Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:17:05.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Successful State Building in Iraq?

Lessons from the Reconstruction of Iraqi Budgeting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

James D. Savage
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

This book examines the challenge of making of institutional change under highly adverse circumstances, specifically the attempt by the American-led Coalition to change indigenous government institutions following its invasion and subsequent nine-year conflict-ridden occupation of Iraq. This project focuses on one aspect of the Coalition’s state-building and counterinsurgency efforts, the stabilization and reconstruction of the Iraqi government’s vital budgeting system. The importance of budgeting, as various literatures on state building, failed states, and postconflict peacekeeping indicate, is that sustainable, effective, and responsible public budgeting systems contribute to state legitimacy, bureaucratic capacity, transparent and accountable public finance, and the efficient provision of public goods, services, and infrastructure. The analysis provided here indicates that through invasion, occupation, and aid conditionality, the Coalition achieved some success in imposing a new budgetary framework on the government of Iraq. The Iraqis, in turn, became invested in that process, and they continue to employ it to budget their expanding oil revenues. Building sustainable budgetary institutions stands as a highlight of the occupation. Evaluating the condition of Iraq’s budgeting, U.S. Ambassador James Jeffrey remarked after the withdrawal of American troops in 2012, “This is a serious, serious, functioning part of Iraq. Many things about Iraq still don’t function, but the budgeting process, the pledge to the IMF, the budget discipline on the ministries. . . . It’s a miracle. It’s something we had a great deal to do with earlier; we have only a limited amount to do with it now, because it’s sort of on autopilot. . . . This is one of the first things they [the Iraqis] got right, with a lot of help from us. So it’s a success story.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Reconstructing Iraq's Budgetary Institutions
Coalition State Building after Saddam
, pp. 247 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990, 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change,” in Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Jack, “Iraqi Lawmakers Take On a Quixotic Quest,” International Herald Tribune, May 13, 2011, 7Google Scholar
Ministry of Planning, “Foreword by the Minister of Planning,” National Development Plan for the Years 2010–2014, Baghdad, 2010, 3Google Scholar
Pincus, Walter, “US Targets Reform of Iraq’s Civil Service,” Washington Post, October 5, 2010, A13Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, 67, 108–109Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A., Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishers, 2012, 450–455Google Scholar
White House, National Security Council, “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 44,” Washington, DC, December 7, 2005Google Scholar
Cordova, Matthew, “A Whole of Government Approach to Stability,” DIPNOTE, U.S. Department of State Official Blog, June 10, 2009, Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Defense, Military Support to Stabilization, Security, Transition, and Reconstruction Operations, Joint Operating Concept, Version 2.0, Washington, DC, December 2006, 44Google Scholar
U.S. Army, Stability Operations FM3–07, October 2008, 3–16
United States Institute of Peace and the U.S. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, Guiding Principles for Stabilization and Reconstruction, Washington, DC, 2009, 9–141Google Scholar
Miles, Renanah, “The State Department, USAID, and the Flawed Mandate for Stabilization and Reconstruction,” Prism, 3, December 2011, 1, 37–46Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, Civilian Response, Washington, DC, Summer 2011, 14, 22Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State, “Civilian Response Corps Member Profile: ‘Ged Smith,’” Civilian Response, Washington, DC, Spring 2010, 10, 6Google Scholar
Sheridan, Mary Beth, “Leadership Vacancy Raises Fears About USAID’s Future,” Washington Post, August 5, 2009, A1Google Scholar
Pincus, Walter, “USAID Leader Outlines His Change in Strategy,” Washington Post, January 25, 2011, A17Google Scholar
Atwood, J. Brian, McPherson, M. Peter, and Natsios, Andrew, “Arrested Development: Making Foreign Aid a More Effective Tool,” Foreign Affairs, November–December 2008, 87, 6, 123–132Google Scholar
United States Department of State, Leading Through Civilian Power: The First Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, Executive Summary, Washington, DC, 2010, 6Google Scholar
American Academy of Diplomacy, “A Foreign Affairs Budget for the Future: Fixing the Crisis in Diplomatic Readiness,” Washington, DC, 2008Google Scholar
Natsois, Andrew, “The Clash of the Counter-Bureaucracy and Development,” Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, July 2010Google Scholar
United States Department of State, Leading Through Civilian Power: The First Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, Washington, DC, 2010, 125Google Scholar
Juul, Peter, “U.S. Military Strategy Shifts Focus,” Center for American Progress, December 20, 2011Google Scholar
“Obama’s Remarks on Libya,” New York Times, March 28, 2011.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×