Abbott, D H, Saltzman, W, Schultz-Darken, N J & Tannenbaum, P L (1998) Adaptations to subordinate status in female marmoset monkeys. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol 119: 261–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abel, R L, Maclaine, J S, Cotton, R et al. (2010) Functional morphology of the nasal region of a hammerhead shark. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 155: 464–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ackerman, D (1990) A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Random House (Phoenix Pbk).Google Scholar

Adams, E S & Traniello, J F A (1981) Chemical interference competition by Monomorium minimum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Oecologia 51: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aeschlimann, P B, Haberli, M A, Reusch, T B H, Boehm, T & Milinski, M (2003) Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54: 119–26.Google Scholar

Aggio, J & Derby, C D (2011) Chemical communication in lobsters. In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 239–56. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Aggleton, J P & Waskett, L (1999) The ability of odours to serve as state-dependent cues for real-world memories: can Viking smells aid the recall of Viking experiences?Br J Psychol 90: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Akino, T (2008) Chemical strategies to deal with ants: a review of mimicry, camouflage, propaganda, and phytomimesis by ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and other arthopods. Myrmecol News 11: 173–81.Google Scholar

Akino, T, Yamamura, K, Wakamura, S & Yamaoka, R (2004) Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as nestmate recognition cues in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Appl Entomol Zool 39: 381–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al Abassi, S, Birkett, M A, Pettersson, J, Pickett, J A & Woodcock, C M (1998) Ladybird beetle odour identified and found to be responsible for attraction between adults. Cell Mol Life Sci 54: 876–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alaux, C & Robinson, G (2007) Alarm pheromone induces immediate–early gene expression and slow behavioral response in honey bees. J Chem Ecol 33: 1346–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alaux, C, Le Conte, Y, Adams, H A et al. (2009a) Regulation of brain gene expression in honey bees by brood pheromone. Genes Brain Behav 8: 309–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alaux, C, Sinha, S, Hasadsri, L et al. (2009b) Honey bee aggression supports a link between gene regulation and behavioral evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15400–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alaux, C, Maisonnasse, A & Le Conte, Y (2010) Pheromones in a superorganism: from gene to social regulation. In Gerald, L (ed.) Pheromones. pp. 401–23. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alberts, A C (1990) Chemical-properties of femoral gland secretions in the desert iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. J Chem Ecol 16: 13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alberts, A C (1992) Constraints on the design of chemical communication-systems in terrestrial vertebrates. Am Nat 139: 62–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albone, E S (1984) Mammalian Semiochemistry: the Investigation of Chemical Signals between Mammals. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Alcock, J (1982) Natural selection and communication in bark beetles. Fla Entomol 65: 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, J (2009) Animal Behaviour. An Evolutionary Approach, 9th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinuaer.Google Scholar

Aldred, N & Clare, A S (2008) The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Biofouling 24: 351–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aldrich, J R (1995) Chemical communication in the true bugs and parasitoid exploitation. In Cardé, R T & Bell, W J (eds.) Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. pp. 318–63. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, J R (1999) Predators. In Hardie, J & Minks, A K (eds.) Pheromones of Non-lepidopteran Insects associated with Agricultural Plants. pp. 357–81. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB International.Google Scholar

Aldrich, J R, Kochansky, J R & Abrams, C B (1984) Attractant for a beneficial insect and its parasitoids: pheromone of the predatory spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol 13: 1031–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, J R, Neal, J W, Oliver, J E & Lusby, W R (1991) Chemistry vis-a-vis maternalism in lace bugs (Heteroptera, Tingidae) – alarm pheromones and exudate defense in Corythucha and Gargaphia species. J Chem Ecol 17: 2307–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, R A, Elgar, M A & Capon, R J (1996) Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. Proc R Soc B 263: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, S A (2010) Chemical ecology of tick–host interactions. In Takken, W & Knols, B G J (eds.) Olfaction in Vector–Host Interactions. pp. 327. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Allee, W C (1931) Animal Aggregations: a Study in General Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, C E, Zwaan, B J & Brakefield, P M (2011) Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 56: 445–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allison, J D & Cardé, R T (eds.) (2014) Pheromone Communication in Moths: Evolution, Behavior and Application. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Alpizar, D, Fallas, M, Oehlschlager, A & Gonzalez, L (2012) Management of Cosmopolites sordidus and Metamasius hemipterus in banana by pheromone-based mass trapping. J Chem Ecol 38: 245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aluja, M, Leskey, T C & Vincent, C (eds.) (2009a) Biorational Tree Fruit Pest Management. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.CrossRef

Aluja, M, Diaz-Fleischer, F, Boller, E F et al. (2009b) Application of feces extracts and synthetic analogues of the host marking pheromone of Anastrepha ludens significantly reduces fruit infestation by A. obliqua in tropical plum and mango backyard orchards. J Econ Entomol 102: 2268–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alves, H, Rouault, JD, Kondoh, Y et al. (2010) Evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Behav Genet 40: 694–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amoore, J E (1977) Specific anosmia and the concept of primary odors. Chem Senses 2: 267–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, J, Borg-Karlson, A K & Wiklund, C (2003) Antiaphrodisiacs in pierid butterflies: a theme with variation!J Chem Ecol 29: 1489–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andersson, J, Borg-Karlson, A K & Wiklund, C (2004) Sexual conflict and anti-aphrodisiac titre in a polyandrous butterfly: male ejaculate tailoring and absence of female control. Proc R Soc B 271: 1765–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Andersson, M & Iwasa, Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andersson, M & Simmons, L W (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 296–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andrade, M C B & Roitberg, B D (1995) Rapid response to intraclonal selection in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Evol Ecol 9: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anon (2008) General guidelines for authors for submission of manuscripts that contain identifications and syntheses of compounds. J Chem Ecol 34: 984–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anon (2009) New SPME guidelines. J Chem Ecol 35: 1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anon (2010) General guidelines for authors for submission of manuscripts that contain molecular biological content. J Chem Ecol 36: 1288–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anton, S, Dufour, M C & Gadenne, C (2007) Plasticity of olfactory-guided behaviour and its neurobiological basis: lessons from moths and locusts. Entomol Exp Appl 123: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anton, S, Evengaard, K, Barrozo, R B, Anderson, P & Skals, N (2011) Brief predator sound exposure elicits behavioral and neuronal long-term sensitization in the olfactory system of an insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 3401–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aoki, S (1977) Colophina clematis (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), an aphid species with soldiers. Kontyu 45: 276–82.Google Scholar

Apanius, V, Penn, D, Slev, P R, Ruff, L R & Potts, W K (1997) The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit Rev Immunol 17: 179–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Appelt, C W & Sorensen, P W (2007) Female goldfish signal spawning readiness by altering when and where they release a urinary pheromone. Anim Behav 74: 1329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arak, A & Enquist, M (1993) Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil Trans R Soc B 340: 207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arakaki, N (1989) Alarm pheromone eliciting attack and escape responses in the sugar-cane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera, Pemphigidae). J Ethol 7: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arakaki, N (1990) Colony defense by first instar nymphs and dual function of alarm pheromone in the sugar cane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera. In Veeresh, G K, Mallik, B & Viraktamath, C A (eds.) Social Insects and the Environment. pp. 299–300. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arakaki, N, Wakamura, S & Yasuda, T (1996) Phoretic egg parasitoid, Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae), uses sex-pheromone of tussock moth Euproctis taiwana (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae) as a kairomone. J Chem Ecol 22: 1079–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arakaki, N, Wakamura, S, Yasuda, T & Yamagishi, K (1997) Two regional strains of a phoretic egg parasitoid, Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), that use different sex pheromones of two allopatric tussock moth species as kairomones. J Chem Ecol 23: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arakaki, N, Yamazawa, H & Wakamura, S (2011) The egg parasitoid Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) uses sex pheromone released by immobile female tussock moth Orgyia postica (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) as kairomone. Appl Entomol Zool 46: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arakawa, H, Cruz, S & Deak, T (2011) From models to mechanisms: odorant communication as a key determinant of social behavior in rodents during illness-associated states. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35: 1916–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arathi, H S, Shakarad, M & Gadagkar, R (1997) Factors affecting the acceptance of alien conspecifics on nests of the primitively eusocial wasp, Ropalidia marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 10: 343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcese, P (1999) Effect of auxiliary males on territory ownership in the oribi and the attributes of multimale groups. Anim Behav 57: 61–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Archie, E A & Theis, K R (2011) Animal behaviour meets microbial ecology. Anim Behav 82: 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arn, H (1990) Pheromones: prophesies, economics, and the ground swell. In Ridgeway, R L, Silverstein, R M & Inscoe, M N (eds.) Behavior-modifying Chemicals for Insect Management. pp. 717–22. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Arn, H & Louis, F (1997) Mating disruption in European vineyards. In Cardé, R T & Minks, A K (eds.) Pheromone Research: New Directions. pp. 377–82. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, A P (2009) The organizational–activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues. Horm Behav 55: 570–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnqvist, G (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Phil Trans R Soc B 361: 375–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnqvist, G & Rowe, L (2005) Sexual Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arvedlund, M, McCormick, M I, Fautin, D G & Bildsøe, M (1999) Host recognition and possible imprinting in the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188: 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atema, J (1986) Review of sexual selection and chemical communication in the lobster, Homarus americanus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 2283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atema, J (1995) Chemical signals in the marine environment: dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis. In Eisner, T & Meinwald, J (eds.) Chemical Ecology: the Chemistry of Biotic Interaction. pp. 147–59. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Atema, J (2012) Aquatic odour dispersal fields: opportunities and limits of detection, communication, and navigation. In Brönmark, C & Hansson, L-A (eds.) Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems. pp. 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Atema, J & Steinbach, M A (2007) Chemical communication and social behavior of the lobster Homarus americanus and other decapod Crustacea. In Duffy, J E & Thiel, M (eds.) Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms. pp. 115–44. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avila, F W, Sirot, L K, Laflamme, B A, Rubinstein, C D & Wolfner, M F (2011) Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Annu Rev Entomol 56: 21–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Axel, R (2005) Scents and sensibility: a molecular logic of olfactory perception (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 6111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagley, K R, Goodwin, T E, Rasmussen, L E L & Schulte, B A (2006) Male African elephants, Loxodonta africana, can distinguish oestrous status via urinary signals. Anim Behav 71: 1439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagnères, A-G & Lorenzi, M C (2010) Chemical deception/mimicry using cuticular hydrocarbons. In Blomquist, G J & Bagnères, A-G (eds.) Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology. pp. 282–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagøien, E & Kiørboe, T (2005) Blind dating – mate finding in planktonic copepods. I. Tracking the pheromone trail of Centropages typicus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300: 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, C F, Montgomery, J C & Dennis, T E (2002) The sensory basis of olfactory search behavior in banded kokopu (Galaxias fasciatus). J Comp Physiol A 188: 553–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, T C (2002) Mechanism for saltational shifts in pheromone communication systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13368–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baker, T C (2008) Balanced olfactory antagonism as a concept for understanding evolutionary shifts in moth sex pheromone blends. J Chem Ecol 34: 971–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baker, T C (2011) Insect pheromones: useful lessons for crustacean pheromone programs? In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 531–50. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Baker, T C, Cossé, A A & Todd, J L (1998) Behavioral antagonism in the moth Helicoverpa zea in response to pheromone blends of three sympatric heliothine moth species is explained by one type of antennal neuron. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855: 511–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bakker, J, Pierman, S & Gonzalez-Martinez, D (2010) Effects of aromatase mutation (ArKO) on the sexual differentiation of kisspeptin neuronal numbers and their activation by same versus opposite sex urinary pheromones. Horm Behav 57: 390–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barata, E N, Hubbard, P C, Almeida, O G, Miranda, A & Canário, A V M (2007) Male urine signals social rank in the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). BMC Biol 5: 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barata, E N, Serrano, R M, Miranda, A, et al. (2008a) Putative pheromones from the anal glands of male blennies attract females and enhance male reproductive success. Anim Behav 75: 379–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barata, E N, Fine, J M, Hubbard, P C et al. (2008b) A sterol-like odorant in the urine of Mozambique tilapia males likely signals social dominance to females. J Chem Ecol 34: 438–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barbero, F, Bonelli, S, Thomas, J A, Balletto, E & Schonrogge, K (2009) Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants. J Exp Biol 212: 4084–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bargmann, C I (2006a) Comparative chemosensation from receptors to ecology. Nature 444: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bargmann, C I (2006b) Chemosensation in C. elegans. In The C. elegans Research Community (ed.) WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology [Internet]. . Pasadena, CA: WormBook.Google Scholar

Barki, A, Jones, C & Karplus, I (2011) Chemical communication and aquaculture of decapod crustaceans: needs, problems, and possible solutions. In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 485–506. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Barrozo, R B, Jarriault, D, Simeone, X et al. (2010) Mating-induced transient inhibition of responses to sex pheromone in a male moth is not mediated by octopamine or serotonin. J Exp Biol 213: 1100–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barth, F G, Hrncir, M & Jarau, S (2008) Signals and cues in the recruitment behavior of stingless bees (Meliponini). J Comp Physiol A 194: 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlet, R J (2010) Volatile hydrocarbon pheromones from beetles. In Blomquist, G J & Bagnères, A-G (eds.) Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology. pp. 448–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashir, M & Hassanali, A (2010) Novel cross-stage solitarising effect of gregarious-phase adult desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria (Forskål)) pheromone on hoppers. J Insect Physiol 56: 640–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Basil, J A, Hanlon, R T, Sheikh, S I & Atema, J (2000) Three-dimensional odor tracking by Nautilus pompilius. J Exp Biol 203: 1409–14.Google ScholarPubMed

Bastir, M, Rosas, A, Gunz, P et al. (2011) Evolution of the base of the brain in highly encephalized human species. Nat Commun 2: 588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bateman, A & Logan, D W (2010) Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom. Nature 468: 765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bateson, P & Mameli, M (2007) The innate and the acquired: useful clusters or a residual distinction from folk biology?Dev Psychobiol 49: 818–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bathellier, B, Gschwend, O & Carleton, A (2010) Temporal coding in olfaction. In Menini, A (ed.) The Neurobiology of Olfaction. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press. Available online at .Google ScholarPubMed

Bauer, R T (2011) Chemical communication in decapod shrimps: the influence of mating and social systems on the relative importance of olfactory and contact pheromones. In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 277–96. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Baum, M J (2012) Contribution of pheromones processed by the main olfactory system to mate recognition in female mammals. Front Neuroanat 6: 20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baum, M J & Kelliher, K R (2009) Complementary roles of the main and accessory olfactory systems in mammalian mate recognition. Annu Rev Physiol 71: 141–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baxi, K N, Dorries, K M & Eisthen, H L (2006) Is the vomeronasal system really specialized for detecting pheromones?Trends Neurosci 29: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beale, M H, Birkett, M A, Bruce, T J A et al. (2006) Aphid alarm pheromone produced by transgenic plants affects aphid and parasitoid behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 10509–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchamp, G K, Doty, R L, Moulton, D G & Mugford, R A (1976) The pheromone concept in mammalian chemical communication: a critique. In Doty, R L (ed.) Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes, and Behavior. pp. 143–60. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, S D & Hurst, J L (2009) Female behaviour plays a critical role in controlling murine pregnancy block. Proc R Soc B 276: 1723–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckers, R, Deneubourg, J L & Goss, S (1993) Modulation of trail laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J Insect Behav 6: 751–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedell, V M, Westcot, S E & Ekker, S C (2011) Lessons from morpholino-based screening in zebrafish. Brief Funct Genomics 10: 181–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beggs, K T & Mercer, A R (2009) Dopamine receptor activation by honey bee queen pheromone. Curr Biol 19: 1206–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Belanger, R M & Moore, P A (2006) The use of the major chelae by reproductive male crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) for discrimination of female odours. Behaviour 143: 713–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, W J (1991) Searching Behaviour. The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Bell, W J, Roth, L M & Nalepa, C A (2007) Cockroaches: Ecology, Behavior, and Natural History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bellés, X (2010) Beyond Drosophila: RNAi in vivo and functional genomics in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 55: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Shahar, Y, Dudek, N L & Robinson, G E (2004) Phenotypic deconstruction reveals involvement of manganese transporter malvolio in honey bee division of labor. J Exp Biol 207: 3281–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Shaul, Y, Katz, L C, Mooney, R & Dulac, C (2010) In vivo vomeronasal stimulation reveals sensory encoding of conspecific and allospecific cues by the mouse accessory olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 5172–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bendesky, A & Bargmann, C I (2011) Genetic contributions to behavioural diversity at the gene–environment interface. Nat Rev Genet 12: 809–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bengtsson, B O & Löfstedt, C (2007) Direct indirect selection in moth pheromone evolution: population genetical simulations of asymmetric sexual interactions. Biol J Linn Soc 90: 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, J B, Phillips, S A, Croxall, T J et al. (2009) Addition of alarm pheromone components improves the effectiveness of desiccant dusts against Cimex lectularius. J Med Entomol 46: 572–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benton, R (2011) Decision making: singin’ in the brain. Neuron 69: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, R, Vannice, K S, Gomez-Diaz, C & Vosshall, L B (2009) Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila. Cell 136: 149–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bentz, B J, Régnière, J, Fettig, C J et al. (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60: 602–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berec, L, Angulo, E & Courchamp, F (2007) Multiple Allee effects and population management. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 185–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berg, H C (2004) E. coli in Motion. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergstrom, C T & Lachmann, M (1998) Signaling among relatives. III. Talk is cheap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bergstrom, C T, Számadó, S & Lachmann, M (2002) Separating equilibria in continuous signalling games. Phil Trans R Soc B 357: 1595–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bertness, M D, Leonard, G H, Levine, J M & Bruno, J F (1999) Climate-driven interactions among rocky intertidal organisms caught between a rock and a hot place. Oecologia 120: 446–50.Google Scholar

Beydoun, H & Saftlas, A (2005) Association of human leucocyte antigen sharing with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Tissue Antigens 65: 123–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bhatnagar, K & Smith, T (2010) The human vomeronasal organ. Part VI: A nonchemosensory vestige in the context of major variations of the mammalian vomeronasal organ. Curr Neurobiol 1: 1–9.Google Scholar

Billen, J (2006) Signal variety and communication in social insects. Proc Neth Entomol Soc Meet 17: 9–25 available at .Google Scholar

Billen, J & Morgan, E D (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: sources and secretions. In Vander Meer, R K, Breed, M D, Espelie, K E & Winston, M L (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects: Ants, Wasps, Bees, and Termites. pp. 3–33. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Billeter, J C, Rideout, E J, Dornan, A J & Goodwin, S F (2006) Control of male sexual behavior in Drosophila by the sex determination pathway. Curr Biol 16: R766–R776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billeter, J C, Atallah, J, Krupp, J J, Millar, J G & Levine, J D (2009) Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 461: 987–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Birch, M C, Poppy, G M & Baker, T C (1990) Scents and eversible scent structures of male moths. Annu Rev Entomol 35: 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisulco, S & Slotnick, B (2003) Olfactory discrimination of short chain fatty acids in rats with large bilateral lesions of the olfactory bulbs. Chem Senses 28: 361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Black, S & Biron, C (1982) Androstenol as a human pheromone: no effect on perceived physical attractiveness. Behav Neural Biol 34: 326–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blomquist, G J (2010) Structure and analysis of insect hydrocarbons. In Blomquist, G J & Bagnères, A-G (eds.) Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology. pp. 19–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blomquist, G J & Bagnéres, A G (eds.) (2010) Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Blomquist, G J, Teran, R F, Aw, M et al. (2010) Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 699–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blum, M S (1974) Pheromonal bases of social manifestations in insects. In Birch, M C (ed.) Pheromones. pp. 190–99. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Blum, M S (1982) Pheromonal bases of insect sociality: communications, conundrums and caveats. Colloques de l’INRA 7: 149–62.Google Scholar

Blum, M S (1985) Alarm pheromones. In Kerkut, GA & Gilbert, LI (eds.) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. pp. 193–224. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Blum, M S (1996) Semiochemical parsimony in the arthropoda. Annu Rev Entomol 41: 353–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boake, C R B (1991) Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 225–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boehm, U, Zou, Z H & Buck, L B (2005) Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction. Cell 123: 683–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolnick, D I & Fitzpatrick, B M (2007) Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38: 459–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonabeau, E, Theraulaz, G, Deneubourg, J L, Aron, S & Camazine, S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 188–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonabeau, E, Theraulaz, G, Deneubourg, JL et al. (1998) A model for the emergence of pillars, walls and royal chambers in termite nests. Phil Trans R Soc B 353: 1561–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonadonna, F & Sanz-Aguilar, A (2012) Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in wild birds: the first evidence for individual kin-related odour recognition. Anim Behav 84: 509–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, A L (2011) Why ornithologists should embrace and contribute to Wikipedia. Ibis 153: 640–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonthuis, P J, Cox, K H, Searcy, B T et al. (2010) Of mice and rats: key species variations in the sexual differentiation of brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 31: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boone, C K, Six, D L & Raffa, K F (2008) The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy: competitors add to predator load of a tree-killing bark beetle. Agric For Entomol 10: 411–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, D W & Signoret, J P (1992) Olfaction and reproduction in ungulates. In Milligan, S R (ed.) Oxford Reviews of Reproduction. pp. 263–301. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boppré, M (1990) Lepidoptera and pyrrolizidine alkaloids – exemplification of complexity in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 16: 165–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bordereau, C & Pasteels, J M (2011) Pheromones and chemical ecology of dispersal and foraging in termites. In Bignell, D E, Roisin, Y & Lo, N (eds.) Biology of Termites: a Modern Synthesis, 2nd edn. pp. 279–320. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Bos, D H, Williams, R N, Gopurenko, D, Bulut, Z & Dewoody, J A (2009) Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders. Mol Ecol 18: 3307–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bos, N & d’Ettorre, P (2012) Recognition of social identity in ants. Front Psychol 3: 83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bossert, W H & Wilson, E O (1963) The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J Theor Biol 5: 443–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bourke, A F G (2011a) The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory. Proc R Soc B 278: 3313–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bourke, A F G (2011b) Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bousquet, F, Nojima, T, Houot, B et al. (2012) Expression of a desaturase gene, desat1, in neural and nonneural tissues separately affects perception and emission of sex pheromones in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 249–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boydston, E E, Morelli, T L & Holekamp, K E (2001) Sex differences in territorial behavior exhibited by the spotted hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107: 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradbury, J W & Vehrencamp, S L (2011) Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, J W S, Baker, R & Howse, P E (1975) Multicomponent alarm pheromones of the weaver ant. Nature 258: 230–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bradshaw, J W S, Baker, R & Howse, P E (1979) Multicomponent alarm pheromones in the mandibular glands of the African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda. Physiol Entomol 4: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandstaetter, A S & Kleineidam, C J (2011) Distributed representation of social odors indicates parallel processing in the antennal lobe of ants. J Neurophysiol 106: 2437–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brandstaetter, A S, Endler, A & Kleineidam, C J (2008) Nestmate recognition in ants is possible without tactile interaction. Naturwissenschaften 95: 601–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brandstaetter, A S, Rossler, W & Kleineidam, C J (2011) Friends and foes from an ant brain’s point of view – neuronal correlates of colony odors in a social insect. PLoS ONE 6: e21383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brashares, J S & Arcese, P (1999a) Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: I. The maintenance of borders between male oribi. Anim Behav 57: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brashares, J S & Arcese, P (1999b) Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces. Anim Behav 57: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brechbühl, J, Klaey, M & Broillet, M-C (2008) Grueneberg ganglion cells mediate alarm pheromone detection in mice. Science 321: 1092–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brechbühl, J, Luyet, G, Moine, F, Rodriguez, I & Broillet, M-C (2011) Imaging pheromone sensing in a mouse vomeronasal acute tissue slice preparation. J Vis Exp e3311.Google Scholar

Breed, M D (1998a) Chemical cues in kin recognition: criteria for identification, experimental approaches, and the honey bee as an example. In Vander Meer, R K, Breed, M D, Espelie, K E & Winston, M L (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects: Ants, Wasps, Bees, and Termites. pp. 57–78. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Breed, M D (1998b) Recognition pheromones of the honey bee. Bioscience 48: 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, M D & Buchwald, R (2009) Cue diversity and social recognition. In Gadau, J & Fewell, J H (eds.) Organization of Insect Societies: From Genome to Sociocomplexity. pp. 173–94. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Breed, M D, Stiller, T M & Moor, M J (1988) The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Behav Genet 18: 439–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breed, M D, Garry, M F, Pearce, A N et al. (1995) The role of wax comb in honey-bee nestmate recognition. Anim Behav 50: 489–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, M D, Perry, S & Bjostad, L B (2004a) Testing the blank slate hypothesis: why honey bee colonies accept young bees. Insectes Soc 51: 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, M D, Guzmán-Novoa, E & Hunt, G J (2004b) Defensive behavior of honey bees: organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annu Rev Entomol 49: 271–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breed, M D, Cook, C & Krasnec, M O (2012) Cleptobiosis in social insects. Psyche 2012 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) (2011) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Breithaupt, T & Hardege, J (2012) Pheromones mediating sex and dominance in aquatic animals. In Brönmark, C & Hansson, L-A (eds.) Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems. pp. 39–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremner, E A, Mainland, J D, Khan, R M & Sobel, N (2003) The prevalence of androstenone anosmia. Chem Senses 28: 423–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennan, P A (2009) Outstanding issues surrounding vomeronasal mechanisms of pregnancy block and individual recognition in mice. Behav Brain Res 200: 287–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennan, P A (2010) Pheromones and mammalian behavior. In Menini, A (ed.) The Neurobiology of Olfaction. pp. 157. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Available online at .Google ScholarPubMed

Brennan, P A & Kendrick, K M (2006) Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Phil Trans R Soc B 361: 2061–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennan, P A & Zufall, F (2006) Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature 444: 308–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenner, S (2002) Life sentences: Detective Rummage investigates. Genome Biol 3: 1–1013.Google Scholar

Bretman, A, Westmancoat, J D, Gage, M J G & Chapman, T (2011) Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals. Curr Biol 21: 617–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brisbin, I L & Austad, S N (1991) Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction. Anim Behav 42: 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisbin, I L, Austad, S N & Jacobson, S K (2000) Canine detectives: the nose knows – or does it?Science 290: 1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brodmann, J, Twele, R, Francke, W et al. (2009) Orchid mimics honey bee alarm pheromone in order to attract hornets for pollination. Curr Biol 19: 1368–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brönmark, C & Hansson, L-A (eds.) (2012) Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Brown, G E & Smith, R J F (1998) Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): conditioning hatchery-reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 611–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, G E, Chivers, D P & Smith, R J F (1997) Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat. Environ Biol Fishes 49: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, R E, Roser, B & Singh, P B (1989) Class I and class II regions of the major histocompatibility complex both contribute to individual odors in congenic inbred strains of rats. Behav Genet 19: 659–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruschini, C, Cervo, R & Turillazzi, S (2010) Pheromones in social wasps. In Gerald, L (ed.) Pheromones. pp. 447–92. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Buck, L B (2005) Unraveling the sense of smell (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed 44: 6128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck, L B & Axel, R (1991) A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors – a molecular-basis for odor recognition. Cell 65: 175–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buckley, S H, Tregenza, T & Butlin, R K (2003) Transitions in cuticular composition across a hybrid zone: historical accident or environmental adaptation?Biol J Linn Soc 78: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Būda, V, Mozūraitis, R, Kutra, J & Borg-Karlson, A-K (2012) p-Cresol: a sex pheromone component identified from the estrous urine of mares. J Chem Ecol 38: 811–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buesching, C D, Stopka, P & Macdonald, D W (2003) The social function of allo-marking in the European badger (Meles meles). Behaviour 140: 965–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgener, N, Dehnhard, M, Hofer, H & East, M L (2009) Does anal gland scent signal identity in the spotted hyaena?Anim Behav 77: 707–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burghardt, G M, Bartmess-LeVasseur, J N, Browning, S A et al. (2012) Perspectives – Minimizing observer bias in behavioral studies: a review and recommendations. Ethology 118: 511–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, R D (1984) Pheromonal control of metamorphosis in the Pacific sand dollar, Dendraster excentricus. Science 225: 442–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burkholder, W E (1982) Reproductive biology and communication among grain storage and warehouse beetles. J Ga Entomol Soc 17 (II. suppl.): 1–10.Google Scholar

Burton, J L & Franks, N R (1985) The foraging ecology of the army ant Eciton rapax – an ergonomic enigma. Ecol Entomol 10: 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buschinger, A (2009) Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12: 219–35.Google Scholar

Butenandt, A, Beckmann, R, Stamm, D & Hecker, E (1959) Uber den sexual-lockstoff des seidenspinners Bombyx mori – reindarstellung und konstitution. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Part B-Chemie Biochemie Biophysik Biologie Und Verwandten Gebiete 14: 283–4.Google Scholar

Butler, C (1623) The Feminine Monarchie, Or the Historie of Bees, 2nd edn. Haviland, John. Available Google Books .

Butlin, R K & Ritchie, M G (1989) Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems – what is the evidence. Biol J Linn Soc 37: 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butlin, R K & Trickett, A J (1997) Can population genetic simulations help to interpret pheromone evolution? In Cardé, R T & Minks, A K (eds.) Pheromone Research: New Directions pp. 548–62. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byers, J A (1992) Optimal fractionation and bioassay plans for isolation of synergistic chemicals: the subtractive-combination method. J Chem Ecol 18: 1603–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Byers, J A (2005) A cost of alarm pheromone production in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii. Naturwissenschaften 92: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Byers, J A & Zhang, Q (2011) Chemical ecology of bark beetles in regard to search and selection of host trees. In Liu, T & Kang, L (eds.) Recent Advances in Entomological Research: from Molecular Biology to Pest Management. pp. 150–90. Beijing and Berlin: Higher Education Press and Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calenbuhr, V & Deneubourg, J L (1992) A model for osmotropotactic orientation. 1. J Theor Biol 158: 359–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calenbuhr, V, Chretien, L, Deneubourg, J L & Detrain, C (1992) A model for osmotropotactic orientation. 2. J Theor Biol 158: 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camazine, S, Deneubourg, J-L, Franks, N R et al. (2001) Self-organization in Biological Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cammaerts, M C & Cammaerts, R (1980) Food recruitment strategies of the ant Myrmica sabuleti and Myrmica ruginodis. Behav Processes 5: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campagna, S, Mardon, J, Celerier, A & Bonadonna, F (2012) Potential semiochemical molecules from birds: a practical and comprehensive compilation of the last 20 years studies. Chem Senses 37: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell-Palmer, R & Rosell, F (2010) Conservation of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber: an olfactory perspective. Mammal Rev 40: 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardé, R T & Baker, T C (1984) Sexual communication with pheromones. In Bell, W J & Cardé, R T (eds.) Chemical Ecology of Insects. pp. 355–86. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardé, R T & Haynes, K F (2004) Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths. In: Cardé, R & Millar, J G (eds.) Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. pp. 283–332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardé, R T & Mafra-Neto, A (1997) Mechanisms of flight of male moths to pheromone. In Cardé, R T & Minks, A K (eds.) Pheromone Research: New Directions. pp. 275–90. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardé, R T & Minks, A K (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption – successes and constraints. Annu Rev Entomol 40: 559–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardé, R T & Willis, M A (2008) Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor. J Chem Ecol 34: 854–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cardé, R T, Cardé, A M & Girling, R D (2012) Observations on the flight paths of the day flying moth Virbia lamae during periods of mate location: do males have a strategy for contacting the pheromone plume?J Anim Ecol 81: 268–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cardwell, J R, Stacey, N E, Tan, E S P, McAdam, D S O & Lang, S L C (1995) Androgen increases olfactory receptor response to a vertebrate sex pheromone. J Comp Physiol A 176: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, A F & Carlson, J R (2011) Insect olfaction from model systems to disease control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 12987–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carlin, N F & Hölldobler, B (1987) The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp). 2. Larger colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20: 209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caro, S P & Balthazart, J (2010) Pheromones in birds: myth or reality?J Comp Physiol A 196: 751–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carroll, J F, Mills, G D & Schmidtmann, E T (1996) Field and laboratory responses of adult Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) to kairomones produced by white-tailed deer. J Med Entomol 33: 640–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, C, Birkett, M A, Logan, J G et al. (2010) Novel use of stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) as a tool for isolation of oviposition site attractants for gravid Culex quinquefasciatus. Bull Entomol Res 100: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carter, C S & Getz, L L (1993) Monogamy and the prairie vole. Sci Am 268: 100–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carter, C S & Roberts, R L (1997) The psychobiological basis of cooperative breeding in rodents. In Solomon, N G (ed.) Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. pp. 231–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caspers, B A, Schroeder, F C, Franke, S, Streich, W J & Voigt, C C (2009) Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 741–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamero, P, Marton, T F, Logan, D W et al. (2007) Identification of protein pheromones that promote aggressive behaviour. Nature 450: 899–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chamero, P, Leinders-Zufall, T & Zufall, F (2012) From genes to social communication: molecular sensing by the vomeronasal organ. Trends Neurosci 35: 597–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandler, D, Bailey, A S, Tatchell, G M et al. (2011) The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Phil Trans R Soc B 366: 1987–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chapman, R F (1998) The Insects. Structure and Function, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, T (2008) The soup in my fly: evolution, form and function of seminal fluid proteins. PLoS Biol 6: e179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, D & Willis, J H (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10: 783–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charra, R, Datiche, F, Casthano, A et al. (2012) Brain processing of the mammary pheromone in newborn rabbits. Behav Brain Res 226: 179–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chemineau, P (2011) A foresight reflection on sustainable methods for controlling mammalian farm animal reproduction. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst [Online], 15. Available: [Accessed 6 June 2013].

Chen, Z-F, Matsumura, K, Wang, H et al. (2011) Toward an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of barnacle larval settlement: a comparative transcriptomic approach. PLoS ONE 6: e22913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chivers, D P, Brown, G E & Ferrari, M C O (2012) The evolution of alarm substances and disturbance cues in aquatic animals. In Brönmark, C & Hansson, L-A (eds) Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems. pp. 127–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choe, A, von Reuss, SH, Kogan, D et al. (2012) Ascaroside signaling is widely conserved among nematodes. Curr Biol 22: 772–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Choleris, E, Clipperton-Allen, A E, Phan, A & Kavaliers, M (2009) Neuroendocrinology of social information processing in rats and mice. Front Neuroendocrinol 30: 442–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Choleris, E, Pfaff, D WKavaliers, M (eds.) (2013) Oxytocin, Vasopressin and Related Peptides in the Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Christensen, T A (2005) Making scents out of spatial and temporal codes in specialist and generalist olfactory networks. Chem Senses 30: i283–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christensen, T A & Hildebrand, J G (2002) Pheromonal and host-odor processing in the insect antennal lobe: how different?Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 393–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Christy, J H (2011) Timing of hatching and release of larvae by brachyuran crabs: patterns, adaptive significance and control. Integr Comp Biol 51: 62–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chung-Davidson, Y-W, Huertas, M & Li, W (2011) A review of research in fish pheromones. In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 467–82. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Clare, A S (2011) Toward a characterization of the chemical cue to barnacle gregariousness. In Breithaupt, T & Thiel, M (eds.) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. pp. 431–50. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Clark, C J (2012) The role of power versus energy in courtship: what is the ‘energetic cost’ of a courtship display?Anim Behav 84: 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, J & Edexcel, (2009) Edexcel International GCSE Chemistry. Harlow: Pearson Education. Supported by the website .Google Scholar

Clarke, I J (2011) Control of GnRH secretion: one step back. Front Neuroendocrinol 32: 367–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Classen, C, Honer, D & Synott, A (1994) Aroma. The Cultural History of Smell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clavijo McCormick, A, Unsicker, S B & Gershenzon, J (2012) The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci 17: 303–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clegg, J M & Barlow, C A (1982) Escape behavior of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) in response to alarm pheromone and vibration. Can J Zool 60: 2245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clément, J L & Bagnères, A G (1998) Nestmate recognition in termites. In Vander Meer, R K, Breed, M D, Espelie, K E & Winston, M L (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, pp. 126–55. Boulder, CD: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Cleveland, A, Verde, E A & Lee, R W (2011) Nutritional exchange in a tropical tripartite symbiosis: direct evidence for the transfer of nutrients from anemonefish to host anemone and zooxanthellae. Mar Biol 158: 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifford, K T, Gross, L, Johnson, K et al. (2003) Slime-trail tracking in the predatory snail, Euglandina rosea. Behav Neurosci 117: 1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clutton-Brock, T (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clutton-Brock, T (2009) Structure and function in mammalian societies. Phil Trans R Soc B 364: 3229–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clutton-Brock, T & McAuliffe, K (2009) Female mate choice in mammals. Q Rev Biol 84: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clyne, J D & Miesenböck, G (2009) Postcoital finesse. Neuron 61: 491–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clyne, P J, Warr, C G, Freeman, M R et al. (1999) A novel family of divergent seven-transmembrane proteins: candidate odorant receptors in Drosophila. Neuron 22: 327–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cohen, L, Rothschild, G & Mizrahi, A (2011) Multisensory integration of natural odors and sounds in the auditory cortex. Neuron 72: 357–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Colazza, S, Peri, E, Salerno, G & Conti, E (2010) Host searching by egg parasitoids: exploitation of host chemical cues. In Consoli, F L, Parra, J R P & Zucchi, R A (eds.) Egg Parasitoids in Agroecosystems with Emphasis on Trichogramma. pp. 97–147. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Colledge, W H (2009) Kisspeptins and GnRH neuronal signalling. Trends Endocrinol Metab 20: 115–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Conner, W E (ed.) (2009) Tiger Moths and Woolly Bears: Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution of the Arctiidae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Conner, W E & Best, B A (1988) Biomechanics of the release of sex pheromone in moths: effects of body posture on local airflow. Physiol Entomol 13: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, W E & Weller, S J (2004) A quest for alkaloids: the curious relationship between tiger moths and plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids. In Cardé, R & Millar, J G (eds.) Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. pp. 248–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, W E, Eisner, T, Vander Meer, R K, Guerrero, A & Meinwald, J (1980) Sex attractant of an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): a pulsed chemical signal. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, T, Paxton, R J, Barth, F G, Francke, W & Ayasse, M (2010) Female choice in the red mason bee, Osmia rufa (L.) (Megachilidae). J Exp Biol 213: 4065–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Consuegra, S & Garcia de Leaniz, C (2008) MHC-mediated mate choice increases parasite resistance in salmon. Proc R Soc B 275: 1397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, S M, Khan, Z R & Pickett, J A (2007) The use of push–pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 52: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Corbin, A (1996) The Foul and the Fragrant: Odour and the Social Imagination. London: Papermac.Google Scholar

Cornwallis, C K & Uller, T (2010) Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 145–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costa-Leonardo, A M & Haifig, I (2010) Pheromones and exocrine glands in Isoptera. In Gerald, L (ed.) Pheromones. pp. 521–49. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costello, E K, Lauber, C L, Hamady, M et al. (2009) Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326: 1694–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Courchamp, F, Berec, L & Gascoigne, J (2008) Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coureaud, G, Langlois, D, Sicard, G & Schaal, B (2004) Newborn rabbit responsiveness to the mammary pheromone is concentration-dependent. Chem Senses 29: 341–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coureaud, G, Charra, R, Datiche, F et al. (2010) A pheromone to behave, a pheromone to learn: the rabbit mammary pheromone. J Comp Physiol A 196: 779–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Couvillon, M J, Caple, J P, Endsor, S L et al. (2007) Nest-mate recognition template of guard honeybees (Apis mellifera) is modified by wax comb transfer. Biol Lett 3: 228–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cox, J P L (2008) Hydrodynamic aspects of fish olfaction. J R Soc Interface 5: 575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coyne, J A & Elwyn, S (2006) Does the desaturase-2 locus in Drosophila melanogaster cause adaptation and sexual isolation?Evolution 60: 279–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coyne, J A & Orr, H A (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Craven, B A, Paterson, E G & Settles, G S (2010) The fluid dynamics of canine olfaction: unique nasal airflow patterns as an explanation of macrosmia. J R Soc Interface 7: 933–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cremer, S, d’Ettorre, P, Drijfhout, F P et al. (2008) Imperfect chemical female mimicry in males of the ant Cardiocondyla obscurior. Naturwissenschaften 95: 1101–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crespi, B J (2005) Social sophistry: logos and mythos in the forms of cooperation. Ann Zool Fenn 42: 569–71.Google Scholar

Crimaldi, J P (2012) The role of structured stirring and mixing on gamete dispersal and aggregation in broadcast spawning. J Exp Biol 215: 1031–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crossland, M R, Haramura, T, Salim, A A, Capon, R J & Shine, R (2012) Exploiting intraspecific competitive mechanisms to control invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina). Proc R Soc B 279: 3436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, J & Bradshaw, T (2010) Chemistry for the Biosciences: the Essential Concepts, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crozier, R H (1986) Genetic clonal recognition abilities in marine invertebrates must be maintained by selection for something else. Evolution 40: 1100–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crozier, R H (1987) Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. In Fletcher, D J C & Michener, C D (eds.) Kin Recognition in Animals. pp. 55–73. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Crozier, R H, Newey, P S, Schluns, E A & Robson, S K A (2010) A masterpiece of evolution – Oecophylla weaver ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 13: 57–71.Google Scholar

Cummins, S F & Bowie, J H (2012) Pheromones, attractants and other chemical cues of aquatic organisms and amphibians. Nat Prod Rep 29: 642–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cummins, S F & Degnan, B M (2010) Sensory sea slugs: towards decoding the molecular toolkit required for a mollusc to smell. Commun Integr Biol 3: 423–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cummins, S F, Xie, F, de Vries, M R et al. (2007) Aplysia temptin – the ‘glue’ in the water-borne attractin pheromone complex. FEBS J 274: 5425–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cummins, S F, Boal, J G, Buresch, K C et al. (2011) Extreme aggression in male squid induced by a beta-MSP-like pheromone. Curr Biol 21: 322–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Czaczkes, T J & Ratnieks, F L W (2012) Pheromone trails in the Brazilian ant Pheidole oxyops: extreme properties and dual recruitment action. Behav Ecol Sociobiol: 1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czaczkes, T J, Grüter, C, Jones, S M & Ratnieks, F L W (2012) Uncovering the complexity of ant foraging trails. Commun Integr Biol 5: 78–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

d’Ettorre, P & Heinze, J (2005) Individual recognition in ant queens. Curr Biol 15: 2170–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

d’Ettorre, P & Lenoir, A (2010) Nestmate recognition in ants. In Lach, L, Parr, C L & Abbott, K L (eds.) Ant Ecology. pp. 194–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

d’Ettorre, P & Moore, A J (2008) Chemical communication and the coordination of social interactions in insects. In d’Ettorre, P & Hughes, D P (eds.) Sociobiology of Communication: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. pp. 81–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahanukar, A & Ray, A (2011) Courtship, aggression and avoidance: pheromones, receptors and neurons for social behaviors in Drosophila. Fly 5: 58–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dalton, P, Doolittle, N & Breslin, P A S (2002) Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat Neurosci 5: 199–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dani, F R (2006) Cuticular lipids as semiochemicals in paper wasps and other social insects. Ann Zool Fenn 43: 500–14.Google Scholar

Dani, F R, Jones, G R, Corsi, S et al. (2005) Nestmate recognition cues in the honey bee: differential importance of cuticular alkanes and alkenes. Chem Senses 30: 477–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dani, F R, Michelucci, E, Francese, S et al. (2011) Odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in pheromone detection and release in the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Chem Senses 36: 335–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darwin, C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

David, C T, Kennedy, J S & Ludlow, A R (1983) Finding of a sex-pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field. Nature 303: 804–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, N B, Krebs, J R & West, S A (2012) An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 4th edn. Chicester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Davis, E C (2007) Investigation in the laboratory of mucous trail detection in the terrestrial pulmonate snail Mesodon thyroidus (Say, 1817) (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Polygyridae). Am Malacol Bull 22: 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, M S (2007) Observing Animal Behaviour: Design and Analysis of Quantitative Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawkins, R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R (1982) The Extended Phenotype. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.Google Scholar

de Brito-Sanchez, M G, Deisig, N, Sandoz, J C & Giurfa, M (2008) Neurobiology of olfactory communication in the honeybee. In d’Ettorre, P & Hughes, D P (eds.) Sociobiology of Communication: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. pp. 119–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Bruyne, M & Baker, T C (2008) Odor detection in insects: volatile codes. J Chem Ecol 34: 882–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Vos, M, Cheng, W Y, Summers, H E, Raguso, R A & Jander, G (2010) Alarm pheromone habituation in Myzus persicae has fitness consequences and causes extensive gene expression changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 14673–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeBose, J & Nevitt, G (2008) The use of odors at different spatial scales: comparing birds with fish. J Chem Ecol 34: 867–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dehnhard, M (2011) Mammal semiochemicals: understanding pheromones and signature mixtures for better zoo animal husbandry and conservation. Int Zoo Yearb 45: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

delBarco-Trillo, J & Ferkin, M H (2004) Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature 431: 446–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

delBarco-Trillo, J, Burkert, B A, Goodwin, T E & Drea, C M (2011) Night and day: the comparative study of strepsirrhine primates reveals socioecological and phylogenetic patterns in olfactory signals. J Evol Biol 24: 82–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

delBarco-Trillo, J, Sacha, C R, Dubay, G R & Drea, C M (2012) Eulemur, me lemur: the evolution of scent-signal complexity in a primate clade. Phil Trans R Soc B 367: 1909–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

delBarco-Trillo, J, Harelimana, I H, Goodwin, T E & Drea, C M (2013) Chemical differences between voided and bladder urine in the aye-aye (Daubentonia madagascariensis): implications for olfactory communication studies. Am J Primatol 75: 695–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Delgadillo, J A, Gelez, H, Ungerfeld, R, Hawken, P A R & Martin, G B (2009) The ‘male effect’ in sheep and goats – revisiting the dogmas: pheromonal communication in higher vertebrates and its implication for reproductive function. Behav Brain Res 200: 304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deneubourg, J L, Goss, S, Franks, N & Pasteels, J M (1989) The blind leading the blind – modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. J Insect Behav 2: 719–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denny, M W (1993) Air and Water. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Derby, C D & Sorensen, P W (2008) Neural processing, perception, and behavioral responses to natural chemical stimuli by fish and crustaceans. J Chem Ecol 34: 898–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derti, A & Roth, F P (2012) Response to “MHC-dependent mate choice in humans: Why genomic patterns from the HapMap European American data set support the hypothesis” (). Bioessays 34: 576–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dethier, V G (1987) Sniff, flick, and pulse: an appreciation of intermittency. Proc Am Philos Soc 131: 159–76.Google Scholar

Detrain, C & Deneubourg, J-L (1997) Scavenging by Pheidole pallidula: a key for understanding decision-making systems in ants. Anim Behav 53: 537–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detrain, C & Deneubourg, J-L (2006) Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants “behave” like molecules?Phys Life Rev 3: 162–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, J & Murakhver, N (eds.) (2012) They Eat That? A Cultural Encyclopedia of Weird and Exotic Food from Around the World. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

Deutsch, J C & Nefdt, R J C (1992) Olfactory cues influence female choice in two lek-breeding antelopes. Nature 356: 596–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dewhirst, S Y, Pickett, J A & Hardie, J (2010) Aphid pheromones. In Gerald, L (ed.) Pheromones. pp. 551–74. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dhawale, A K, Hagiwara, A, Bhalla, U S, Murthy, V N & Albeanu, D F (2010) Non-redundant odor coding by sister mitral cells revealed by light addressable glomeruli in the mouse. Nat Neurosci 13: 1404–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dicke, M & Baldwin, I T (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends Plant Sci 15: 167–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dicke, M & Sabelis, M W (1988) Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds?Funct Ecol 2: 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickson, B J (2008) Wired for sex: the neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions. Science 322: 904–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dietemann, V, Liebig, J, Hölldobler, B & Peeters, C (2005) Changes in the cuticular hydrocarbons of incipient reproductives correlate with triggering of worker policing in the bulldog ant Myrmecia gulosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58: 486–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diggle, S P, Gardner, A, West, S A & Griffin, A S (2007) Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal?Phil Trans R Soc B 362: 1241–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dill, L M, Fraser, A H G & Roitberg, B D (1990) The economics of escape behavior in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Oecologia 83: 473–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dillehay, T D (2003) Tracking the first Americans. Nature 425: 23–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dixson, A F (1998) Primate Sexuality. Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Human Beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixson, A F (2009) Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixson, A F (2012) Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Human Beings, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixson, D L, Munday, P L & Jones, G P (2010) Ocean acidification disrupts the innate ability of fish to detect predator olfactory cues. Ecol Lett 13: 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

do Nascimento, R R, Morgan, E D, Billen, J et al. (1993) Variation with caste of the mandibular gland secretion in the leaf-cutting ant – Atta sexdens rubropilosa. J Chem Ecol 19: 907–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doall, M H, Colin, S P, Strickler, J R & Yen, J (1998) Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis. Phil Trans R Soc B 353: 681–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domingue, M J, Haynes, K F, Todd, J L & Baker, T C (2009) Altered olfactory receptor neuron responsiveness is correlated with a shift in behavioral response in an evolved colony of the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 35: 405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doney, S C, Fabry, V J, Feely, R A & Kleypas, J A (2009) Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann Rev Mar Sci 1: 169–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doney, S C, Ruckelshaus, M, Emmett Duffy, J et al. (2012) Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4: 11–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dopman, E B, Robbins, P S & Seaman, A (2010) Components of reproductive isolation between north American pheromone strains of the European corn borer. Evolution 64: 881–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorries, K M, Adkins-Regan, E & Halpern, B P (1997) Sensitivity and behavioral responses to the pheromone androstenone are not mediated by the vomeronasal organ in domestic pigs. Brain Behav Evol 49: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doty, R L (2001) Olfaction. Annu Rev Psychol 52: 423–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L (2009) The olfactory system and its disorders. Semin Neurol 29: 74–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L (2010) The Great Pheromone Myth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Doty, R L (2012a) Olfaction in Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Neurobiol Dis 46: 527–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L (2012b) Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 8: 329–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L & Cameron, E L (2009) Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol Behav 97: 213–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L, Ford, M, Preti, G & Huggins, G R (1975) Changes in the intensity and pleasantness of human vaginal odors during the menstrual cycle. Science 190: 1316–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doty, R L, Orndorff, M M, Leyden, J & Kligman, A (1978) Communication of gender from human axillary odors: relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behav Biol 23: 373–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doucet, S, Soussignan, R, Sagot, P & Schaal, B (2009) The secretion of areolar (Montgomery’s) glands from lactating women elicits selective, unconditional responses in neonates. PLoS ONE 4: e7579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed