Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:33:46.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Territorial behavior and semiochemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Tristram D. Wyatt
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Marking a territory with scent marks is a conspicuous behavior of many mammals and other terrestrial vertebrates including lizards (Font et al. 2012; Martín & López 2010a; Müller-Schwarze 2006; Roberts 2007). The molecules in scent marks include species-wide pheromones as well as highly individual odors, which are cues to identity (Chapter 1; Wyatt 2010).

Mammals have an enormous variety of specialized scent glands but a common pattern of scent marking: glandular secretions, and often feces and urine, are placed at conspicuous places in their home ranges or territories, often in lines along paths or boundaries (Figure 5.1) (Gosling & Roberts 2001). Males tend to mark more than females, and dominant males or territory holders mark most, especially during breeding (Roberts 2007). Scent marking may form a central part of ritualized contests between territorial males or between competing groups, for example “stink fights” between neighboring groups of ringtailed lemurs (Figure 5.2).

One benefit of scent marks for territorial behavior is that, unlike other signals, scent marks “shout” even when the animal is not there. However, while it may take less energy than sound signals (Chapter 1), scent marking in some species can have significant metabolic costs – in mice the territorial male’s urine marks contain 20 to 40 mg/ml of protein, largely MUPs (Box 5.2) (Hurst & Beynon 2004, 2013). Other costs are in time and risk. For example, males of a territorial African antelope, the oribi, Ourebia ourebi, spend up to 35% of their time on marking or associated activities (Brashares & Arcese 1999a). Animals will go to some risk to investigate and over-mark intruders’ scent marks. Beavers will leave the safety of water to investigate foreign scent marks on the shore (Sun & Müller-Schwarze 1998). Scent marks can be “eavesdropped” by predators and parasites (Chapter 11).

Type
Chapter
Information
Pheromones and Animal Behavior
Chemical Signals and Signatures
, pp. 113 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×