Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T13:44:59.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Bird contests: from hatching to fertilisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Mark Briffa
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Get access

Summary

Summary

Work on birds has prompted some key theoretical developments in the field of animal contests. Birds have an unusually conservative morphology, which constrains the ability of many species to fight physically, but many birds have evolved adaptations to aid in conflict resolution. These include the display of bright colours, elaborate vocalisations and physiological mechanisms. Birds also have a relatively conservative life history (parental care is ubiquitous), which influences the nature and extent of contests: for most birds, competition begins at birth for access to food provided by their carers. Intense resource competition continues into their adult lives, especially as many birds are territorial and/or reside in social flocks of related and/or unrelated conspecifics. At breeding, competition for access to mates is particularly severe, with birds competing both overtly and more cryptically to gain fertilisation precedence. Here I consider the diversity of avian contests.

Introduction

Bird contests can be highly conspicuous. An example is the ferocious fighting that occurs between two unfamiliar (or staged) jungle fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) where males may fight to the death using sharp-pointed spurs as weapons (Mench 2009). Many avian contests are, however, less physical. Under more natural circumstances, for example within the jungle fowl's mixed-sex flock, disputes between flock members are unlikely to escalate to physical fighting (Ligon et al. 1990, Collias & Collias 1996). Agonistic encounters generally involve stereotyped behaviours, a range of complex vocalisations, and variation in conspicuously coloured morphological traits (e.g. Ligon et al. 1990, Cornwallis & Birkhead 2008). Nevertheless, the lack of physical contests does not necessarily indicate an absence of competition. Indeed, birds compete for the same things that cause and define competition in other taxa. However, there are a number of general avian morphological and life-history adaptations that are likely to have influenced the nature of competition in birds.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Contests , pp. 287 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alatalo, RV, Lundberg, A & Glynn, C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature, 323, 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Alvarez, C, Doutrelant, C & Sorci, G (2004) Ultraviolet reflectance affects male–male interactions in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus ultramarinus). Behavioral Ecology, 15, 805–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundsen, T & Pärn, H (2006) Female coloration: review of functional and nonfunctional hypotheses. In: Hill, GE & McGraw, KJ (eds.) Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution, pp. 280–348. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Apanius, V (1998) Stress and immune defense. In: AP Møller, M Milinski & PJB Slater (eds.) Stress and Behaviour. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 27, 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcese, P (1987) Age, intrusion pressure and defence against floaters by territorial male song sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 35, 773–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badyaev, AV, Whittingham, LA & Hill, GE (2001) The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the house finch. III. Developmental basis. Evolution, 55, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballentine, B, Searcy, WA & Nowicki, S (2008) Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 75, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamford, AJ, Monadjem, A & Hardy, ICW (2010) Associations of avian facial flushing and skin colouration with agonistic interaction outcomes. Ethology, 116, 1163–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, KL, Evans, CS & Taylor, A (2006) Measuring social structure: a comparison of eight dominance indices. Behavioural Processes, 73, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, G (1998) The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biological Reviews, 73, 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, G (2010) Relaxed predation risk reduces but does not eliminate sociality in birds. Biology Letters, 6, 472–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, MD, Campbell, SE, Stoddard, PK, et al. (1996) Repertoire matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 51, 917–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, MD, Campbell, SE, Burt, JM, et al. (2000) Song type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 59, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beletsky, LD & Orians, GH (1987) Territoriality among male red-winged blackbirds. II. Removal experiments and site dominance. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, TR (2010) Post-copulatory sexual selection and the zebra finch. Emu, 110, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bókony, V, Garamszegi, LZ, Hirschenhauser, K, et al. (2008) Testosterone and melanin-based black plumage coloration: a comparative study. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1229–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonabeau, E, Deneubourg, J-L & Theraulaz, G (1998) Within-brood competition and the optimal partitioning of parental investment. American Naturalist, 152, 419–427.Google ScholarPubMed
Bortolotti, GR, Wiebe, KL & Iko, WM (1991) Cannabilism of nestling American kestrels by parents and siblings. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 1447–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazill-Boast, J, van Rooij, E, Pryke, SR & Griffith, SC (2011) Interference from long-tailed finches constrains reproduction in the endangered Gouldian finch. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breitwisch, R (1989) Mortality patterns, sex ratios, and parental investment in monogamous birds. In: Power, DM (ed.) Current Ornithology, Vol. 6, pp. 1–49. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Briskie, JV, Naugler, CT & Leech, SM (1994) Begging intensity of nestling birds varies with sibling relatedness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 258, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, L, Barr, I, , Pol M, et al. (2010) MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3444–3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, DM & Newton, AV (1994) Metabolic costs of dominance in dippers Cinclus cinclus. Animal Behaviour, 48, 445–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, M, Worthy, TH, Ford, T, et al. (2003) Extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism in the extinct New Zealand moa Dinornis. Nature, 425, 172–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, JM, Campbell, SE & Beecher, MD (2001) Song type matching as threat: a test using interactive playback. Animal Behaviour, 62, 1163–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhim, S, Immler, S & Birkhead, TR (2007) Postcopulatory sexual selection decreases variation in sperm morphology. PLoS ONE, 2, e413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T (2007) Behavior and conservation: a bridge too far? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catchpole, CK & Slater, PJB (2008) Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collias, NE & Collias, EC (1990) Social organization of a high density population of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). In: Acta XX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 466–467.Google Scholar
Collias, NE & Collias, EC (1996) Social organization of a red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, population related to evolution theory. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1337–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collias, NE, Collias, EC & Jennrich, RI (1994) Dominant red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) hens in an unconfined flock rear the most young over their lifetime. Auk, 111, 863–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwallis, CK & Birkhead, TR (2006) Social status and availability of females determine patterns of sperm allocation in the fowl. Evolution, 60, 1486–1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwallis, CK & Birkhead, TR (2007) Changes in sperm quality and numbers in response to experimental manipulation of male social status and female attractiveness. American Naturalist, 170, 758–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwallis, CK & Birkhead, TR (2008) Plasticity in reproductive phenotypes reveals status-specific correlations between behavioral, morphological and physiological sexual traits. Evolution, 62, 1149–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crook, JH & Butterfield, PA (1970) Gender role in the social system of Quelea. In: Crook, JH (ed.) Social Behaviour in Birds and Mammals: Essays on the Social Ethology of Animals and Man, pp. 211–248. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, CE & Magrath, RD (2004) Shields of offence: signalling competitive ability in the dusky moorhen, Gallinula tenebrosa. Australian Journal of Zoology, 52, 463–474.CrossRef
Dale, S, Rinden, H & Slagsvold, T (1992) Competition for a male restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, S, Slagsvold, T, Lampe, HM, et al. (1999) Population divergence in sexual ornaments: the patch of Norwegian pied flycatchers is small and unsexy. Evolution, 53, 1235–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Double, MC & Cockburn, A (2003) Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 379–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drews, C (1993) The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour, 125, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, H & Osorno, JL (1992) Training siblings to be submissive losers: dominance between booby nestlings. Animal Behaviour, 44, 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, P, Afton, A, Gloutney, M, et al. (1999) Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross's and lesser snow geese. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, JB & Askenmo, CEH (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Animal Behaviour, 32, 508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, MR & Hatchwell, BJ (1992) An experimental study of male adornment in the scarlet-tufted malachite sunbird: I. The role of pectoral tufts in territorial defence. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 413–419.Google Scholar
Forkman, B & Haskell, MJ (2004) The maintenance of stable dominance hierarchies and the pattern of aggression: support for the suppression hypothesis. Ethology, 110, 737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froman, DP, Pizzari, T, Feltmann, AJ, et al. (2002) Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilising efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the fowl, Gallus g. domesticus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, D & Gahr, M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Voyer, A, Székely, T & Drummond, H (2007) Why do some siblings attack each other? Comparative analysis of aggression in avian broods. Evolution, 61, 1946–1955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goymann, W & Wingfield, JC (2004) Allostatic load, social status and stress hormones: the costs of social status matter. Animal Behaviour, 67, 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E, Lyon, BE, Muehter, VR, et al. (2000) Disruptive sexual selection for plumage coloration in a passerine bird. Nature, 407, 1000–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, SC & Pryke, SR (2006) Benefits to females of assessing color displays. In: Hill, GE & McGraw, KJ (eds.) Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, SC, Owens, IPF & Thuman, KA (2002) Extra-pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195–2212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasselquist, D & Sherman, PW (2001) Social mating systems and extrapair fertilisations in passerine birds. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegner, RE & Wingfield, JC (1987) Social status and circulating levels of hormones in flocks of house sparrows, Passer domesticus. Ethology, 76, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, GE & McGraw, KJ (2006) Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Höglund, J, Johansson, T & Pelabon, C (1997) Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 54, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogstad, O (1987) It is expensive to be dominant. Auk, 104, 333–336.Google Scholar
Hovi, M, Alatalo, RV & Siikamaki, P (1995) Black grouse leks on ice: female mate sampling by incitation of male competition? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, PL & Enquist, M (2001) Threat display in birds. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 931–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immler, S, Saint-Jalme, M, Lesobre, L, et al. (2007) The evolution of sperm morphometry in pheasants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1008–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, KA, Appleby, MC & Freeman, LC (1999) Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy based on probabilistic dominance. Animal Behaviour, 57, 991–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsen, TS, Zuk, M & Fessler, EA (2001) Social dominance, male behaviour and mating in mixed-sex flocks of red jungle fowl. Behaviour, 138, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, RA & Norris, K (1993) Badges of status and the cost of aggression. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jullien, M & Clobert, J (2000) The survival value of flocking in neotropical birds: reality or fiction? Ecology, 81, 3416–3430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinoski, R (1975) Intra- and interspecific aggression in house finches and house sparrows. Condor, 77, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, A & Hill, GE (2000) Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilner, R & Johnstone, RA (1997) Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivula, K, Orell, M & Rytkönen, S (1996) Winter survival and breeding success of dominant and subordinate Willow Tits Parus montanus. Ibis, 138, 624–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komdeur, J (1996) Breeding of the Seychelles magpie robin Copsychus sechellarum and implications for its conservation. Ibis, 138, 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komdeur, J (2001) Mate guarding in the Seychelles warbler is energetically costly and adjusted to paternity risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 2103–2111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs, JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit, Parus major: do residents always win?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, JR, Ashcroft, R & Webber, M (1978) Song repertoire and territory defence in the great tit. Nature, 271, 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, JR, Ashcroft, R & , Orsdol K (1981) Song matching in the great tit Parus major L. Animal Behaviour, 29, 918–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahti, K (1998) Social dominance and survival in flocking passerine birds: a review with an emphasis on the Willow Tit Parus montanus. Ornis Fennica, 75, 1–17.Google Scholar
Langmore, NE (2000) Why do female birds sing? In: Espmark, Y, Amundsen, T & Rosenquist, G (eds.) Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication, pp. 317–327. Trondheim: Tapir.Google Scholar
Lank, DB, Smith, CM, Hanotte, O, et al. (1995) Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature, 378, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, S (2000) Siblicide in the cooperatively breeding laughing kookaburra (Dacelo novaeguineae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, ML & Horn, AG (1995) Crowing in relation to social status in roosters. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1293–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligon, JD (1999) The Evolution of Avian Breeding Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ligon, JD & Ligon, SH (1989) Green woodhoopoes. In: Newton, I (ed.) Lifetime Reproduction in Birds, pp. 219–232. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ligon, JD, Thornhill, R, Zuk, M, et al. (1990) Male–male competition, ornamentation and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl. Animal Behaviour, 40, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, KM (2004) Social status in relation to Sindbis virus infection clearance in greenfinches. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, KM, Hasselquist, D & Wikelski, M (2005) House sparrows (Passer domesticus) adjust their social status position to their physiological costs. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, JE & Martin, TE (2003) Sibling competition and the evolution of prenatal development rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 735–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-Sepulcre, A, Norris, K & Kokko, H (2009) Reproductive conflict delays the recovery of an endangered social species. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magrath, RD (1992) The effect of egg size on growth and survival of blackbirds: a field experiment. Journal of Zoology, 227, 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P & Bateson, P (1993) Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J & Harper, DGC (1988) The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 319, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mench, JA (2009) Behaviour of fowl and other domesticated birds. In: Jensen, P (ed.) The Ethology of Domesticated Animals, pp. 121–136. Cambridge, MA: CABI.Google Scholar
Mock, DW & Parker, GA (1997) The Evolution of Sibling Rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mock, DW, Drummond, H & Stinson, CH (1990) Avian siblicide. American Scientist, 78, 438–449.Google Scholar
Møller, AP & Briskie, JV (1995) Extra-pair paternity, sperm competition and the evolution of testis size in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, RE (1972) The Palaearctic–African Bird Migration System. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mougeot, F (2003) Breeding density, cuckoldry risk and copulation behaviour during the fertile period in raptors: a comparative analysis. Animal Behaviour, 67, 1067–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muehter, VR, Greene, E & Ratcliffe, L (1997) Delayed plumage maturation in Lazuli Buntings: tests of the female mimicry and status signalling hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negro, JJ, Donazar, JA & Hiraldo, F (1992) Kleptoparasitism and cannibalism in a colony of lesser kestrels (Falco naumanni). Journal of Raptor Research, 26, 225–228.Google Scholar
Norris, K & McCulloch, N (2003) Demographic models and the management of endangered species: case study of the critically endangered Seychelles magpie robin. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 890–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorno, JL & Drummond, H (1995) The function of hatching asynchrony in the blue footed booby. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, IPF & Hartley, IR (1991) ‘Trojan sparrows’: evolutionary consequences of dishonest invasion for the badges-of-status model. American Naturalist, 138, 1187–1205.Google Scholar
Pärt, T & Qvarnström, A (1997) Badge size in collared flycatchers predicts outcome of male competition over territories. Animal Behaviour, 54, 893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, FW (1972) An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual displays in the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Animal Behaviour, 20, 112–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitcher, TE, Dunn, PO & Whittingham, LA (2005) Sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzari, T & Birkhead, TR (2000) Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature, 405, 787–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzari, T & Parker, GA (2009) Sperm competition and sperm phenotype. In: Birkhead, TR, Hosken, DJ & Pitnick, S (eds.) Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective, pp. 207–245. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzari, T, Løvlie, H & Cornwallis, CK (2004) Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 2115–2121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzari, T, Cornwallis, CK & Froman, DP (2007) Social competitiveness associated with rapid fluctuations in sperm quality in male fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 853–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poisbleau, M, Fritz, H, Guillon, N, et al. (2005) Linear social dominance hierarchy and corticosterone responses in male mallards and pintails. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 485–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, W (1992) Dominance and mating success in male boat-tailed grackles. Animal Behaviour, 44, 917–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poston, JP (1997) Dominance, access to colonies, and queues for mating opportunities by male boat-tailed grackles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S & Pruett-Jones, M (1994) Sexual competition and courtship disruptions: why do male bowerbirds destroy each other's bowers? Animal Behaviour, 47, 607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR (2007) Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR (2009) Is red an innate or learned signal of aggression and intimidation?. Animal Behaviour, 78, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR & Andersson, S (2003a) Carotenoid-based status signalling in red-shouldered widowbirds (Euplectes axillaris): epaulet size and redness affect captive and territorial competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 393–401.Google Scholar
Pryke, SR & Andersson, S (2003b) Carotenoid-based epaulettes reveal male competitive ability: experiments with resident and floater red-shouldered widowbirds. Animal Behaviour, 66, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR, Astheimer, LB, Buttemer, WA & Griffith, SC (2007) Frequency-dependent physiological tradeoffs between competing colour morphs. Biology Letters, 3, 494–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR, Astheimer, LB, Griffith, SC & Buttemer, WA (2012) Covariation in life-history traits: differential effects of diet on condition, hormones, behavior, and reproduction in genetic finch morphs. American Naturalist, 179, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryke, SR & Griffith, SC (2006) Red dominates black: agonistic signalling among head morphs in the colour polymorphic Gouldian finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 949–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryke, SR & Griffith, SC (2009) Socially mediated trade-offs between aggression and parental effort in competing color morphs. American Naturalist, 174, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryke, SR, Lawes, MJ & Andersson, S (2001) Agonistic carotenoid signalling in male red-collared widowbirds: aggression related to the colour signal of both the territory owner and model intruder. Animal Behaviour, 62, 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR, Andersson, S, Lawes, MJ, et al. (2002) Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and color. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 622–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryke, SR, Rollins, LA & Griffith, SC (2010) Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes. Science, 329, 964–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, DS, Komdeur, J & Burke, T (2002) Direct benefits and the evolution of female-biased cooperative breeding in Seychelles warblers. Evolution, 56, 2313–2321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricklefs, RE (1993) Sibling competition, hatching asynchrony, incubation period, and lifespan in altricial birds. Current Ornithology, 11, 199–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, SA (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution, 29, 593–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohwer, SA (1977) Status signaling in Harris Sparrows: some experiments in deception. Behaviour, 61, 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, SA (1982) The evolution of reliable and unreliable badges of fighting ability. American Zoologist, 22, 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royle, NJ, Hartley, IR, Owens, IPF, et al. (1999). Sibling competition and the evolution of growth rates in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 923–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røskaft, E & Rohwer, S (1987) An experimental study of the red epaulettes and black body colour of male red-winged blackbirds. Animal Behaviour, 35, 1070–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røskaft, E, Järvi, T, Bakken, M, et al. (1986) The relationship between social status and resting metabolic rate in great tits (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Animal Behaviour, 34, 838–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandell, MI (1998) Female aggression and the maintenance of monogamy: female behaviour predicts male mating status in European starlings. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 1307–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schjelderup-Ebbe, T (1922) Observation on the social psychology of domestic fowls. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie, 88, 225–252.Google Scholar
Schubert, KA, Mennill, DJ, Ramsay, SM, et al. (2008) Between-year survival and rank transitions in male black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus): a multistate modeling approach. Auk 125, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwabl, H, Mock, DW & Gieg, JA (1997) A hormonal mechanism for parental favouritism. Nature, 386, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, WA & Beecher, MD (2009) Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1281–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, WA & Nowicki, S (2000) Intra- and intersexual selection on bird song. In: Espmark, Y, Amundsen, T & Rosenquist, G (eds.) Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication, pp. 301–315. Trondheim: TapirAcademic Press.Google Scholar
Searcy, WA & Nowicki, S (2005) The Evolution of Animal Communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searcy, WA & Yasukawa, K (1995) Polygyny and Sexual Selection in Red-winged Blackbirds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, WA, Anderson, RC & Nowicki, S (2006) Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senar, JC (1990) Agonistic communication in social species: what is communicated? Behaviour, 112, 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senar, JC (2006) Bird coloration as an intrasexual signals of aggression and dominance. In: Hill, GE & McGraw, KJ (eds.) Bird Coloration: Function and Evolution, pp. 87–136. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Senar, JC, Camerino, M, Copete, JL, et al. (1993) Variation in black bib of the Eurasian siskin (Carduelis spinus) and its role as a reliable badge of dominance. Auk, 110, 924–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senar, JC, Polo, V, Uribe, F, et al. (2000) Status signalling, metabolic rate and body mass in the siskin: the cost of being a subordinate. Animal Behaviour, 59, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shutler, D & Weatherhead, PJ (1991) Owner and floater redwinged blackbirds: determinants of status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutler, D & Weatherhead, PJ (1992) Surplus territory contenders in male red-winged blackbirds: where are the desperados? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siefferman, L & Hill, GE (2005) UV-blue structural coloration and competition for nestboxes in male eastern bluebirds. Animal Behaviour, 69, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slagsvold, T, Amundsen, T, Dale, S, et al. (1992) Female–female aggression explains polyterriorality in male pied flycatchers. Animal Behaviour, 43, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, JJ & Avilés, JM (2010) Sibling competition and conspicuousness of nestling gapes in altricial birds: a comparative study. PLoS ONE, 5, e10509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soma, M, Hasegawa, T & Okanoya, K (2005) The evolution of song learning: a review from a biological perspective. Cognitive Studies, 12, 166–176.Google Scholar
Sridhar, H, Beauchamp, G & Shanker, K (2009) Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Animal Behaviour, 78, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamps, JA (1987) The effect of familiarity with a neighbourhood on territory acquisition. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamps, JA & Krishnan, VV (1997) Functions of fights in territory establishment. American Naturalist, 150, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starck, JM & Ricklefs, RE (1998) Patterns of development: the altricial-precocial spectrum. In: Starck, JM & Ricklefs, RE (eds.) Avian Growth and Development, pp. 59–88. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Studd, MV & Robertson, RJ (1985) Life span, competition, and delayed plumage maturation in male passerines: the breeding threshold hypothesis. American Naturalist, 126, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutchbury, BJ (1991) Floater behaviour and territory acquisition in male purple martins. Animal Behaviour, 42, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Számadó, SZ (2000) Cheating as mixed strategy in a simple model of aggressive communication. Animal Behaviour, 59, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Székely, T, Lislevand, T & Figuerola, J (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in birds. In: Blanckenhorn, W, Fairburn, DJ & Székely, T (eds.) Sex, Size and Gender Roles, pp. 27–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuman, KA & Griffith, SC (2005) Genetic similarity and the nonrandom distribution of paternity in a genetically highly polyandrous shorebird. Animal Behaviour, 69, 765–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, J (1997) Asymmetric territorial contests in the European robin: the role of settlement costs. Animal Behaviour, 54, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trail, PW (1985) Courtship disruption modifies mate choice in a lek-breeding bird. Science, 227, 778–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufto, J, Solberg, EJ & Ringsby, TH (1998) Statistical models of transitive and intransitive dominance structures. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1489–1498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuttle, EM (2003) Alternative reproductive strategies in the white-throated sparrow. Behavioral and genetic evidence. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderWerf, EA & Freed, LA (2003) Elepaio subadult plumages reduce aggression through graded status-signaling, not mimicry. Journal of Field Ornithology, 74, 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, H & Appleby, MC (2000) Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy: a comparison of the I&SI and the BBS methods. Animal Behaviour, 59, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westneat, DF (2006) No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. American Naturalist, 167, E171–E189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, DP (1987) Plumage variability, status signalling and individual recognition in avian flocks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittingham, LA & Dunn, PO (2005) Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widemo, F (1998) Alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff, Philomachus pugnax: a mixed ESS?Animal Behaviour, 56, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigby, S & Chapman, T (2004) Sperm competition. Current Biology, 14, R100–R103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, DR, Bayly, KL, Nelson, XJ, et al. (2008) Alarm calling best predicts mating and reproductive success in ornamented male fowl, Gallus gallus. Animal Behaviour, 76, 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J & Leonard, ML (2002) The Evolution of Nestling Begging: Competition, Cooperation and Communication. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasukawa, K (1981) Song and territory defense in the red-winged blackbird. Auk, 98, 185–187.Google Scholar
Yasukawa, K, Enstrom, DA, Parker, GA, et al. (2009) Epaulet color and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird: a field experiment. Condor, 111, 740–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasukawa, K, Enstrom, DA, Parker, PG, et al. (2010) Male red-winged blackbirds with experimentally dulled epaulets experience no disadvantage in sexual selection. Journal of Field Ornithology, 81, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuk, M & Johnsen, TS (2000) Social environment and immunity in the red jungle fowl. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuk, M, Johnsen, TS & Maclarty, T (1995) Endocrine–immune interactions, ornaments and mate choice in red jungle fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×