Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:46:13.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - CCD imaging detectors

from Part IV - From detected photons to the celestial sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

William F. van Altena
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Charge-coupled devices (CCDs), the standard imagers at all observatories today, consist of integrated circuits made through the same process as computer memory or the chips in cell phones. Complementary metal oxide semiconductors (CMOS) are an alternative image-sensor technology with high noise immunity and low static power consumption; however, CCDs are the dominant imagers today, so we will concentrate our discussion on their use.

Silicon crystals are sensitive to light through the process by which incident photons of sufficient energy can excite electrons into the valence levels of the atom. Photons with energies less than the valence levels fail to create photoelectrons and are therefore not detected, while the higher-energy photons are absorbed near the surface of the silicon layer before creating usable photoelectrons. If one applies a voltage to the silicon in a controlled manner, these photoelectrons can be either held in place (during the integration) or moved through the silicon lattice (during readout) and collected.

What is a charge-coupled device?

When a CCD is constructed, a square grid of microscopic electrodes called gates is fabricated on the surface of a silicon wafer (see Fig. 14.1). The orthogonal axes of the grid are called columns and rows and the grid elements are the pixels, which have typical sizes of 10–20 üm. When exposed to optical light, the silicon substrate reacts to each absorbed photon by creating one photoelectron–hole pair. The gate voltages control the movement and position of these photoelectrons.

Type
Chapter
Information
Astrometry for Astrophysics
Methods, Models, and Applications
, pp. 222 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auer, L. H. and van Altena, W. F. (1978). Digital image centering. II. AJ, 83, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertin, E. and Arnouts, S. (1996). SExtractor: software for source extraction. A&AS, 117, 393.Google Scholar
Biretta, J. (2005). WFPC2 status and calibration. In The 2005 HST Calibration Workshop, ed. A. M., Koekemoer, P., Goudfrooij, and L. L., Dressel. Baltimore, MD: Space Telescope Science Institute.Google Scholar
Chromey, F. R. and Hasselbacker, D. A. (1996). The flat sky: calibration and background uniformity in wide field astronomical images. PASP, 108, 944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diego, F. (1985). Stellar image profiles from linear detectors and the throughput of astronomical instruments. PASP, 97, 1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, M. and Howell, S. B. (2001). A technique for ultrahigh-precision CCD photometry. PASP, 113, 1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliland, R. L., Brown, T. M., Kjeldsen, H., et al. (1993). A search for solar-like oscillations in the stars of M67 with CCD ensemble photometry on a network of 4 M telescopes. AJ, 106, 2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudfrooij, P., Bohlin, R., Máýz-Apellániz, J., and Kimble, R. (2006). Empirical corrections for charge transfer inefficiency and associated centroid shifts for STIS CCD observations. PASP, 118, 1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. B. (1989). Two-dimensional aperture photometry – signal-to-noise ratio of point-source observations and optimal data-extraction techniques. PASP, 101, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. B. (1992). Astronomical CCD observing and reduction techniques. ASP Conf. Ser., 23, 345.Google Scholar
Howell, S. B. (2006). Handbook of CCD Astronomy, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janesick, J. (2001). Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, I. (1983). Accuracy of measurement of star images on a pixel array. PASP, 95, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozhurina-Platais, V., Goudfrooij, P. and Puzia, T. H. (2007). ACS/WFC: Differential CTE Corrections for Photometry and Astronomy from Non-Drizzled Images. Space Telescope Science Institute, Instrument Science Report ACS 2007-04d.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-F. and van Altena, W. F. (1983). Theoretical studies of the effects of grain noise on photographic stellar astrometry and photometry. AJ, 88, 1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindegren, L. (2010). High-accuracy positioning: astrometry. In Observing Photons in Space, ed. M. C. E., Huber, A., Pauluhn, J. L., Culhane, J. G., Timothy, K., Wilhelm, and A., Zehnder. ESA/ISSI, ISSI Scientific Reports Series, 279.Google Scholar
Mackay, C. (1986). Charge-coupled devices in astronomy. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astr., 24, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merline, W. and Howell, S. B. (1995). A realistic model for point-sources imaged on array detectors: the model and initial results. Exp. Ast., 6, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeser, M. J., Sackett, P. D., De Marchi, G., and Paresce, F. (2002). Detection of a thick disk in the edge-on low surface brightness galaxy ESO 342-G017. I. VLT photometry in V and R bands. A&A, 383, 472.Google Scholar
Newberry, M.V. (1991). Signal-to-noise considerations for sky-subtracted CCD data. PASP, 103, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, M. V. (1994). The signal-to connection. CCD Astron., 1, No. 2/Summer, 34.Google Scholar
Sterken, C. (2007). The future of photometric, spectrophotometric, and polarimetric standardization. ASP Conf. Series, 364.Google Scholar
Stetson, P. (1987). DAOPHOT – A computer program for crowded-field stellar photometry. PASP, 99, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetson, P. (1998). On the photometric consequences of charge-transfer inefficiency in WFPC2. PASP, 110, 1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, N., Urban, S. E., Zacharias, M. I., et al. (2000). The First US Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog. AJ, 120, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Burstein, D., Byun, Y. I., et al. (2004). Dome-diffuser flat-fielding for Schmidt telescopes. AJ, 127, 3642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×