Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:20:37.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Prospects for animal contests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Mark Briffa
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Get access

Summary

Repeated patterns in animal contest behaviour research

Among studies of contest behaviour that have been conducted within the framework of evolutionary theory, one can discern distinct phases of activity that have been associated with developments in an underpinning body of theory. As recounted in Geoff Parker's Foreword to this volume, the initial period of intense activity that occurred in the early to mid 1970s involved the laying down of a fundamental body of theory. During this time, contest behaviour provided the original context for the biological application of evolutionary game theory (as opposed to economic game theory, from which it derives). Game theory still acts as a cornerstone for behavioural ecology research and it is testament to its explanatory power that the Hawk–Dove game, wars of attrition and other examples of ‘Evolutionarily Stable Strategy, or ESS, thinking’ (Davies et al. 2012) still dominate undergraduate curricula in the subject. These early models stimulated empirical studies that provided evidence for ESSs in contests in diverse study systems including scorpionflies (Thornhill 1984), butterflies (Davies 1978) and red deer (Clutton-Brock et al. 1979). Studies such as these provided the early foundation for the cross-taxon approach to contests that we have continued in this book.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Contests , pp. 335 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubin-Horth, N, Deschênes, M, Cloutier, S (2012) Natural variation in the molecular stress response is correlated to a behavioural syndrome. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baier, A, Britta, W & Brembs, B (2002) Drosophila as a new model organism for the neurobiology of aggression? Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1233–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Birkhead, TR & Monaghan, P (2010) Ingenious ideas – the history of behavioral ecology. In: Westneat, DF & Fox, CW (eds.) Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology, pp. 3–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birkhead, TR & Pizzari, T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews, 3, 262–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, JW & Vehrencamp, SL (2012) Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Branson, K, Robie, AA, Bender, J, et al. (2009) High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila. Nature Methods, 6, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briffa, M, de la, Haye K & Munday, PL (2012) High CO2 and marine animal behaviour: potential mechanisms and ecological consequences. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64, 1519–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candolin, U & Wong, BBM (eds.)(2012) Behavioural Responses to a Changing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH, Albon, RM & Guinness, FE (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.)Animal Behaviour, 27, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, DP, Madden, J, Franks, D, et al. (2011) Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 502–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dall, SRX, Houston, AI & McNamara, JM (2004) The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danchin, E, Giraldeau, L-A & Cézilly, F (eds.) (2008) Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Animal Behaviour, 26, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, NB, Krebs, JR & West, SA (2012) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 4th edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enquist, M & Leimar, O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 102, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goubault, M & Decuignière, M (2012) Prior experience and contest outcome: winner effects persist in absence of evident loser effects in a parasitoid wasp. American Naturalist, 180, 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskins, CP (1939) Of Ants and Men. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Huntingford, FA & Turner, A (1987) Animal Conflict. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, JGA, Nussey, DH, Wilson, AJ, et al. (2011) Measuring individual differences in field and experimental studies: a power analysis of random regression models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowles, SL & Ord, TJ (2012) Repetitive signals and mate choice: insights from contest theory. Animal Behaviour, 84, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowles, SL, Cotton, PA & Briffa, M (2010) Whole-organism performance capacity predicts resource holding potential in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus. Animal Behaviour, 80, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowles, SL, Cotton, PA & Briffa, M (2012) Consistent crustaceans: the identification of stable behavioural syndromes in hermit crabs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 1087–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, RG (2011) Aggression and welfare in a common aquarium fish, the Midas cichlid. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 14, 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, RJH (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour, 56, 651–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, RJH & Pagel, M (1997) Why do animals repeat displays? Animal Behaviour, 54, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prenter, J, Elwood, RW, Taylor, PW (2006) Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contests over precopula females in amphipods. Animal Behaviour, 72, 861–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, SF & Briffa, M (2011) The logical polyp: assessments and decisions during contests in the beadlet anemone Actinia equina. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1278–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, FS & Briffa, M (2012) Is boldness a resource holding potential trait? Fighting prowess and changes in startle response in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 279, 1904–1910.CrossRef
Sopinka, NM, Marentette, JR & Balshine, S (2010) Impact of contaminant exposure on resource contests in an invasive fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1947–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamps, JA, Briffa, M & Biro, PA (2012) Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intra-individual variability (IIV). Animal Behaviour, 83, 1325–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, WJ (1995) From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R (1984) Fighting and assessment in Harpobittacus scorpionflies (Insecta: Mecoptera). Evolution, 38, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbetts, EA & Dale, J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature, 432, 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbetts, EA & Lindsay, R (2008) Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biology Letters, 4, 237–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibbetts, EA, Mettler, A & Levy, S (2010) Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps. Biology Letters, 6, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westneat, DF & Fox, CW (2010) Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, AJ, Boer, M de, Arnott, G, et al. (2011) Integrating personality research and animal contest theory: aggressiveness in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri. PLoS ONE, 6, e28024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, M, Doorn, GS van, Leimar, O, et al. (2007) Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities. Nature, 447, 581–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, A (1975) Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×