price
  • Book: Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680486.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Strategic Platforms
  • Monroe E. Price
  • Book: Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680486.010
Available formats
×