Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T16:02:46.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reverse mathematics, countable and uncountable: a computational approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Noam Greenberg
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Denis Hirschfeldt
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Joel David Hamkins
Affiliation:
College of Staten Island
Russell Miller
Affiliation:
Queens College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Abstract Reverse mathematics analyzes the complexity of mathematical statements in terms of the strength of axiomatic systems needed to prove them. Its setting is countable mathematics and subsystems of second order arithmetic. We present a similar analysis based on (recursion-theoretic) computational complexity instead. In the countable case, this view is implicit in many of results in the area. By making it explicit and precise, we provide an alternate approach to this type of analysis for countable mathematics. It may be more intelligible to some mathematicians in that it replaces logic and proof systems with relative computability. In the uncountable case, second order arithmetic and its proof theory is insufficient for the desired analysis. Our computational approach, however, supplies a ready made paradigm for similar analyses. It can be implemented with any appropriate notion of computation on uncountable sets.

§1. Introduction. The enterprise of calibrating the strength of theorems of classical mathematics in terms of the (set existence) axioms needed to prove them, was begun by Harvey Friedman in the 1970s (as in [6] and [7]). It is now called Reverse Mathematics as, to prove that some set of axioms is actually necessary to establish a given theorem, one reverses the standard paradigm by proving that the axioms follow from the theorem (in some weak base theory). The original motivations for the subject were foundational and philosophical. It has become a remarkably fruitful and successful endeavor supplying a framework for both the philosophical questions about existence assumptions and foundational or mathematical ones about construction techniques needed to actually produce the objects that the theorems assert exist.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Aharoni, R., Konig's duality theorem for infinite bipartite graphs, J. Lon. Math. Soc. (3) 29 (1984), 1–12.Google Scholar
[2] Aharoni, R., Magidor, M., and Shore, R.A., On the strength of Konig's duality theorem for infinite bipartite graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 54 (1992) 257–290.Google Scholar
[3] Blum, Lenore, Cucker, Felipe, Shub, Michael and Smale, Steve, Complexity and Real Computation, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
[4] Chong, C.T.Techniques of Admissible Recursion Theory, LNM 1106, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
[5] Fenstad, Jens Erik, General Recursion Theory: An Axiomatic Approach, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1980.
[6] Friedman, H., Higher set theory and mathematical practice, Ann. Math. Logic 2 (1971), 326–357.Google Scholar
[7] Friedman, H., Some systems of second order arithmetic and their use, Proc. Intl. Cong. Math., Vancouver 1974, vol. 1, Can. Math. Congress, 1975, 235–242.
[8] Grilliot, T.J.On effectively discontinuous type-2 objects. J. Symbolic Logic 36 (1971) 245–248.Google Scholar
[9] Hirst, J., Marriage theorems and reverse mathematics. In Logic and Computation (Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), Contemporary Mathematics 106, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1990, 181–196.
[10] Jockusch, C.G. Jr. and Soare, R.I., classes and the degrees of theories, Tran. AMS 173 (1972), 33–56.Google Scholar
[11] Kohlenbach, U., Higher order reverse mathematics. In Reverse Mathematics 2001, S., Simpson ed., 281–295, Lect. Notes Log. 21, Association for Symbolic Logic and A.K. Peters, Wellesley MA 2005.
[12] Lovasz, L. and Plummer, M. D., Matching Theory, Ann. Discrete Math. 29, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
[13] Metakides, G. and Nerode, A., Recursively enumerable vector spaces, Ann. Math. Logic 11 (1977), 147–171.Google Scholar
[14] Moldestad, J., Computations in Higher Types, LNM 574, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.
[15] Mummert, C. and Simpson, S.G., Reverse Mathematics and comprehension, Bulletin ofSymbolic Logic 11 (2005) 526–533.Google Scholar
[16] Montalban, A. and Shore, R.A., The limits of determinacy in second order arithmetic, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 104(3) (2012), 223–252.Google Scholar
[17] Sacks, Gerald E., Higher Recursion Theory, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
[18] Shore, R.A., On the jump of an α-recursively enumerable set, Trans. AMS 217 (1976), 351–364.Google Scholar
[19] Simpson, S., On the strength of König's duality theorem for countable bipartite graphs, J. Symbolic Logic 59 (1994) 113–123.Google Scholar
[20] Simpson, S., Subsystems ofSecond Order Arithmetic, 2nd edition, Perspectives in Logic, Association for Symbolic Logic and Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×