Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:20:50.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Fibroblasts and Stromal Cells

from PART II - INDIVIDUAL CELL TYPES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Andrew Filer
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Christopher D. Buckley
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Charles N. Serhan
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Peter A. Ward
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek W. Gilroy
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

WHAT IS A STROMAL CELL?

The architecture of organs and tissues is closely adapted to their function to provide microenvironments in which specialized functions may be carried out efficiently. The nature and character of such microenvironments are primarily defined by the stromal cells that reside within the tissues. The most abundant cell types of the stroma are fibroblasts, which are responsible for the synthesis and remodeling of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. In addition, their ability to produce and respond to growth factors and cytokines allows reciprocal interactions with adjacent epithelial and endothelial structures and with infiltrating leukocytes. As a consequence, fibroblasts play a critical role during tissue development and homeostasis and have often been described as having a “landscaping” function. In this chapter, we concentrate on fibroblasts as the prototype stromal cell. However, the stroma also consists of blood and lymphatic vessels, and a wider definition of stromal cells might include endothelial cells, specialized cells such as pericytes (blood vessel supporting cells), and even tissue resident macrophages.

Stromal Cell Identity and Microenvironments

Tissue resident macrophages in the liver (Kupffer cells) and lung (alveolar macrophages) perform very different functions compared to macrophages in the brain (glial cells) or skin (Langerhans cells), yet they are all members of the monocyte/macrophage family. Until recently, fibroblasts had been thought of as ubiquitous, generic cells with a common phenotype even within different tissues.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., et al. 1997. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275:964–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhowmick, N.A., Neilson, E.G., and Moses, H.L. 2004. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature 432:332–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjornson, C.R., Rietze, R.L., Reynolds, B.A., Magli, M.C., and Vescovi, A.L. 1999. Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 283:534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blades, M.C., Ingegnoli, F., Wheller, S.K., et al. 2002. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (CXCL12) induces monocyte migration into human synovium transplanted onto SCID Mice. Arthritis Rheum 46:824–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouty-Boye, D., Pottin-Clemenceau, C., Doucet, C., Jasmin, C. and Azzarone, B. 2000. Chemokines and CD40 expression in human fibroblasts. Eur J Immunol 30:914–919.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucala, R., Spiegel, L.A., Chesney, J., Hogan, M., and Cerami, A. 1994. Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med 1: 71–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Buckley, C.D., Amft, N., Bradfield, P.F., et al. 2000. Persistent induction of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by TGF-beta 1 on synovial T cells contributes to their accumulation within the rheumatoid synovium. J Immunol 165: 3423–3429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, C.D., Pilling, D., Lord, J.M., Akbar, A.N., Scheel-Toellner, D., and Salmon, M. 2001. Fibroblasts regulate the switch from acute resolving to chronic persistent inflammation. Trends Immunol 22:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, J.A., Zvaifler, N.J., Tsukada, N., Firestein, G. S. and Kipps, T.J. 2001. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes support B-cell pseudoemperipolesis via a stromal cell-derived fac-tor-1- and CD106 (VCAM-1)-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest 107:305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, J.S., Forbes, S.J., Constandinou, C.M., et al. 2005. Selective depletion of macrophages reveals distinct, opposing roles during liver injury and repair. J Clin Invest 115:56–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filer, A., Parsonage, G., Smith, E., et al. 2006. Differential survival of leukocyte subsets mediated by synovial, bone marrow, and skin fibroblasts: site-specific versus activation-dependent survival of T cells and neutrophils. Arthritis Rheum 54:2096–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haniffa, M.A., Wang, X.N., Holtick, U., et al. 2007. Adult human fibroblasts are potent immunoregulatory cells and functionally equivalent to mesenchymal stem cells. J Immunol 179:1595–1604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalluri, R. and Neilson, E.G. 2003. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J Clin Invest 112:1776–1784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, K.W., Cho, M.L., Kim, H.R., et al. 2007. Up-regulation of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (CXCL12) production in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts through interactions with T lymphocytes: role of interleukin-17 and CD40L-CD40 interaction. Arthritis Rheum 56:1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lally, F., Smith, E., Filer, A., et al. 2005. A novel mechanism of neutrophil recruitment in a coculture model of the rheumatoid synovium. Arthritis Rheum 52:3460–3469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, S.A., Bidgol, A., Hargreaves, D.C., et al. 2002. Differing activities of homeostatic chemokines CCL19, CCL21, and CXCL12 in lymphocyte and dendritic cell recruitment and lymphoid neogenesis. J Immunol 169:424–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzo, A., Paoletti, S., Carulli, M., et al. 2005. Systematic microanatomical analysis of CXCL13 and CCL21 in situ production and progressive lymphoid organization in rheumatoid synovitis. Eur J Immunol 35:1347–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinova-Mutafchieva, L., Williams, R.O., Funa, K., Maini, R.N., and Zvaifler, N.J. 2002. Inflammation is preceded by tumor necrosis factor-dependent infiltration of mesenchymal cells in experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:507–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merville, P., Dechanet, J., Desmouliere, A., et al. 1996. Bcl-2+ tonsillar plasma cells are rescued from apoptosis by bone marrow fibroblasts. J Exp Med 183:227–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller-Ladner, U., Kriegsmann, J., Franklin, B.N., et al. 1996. Synovial fibroblasts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis attach to and invade normal human cartilage when engrafted into SCID mice. Am J Pathol 149:1607–1615.Google ScholarPubMed
Parsonage, G., Falciani, F., Burman, A., et al. 2003. Global gene expression profiles in fibroblasts from synovial, skin and lymphoid tissue reveals distinct cytokine and chemokine expression patterns. Thromb Haemost 90:688–697.Google ScholarPubMed
Parsonage, G., Filer, A.D., Haworth, O., et al. 2005. A stromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol 26:150–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierer, M., Rethage, J., Seibl, R., et al. 2004. Chemokine secretion of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts stimulated by toll-like receptor 2 ligands. J Immunol 172:1256–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Postlethwaite, A.E., Shigemitsu, H., and Kanangat, S. 2004. Cellular origins of fibroblasts: possible implications for organ fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:733–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinn, J.L., Bondre, C., Gladstone, H.B., Brown, P.O., and Chang, H.Y. 2006. Anatomic demarcation by positional variation in fibroblast gene expression programs. PLoS Genet 2:e119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchlin, C. 2000. Fibroblast biology. Effector signals released by the synovial fibroblast in arthritis. Arthritis Res 2:356–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, M., Scheel-Toellner, D., Huissoon, A.P., et al. 1997. Inhibition of T cell apoptosis in the rheumatoid synovium. J Clin Invest 99:439–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Pernaute, O., Ospelt, C., Neidhart, M., and Gay, S. 2008. Epigenetic clues to rheumatoid arthritis. J Autoimmun 30:12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmeichel, K.L. and Bissell, M.J. 2003. Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J Cell Sci 116:2377–2388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, M., Sun, G., Stacey, M.A., Mori, L. and Mattoli, S. 2003. Identification of circulating fibrocytes as precursors of bronchial myofibroblasts in asthma. J Immunol 171:380–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E., McGettrick, H.M., Stone, M.A., et al. 2008. Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines and CXCL5 are essential for the recruitment of neutrophils in a multicellular model of rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Arthritis Rheum 58:1968–1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.S., Smith, T.J., Blieden, T.M. and Phipps, R.P. 1997. Fibroblasts as sentinel cells. Synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol 151:317–322.Google ScholarPubMed
Sweeney, S.E., and Firestein, G.S. 2004. Rheumatoid arthritis: regulation of synovial inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szekanecz, Z., Kim, J., and Koch, A.E. 2003. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunol 15:15–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takemura, S., Braun, A., Crowson, C., et al. 2001. Lymphoid neogenesis in rheumatoid synovitis. J Immunol 167:1072–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thalhamer, T., McGrath, M.A., and Harnett, M.M. 2008. MAPKs and their relevance to arthritis and inflammation. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47:409–414.Google ScholarPubMed
Thelen, M. 2001. Dancing to the tune of chemokines. Nat Immunol 2:129–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurlings, R.M., Wijbrandts, C.A., Mebius, R.E., et al. 2008. Synovial lymphoid neogenesis does not define a specific clinical rheumatoid arthritis phenotype. Arthritis Rheum 58:1582–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolboom, T.C., van der Helm-van Mil, A. H., Nelissen, R.G., Breedveld, F.C., Toes, R.E., and Huizinga, T.W. 2005. Invasiveness of fibroblast-like synoviocytes is an individual patient characteristic associated with the rate of joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 52:1999–2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×