Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:47:44.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Assessing the Implications of ACTA for the European Union

Legitimate Aim but Wrong Means

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2014

Christophe Geiger
Affiliation:
University of Strasbourg
Pedro Roffe
Affiliation:
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development
Xavier Seuba
Affiliation:
Université de Strasbourg
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is a plurilateral agreement aimed, according to its Preamble, at providing effective and appropriate means for the enforcement of intellectual property rights. The issue is obviously important, since the attractiveness of intellectual property rights risks being seriously undermined if they cannot be enforced in an appropriate manner. For this reason, the creation of an effective system to secure a proper enforcement of intellectual property rights and to combat counterfeiting has been a constant preoccupation of the European Union (EU) over the last few years. Serious efforts have been made and numerous initiatives undertaken by the EU and its member states to improve the European legal framework in this regard. Following an evaluation report published on 22 December 2010, the European Commission has announced its intention to revise the reference text on the topic, the Directive of 29 April 2004, which has now been implemented in all the member states. Work has also started on an amendment of the regulation of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights. In 2009, the Commission also set up a European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy, one of whose principal objectives is to collect and transmit data on the economic and social consequences of counterfeiting, and whose powers were recently considerably increased. It is only in the sensitive field of criminal penalties for counterfeiting that harmonisation has not yet succeeded, mostly because of the considerable opposition that a proposed directive on this matter encountered within the European Parliament. This resistance ultimately led to the text being withdrawn by the European Commission on 18 September 2010.

Type
Chapter
Information
The ACTA and the Plurilateral Enforcement Agenda
Genesis and Aftermath
, pp. 313 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ruse-Khan, H. Grosse, D’Erme, R., Geiger, Ch, Heinze, C., Jaeger, T., Matulionyte, R. and Metzger, A., The Impact of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement on the Legal Framework for IP Enforcement in the European Union, in: Geiger, Ch. (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives, EIPIN Series Vol. 1, Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2013, p. 394
Weatherall, K., Politics, Compromise, Text and the Failures of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, Sidney Law Review 2011, Vol. 33, p. 229Google Scholar
Devigne, L. P., Velasco-Martins, P. and Iliopoulou, A., Where Is ACTA Taking Us? Policies and Politics, in: Stamatoudi, I. A. (ed.), Copyright Enforcement and the Internet, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2010, p. 29
Ayoob, E., Recent Development: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J., Vol. 28, 2010, p. 175Google Scholar
Mercurio, B., Beyond the Text: The Significance of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, Journal of International Economic Law 2012, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 361Google Scholar
Blakeney, M., Intellectual Property Enforcement A Commentary on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), Cheltenham UK / Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2012
Metzger, A., A Primer on ACTA, What Europeans Should Fear about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, JIPITEC 2010, p. 109Google Scholar
Yu, P. K., Six Secret (and Now Open) Fears of ACTA, SMU Law Review 2011, Vol. 64, No. 3, p. 975Google Scholar
McManis, C. R., The Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Two Tales of a Treaty, Houston Law Review 2009, Vol. 46, No. 4, p. 1235Google Scholar
Geiger, Ch., The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: What Consequences for the European Union?, in: Rosen, J. (ed.), Intellectual Property at the Crossroads of Trade, Cheltenham UK / Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2012, 167
Xue, H., Enforcement For Development: Why Not an Agenda For the Developing World?, in: Li, X. and Correa, C. M. (eds.), Intellectual Property Enforcement, International Perspectives, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2009, p. 133
Gervais, D., China – Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, Am. J. Int’l L. 2009, p. 549Google Scholar
Grosse Ruse-Khan, H., Criminal Enforcement and International IP Law, and Yu, P. K., Shaping Chinese Criminal Enforcement Norms through the TRIPS Agreement, in: Geiger, Ch. (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2012
Gibbons, L. J., Do as I Say (Not as I Did): Putative Intellectual Property Lessons for Emerging Economies from the Not So Long Past of the Developed Nations, SMU Law Review 2011, Vol. 64, No. 3, p. 923Google Scholar
Sell, S. K., Everything Old Is New Again: The Development Agenda Then and Now, WIPO J. 2011, Vol. 3, p. 20Google Scholar
Sell, S. K., TRIPS was Never Enough: Vertical Forum Shifting, FTAs, ACTA, and TPP, J. Intell. Prop. L., 2011, Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 449Google Scholar
Helfer, L., Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, Yale J. Int’l. L 2004, Vol. 29, p. 1Google Scholar
Yu, P. K., ACTA and Its Complex Politics, WIPO J. 2011, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 3Google Scholar
Matulionyte, R., ACTA’s Digital Chapter: Remaining Concerns and What Can Be Done, QMJIP 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 248Google Scholar
Geiger, Ch., Exploring the Flexibilities of the TRIPs Agreement Provisions on Limitations and Exceptions, in: Kur, A. and Mizaras, V. (eds.), The Structure of Intellectual Property Law – Can One Size Fit All?, Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2011, p. 287
Yu, P.K., The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPs Agreement, Houston Law Review 2009, p. 979Google Scholar
Bannerman, S., WIPO and the ACTA Threat, Int. J. Technology and Law 2012, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 3Google Scholar
Abdel- Latif, A., Change and Continuity in the International Intellectual Property System: A Turbulent Decade in Perspective, WIPO J. 2011, Vol. 3, No. 1, p. 36Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×