Borel structures: a brief survey

Antonio Montalbán; André Nies

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139028592.007

Borel structures: a brief survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2013

Antonio Montalbán and

André Nies

Edited by

Noam Greenberg ,

Denis Hirschfeldt ,

Joel David Hamkins and

Russell Miller

Show author details

Noam Greenberg: Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Denis Hirschfeldt: Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Joel David Hamkins: Affiliation:
College of Staten Island
Russell Miller: Affiliation:
Queens College, City University of New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Abstract We survey some research aiming at a theory of effective structures of size the continuum. The main notion is the one of a Borel presentation, where the domain, equality and further relations and functions are Borel. We include the case of uncountable languages where the signature is Borel. We discuss the main open questions in the area.

§1. Introduction. When looking at structures of size the continuum from an effective viewpoint, the following definition is a natural generalization of ideas from computable model theory.

Definition 1.1. Let X be either 2ω, ωω or ℝ, and let C be a (complexity) class of relations on X. A C-presentation of a structure A is a tuple of relations S = (D, E, R1,…, Rn) such that

о All D, E, R1,…, Rn are in C;

о D ⊆ X and E is an equivalence relation on D (D is called the domain);

о R1, …, Rn are relations compatible with E.

S is a C-representation of A if A ≅ S/E. When E is the identity on D, we say that S is an injective C-presentation of A.

There are various possible choices for C. In this paper we concentrate on the case that C is the class of Borel relations. Given a topological space X as above, the σ-algebra of Borel sets is the smallest σ-algebra containing the open sets.

Type: Chapter
Information: Effective Mathematics of the Uncountable , pp. 124 - 134

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028592.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Howard, Becker and Alexander S., Kechris. The Descriptive Set Theory of Polish Group Actions. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[2] Harvey, Friedman. On the logic of measure and category I. Manuscript, 1978.

[3] Harvey, Friedman. Borel structures and mathematics. Manuscript, 1979.

[4] Leo, Harrington, David, Marker, and Saharon, Shelah. Borel orderings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 310(1), 293–302, 1988.Google Scholar

[5] Leo, Harrington and Saharon, Shelah. Counting equivalence classes for co-κ-Souslin equivalence relations. In Logic Colloquium '80 (Prague, 1980), D., van Dalen (ed), volume 108 of Stud. Logic Foundations Math., 147–152. North-Holland, 1982.

[6] Greg, Hjorth. Borel equivalence relations. In Handbook on Set Theory, Vol. 1, Matt, Foreman and Aki, Kanamori (eds), Springer-Verlag, 2010.

[7] G., Hjorth, Bakh, Khoussainov, Antonio, Montalbán, and André, Nies. From automatic structures to Borel structures. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2008), 431–441, 2008.

[8] Greg, Hjorth and André, Nies. Borel structures and Borel theories. J. Symbolic Logic 76 (2011), 461–476.Google Scholar

[9] Vladimir, Kanovei. When a partial Borel order is linearizable. Fund. Math., 155(3), 301–309, 1998.Google Scholar

[10] R., Kaye. Models of Peano Arithmetic, volume 15 of Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, 1991.

[11] Alexander S., Kechris. Classical Descriptive Set Theory, volume 156 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1995.

[12] Julia, Knight and Mark, Nadel. Models of arithmetic and closed ideals. J. Symbolic Logic, 47(4), 833–840. 1983.Google Scholar

[13] R., Kossak and J.H., Schmerl. The Structure of Models of Peano Arithmetic. Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 50. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[14] S., Lang. Algebra. Addison-Wesley, 1965.

[15] J., Lindenstrauss and L., Tzafriri. Classical Banach Spaces I. Springer, 1996.

[16] Alain, Louveau. Two results on Borel orders. J. Symbolic Logic, 54(3) 865–874, 1989.Google Scholar

[17] Alain, Louveau and Jean, Saint-Raymond. On the quasi-ordering of Borel linear orders under embeddability. J. Symbolic Logic, 55(2) 537–560, 1990.Google Scholar

[18] C.I., Steinhorn. Borel structures and measure and category logics. In Model-Theoretic Logics, J., Barwise and S., Feferman (eds), volume 8 of Perspect. Math. Logic, 579-596. Springer, 1985.

[19] C.I., Steinhorn. Borel structures for first-order and extended logics. In Harvey Friedman's Research on the Foundations of Mathematics, L.A., Harrington, M.D., Morley, A., Scedrov and S.G., Simpson (eds), volume 117 of Stud. Logic Found. Math., 161-178. North-Holland, 1985.

Book contents

Borel structures: a brief survey

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive