Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:30:30.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Setting, implementing, and monitoring targets as a basis for adaptive management: a Canadian forestry case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Elston Dzus
Affiliation:
Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Canada
Brigitte Grover
Affiliation:
Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Canada
Simon Dyer
Affiliation:
The Pembina Institute, Canada
Dave Cheyne
Affiliation:
Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Canada
Don Pope
Affiliation:
Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc., Canada
Jim Schieck
Affiliation:
Alberta Research Council, Canada
Marc-André Villard
Affiliation:
Université de Moncton, Canada
Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Affiliation:
Mid-Sweden University, Sweden
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Forest management has seen a gradual transition from focusing on few to focusing on multiple values. Early forestry operations focused on production of timber. As the need for sustainability of the timber resource became apparent, foresters began developing production and regrowth strategies that focused on perpetuating the fiber source. This approach of harvest and regeneration, with a focus on trees, became known as sustained yield forestry. Throughout the latter half of the twentieth century there emerged a growing societal demand that forests provide not only fiber, but also ecological and social values. So began the transition from sustained yield forestry (with a focus primarily on economics) to sustainable forest management (with a focus on economic, ecological, and social values). Embedded within this transition from sustained yield to sustainable forest management was the concept of adaptive management.

Adaptive management is a “formal process for continually improving management policies and practices by learning from their outcomes” (Taylor et al. 1997). Many companies and government agencies utilize some form of adaptive management in their decision-making process. Passive adaptive management or “trial and error” approaches are the most commonly used forms of adaptive management. A more strategic and defensible approach exists in the form of “active adaptive management” (Walters and Holling 1990; Taylor et al. 1997).

The term adaptive management describes an interactive process designed to improve the rate of learning about the management of complex systems (see Box 17.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Alberta Chamber of Resources. 2005a.Integrated Landscape Management Program. Available online at www.acr-alberta.com/.Google Scholar
,Alberta Chamber of Resources. 2005b. Integrated Landscape Management Program: Five-Year Supplemental Business Plan 2006–2011. Calgary: Alberta Chamber of Resources.Google Scholar
,Alberta Land and Forest Service. 2000. Wildfire Historical Database. Available online at www.govab.ca/env.forests/fpd.Google Scholar
,(Al-Pac) Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. 2000a. Operators Guide to Stand Structure. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.Google Scholar
,(Al-Pac) Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. 2000b. Alberta-Pacific's Detailed Forest Management Plan. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.Google Scholar
,(Al-Pac) Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. 2001. Alberta Vegetation Inventory for the Al-Pac Forest Management Agreement Area. Approved by Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.Google Scholar
,(Al-Pac) Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. 2006. Alberta-Pacific FMA Area Forest Management Plan. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.Google Scholar
,Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. 2006. Timber Damage Tables 2005/2006. Available online at www.srd.gov.ab.ca/land/m_li_timberdamage.html. Last review/updated: October 21, 2005.Google Scholar
Andison, D. W. 2003. Natural Levels of Forest Age-Class Variability on the Alberta-Pacific FMA. Belcarra, BC: Bandaloop Landscape-Ecosystem Services. (Prepared for Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.)Google Scholar
Andison, D. W. and Marshall, P. L.. 1998. Simulating the impacts of landscape-level biodiversity guidelines: a case study. Forestry Chronicle 75:655–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attiwill, P. M. 1994. Disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservation management. Forest Ecology and Management 63:247–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, E. M., Wilgenburg, S. L., Boutin, S. and Hobson, K. A.. 2005. Modelling and field-testing of Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus) responses to boreal forest dissection by energy sector development at multiple scales. Landscape Ecology 20:203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, Y., Leduc, A., Harvey, B. D. and Gauthier, S.. 2002. Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fennica 36:81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeron, P. S. and Jensen, M. G.. 1993. An overview of ecological principles for ecosystem management. Pp. 49–60 in Jensen, M. E. and Bourgeron, P. S. (eds.) Eastside Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment, Vol. II, Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
Boutin, S. 2007. Integrated landscape management. Available online at www.biology.ualberta.ca/faculty/stan_boutin/ilm/ [viewed September 6, 2007].
Bradbury, S. 2002a. Response of understory vascular plants to wildfire and harvesting. Pp. 6-1–6-58 in Song, S. J. (ed.) Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Bradbury, S. 2002b. Response of nonvascular plants to wildfire and harvesting. Pp. 7-1 – 7-34 in Song, S. J. (ed.) Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Bunnell, F. L. 1998. Overcoming paralysis by complexity when establishing operational goals for biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 7:145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,(CAPP) Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. 2006. Oil Sands Resources, Production and Projects. Available online at www.capp.ca/default.asp?V_DOC_ID=1162. (Accessed June 28, 2006.)Google Scholar
Carleton, T. J. and MacLellan, P.. 1994. Woody vegetation response to fire versus clear-cut logging: a comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience 1:141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. L., Bartuska, A. M., Brown, J. H.et al. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cissel, J. H., Swanson, F. J. and Weisberg, P. J.. 1999. Landscape management using historical fire regimes: Blue River, Oregon. Ecological Applications 4:1217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, D. 2005. Canada oil sands output may increase sixfold by 2030 (update 1). Available online at www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000082&sid=aGEiywJ8Yr8s&refer=canada. (Accessed June 28, 2006.)
Cumming, S. G. 2001. Forest type and wildfire in the Alberta boreal mixedwood: what do fires burn? Ecological Applications 11:97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, S. G., Schmiegelow, F. K. A. and Burton, P. J.. 2000. Gap dynamics in boreal aspen stands: is the forest older than we think? Ecological Applications 10:744–59.Google Scholar
Devito, K. J., Creed, I., Gan, T.et al. 2005. A framework for broad scale classification of hydrologic response units on the Boreal Plain: is topography the last thing to consider? Invited Commentaries, HP Today. Hydrological Processes 19:1705–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, S. J. 2004. High Conservation Value Forests (HCVF) Within the Alberta-Pacific Forest Management Agreement Area: A Summary Report. Boyle, AB, Canada. Available online at www.alpac.ca.Google Scholar
Dyer, S. J., O'Neill, J. P., Wasel, S. M. and Boutin, S.. 2002. Quantifying barrier effects of roads and seismic lines on movements of female woodland caribou in northeastern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:839–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, K. E. 1986. Distribution and composition of residual vegetation associated with large fires in Alberta. M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Eberhart, K. E. and Woodard, P. M.. 1987. Distribution of residual vegetation associated with large fires in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:1207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkie, E. C. and Rempel, R. S.. 2001. Detecting scales of pattern in boreal forest landscapes. Forest Ecology and Management 147:253–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. T. and Wilkinson, L.. 2002. Mammalian response to wildfire and harvesting. Pp. 10-1–10-75 in Song, S. J. (ed.) Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
,Forest Stewardship Council Canada Working Group. 2004. National Boreal Standard. Toronto: FSC Canada.Google Scholar
,Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group. 1992. Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behaviour Prediction System. Information Report ST-X-3. Ottawa: Forestry Canada.Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M.. 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York, NY: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F. 1989. Toward a new forestry. American Forests 95:37–44.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity species, ecosystems, or landscapes?Ecological Applications 3:202–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, J. F., Berg, D. R., Thornburgh, D. A. and Tappeiner, J. C.. 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. Pp. 111–39 in Kohm, K. A. and Franklin, J. F. (eds.) Creating Forestry for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
,Government of Alberta. 2006. Government of Alberta Strategic Business Plan and 2006–09 Business Plan. March 22, 2006. Available online at www.finance.gov.ab.ca/publications/budget/budget2006/govbp.html. (Accessed July 18, 2006.)Google Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management?Conservation Biology 8:27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. J., Spies, T. A., Swanson, F. J. and Ohmann, J. L.. 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests: lessons from natural forests. BioScience 41:384–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, D., Harvey, B., Wasel, S.et al. 2003. Implementing sustainable forest management: some case studies. Pp. 893–952 in Burton, P. J., Messier, C., Smith, D. W. and Adamowicz, W. L. (eds.) Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council Research Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. L. and Calhoun, A.. 1996. A triad approach to land-use allocation. Pp. 477–91 in Szaro, R. A. and Johnston, D. W. (eds.) Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iacobelli, A., Alidina, H., Blasutti, A. and Kavanagh, K.. 2003. A Landscape-Based Protected Areas Gap Analysis and GIS Tool for Conservation Planning. Toronto: World Wildlife Fund Canada.Google Scholar
James, A. and Stuart-Smith, K.. 2000. Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation to linear corridors. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A. 1992. Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forest. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A., Miyanishi, K. and Weir, J. M. H.. 1998. Wildfires in the western Canadian boreal forest: landscape patterns and ecosystem management. Journal of Vegetation Science 9:603–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, K. and Iacobelli, A.. 1995. A Protected Areas Gap Analysis Methodology: Planning for the Conservation of Biodiversity. Toronto, ON: World Wildlife Fund Canada.Google Scholar
Kessler, W. B., Salwasser, H., Cartwright, C. W. and Caplan, J. A.. 1992. New perspectives for sustainable natural resources management. Ecological Applications 2:221–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimmins, J. P. 2002. Old growth forest. An ancient and stable sylvan equilibrium, or a relatively transitory ecosystem condition that offers people a visual and emotional feast? Answer – it depends. Forestry Chronicle 79:429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwong, N. L. 2005. Speech from the Throne. Government of Alberta, First Session of the Twenty-sixth Legislature. Available online at www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/govrel//pdfs/FullText2005 SpeechFromTheThrone(PDF).pdf. (Accessed July 18, 2006.)Google Scholar
Kwong, N. L. 2006. Speech from the Throne. Government of Alberta, Second Session of the Twenty-sixth Legislature. Available online at www.gov.ab.ca/home/thronespeech/2006/. (Accessed July 18, 2006.)Google Scholar
Lee, P. 2002. Forest structure after wildfire and harvesting. Pp. 5-1–5-48 in Song, S. J. (ed.) Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Lee, P. and Boutin, S.. 2006. Persistence and developmental transition of wide seismic lines in the western boreal plains of Canada. Journal of Environmental Management 78: 240–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, P. and Boutin, S.. 2008. Using Patterns of Live Tree Residuals After Natural Disturbances as a Template for Retention After Timber Harvest. Edmonton, Alberta: Sustainable Forest Management Network.Google Scholar
Lee, P., Crites, S., Marinelli, L.et al. 1999. Fire and Harvest Residual (FAHR) Project: The Impact of Wildfire and Harvest Residuals on Forest Structure and Biodiversity in Aspen-Dominated Boreal Forests of Alberta. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B. and Franklin, J. F.. 1997. Managing stand structure as part of ecologically sustainable forest management in Australian mountain ash forests. Conservation Biology 11:1053–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maes, D. and Dyck, H.. 2004. Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heathlands in Belgium. Biological Conservation 123:177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, D. and Jennings, S.. 2005. Power of monitoring programs to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, S. B., Cuthbert, F. J. and Oehlert, G.. 1998. Residual patches and their contribution to forest-bird diversity on northern Minnesota aspen clearcuts. Conservation Biology 12:190–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. R. and Halpern, C. B.. 2005. Short-term effects of timber harvest and forest edges on ground-layer mosses. Canadian Journal of Botany 83:610–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemelä, J. 1999. Management in relation to disturbance in the boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management 115:127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, M. R. and Hannon, S. J.. 1997. Songbird response to partial-cut logging in the boreal mixedwood forest of Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2001. Forest Management Guidelines for the Natural Disturbance Pattern Emulation. Version 3.0. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Peck, J. E. and McCune, B.. 1997. Remnant trees and canopy lichen communities in western Oregon: a retrospective approach. Ecological Applications 7:1181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perera, A. H., Buse, L. J., Weber, M. G. and Crow, T. R.. 2004. Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: a synthesis. Pp. 265–74 in Perera, A. H., Buse, L. J. and Weber, M. G. (eds.) Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances: Concepts and Applications. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. S. 2002. Ecosystem-based management. Pp. 370–82 in Thompson, D. (ed.) Tools for Environmental Management: A Practical Introduction and Guide. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Press.Google Scholar
,Remsoft Inc. 2007. Spatial woodstock: flexible forest modelling. Available online at www.remsoft.com.
Schieck, J. 2004. The Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program (ABMP): A Cost-effective, Multi-species, Broad-scale, Long-term, Biodiversity Monitoring Program. Available online at www.abmp.arc.ab.ca/Documents/Prototype%20Summary.with%20fig.pdf.
Schieck, J. and Hobson, K. A.. 2000. Bird communities associated with live residual tree patches within cut blocks and burned habitat in mixedwood boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:1281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieck, J. and Song, S. J.. 2002. Responses of boreal birds to wildfire and harvesting. Pp. 9-1–9-100 in Song, S. J. (ed.) Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Schieck, J. and Song, S. J.. 2006. Changes in bird communities throughout succession following fire and harvest in boreal forests of western North America: literature review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:1299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieck, J., Marinelli, L., Crites, S.et al. 2000a. Biodiversity in cutblocks with few large versus many small residual patches of trees and snags. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council.Google Scholar
Schieck, J., Stuart-Smith, K. and Norton, M.. 2000b. Bird communities are affected by amount and dispersion of vegetation retained in mixedwood boreal forest harvest areas. Forest Ecology and Management 126:239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R. R. 2002. Alternative Futures: Alberta's Boreal Forest at the Crossroads. Edmonton, AB: Federation of Alberta Naturalists and the Alberta Centre for Boreal Research.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. R., Stelfox, J. B., Boutin, S. and Wasel, S.. 2003. Managing the cumulative impacts of land uses in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin: a modelling approach. Conservation Ecology 7. Available online at www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schowalter, T. D. 1995. Canopy arthropod communities in relation to forest age and alternative harvest practices in western Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management 78:115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, R. S. and Hunter, Jr. M. L. 1992. New Forestry in Eastern Spruce-Fir Forests: Principles and Applications to Maine. Maine Agricultural Experimental Station Miscellaneous Publications 716.Google Scholar
Smyth, C. 1999. Overstory composition of live residuals in fire affected landscapes of northern Alberta. M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Smyth, C. and Lee, P.. 2001. Distribution of Post-Wildfire Live Residuals Within Riparian Areas Within a Lower Foothills-Boreal Wildfire. Report No. 2. Northern Watershed Project. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Smyth, C., Schieck, J., Boutin, S. S. and Wasel, S.. 2005. Influence of stand size on pattern of live trees in mixedwood landscapes following wildfire. Forestry Chronicle 81:125–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, S. J. (ed.) 2002. Ecological Basis for Stand Management: A Synthesis of Ecological Responses to Wildfire and Harvesting. Vegreville, AB: Alberta Research Council Inc.Google Scholar
Spies, T. A., Ripple, W. J. and Bradshaw, G. A.. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications 4:555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stambaugh, C. and Schieck, J.. 2005. The Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program: a cost effective program for detecting biotic change in Alberta. Pp. 7–18 in Eppand, H. and Brewin, M. K. (eds.) Prediction to Practice: Environmental Assessment Follow-up. Proceedings of the Alberta Society of Professional Biologists Conference. Calgary, AB: Alberta Society of Professional Biologists.Google Scholar
Stelfox, J. B. (ed.) 1995. Relationships between Stand Age, Stand Structure, and Biodiversity in Aspen Mixedwood Forests in Alberta. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Environmental Centre (AECV95-R1) and Canadian Forest Service (Project No. 0001A). Available online at www.borealcentre.ca/reports/stelfox/aspen.html.Google Scholar
Steventon, J. D., MacKenzie, K. L. and Mahon, T. E.. 1998. Response of small mammals and birds to partial cutting and clearcutting in northwest British Columbia. Forestry Chronicle 74:703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strittholt, J. R. 2006. Al-Pac FMA – Adequacy of Proposed Protected Areas to Meet Requirements for FSC Certification. A review prepared for Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc. Corvallis, OR: Conservation Biology Institute.Google Scholar
Taylor, B., Kremsater, L. and Ellis, R.. 1997. Adaptive management of forests in British Columbia. BC Ministry of Forests, Forest Practices Branch, Victoria BC. Available online at www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/docs/sil/sil426.htm.
Wallin, D. O., Swanson, F. J. and Marks, B.. 1994. Landscape pattern response to changes in pattern generation rules: land use legacies in forestry. Ecological Applications 4:569–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C. and Holling, C. S.. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westworth, D. A. and Telfer, E. S.. 1993. Summer and winter bird populations associated with five age-classes of aspen forest in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1830–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×