Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:03:01.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - On the possible developments for the structural materials relevant for future mobile devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Tapani Ryhänen
Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Cambridge
Mikko A. Uusitalo
Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Helsinki
Olli Ikkala
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology
Asta Kärkkäinen
Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center, Cambridge
O. Ikkala
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology
M. Heino
Affiliation:
Nokia Research Center
Get access

Summary

Materials science and processing technologies of electronics materials have been central to the rapid progress that we have experienced in electronics and its applications. Drastically new options are being realized and these can have a major impact on mobile devices, based on applications related to, e.g., flexible and polymer electronics and roll-to-roll processes. Mobile devices are, however, balanced combinations of electronics and peripheral structures, in which the latter are also strongly dependent on the advanced materials that are available. There is expected to be relevant progress in materials science contributing to the structural parts of mobile devices, e.g., promoting lightweight construction, rigidity, flexibility, adaptability, functional materials, sensing, dirt repellency, adhesive properties, and other surface properties. In this chapter we will review some of the potential future developments, leaving some others to be discussed in later chapters since they are intimately related to the developments of the electronics. We expect the most significant developments to take place in “soft” organic and polymeric materials and nanostructured organic-inorganic hybrids and therefore the main emphasis is there. Biological materials offer illustrative examples of advanced materials properties providing versatile lightweight, functional, and sustainable structures, showing potential for the design of novel materials.

Introduction

It is expected that new multifunctional materials with specific combinations of properties will extensively be developed for the structural parts and user interfaces of future mobile devices. Adaptivity, sensing, and context awareness are key sought-after features, and are described widely in the different chapters of this book.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] P., Ball, Designing the Molecular World, Chemistry at the Frontier, Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
[2] G. M., Whitesides and B., Grzybowski, Self-assembly at all scales, Science, 295, 2418-2421, 2002.Google Scholar
[3] R.A.L., Jones, Soft Machines: Nanotechnology and Life, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
[4] P.M., Ajayanet al., eds., Nanocomposite Science and Technology, VCH-Wiley, 2004.Google Scholar
[5] G. A., Ozin and A. C., Arsenault, Nanochemistry; A Chemical Approach for Nanomaterials, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2005.Google Scholar
[6] K., Matyjaszewskiet al., eds., Macromolecular Engineering, Wiley-VCH, 2007.Google Scholar
[7] P., Fratzl, Biomimetic materials research: what can we really learn from nature's structural materials?, J. R. Soc. Interface, 4, 637-642, 2007.Google Scholar
[8] M. A., Meyerset al., Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties, Prog. Mater Science, 53, 1-206, 2008.Google Scholar
[9] S. D., Bergman and F., Wudl, Mendable polymers, J. Mater Chem., 18, 41-62, 2008.Google Scholar
[10] P., Cordieret al., Self-healing and thermoreversible rubber from supramolecular assembly, Nature, 451, 977-980, 2008.Google Scholar
[11] R. P., Wool, Self-healing materials: a review, Soft Matter, 4, 400-418, 2008.Google Scholar
[12] P.-G., de Genneset al., Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena; Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, and Waves, Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
[13] R., Blossey, Self-cleaning surfaces-virtual realities, Nat. Mat., 2, 301-306, 2003.Google Scholar
[14] A., Tutejaet al., Designing superoleophobic surfaces, Science, 318, 1618-1622, 2007.Google Scholar
[15] D., Quere, Wetting and roughness, Annu. Rev. Mat. Res., 38, 71-99, 2008.Google Scholar
[16] H., Gleiter, Our thoughts are ours, their ends none of our own: Are there ways to synthesize materials beyond the limitations of today?, Acta Mat, 56, 5875-5893, 2008.Google Scholar
[17] M. C., Petty, Molecular Electronics; from Principles to Applications, Wiley, 2007.Google Scholar
[18] G., Hadziioannou and C. G., Malliaras, eds., Semiconducing Polymers; Chemistry, Physics and Engineering, Wiley-VCH, 2007.Google Scholar
[19] H. S., Nalwa, ed., Handbook of Organic Electronics and Photonics, American Scientific Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
[20] N., Kochet al., Special Issue: “Organic Materials for Electronic Applications”, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process, 95, 2009.Google Scholar
[21] Y., Linet al., Self-directed self-assembly of nanoparticle/copolymer mixtures, Nature, 434, no. 3, 55-59, 2005.Google Scholar
[22] A. C., Balazset al., Nanoparticlepolymercomposites: where two small world smeet, Science, 314, 1107-1110, 2006.Google Scholar
[23] B. E., Chenet al., A critical appraisal of polymerclay nanocomposites, Chem. Soc. Rev., 37, 568-594, 2008.Google Scholar
[24] D. R., Paul and L. M., Robeson, Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites, Polymer, 49, 3187-3204, 2008.Google Scholar
[25] G. M., Whitesides, Self-assembling materials, Sci. Am., 273, 146, 1995.Google Scholar
[26] F. S., Bates and G. H., Fredrickson, Block copolymers – designer soft materials, Physics Today, 52, 32-38, 1999.Google Scholar
[27] I. W., Hamley, Nanotechnology with soft materials, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 1692-1712, 2003.Google Scholar
[28] B. L., Zhou, Bio-inspired study of structural materials, Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 11, 13-18, 2000.Google Scholar
[29] U. G. K., Wegst and M. F., Ashby, The mechanical efficiency of natural materials, Philos. Mag., 84, 2167-2186, 2004.Google Scholar
[30] M. F., Ashby, On the engineering properties of materials, Acta Metall., 5, 1273-1293, 1989.Google Scholar
[31] Z., Tanget al., Nanostructured artifical nacre, Nat. Mat., 2, 413-418, 2003.Google Scholar
[32] P., Fratzlet al., J. Mat. Chem., 14, 2115-2123, 2004.
[33] B., Fiedleret al., Fundamental aspects of nano-reinforced composites, Comp. Sci. Tech., 66, 3115-3125, 2006.Google Scholar
[34] S. C., Tjong, Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites, Mater. Sci. Eng. R, 53, 73-197, 2006.Google Scholar
[35] P., Podsiadloet al., Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites, Science, 318, 80-83, 2007.Google Scholar
[36] D. W., Schaefer and R. S., Justice, How nano are nanocomposites?, Macromolecules, 40, 8501-8517, 2007.Google Scholar
[37] M., Alexandre and P., Dubois, Nanocomposites, in Macromolecular Engineering, vol. 4, K., Matyjaszewskiet al., eds., pp. 2033-2070, Wiley-VCH, 2007.Google Scholar
[38] L. J., Bondereret al., Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films, Science, 319, 1069-1073, 2008.Google Scholar
[39] L. A., Utracki, Clay-Containing Polymer Nanocomposites, Rapra Technology Ltd., 2004.Google Scholar
[40] J., Njuguna and K., Pielichowski, Polymer nanocomposites for aerospace applications: characterization, Adv. Eng. Mater., 6, 204-210, 2004.Google Scholar
[41] W., Wanget al., Effective reinforcement in carbon nanotube-polymer composites, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 366, 1613-1626, 2008.Google Scholar
[42] A., Usukiet al., Synthesis of nylon 6–clay hybrid, J. Mater. Res., 8, 1179-1184, 1993.Google Scholar
[43] K., Yanoet al., Synthesis and properties of polyimideclay hybrid, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 31, 2493-2498, 1993.Google Scholar
[44] A., Okada and A., Usuki, The chemistry of polymerclay hybrids, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 3, 109-115, 1995.Google Scholar
[45] M., Okamotoet al., A house of cards structure inpolypropylene/claynano composites under elongational flow, Nano Letters, 1, no. 6, 295-298, 2001.Google Scholar
[46] S. S., Ray and M., Okamoto, Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from prepa-rationto processing, Prog. Polym. Sci., 28, 1539-1641, 2003.Google Scholar
[47] F., Gao, Mater. Today, 7, 50, 2004.
[48] A., Usukiet al., Polymerclay nanocomposites, Adv. Polym. Sci., 179, 135-195, 2005.Google Scholar
[49] M., Okamoto, Polymer/layered filled nanocomposites: an overview from science to technology, in Macromolecular Engineering, vol. 4, K., Matyjaszewski, et al., eds., pp. 2071-2134, Wiley-VCH, 2007.Google Scholar
[50] A. J., Patil and S., Mann, Self-assembly of bio-inorganic nanohybrids using organoclay building blocks, J. Mat. Chem., 18, 4605-4615, 2008.Google Scholar
[51] S., Srivastava and N. A., Kotov, Composite layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly with inorganic nanoparticles and nanowires, Acc. Chem. Res., 41, 1831-1841, 2008.Google Scholar
[52] P., Bordeset al., Nano-biocomposites: biodegradable polyester/nanoclay systems, Prog. Polym. Sci, 34, 125-155, 2009.Google Scholar
[53] O. L., Manevitch and, G. C., Rutledge, Elasticproperties of a single lamella of montmorillonite by molecular dynamics simulation, J. Phys. Chem B, 108, 1428-1435, 2004.Google Scholar
[54] J.-H., Leeet al., Properties of polyethylene-layered silicate nanocomposites prepared by melt intercalation with a PP-g-MA compatibilizer, Composite Sci. Tech., 65, 1996-2002, 2005.Google Scholar
[55] J. R., Capadonaet al., A versatile approach for the processing of polymer nanocomposites with self-assembled nanofiber templates, Nat. Nanotech., 2, 765-768, 2007.Google Scholar
[56] A., Dufresne, Polysaccharide nano crystal reinforced nanocomposites, Can. J. Chem., 86, 484-494, 2008.Google Scholar
[57] S. V., Ahiret al., Polymers with aligned carbon nanotubes: Active composite materials, Polymer, 49, 3841-3854, 2008.Google Scholar
[58] E. W., Wonget al., Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes, Science, 277, 1971-1975, 1997.Google Scholar
[59] M.-F., Yuet al., Carbonnanotubes undertensile load, Science, 287, 637-640, 2000.Google Scholar
[60] M., Alexandre and P., Dubois, Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials, Mat. Sci. Eng., 28, 1-63, 2000.Google Scholar
[61] R. R. S., Schlittleret al., Single crystals of single-walled carbon nanotubes formed by self-assembly, Science, 292, 1139, 2001.Google Scholar
[62] A. B., Daltonet al., Super-tough carbon-nanotube fibers, Nature, 423, 703-2003.
[63] T., Fukushimaet al., Molecularordering of organic moltensalts triggeredby single-walled carbon nanotubes, Science, 300, 2072-2074, 2003.Google Scholar
[64] C., Wanget al., Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures, Prog. Polym. Sci., 29, 1079-1141, 2004.Google Scholar
[65] J. H., Rouseet al., Polymer/single-walled carbon nanotube films assembled via donor-acceptor interactions and their use as scaffolds for silica deposition, Chem. Mater., 16, 3904-3910, 2004.Google Scholar
[66] T., Liuet al., Morphology and mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced nylon-6 composites, Macromolecules, 37, 7214-7222, 2004.Google Scholar
[67] M., Zhanget al., Strong, transparent, multifunctional, carbonnanotube sheets, 309, 1215-1219, 2005.
[68] L., Jiang and L., Gao, Fabrication and characterization of ZnO-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes with enhanced photocatalytic activity, Mat. Chem. Phys., 91, 313-316, 2005.Google Scholar
[69] J. N., Coleman, et al., Mechanical reinforcement of polymers using carbon nanotubes, Adv. Mat., 18, 689-706, 2006.Google Scholar
[70] M., Oleket al., Quantum dot modified multiwall carbon nanotubes, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 12901-12904, 2006.Google Scholar
[71] M., Moniruzzamanet al., Tuning the mechanical properties of SWNT/nylon 6, 10 composites with flexible spacers at the interface, Nano Lett., 7, 1178-1185, 2007.Google Scholar
[72] L., Bokobza, Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: a review, Polymer, 48, 4907-4920, 2007.Google Scholar
[73] Y., Liuet al., Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes with sodium lignosulfonate and subsequent quantum dot decoration, J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 1223-1229, 2007.Google Scholar
[74] Y., Yeet al., High impact strength epoxy nanocomposites with natural nanotubes, Polymer, 48, 6426-6433, 2007.Google Scholar
[75] P., Miaudetet al., Hot-drawing of single and multiwall carbon nanotube fibers for high toughness and alignment, Nano Lett., 5, 2212-2215, 2005.Google Scholar
[76] R., Haggenmuelleret al., Interfacial in situ polymerization of single wall carbon nanotube/ nylon 6,6 nanocomposites, Polymer, 47, 2381-2388, 2006.Google Scholar
[77] K., Fleminget al., Cellulose crystallites, Chem. Eur. J., 7, 1831-1835, 2001.Google Scholar
[78] D., Klemmet al., Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 3358-3393, 2005.Google Scholar
[79] M., Nogiet al., Optically transparent nanofiber paper, Adv. Mat., 20, 1-4, 2009.Google Scholar
[80] J. R., Capadonaet al., Stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by the sea cucumberdermis, Science, 319, 1370-1374, 2008.Google Scholar
[81] M., Henrikssonet al., An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers, Eur. Polym. J., 43, no. 8, 3434-3441, 2007.Google Scholar
[82] M., Pääkköet al., Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels, Biomacromolecules, 8, 1934-1941, 2007.Google Scholar
[83] M., Pääkköet al., Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities, Soft Matter, 4, 2492-2499, 2008.Google Scholar
[84] M., Henrikssonet al., Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness, Biomacromolecules, 9, 1579-1585, 2008.Google Scholar
[85] A. N., Nakagaito and H., Yano, Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure, Appl. Phys. A, 80, 155-159, 2005.Google Scholar
[86] M., Nogi and H., Yano, Transparent nanocomposites based on cellulose produced by bacteria offer potential innovation in the electronics device industry, Adv. Mat., 20, 1849-1852, 2008.Google Scholar
[87] T., Zimmermanet al., Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement, Adv. Eng. Mater., 6, no. 9, 754-761, 2004.Google Scholar
[88] F. J. M., Hoebenet al., About supramolecular assemblies of n-conjugated systems, Chem. Rev., 105, 1491-1546, 2005.Google Scholar
[89] J., Ruokolainenet al., Switching supramolecular polymeric materials with multiple length scales, Science, 280, 557-560, 1998.Google Scholar
[90] S., Valkamaet al., Self-assembled polymeric solid films with temperature-induced large and reversible photonic bandgap switching, Nat. Mat., 3, 872-876, 2004.Google Scholar
[91] R. P., Sijbesmaet al., Reversible polymers formed from self-complementary monomers using quadruple hydrogen bonding, Science, 278, 1601-1604, 1997.Google Scholar
[92] T., Thurn-Albrechtet al., Ultrahigh-density nanowire arrays grown in self-assembled copolymer templates, Science, 290, 2126-2129, 2000.Google Scholar
[93] C., Tanget al., Evolution of block copolymer lithography to highly ordered square arrays, Science, 322, 429-432, 2008.Google Scholar
[94] S., Parket al., Macroscopic 10-terabit-per-square-inch arrays from block copolymers with lateral order, Science, 323, 1030-1033, 2009.Google Scholar
[95] M., Muthukumaret al., Competing interactions and levels of ordering in self-organizing polymeric materials, Science, 277, 1225-1232, 1997.Google Scholar
[96] A., Pron and P., Rannou, Processible conjugated polymers: from organic semiconductors to organic metals and superconductors, Prog. Polym. Sci., 27, 135-190, 2002.Google Scholar
[97] P., Leclereet al., Supramolecular organization in block copolymers containing a conjugated segment: a joint AFM/molecular modeling study, Prog. Polym. Sci., 28, 55-81, 2003.Google Scholar
[98] V., Percecet al., Controlling polymer shape through the self-assembly of dendritic side-groups, Nature, 391, 161-164, 1998.Google Scholar
[99] X., Fenget al., Towards high charge-carrier mobilities by rational design of the shape and periphery of discotics, Nat. Mat., 8, 421-426, 2009.Google Scholar
[100] T., Katoet al., Functional liquid-crystalline assemblies: self-organized soft materials, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 45, 38-68, 2006.Google Scholar
[101] G., Holdenet al., eds., Thermoplastic Elastomers, Hanser, 2004.Google Scholar
[102] B., O'Regan and M., Graetzel, A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films, Nature, 353, 737-740, 1991.Google Scholar
[103] M., Gratzel, Dye-sensitized solid-state heterojunction solar cells, MRS Bulletin, 30, 23-27, 2005.Google Scholar
[104] E. J. W., Crossl and et al., A bicontinuous double gyroid hybrid solar cell, Nano Lett., in press, 2009.Google Scholar
[105] D. L., Kaplanet al., Self-organization (assembly) in biosynthesis of silk fibers – a hierarchical problem, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 255, 19-29, 1992.Google Scholar
[106] D. L., Kaplanet al., Silk, in Protein-Based Materials, K., McGrath, D., Kaplan, eds., pp. 103-131, Birkhauser, 1997.Google Scholar
[107] J. M., Goslineet al., The mechanical properties of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function, J. Exp. Biol., 202, 3295-3303, 1999.Google Scholar
[108] S., Kubik, High-performance fibers from spider silk, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 41, 2721-2723, 2002.Google Scholar
[109] R., Valluzziet al., Silk: molecularo rganization and control of assembly, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B: Bio. Sci., 357, 165-167, 2002.Google Scholar
[110] F., Vollrath and D., Porter, Spider silk as archetypal protein elastomer, Soft Matter, 2, 377-385, 2006.Google Scholar
[111] J. G., Hardyet al., Polymeric materials based on silk proteins, Polymer, 49, 4309-4327, 2008.Google Scholar
[112] S., Mannet al., Biomineralization, Chemical and Biochemical Perspectives, VCH Publishers, 1989.Google Scholar
[113] M., Darderet al., Design and preparation of bionanocomposites based on layered solids with functional and structural properties, Mat. Sci. Tech., 24, 1100-1110, 2008.Google Scholar
[114] H.-O., Fabritiuset al., Influence of structural principles on the mechanics of a biological fiber-based composite material with hierarchical organization: the exoskeleton of the lobsterHomarus americanus, Adv. Mat., 21, 391-400, 2009.Google Scholar
[115] G., Decher, Fuzzy nanoassemblies: towards layered polymeric multicomposites, Science, 277, 1232-1237, 1997.Google Scholar
[116] N. C., Seeman, Nucleic acid junctions and lattices, J. Theor. Biol., 99, 237-247, 1982.Google Scholar
[117] E., Winfreeet al., Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals, Nature, 394, 539-544, 1998.Google Scholar
[118] N. C., Seeman, DNA in a material world, Nature, 421, 427-431, 2003.Google Scholar
[119] P. W. K., Rothemund, Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns, Nature, 440, 297-302, 2006.Google Scholar
[120] H., Yanet al., DNA-templated self-assembly of protein arrays and highly conductive nanowires, Science, 301, 1882-1884, 2003.Google Scholar
[121] E. S., Andersenet al., DNA origami design of dolphin-shaped structures with flexible tails, ACSNano, 2, 1213-1218, 2008.Google Scholar
[122] A., Kuzyket al., Dielectrophoretic trapping of DNA origami, Small, 4, 447-450, 2008.Google Scholar
[123] A., Lafuma and D., Quere, Superhydrophobic states, Nat. Mat., 2, 457-460, 2003.Google Scholar
[124] M., Callies and D., Quere, On water repellency, Soft Matter, 1, 55-61, 2005.Google Scholar
[125] X., Feng and L., Jiang, Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces, Adv. Mat., 18, 3063-3078, 2006.Google Scholar
[126] M., Maet al., Decorated electrospun fibers exhibiting superhydrophobicity, Adv. Mat., 19, 255-259, 2007.Google Scholar
[127] L., Gaoet al., Superhydrophobicity and contact-line issues, MRS Bulletin, 33, 747-751, 2008.Google Scholar
[128] R., Fürstneret al., Der Lotus-Effekt: Selbstreinigung mikrostrukturierter Oberflächen, Nachricten aus der Chemie, 48, 24-28, 2000.Google Scholar
[129] P., Wagneret al., Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces, J. Exp. Bot., 54, 1295-1303, 2003.Google Scholar
[130] K., Autumnet al., Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair, Nature, 405, 681-685, 2000.Google Scholar
[131] A. K., Geimet al., Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair, Nat. Mat., 2, 461-463, 2003.Google Scholar
[132] B., Bhushan, Adhesion of multi-level hierarchical attachment systems in gecko feet, J. Adh. Sci. Tech., 21, 1213-1258, 2007.Google Scholar
[133] B. N. J., Persson, Biological adhesion for locomotion on rough surfaces: basic principles and a theorist's view, MRS Bulletin, 32, 486-490, 2007.Google Scholar
[134] K., Autumn and N., Gravish, Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 366, 1575-1590, 2008.Google Scholar
[135] A., del Campo and E., Arzt, Fabrication approaches for generating complex micro-and nanopatterns on polymeric surfaces, Chem. Rev., 108, 911-945, 2008.Google Scholar
[136] M. T., Northenet al., A gecko-inspired reversible adhesive, Adv. Mat., 20, 3905-3909, 2008.Google Scholar
[137] L., Quet al., Carbonnanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off, Science, 322, 238-242, 2007.Google Scholar
[138] J., Genzer and K., Efimenko, Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review, Biofouling, 22, 339-360, 2006.Google Scholar
[139] S., Weineret al., Materials designinbiology, Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 11, 1-8, 2000.Google Scholar
[140] X., Chenet al., A thermally re-mendable cross-linked polymeric material, Science, 295, 1698-1702, 2002.Google Scholar
[141] M., Chipara and K., Wooley, Molecular self-healing processes in polymers, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 851, 127-132, 2005.Google Scholar
[142] A. C., Balazs, Modeling self-healing materials, Materials Today, 10, 18-23, 2007.Google Scholar
[143] M. W., Kelleret al., Recent advances in self-healing materials systems, in Adaptive Structures, D., Wagg, ed., pp. 247-260, J. Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2007.Google Scholar
[144] R. S., Trasket al., Self-healing polymer composites: mimicking nature to enhance performance, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2, P1-P9, 2007.Google Scholar
[145] D., Montarnalet al., Synthesis of self-healing supramolecular rubbers from fatty acid derivatives, diethylene triamine, and urea, J. Polym. Sci., Part A, 46, 7925-7936, 2008.Google Scholar
[146] S., Burattiniet al., A novel self-healing supramolecular polymer system, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc., in press, 2009.Google Scholar
[147] R. P., Sijbesma and E. W., Meijer, Quadruple hydrogen bonded systems, Chem. Commun., 5-16, 2003.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×