Abbott, Frederick. ‘Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law’, ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue paper 12. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2006.Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick‘Worst Fears Realised: The Dutch Confiscation of Medicines Bound from India to Brazil’, Bridges Monthly no. 1, February–March 2009.

Abdel-Latif, Ahmed, ‘Developing Country Coordination in Intellectual Property Standard-Setting’, Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity, Working Paper 24. Geneva: South Centre, 2005.Google Scholar

Abdel Latif, Ahmed, ‘ACTA: Original Expectations and Future Implications’, Bridges Weekly vol 14 no. 4 (December 2010). Available at: .Google Scholar

Abdel Latif, Ahmed, ‘Change and Continuity in the International Intellectual Property System: A Turbulent Decade in Perspective’, The WIPO Journal vol. 3 no. 1 (2011): 36.Google Scholar

Adam, Ainee. ‘What Is “Commercial Scale”? A Critical Analysis of the WTO Panel Decision in WT/DS362/R’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 33 no. 6 (2011): 342–348.Google Scholar

Akester, Patrícia. ‘The Impact of Digital Rights Management on Freedom of Expression – the First Empirical Assessment’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law vol. 41 no. 1 (2010): 31–58.Google Scholar

American University Washington College of Law. ‘ACTA Section Analysis’, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property series. Available at: .

Arezzo, Emanuela. ‘Videogames and Consoles between Copyright and Technical Protection Measures’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law vol. 40 no. 1 (2009): 82–95.Google Scholar

Arhel, Pierre. ‘L’accord commercial anticontrefaçon: version finale’, Propriété industrielle no. 3 (2011): 13.Google Scholar

Arlt, Christian. ‘Marktabschottend wirkender Einsatz von DRM-Technik – Eine Untersuchung aus wettbewerbsrechtlichem Blickwinkel’, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2005): 1003–1011.Google Scholar

Assange, Julian. The Unauthorised Autobiography. Edinburgh: Canongate, 2012.Google Scholar

Atik, Jeffrey. ‘ACTA and the Destabilization of TRIPS’, in Lidgard, Hans Henrik, Jeffery Atik and Tu Thanh Nguyen (eds.), Sustainable Technology Transfer: A Guide to Global Aid & Trade Development. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012.Google Scholar

Ayoob, Emily. ‘Recent Development: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal vol. 28 (2010): 175–193.Google Scholar

Baccus, James. ‘A Way Forward for the WTO’, in Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo, Christoph Bellmann and Miguel Rodriguez (eds.), The Future and the WTO: Confronting the Challenges. A Collection of Short Essays, 2012.

Baker, Brook. ‘ACTA – Risks of Third-Party Enforcement for Access to Medicines’, American University International Law Review vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 579–599.Google Scholar

Baker, Brook ‘Settlement of India/EU WTO Dispute re Seizures of In-Transit Medicines: Why the Proposed EU Border Regulation Isn’t Good Enough’, School of Law Faculty Publications, Paper 37 (2012).Google Scholar

Band, Jonathan. ‘The SOPA/TPP Nexus’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 6. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2012.Google Scholar

Bannerman, Sara. ‘WIPO and the ACTA Threat’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 4. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Denis Borges. ‘BRIIC: Laying a New Patent System’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law vol. 43 no. 4 (2012): 369–498.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Denis Borges‘Counting Ten for TRIPS: Author Rights and Access to Information – A Cockroach’s View of Encroachment’, in Kors, Jorge, and Remiche, Bernard (eds.), L’Accord ADPIC: dix ans après: regards croisés Europe-Amérique latine: actes du séminaire de Buenos Aires organisé par l’Association internationale de Droit économique. Bruxelles: Larcier, 2007.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Denis Borges‘Minimum Standards vs. Harmonization in the TRIPS Context: The Nature of Obligations under TRIPS and Modes of Implementation at the National Level in Monist and Dualist Systems’, in Correa, Carlos (ed.), Research Handbook on the Interpretation and Enforcement of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2010.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Denis Borges‘Untoward Restrictions to Trade and Abuses of Intellectual Property Rights: A Brazilian Perspective to the ACTA Exercise’, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro working paper series. Rio de Janeiro: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2010.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Denis Borges, Chon, Margaret and Hase, Andrès Moncayo von. ‘Slouching Towards Development in International Intellectual Property’, Michigan State Law Review vol. 2007 no. 1 (2008): 71–143.

Bently, Lionel, Davis, Jennifer and Ginsburg, Jane (eds.). Trade Marks and Brands: An Interdisciplinary Critique. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George W.. ‘The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’, Stanford Law Review vol. 60 no. 2 (2007): 595–631.Google Scholar

Bitton, Miriam. ‘Rethinking the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’s Criminal Copyright Enforcement Measures’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology vol. 102 no. 1 (2012): 67.Google Scholar

Blakeney, Michael. Intellectual Property Enforcement. A Commentary on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakeney, Michael ‘International Proposals for the Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: International Concern with Counterfeiting and Piracy’, Intellectual Property Quarterly Issue 1 (2009): 1–26.Google Scholar

Bradley, Curtis and Martin, Flaherty. ‘Executive Power Essentialism and Foreign Affairs’, Michigan Law Review vol. 102 no. 4 (2004): 545–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, John and Drahos, Peter. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bridy, Annemarie. ‘ACTA and the Specter of Graduated Response’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 2. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Bridy, Annemarie ‘Graduated Response American Style: “Six Strikes” Measured against Five Norms’, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal vol. 23 no. 1 (2012): 1–66.Google Scholar

Carrier, Michael. ‘SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, TPP: An Alphabet Soup of Innovation-Stifling Copyright Legislation and Agreements’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property vol. 11 no. 2 (2013): 21–31.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, Chiam, Madelaine, Hovell, Devika and Williams, George. No Country Is an Island: Australia and International Law. Sydney: UNSW Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Chaudhry, Peggy and Zimmerman, Alan. The Economics of Counterfeit Trade – Governments, Consumers, Pirates and Intellectual Property Rights. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar

Cheng, Jacqui. ‘Germany Says “Nein” to Three-Strikes Infringement Plan’, Ars Technica, 6 February 2009. Available at: .

Chow, Daniel. ‘Counterfeiting as an Externality Imposed by Multinational Companies on Developing Countries’, Virginia Journal of International Law vol. 51 no. 4 (2011): 785–823.Google Scholar

Chow, Daniel ‘Counterfeiting in the People’s Republic of China’, Washington University Law Quarterly vol. 78 no. 1 (2000): 1–57.Google Scholar

Chow, Daniel ‘Why China Does Not Take Commercial Piracy Seriously’, Ohio Northern University Law Review vol. 32 no. 2 (2006): 203–225.Google Scholar

Clark, Bradford. ‘Domesticating Sole Executive Agreements’, Virginia Law Review vol. 93 no. 7 (2007): 1573–1661.Google Scholar

Clift, Charles. A Review of Statistical Information on Counterfeiting and Piracy, WIPO/ACE/7/5, 2011.

Coombe, Rosemary. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correa, Carlos. ‘Anti-counterfeiting: A Trojan Horse for Expanding Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries?’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos‘Bilateral Investment Agreements: Agents of New Global Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights?’ Report commissioned by GRAIN, 2004.

Correa, Carlos‘The Push for Stronger Enforcement Rules: Implications for Developing Countries’, ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper 22. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2009.Google Scholar

Correa, CarlosTrade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Creemers, Rogier. ‘The Effects of WTO Case DS362 on Audiovisual Media Piracy in China’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 31 no. 11 (2009): 568–590.Google Scholar

Creemers, Rogier‘Explaining Audiovisual Media Piracy in China’, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maastricht, February 2012.

Curran, Clare. ‘ACTA, Secrecy, Copyright and Delays’, Labour blog (New Zealand), 16 December 2009. Available at: .Google Scholar

Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony (eds.). Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar

De Gucht, Karel. ‘Speaking Points: State of play of negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, speech at the European Parliament, Committee for International Trade, Strasbourg, 8 September 2010. Available at: .

Deere, Carolyn. The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

DeLaurell, Roxane. ‘The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement of 2010: Two Problems and one unanswered question’, The Global Business Law Review no. 2 (2011): 175–192.Google Scholar

Devigne, Luc Pierre and Velasco-Martins, Pedro. ‘Where Is ACTA Taking Us? Policies and Politics’, in Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), Copyright Enforcement and the Internet. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme and Janis, Mark (eds.). Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dogan, Stacy and Lemley, Mark. ‘Parody as Brand’, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2170498. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law School, 2012.Google Scholar

Drahos, Peter. The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and Their Clients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drahos, Peter and Braithwaite, John. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?London: Earthscan, 2002.Google Scholar

Dreier, Thomas and Schulze, Gernot. Urheberrechtsgesetz: UrhG. Munich: Beck, 2008.Google Scholar

Drexl, Josef. ‘The Evolution of TRIPS: Towards Flexible Multilateralism’, in Kors, Jorge and Remiche, Bernard (eds.), L’Accord ADPIC: dix ans après: regards croisés Europe-Amérique latine: actes du séminaire de Buenos Aires organisé par l’Association internationale de Droit économique. Bruxelles: Larcier, 2007.Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle. ‘TRIPS-Round II: Should Users Strike Back?’, University of Chicago Law Review vol. 71 no. 1 (2004): 21–35.Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina, Fahey, Elaine, and Kanetake, Machiko. ‘International, European and US Perspectives on the Negotiation and Adoption of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, Currents, International Trade Law Journal vol. 20 no. 2 (2013): 20–44.Google Scholar

Edström, Jerker and Nilsson, Henrik. ‘The Pirate Bay Verdict – Predictable, and Yet…’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 31 no. 9 (2009): 483–487.Google Scholar

Eibauer, Josef. ‘Blessing or curse? The effects of transparency on the European Commission’s success at the international ACTA negotiations’, PIPE Working Paper no 14/2012. Berlin: Centre for International Political Economy, 2012.Google Scholar

Ermert, Monika. ‘ACTA Negotiators: Maximal Protection Proposals Unlikely in Final Text’, Intellectual Property Watch, 18 February 2010. Available at:

Ermert, Monika‘ACTA Negotiators Vow to Mesh with National-Level Rights; Withhold New Text’, Intellectual Property Watch, 2 July 2010. Available at: .

European Academics. ‘Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law vol. 2 (2011): 65–72.Google Scholar

European Digital Rights (EDRI), ‘ACTA Fact Sheet’, 2 February 2012, Available at: .

Ewing, Tom and Feldman, Robin. ‘The Giants among Us’, Stanford Technology Law Review vol. 1 (2012). Available at: .Google Scholar

Fink, Carsten. ‘Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights: An Economic Prospective’, ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper 22. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2009.Google Scholar

Fink, Carsten, Maskus, Keith, and Qian, Yi, The Economic Effects of Counterfeiting and Piracy: A Literature Review, WIPO/ACE/6/7, 2010.

Floridi, Luciano. ‘ACTA – The Ethical Analysis of A Failure, and Its Lessons’, ECIPE Occasional Paper no. 4/2012. Brussels: ECIPE, 2012.Google Scholar

Flynn, Sean. ‘ACTA’s Constitutional Problem: This Treaty Is Not a Treaty’, American University Journal of International Law vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 903–926.Google Scholar

Flynn, Sean‘USTR’s precedents do not justify ACTA as sole executive agreement’, Infojustice, 3 October 2011. Available at: .

Flynn, Sean and Madhani, Bijan. ‘ACTA and Access to Medicines’, PIJIP Research Paper no.22. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2011.Google Scholar

Flynn, Sean, Baker, Brook, Kaminski, Margot, and Koo, Jimmy. ‘Public Interest Analysis of the US TPP Proposal for an IP Chapter’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 21. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2011.Google Scholar

Flynn, Sean, Baker, Brook, Kaminski, Margot, and Koo, Jimmy ‘The U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement’, American University International Law Review vol. 28 no. 1 (2013): 105–202.Google Scholar

Frontier Economics. ‘Estimating the global economic and social impacts of counterfeiting and piracy’, report commissioned by the International Chamber of Commerce’s BASCAP initiative, 2011.

Garretson, Heather. ‘Federal Criminal Forfeiture: A Royal Pain in the Assets’, Review of Law and Social Justice vol. 18 no. 1 (2008): 45–77.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe. ‘Of ACTA, “Pirates” and Organized Criminality – How “Criminal” Should the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Be?’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law vol. 41 no. 6 (2010): 629–631.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe‘The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): A Comprehensive Assessment from a European Perspective’, paper for the Committee on International Trade, Directorate-General for External Policies of the European Parliament. Brussels: European Union, 2012.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe‘The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: What Consequences for the European Union?’, in Rosén, Jan (ed.), Intellectual Property at the Crossroads of Trade. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe‘Counterfeiting and the Music Industry: Towards a Criminalization of End Users? The French “HADOPI” Example’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiger, ChristopheCriminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiger, Christophe‘Exploring the Flexibilities of the TRIPs Agreement Provisions on Limitations and Exceptions’, in Kur, Annette and Mizaras, Vytautas (eds.), The Structure of Intellectual Property Law – Can One Size Fit All?Cheltenham – Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe ‘The Future of Copyright in Europe – Striking a Fair Balance between Protection and Access to Information’, Intellectual Property Quarterly vol. 14 no. 1 (2010): 1–14.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe ‘Intellectual Property Shall Be Protected!? Article 17.2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Mysterious Provision with an Unclear Scope’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 31 no. 3 (2009): 113–117.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe ‘Quelle mise en œuvre des droits de propriété intellectuelle au niveau international ? Retour sur l’Accord commercial anti-contrefaçon (ACTA)’, Propriété intellectuelle no. 43 (2012): 201.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe ‘Weakening Multilateralism in Intellectual Property Lawmaking: A European Perspective on ACTA’, The WIPO Journal vol. 3 no. 2 (2012): 166.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe (with Michel Vivant). ‘Comment of the Decision of the WTO Panel of 26 January 2009’, Propriété intellectuelle no. 35 (2010): 747.Google Scholar

Geiger, Christophe, Raynard, Jacques, and Rodà, Caroline. ‘What Developments for the European Framework on Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights? – A Comment on the Evaluation Report of the European Commission dated 22 December 2010’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 33 (2011): 543–550.Google Scholar

Geist, Michael. ‘ACTA’s State of Play: Looking Beyond Transparency’, American University International Law Review vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 543–558.Google Scholar

Geist, Michael‘The ACTA Threat to the Future of WIPO’, Intellectual Property Watch, 14 April 2009. Available at .

Geist, Michael‘The Case for Flexibility in Implementing the WIPO Internet Treaties: An Examination of the Anti-Circumvention Requirements’, in Geist, Michael (ed.), From ‘Radical Extremism’ to ‘Balanced Copyright’: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Geist, Michael ‘The Trouble with ACTA: an Analysis of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, report for the Committee on International Trade, Directorate-General for External Policies of the European Parliament. Brussels: European Union, 2012.Google Scholar

Gerhardsen, Tove Iren. ‘Japan Proposes New IP Enforcement Treaty’, Intellectual Property Watch, 15 November 2005. Available at: .

Gervais, D. ‘Country clubs, empiricism, blogs and innovation: the future of international intellectual property law making in the wake of ACTA’, in Burri, M and Cottier, T (eds.), Trade Governance in the Digital Age: World Trade Forum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gervais, Daniel. ‘China-Measures Affecting the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights’, American Journal of International Law vol. 103 no. 3 (2009): 549–555.Google Scholar

Gervais, Daniel‘Criminal Enforcement in the US and Canada’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Gervais, Daniel‘The TRIPS Agreement and the Doha Round: History and Impact on Economic Development’, in Yu, Peter (ed.), Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age. Greenwood: Praeger Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

GfK. ‘Consumo de Contenidos Digitales en España’, study for the Spanish Right Holders Coalition, February 2013. Available at: .

Gibbons, Llewellyn Joseph. ‘Do as I Say (Not as I Did): Putative Intellectual Property Lessons for Emerging Economies from the Not So Long Past of the Developed Nations’, SMU Law Review vol. 64 (2011): 923.Google Scholar

Gibson, Johanna. ‘The Directive Proposal on Criminal Sanctions’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Gowers, Andrew. ‘Gowers Review of Intellectual Property’, independent report to the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer. London: UK Government, 2006.Google Scholar

Green, Stuart. ‘Plagiarism, Norms, and the Limits of Theft Law: Some Observations on the Use of Criminal Sanctions in Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights’, Hastings Law Journal vol. 54 no. 1 (2002): 167–241.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jonathan. ‘Criminal Liability for Intellectual Property Infringement in Europe: The Role of Fundamental Rights’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jonathan and McDonagh, Luke. ‘Fundamental Rights and European IP Law – The Case of Art. 17.2 of the EU Charter’, in Geiger, Christopher (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Groom, Nick. The Forger’s Shadow: How Forgery Changed the Course of Literature. London: Picador, 2003.Google Scholar

Gross, Robin. ‘IP Justice White Paper on the Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, 25 March 2008. Available at .

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Policy Space in WTO Law’, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series No. 08-02. Munich: Max Planck Institute, 2008.Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning‘Criminal enforcement and international IP law’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning‘The (Non) Use of Treaty Object and Purpose in Intellectual Property Disputes in the WTO’, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series No. 11–15. Munich: Max Planck Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning ‘A Trade Agreement Creating Barriers to International trade?: ACTA Border Measures and Goods in Transit’, American University International Law Review vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 645–726.Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning‘From TRIPS to ACTA: Towards a New “Gold Standard” in Criminal IP Enforcement?’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Blessing or a Curse?Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning et al. ‘The Impact of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement on the Legal Framework for IP Enforcement in the European Union’, in Geiger, Christopher (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham – Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Guibault, Lucie et al. ‘Study on the Implementation And Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in The Information Society’, report to the European Commission, DG Internal Market. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law at the University of Amsterdam, 2007.

Haas, Peter. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization vol. 46 no. 1 (1992): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, Trotter. ‘Criminal Copyright Infringement’, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, vol. 11 (2002): 305–341.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, Ian. ‘Digital Opportunity, A review of Intellectual Property and Growth’, independent report commissioned by the UK Government, 2011. Available at: .

Harris, Donald. ‘The Honeymoon Is Over: The U.S.-China WTO Intellectual Property Complaint’, Fordham International Law Journal vol. 32 no. 1 (2008): 96–187.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona. Presidential Power over International Law: Restoring the Balance’, Yale Law Journal vol. 119 no. 2 (2009): 140–268.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona and Kapczynski, Amy. ‘Going It Alone: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement as a Sole Executive Agreement’, American Society of International Law Insights vol. 15 no. 23 (2011).Google Scholar

Health Action International. ‘ACTA and Access to Medicines: A Flawed Process, Flawed Rationale and Flawed Agreement’, Policy Brief, February 2012. Available at: .

Health Action International Africa. ‘A briefing paper on the utilization of TRIPS flexibilities in the EAC Region’, Briefing Paper, July 2012. Available at: .

Heide, Thomas. ‘Copyright in the E.U. and United States: What “Access Right’’’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 23 no. 10 (2001): 469–477.Google Scholar

Helfer, Lawrence. ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’, Yale Journal of International Law vol. 29 no. 1 (2004): 1–83.Google Scholar

Henderson, David. L’accord multilatéral sur l’investissement – Leçons d’un échec. Paris: GEM, 1999.Google Scholar

Heyman, Laura. ‘The Public’s Domain in Trademark Law: A First Amendment Theory of the Consumer’, Georgia Law Review vol. 43 (2009): 651–715.Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto. ‘Economic, Legal and Social Impacts of Counterfeiting’, in Geiger, Christopher (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham – Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Hilty, Reto, Kur, Annette, and Peukert, Alexander. ‘Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on Criminal Measures Aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law vol. 37 no. 8 (2006): 970–977.Google Scholar

Hoeren, Thomas. ‘ACTA ad acta? Überlegunqen zum urheberrechtlichen “Shitstorm”’, MMR vol. 3 (2012): 137–138.Google Scholar

Honsakasalo, Pessi. ‘Criminal Proceedings against the Administrators of a BitTorrent Tracker: Finreactor KKO:2010:47’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 32 no. 11 (2010): 591–592.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, Bernt and Okediji, Ruth. ‘Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright: Final Report’, Open Society Institute’s Information Program, March 2008. Available at: .

Ibáñez, Josep. ‘Transnational Private Authorities and the Erosion of Democracy’, in Cornago, Noé, Filibi, Igor, and Frosini, Justin (eds.), Democracy With(out) Nations? Old and New Foundations for Political Communities in a Changing World. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco, 2011.Google Scholar

Idris, Kamil. Intellectual Property: A Power Tool for Economic Growth. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2002.Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. ‘Brazil, India Challenge Generic Drug Detentions’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest vol. 14 no. 17, 12 May 2010. Available at: .Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Fostering Low Carbon Growth: The Case for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement, ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainable Energy. Geneva: ICTSD, 2011. Available at:

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. ‘EU Parliament Criticises Secrecy of ACTA Negotiations in Landslide Vote’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest vol. 14 no. 10,17 March 2010. Available at: .Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, ‘European Generic Drug Seizures Take Centre Stage at TRIPS Council Meeting’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest vol. 13 no. 21, 10 June 2009. Available at: .Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. ‘New Zealand Confirms Plans for Introducing Cigarette Packaging Law’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest vol. 17 no. 7, 27 February 2013. Available at: .Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. ‘Development Dimensions of Intellectual Property in Uganda: Transfer of Technology, Access to Medicines and Textbooks’, UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2010.Google Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development – United Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentResource Book on TRIPS and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. ‘Digital Music Report 2012 – Expanding Choice. Going Global’, IFPI annual report, 2012. Available at: .

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry‘Digital Music Report 2013 – Engine of a digital world’, IFPI annual report, 2013. Available at: .

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry‘IFPI Digital Music Report 2011 – Music at the touch of a button’, IFPI annual report, 2011. Available at: .

International Intellectual Property Alliance. ‘2012 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement’, February 2012. Available at: .

IP Australia. Implementing the TRIPS Protocol. Canberra: IP Australia, 2010.Google Scholar

IQsensato. ‘The Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Global Policy Implications’, In Focus, 2 June 2008.

Jaffe, Adam and Lerner, Josh. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Jingzhou, Tao. ‘Problems and New Developments in the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in China’, in Torremans, Paul, Shan, Hailing and Erauw, Johan (eds.), Intellectual Property and TRIPS Compliance in China: Chinese and European Perspectives. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2007.Google Scholar

Johns, Adrian. Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, Otto. ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review vol. 37 no. 1 (1974): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaminski, Margot. ‘The Origins and Potential Impact of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, Yale Journal of International Law vol. 34 (2009): 247.Google Scholar

Kaminski, Margot ‘An Overview and the Evolution of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology vol. 21 no. 3 (2011): 385–444.Google Scholar

Kaminski, Margot ‘Recent Development: The Origins and Potential Impact of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, Yale Journal of International Law vol. 34 (2009): 247–256.Google Scholar

Kamperman Sanders, Anselm, Shabalala, Dalindyebo, Moerland, Anke, Pugatch, Meir, and Vergano, Paolo. ‘The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): An Assessment’, study for the Committee on International Trade, Directorate-General for External Policies of the European Parliament. Brussels: European Union, 2011.Google Scholar

Karaganis, Joe (ed.). Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. New York: Social Science Research Council, 2011.Google Scholar

Katz, Eddan and Hinze, Gwen. ‘The Impact of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement on the Knowledge Economy: The Accountability of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative for the Creation of IP Enforcement Norms Through Executive Trade Agreements’, Yale Journal of International Law Online vol. 35 (2009): 24.Google Scholar

KEA European Affairs. ‘The impact of culture on creativity’, study commissioned by the European Commission, 2009. Available at: .

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kelsey, Jane and Wallach, Lori. ‘“Investor-State” Disputes in Trade Pacts Threaten Fundamental Principles of National Judicial Systems’, working paper, April 2012. Available at: .

Kennedy, M., Legal Options for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement, ICTSD, 2012.

Koelman, Kamiel. ‘A Hard Nut to Crack: The Protection of Technological Measures’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 22 no. 6 (2010): 272–288.Google Scholar

Korff, Douwe and Brown, Ian. ‘Opinion on the compatibility of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) with the European Convention on Human Rights & the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, opinion commissioned by the Greens/European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament, 2011.

Kumar, Shashank. ‘Border Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights against In-Transit Generic Pharmaceuticals’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 32 no. 10 (2010): 506–519.Google Scholar

Kur, Annette and Ruse-Khan, Henning Grosse. ‘Enough Is Enough: The Notion of Binding Ceilings in International Intellectual Property Protection’, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper Series No. 09-01. Munich: Max Planck Institute, 2008.Google Scholar

La Quadrature du Net. ‘Three Core Reasons for Rejecting ACTA’, La Quadrature du Net, 29 March 2010. Available at: .

LaFrance, Mary. ‘Graduated Response by Industry Compact’, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal vol. 30 no. 2: 165–186.

Lamy, Pascal. ‘The Rise of Regional Trade Agreements could lead to “Policy Fragmentation’’’, speech at the University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 20 September 2012. Available at: .

Lee, Timothy. ‘As Curiosity Touches Down on Mars, Video Is Taken Down from YouTube’, Ars Technica, 7 August 2012. Available at: .

Lee, Timothy‘Music Publisher Uses DMCA to Take Down Romney Ad of Obama Crooning’, Ars Technica, 17 July 2012. Available at: .

Lee, Timothy‘New Zealand Prime Minister Apologizes For Illegal Dotcom Spying’, Ars Technica, 28 September 2012. Available at: .

Lefranc, David. ‘Historical Perspective on Criminal Enforcement’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre. ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law vol. 4 (1997): 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, David. ‘Bring in the Nerds: Secrecy, National Security and the Creation of International Intellectual Property Law’, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal vol. 30 no. 2 (2012): 105–151.Google Scholar

Levine, David ‘Transparency Soup: The ACTA Negotiating Process and “Black Box” Lawmaking’, American University International Law Review, vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 811–837.Google Scholar

Lewis, Meredith. ‘The Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Paradigm or Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review vol. 34 (2011): 27–52.Google Scholar

Liberman, Jonathan. ‘Plainly Constitutional: The Upholding of Plain Tobacco Packaging by the High Court of Australia’, American Journal of Law and Medicine vol. 39 no. 2 (2013): 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, David. International Domain Name Law: ICANN and the UDRP. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

Lipton, Jacqueline. Internet Domain Names, Trademarks and Free Speech. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loughlan, Patricia. ‘‘‘You Wouldn’t Steal a Car”: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 29 no. 10 (2007): 401–405.Google Scholar

Malkawi, Bashar. ‘A Long “TRIP” Home: How the Berne Convention, TRIPS Agreement, and Other Instruments Complement the International Copyright System’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 35 no. 2 (2013): 93–107.Google Scholar

Manta, Irina. ‘The Puzzle of Criminal Sanctions for Intellectual Property Infringement’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology vol. 24 no. 2 (2011): 469–518.Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith. ‘The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law vol. 9 no. 1 (1998): 109–161.Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith‘The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer’, in Fink, Carsten and Maskus, Keith (eds.), Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. New York: World Bank-Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maskus, Keith and Reichman, Jerome. ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’, in Maskus, Keith and Reichman, Jerome (eds.), International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massey, Joseph. ‘The Emperor Is Far Away: China’s Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Protection, 1986–2006’, Chicago Journal of International Law vol. 7 no. 1 (2006): 231–237.Google Scholar

Matthews, Duncan. ‘Counterfeiting and Public Health’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Matthews, Duncan‘The Rise and Fall of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Lessons for the European Union’, Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 127/2012. London: Queen Mary University, 2012.Google Scholar

Matulionyte, Rita. ‘ACTA’s Digital Chapter: remaining concerns and what can be done’, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property vol. 1 no. 3 (2011): 248–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition. ‘A Balanced Interpretation of the “Three-Step Test” in Copyright Law’, declaration on the ‘Three-Step Test’. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition, 2012.

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition‘Principles for Intellectual Property Provisions in Bilateral and Regional Agreements’, Munich: Max Plank Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition, 2013.

May, Christopher. The World Intellectual Property Organization: Resurgence and the Development Agenda. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

McGeveran, William. ‘Four Free Speech Goals for Trademark Law’, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal vol. 18 (2008): 1205–1227.Google Scholar

McManis, Charles. ‘The Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): Two Tales of a Treaty’, Houston Law Review vol. 46 no. 4 (2009): 1235–1256.Google Scholar

McManis, Charles and Pelletier, John. ‘Two Tales of a Treaty Revisited: The Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, Legal Studies Research Paper no. 12-04-10. St. Louis: Washington University in St. Louis, 2012.Google Scholar

Médecins Sans Frontières. ‘A Blank Cheque for Abuse: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and its Impact on Access to Medicines’, MSF Briefing document, February 2012. Available at: .

Mercedes Frabboni, Maria. ‘File-Sharing and the Role of Intermediaries in the Marketplace: National, European Union and International Developments’, in Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), Copyright Enforcement and the Internet. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.Google Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan. ‘Beyond the Text: The Significance of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, Journal of International Economic Law vol. 15 no. 2 (2012): 361–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan ‘Drugs Seized in Transit: The Case that Wasn’t’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly vol. 61 no. 2 (2012): 389–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan‘“Seizing” Pharmaceuticals in Transit: Analysing the WTO Dispute that Wasn’t’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly vol. 61 no. 2 (2012): 389–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan‘TRIPS-Plus Provisions in FTAs: Recent Trends’, in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Mertha, Andrew. The Politics of Piracy: Intellectual Property in Contemporary China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Metzger, Axel. ‘A Primer on ACTA, What Europeans Should Fear about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law vol. 1 (2010): 109–116.Google Scholar

Metzger, Axel and Kreutzer, Till. ‘Richtlinie zum Urheberrecht in der “Informationsgesellschaft” Privatkopie trotz technischer Schutzmaßnahmen?’, MMR (2002): 139–142.Google Scholar

Moore, Jeffrey, Spink, John, and Lipp, Markus. ‘Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010’, Journal of Food Science vol. 77 no. 4 (2012): 118–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, Michael. ‘ACTA’s Abandoned Third-Party Liability Provisions and What They Mean for the Future’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 10. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter. ‘The Rise and Fall of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Where Now?’, The International Lawyer vol. 34 no. 3 (2000): 1033–1053.Google Scholar

Muñoz Tellez, Viviana. ‘The Changing Global Governance of Intellectual Property Enforcement: A New Challenge for Developing Countries’, in Li, Xuan and Correa, Carlos (eds.), Intellectual Property Enforcement: International Perspectives. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2009.Google Scholar

Musungu, Sisule. ‘Sections of the Kenya Anti Counterfeiting Act Struck Down as a Threat to Fundamental Human Rights’, IQsensato Ideas in Development Blog, 23 April 2012.

Mylly, Tuomas. ‘Criminal enforcement and European Union law’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Nakatomi, Michitaka, Plurilateral Agreements: A Viable Alternative to the World Trade Organization?, ADBI Working Paper, Number 439, October 2013, at:

Ncube, Caroline. ‘Enforcing Patent Rights Against Goods in Transit: a New Threat to Transborder Trade in Generic Medicines’, SA Mercantile Law Journal vol. 21 no. 5 (2009): 680–694.Google Scholar

New, William and Mara, Kaitlin. ‘Near-Finished Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Pact Could Have Broad Reach’, Intellectual Property Watch, 12 October 2010. Available at: .

Nguyên, Quôc Dinh. Droit International Public, 5th Edition. Paris: L.G.D.J, 1995.Google Scholar

Nunes, Ana Beatriz, Barbosa, Denis Borges, and Grau-Kuntz, Karin. A Propriedade Intelectual na Construção dos Tribunais Constitucionais. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2009.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Danny. ‘Blogging ACTA Across the Globe: Lessons from Korea’, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 29 January 2010. Available at: .

Ohly, Ansgar. ‘Counterfeiting and Consumer Protection’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Outterson, Kevin. ‘Import Safety Rules Should Not Hinder Legitimate Generic Drug Markets: The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, in Coglianese, Cary, Finkel, Adam, and Zaring, David (eds.), Import Safety: Regulatory Governance in the Global Economy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Oxfam. ‘Statement Regarding ACTA and Public Health’, Oxfam position paper, October 2011. Available at: .

Papadopoulou, Maria Daphne. ‘ACTA and Copyright in the EU: a Love or Hate Relationship’, paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Information Law and Ethics, Thessaloniki, 2011.Google Scholar

Patry, William. Moral Panics and the Copyright War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘Legal Avenues to “Multilateralizing Regionalism”: Beyond article XXIV’, in Baldwin, R. and Low, P. (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System, Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Peers, Steeve. ‘EU criminal Law and the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Law Review vol. 33 no. 4 (2008): 507.Google Scholar

Penalver, Eduardo and Katyal, Sonia. Property Outlaws: How Squatters, Pirates, and Protestors Improve the Law of Ownership. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Peukert, Alexander. ‘Why Do “Good” People Disregard Copyright on the Internet?’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

PharmaAfrica. ‘EAC Pushes Towards Drug Registration Harmonisation and Integration’, AfriPharma Focus vol. 1 no. 1 (2012).Google Scholar

Pires de Carvalho, Nuno. The TRIPS Regime of Patent Rights. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas Matthew Rimmer and Rubenstein, Kim (eds.). Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Medicines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Port, Kenneth. ‘A Case Against the ACTA’, William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-04. St. Paul: William Mitchell College of Law, 2011.Google Scholar

Porto, Patrícia. ‘O interesse público brasileiro na adesão ao Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement (ACTA)’, Revista Eletrônica do Instituto Brasileiro de Propriedade Intelectual vol. 1 (2011): 148–156.Google Scholar

Prakash, Saikrishna and Ramsey, Micheal. ‘The Executive Power over Foreign Affairs’, Yale Law Journal vol. 111 (2001): 231–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, David. ‘A Critical Look at the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Richmond Journal of Law and Technology vol. 17 no. 4 (2011): 1–25.Google Scholar

Ramalho, Ana. ‘The European Union and ACTA – Or Making Omelettes without Eggs (Again)’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (2011): 97–101.Google Scholar

RAND Corporation. ‘Film Piracy, Organized Crime, and Terrorism’, Safety and Justice Program. Santa Monica: RAND, 2009.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal. ‘Density and Conflict in International Intellectual Property Law’, University of California at Davis Law Review vol. 40 no. 3 (2007): 1021–1038.Google Scholar

Reichman, Jerome. ‘Intellectual Property in the Twenty First Century: Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow?’, Houst Law Review vol. 46 (2009): 1115–1185.Google ScholarPubMed

Reichman, Jerome ‘The TRIPS Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries?’, Case Western Reserve Journal of international Law vol. 32 (2000): 441–470.Google Scholar

Reichman, Jerome and Lange, David. ‘Bargaining Around the TRIPS Agreement: The Case for Ongoing Public-Private Initiatives to Facilitate Worldwide Intellectual Property Transactions’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law vol. 9 no. 1 (1998): 11–68.Google Scholar

Rens, Andrew. ‘Collateral Damage: The Impact of ACTA and the Enforcement Agenda on the World’s Poorest People’, American University International Law Review vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 783–809.Google Scholar

Rens, Andrew ‘Enforcement Theater, the Enforcement Agenda and the Institutionalization of Enforcement Theater in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review vol. 35 (2012): 553–574.Google Scholar

Rice, Nathaniel. ‘Head-in-the-Clouds: The Public’s Failure to Recognize How the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Protects the Global Intellectual Property Marketplace in the Digital Age’, Suffolk Transnational Law Review vol. 35 (2012): 631–650.Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew. ‘Appearance before the Inquiry into the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement 2011’, Australian Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, March 2012.

Rimmer, Matthew ‘Big Tobacco and the Trans-Pacific Partnership’, Tobacco Control vol. 21 no. 6 (2012) 526–527.Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew‘‘‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s”: eBay Inc., Trademark Law, and Counterfeiting’, Journal of Law, Information and Science vol. 21 no. 1 (2011): 128–166.Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew ‘Cigarettes Will Kill You: The High Court of Australia and Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products’, WIPO Magazine no. 1 (2013): 20–23. Available at: .Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew‘A Dangerous Investment: Australia, New Zealand, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership’, The Conversation, 2 July 2012. Available at: .

Rimmer, Matthew ‘A Fair Use Project for Australia: Copyright Law and Creative Freedom’, Copyright Reporter vol. 28 no. 3 (2010): 165–212.Google Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew ‘Race Against Time: The Export of Essential Medicines to Rwanda’, Public Health Ethics vol. 1 no. 2 (2008): 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew‘A Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement 2011’, February 2012. Available at: .

Rodà, Caroline. Les conséquences civiles de la contrefaçon des droits de propriété industrielle : droits français, belge, luxembourgeois, allemand, anglais. Paris: Litec CEIPI Series, 2011.Google Scholar

Roffe, Pedro. ‘Intellectual Property, Preferential Trade Agreements and the Multilateral System’, in ICTSD, The Future and the WTO: Confronting the Challenges. A Collection of Short Essays; ICTSD Programme on Global Economic Policy and Institutions, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. Available at: .

Roffe, Pedro and Genovesi, Luis Mariano. ‘Propuesta de estrategia y plan de acción: implementación del Acuerdo de Promoción Comercial con los EEUU en el área de propiedad intelectual’, Inter-American Development Bank. Washington DC: IADB, 2009.Google Scholar

Roudaut, Mickaël. ‘From Sweatshops to Organized Crime: The New Face of Counterfeiting’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Ryan, Michael. Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institutions, 1988.Google Scholar

Saez, Catherine. ‘ACTA a Sign of Weakness in Multilateral System, WIPO Head Says’, Intellectual Property Watch, 30 June 2010. Available at: .

Saez, Catherine‘WIPO Slowly Advances Industrial Design Treaty, Eyes ISP Liability for Trademarks’, Intellectual Property Watch, 30 June 2010. Available at: .

Salzman, James. ‘Labor Rights, Globalization and Institutions: The Role and Influence of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’, Michigan Journal of International Law vol. 21 no.4 (2000): 769–848.Google Scholar

Sauvé, P. ‘A Plurilateral Agenda for Services? Assessing the case for a Trade in Services Agreement (TISA)’, Working Paper No 2013/29, May 2013.

Schiappacasse, Mikhaelle. ‘Intellectual Property Rights in China: Technology Transfers and Economic Development’, Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal vol. 2 (2004): 164–185.Google Scholar

Schmidt-Szalewski, Joanna. ‘The French Case: Comparison of the Past, Present and Future of Criminal Law’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Sell, Susan. ‘Everything Old Is New Again: The Development Agenda Then and Now’, The WIPO Journal vol. 3 (2011): 20.Google Scholar

Sell, Susan‘From Forum-Shifters to Shape-Shifters: Rulemaking and Enforcement in Intellectual Property’, International Studies Association Conference,New York City, February 2009.Google Scholar

Sell, Susan‘The Global IP Upward Ratchet, Anti-Counterfeiting and Piracy Enforcement Efforts: The State of Play’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 15. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Sell, Susan‘Multinational Corporations as Agents of Change: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights’, in Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony (eds.), Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sell, SusanPrivate Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sell, Susan ‘TRIPS Was Never Enough: Vertical Forum Shifting, FTAS, ACTA, and TPP’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law vol. 18 no. 2 (2011): 447–478.Google Scholar

Seuba, Xavier. ‘Checks and Balances in the Intellectual Property Enforcement Field: Reconstructing EU Trade Agreements’, in Geiger, Christopher (ed.), Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013.Google Scholar

Seuba, Xavier‘Free Trade of Pharmaceutical Products: the Limits of Intellectual Property Enforcement at the Border’, ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper 27. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2010.Google Scholar

Seuba, Xavier, Rovira, Joan and Bloemen, Sophie. ‘Welfare Implications of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Measures’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 5. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Shams, Heba. ‘“Club Multilateralism” and Global Supranationalism: The Case of FATF’, in Attanasio, John B. and Norton, Joseph J. (eds.), Multilateralism v Unilateralism: Policy Choices in a Global Society. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2004.Google Scholar

Silva, Alberto Cerda. ‘Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights by Diminishing Privacy: How the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement Jeopardizes the Right to Privacy’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 11. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Spindler, Gerald and Schuster, Fabian (eds.). Recht der Neuen Medien. Kommentar. Munich: Beck, 2008.Google Scholar

Stamatoudi, Irini. ‘ACTA, Internet Service Provider and the Acquis Communautaire’, in Rosén, Jan (ed.), Intellectual Property at the Crossroads of Trade. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Stieper, Malte. ‘Das Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, GRUR International (2011): 124.Google Scholar

Stopford, John and Strange, Susan. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan. ‘Big Business and the State’, Millennium Journal of International Studies vol. 20 no. 2 (1991): 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, SusanThe Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan ‘States, Firms and Diplomacy’, International Affairs vol. 68 no. 1 (1992): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan ‘Territory, State, Authority and Economy: A New Realist Ontology of Global Political Economy’, in Cox, Robert (ed.), The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. Tokyo, New York, and Paris: Macmillan, 1997.Google Scholar

Szott Moohr, Geraldine. ‘The Crime of Copyright Infringement: An Inquiry Based on Morality, Harm and Criminal Theory’, Boston University Law Review vol. 83 no. 4 (2003): 731–783.Google Scholar

Tera Consultants. ‘Building a Digital Economy: The Importance of Saving Jobs in the EU’s Creative Industries’, study commissioned by the International Chamber of Commerce’s BASCAP initiative, 2010. Available at: .

Thompson, William. Bootleg Billions: The Impact of Counterfeit Goods Trade on New York City, report by the City of New York’s Office of the Comptroller, 2004. Available at: .

Timm, Trevor. ‘How PIPA and SOPA Violate White House Principles Supporting Free Speech and Innovation’, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 16 January 2012. Available at: .

Tribe, Laurence. ‘Taking Text and Structure Seriously: Reflections on Free-Form Method in Constitutional Interpretation’, Harvard Law Review vol. 108 no. 6 (1995): 1221–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turana, Tariana. ‘Government Moves Forward with Plain Packaging of Tobacco Products’, New Zealand Government, 19 February 2013. Available at: .

Van Alstine, Michael. ‘Executive Aggrandizement in Foreign Affairs Lawmaking’, UCLA Law Review vol. 54 (2006): 309.Google Scholar

van ‘t Klooster, Kelvin. ‘Downloading … soon to be Illegal in the Netherlands?’, IRIS – Legal Observations of the European Audiovisual Observator, May 2011. Available at: .

Von Braun, Johanna and Munyi, Peter. ‘New Enforcement Mechanisms Challenge the Legality of Generics in the Name of Public Health: The Emergence of Anti-Counterfeiting Legislation in East Africa’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law vol. 18 (2010): 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Lewinski, Silke. International Copyright Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Voon, Tania, Mitchell, Andrew, Liberman, Jonathan, and Ayres, Glyn (eds.). Public Health and Plain Packaging of Cigarettes: Legal Issues. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voorhoof, Dirk and Høedt-Rasmussen, Inger. ‘ECHR: Copyright vs. Freedom of Expression’, Kluwer Copyright Blog, 25 January 2013. Available at: .

Vrins, Olivier. ‘The impact of ACTA on the EU acquis and civil liberties’, paper for the Committee on International Trade, Directorate-General for External Policies of the European Parliament. Brussels: European Union, 2012.Google Scholar

Wadlow, W.‘“Including Trade in Counterfeit Goods”: The Origins of TRIPs as a GATT Anti-Counterfeiting Code’, Intellectual Property Quarterly 3 (2007): 350–402.Google Scholar

Walter, Michael and Lewinski, Silke von (eds.). European Copyright Law: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Walterscheid, Edward. ‘To Promote the Progress of Science and the Useful Arts: The Background and Origin of the Intellectual Property Clause of the United States Constitution’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law vol. 2 no. 1 (1994): 37–38.Google Scholar

Wambi, Michael. ‘East Africa: Global Players Behind Anti-Counterfeit Law Campaign’, Inter Press Service News Agency, 21 May 2010. Available at: .

Wambi, Michael‘HEALTH UGANDA: EU Supports Law Threatening Access to Medicines’, Inter Press Service News Agency, 15 March 2010. Available at: .

Wan, Charn Wing. ‘Three Strikes Law: A Least Cost Solution to Rampant Online Piracy’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice vol. 5 no. 4 (2010): 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Wattal, Jayashree. ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Agriculture: Interests of Developing Countries’, paper presented at The Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda, World Bank, Geneva, 1999.Google Scholar

Weatherall, Kimberlee. ‘ACTA – Australian Section by Section Analysis’, paper draft, available online at: .

Weatherall, Kimberlee‘ACTA as a New Kind of International IP Law-Making’, PIJIP Research Paper no. 12. Washington, DC: American University Washington College of Law, 2010.Google Scholar

Weatherall, Kimberlee ‘Politics, Compromise, Text and the Failures of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, Sydney Law Review vol. 33 no. 2 (2011): 229–263.Google Scholar

Weatherall, Kimberlee‘Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement 2011’, February 2012. Available at: .

Wechsler, Andrea. ‘Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property Law: An Economic Approach’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Westkamp, Guido. ‘Criminalizing IP Use in the UK: From Trademark Use to Illicit Downloads’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Wollgast, Heike. ‘Intellectual Property Litigation Costs – An Introduction’, WIPO Magazine no. 1 (2010). Available online at: .Google Scholar

Woolcock, Stephen. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon and the European Union as an Actor in International Trade’, European Centre for International Political Economy Working Paper no. 1/2010. Brussels: ECIPE, 2010.Google Scholar

Xue, Hong. ‘An Anatomical Study of the United States versus China at the World Trade Organisation on Intellectual Property Enforcement’, European Intellectual Property Review vol. 31 no. 6 (2009): 292–299.Google Scholar

Xue, Hong‘Enforcement for Development: Why Not an Agenda for the Developing World?’, in Li, Xuan and Correa, Carlos (eds.), Intellectual Property Enforcement: International Perspectives. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2009.Google Scholar

Yager, L., Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeited and Pirated Goods, WIPO WIPO/ACE/6/4. 2010.

Yoo, John. ‘Laws as Treaties? The Constitutionality of the Congressional-Executive Agreement’, Michigan Law Review vol. 99 (2001): 757–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, Peter. ‘The ACTA Committee’, Drake University Legal Studies Research Paper no. 12–34. Des Moines: Drake University Law School, 2012.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘ACTA and Its Complex Politics’, The WIPO Journal vol. 3 no. 1 (2011): 1–16.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter‘The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement’, Drake University Legal Studies Research Paper no. 12–13. Des Moines: Drake University Law School, 2012.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘Currents and Crosscurrents in the International Intellectual Property Regime’, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review vol. 38 no. 1 (2004): 323–443.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘Enforcement, Enforcement, What Enforcement? IDEA’, The Journal of Law and Technology vol. 52 (2012): 239–284.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘Intellectual Property and Human Rights in the Nonmultilateral Era’, Florida Law Review vol. 64 (2011): 1045–1100.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘International Enclosure, the Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia’, Michigan State Law Review vol. 1 (2007): 1–33.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter‘The Middle Intellectual Property Powers’, in Peerenboom, Randall and Ginsburg, Tom (eds.), Law and Development in Middle-Income Countries: Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘The objectives and principles of the TRIPS Agreement’, Houston Law Review vol. 46 no. 4 (2009): 979–1046.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘From Pirates to Partners (Episode II): Protecting Intellectual Property in Post-WTO China’, American University Law Review vol. 55 (2006): 901–1000.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter‘Shaping Chinese Criminal Enforcement Norms through the TRIPS Agreement’, in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2012.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘Six Secret (and Now Open) Fears of ACTA’, SMU Law Review vol. 64 no. 3 (2011): 975–1094.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘A Tale of Two Development Agendas’, Ohio Northern University Law Review vol. 35 no. 2 (2009): 465–573.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘TRIPS Enforcement and Developing Countries’, American University International Law Review vol. 26 no. 3 (2011): 727–782.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘The TRIPS Enforcement Dispute’, Nebraska Law Review vol. 89 no. 4 (2011):1046–1131.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘TRIPS and Its Achilles’ Heel’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law vol. 18 no.2 (2011): 479–531.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter ‘TRIPS and Its Discontents’, Marquette University Intellectual Property Law Review vol. 10 (2006): 369–410.Google Scholar

Yu, Peter‘The U.S.-China Dispute over TRIPS Enforcement’, Drake University Law School Occasional Papers in Intellectual Property Law no. 5. Des Moines: Drake University Law School, 2010.Google Scholar

Zilkha, Genan. ‘The RIAA’s Troubling Solution to File-Sharing’, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal vol. 20 no. 2 (2009): 667–713.Google Scholar

ACTA negotiating parties. ‘The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement – Summary of Key Elements Under Discussion’, press release, 6 November 2009. Available at: .

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, Consolidated Text: Prepared for Public Release, April 2010, Available at:

Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, Consolidated Text: Reflects Changes Made During the September 2010 Tokyo Round, 2nd October 2010: Available at:

Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property. Review of Trade Mark Enforcement. Canberra: IP Australia, 2004.Google Scholar

Australia, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. ‘Discussion Paper: An International Proposal for a Plurilateral Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)’, 13 November 2007

Australian Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. Protocol Amending the TRIPS Agreement. Canberra: Australian Parliament, 2007.Google Scholar

Australian Joint Standing Committee on TreatiesReport 126 – Treaty Tabled on 21 November 2011: Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement 2011. Canberra: Australian Parliament, 2012.Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission. Copyright and the Digital Economy: Issues Paper. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission, 2012.Google Scholar

Brasilia Declaration, India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) Dialogue Forum, Fourth Summit of the Heads of State/Government, Brasília Declaration, 15 April 2010, Brasilia. Available at:

European Commission. ‘10 Myths About ACTA’, position paper, January 2012. Available at: .

European Commission‘A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights Boosting creativity and innovation to provide economic growth, high quality jobs and first class products and services in Europe’, Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2011.

European Commission ‘Comments on the “Opinion of European Academics on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement”’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law vol. 2 (2011): 171–183.Google Scholar

European Commission‘Enhancing the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market’, Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2009.

European Commission, ‘Follow-up to the European Parliament Resolution on the transparency and state of play of the ACTA negotiations, adopted by the Commission on 12 May 2010’ Available at: , 2010.

European Commission, ‘What ACTA is about’, 2012, Available at: .

European Data Protection Survey. ‘Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, 2010. Available at: .

European Data Protection Survey‘Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the United Mexican States, the Kingdom of Morocco, New Zealand, the Republic of Singapore, the Swiss Confederation and the United States of America’, 2012. Available at: .

European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies. The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): An Assessment. Brussels: European Union, 2011. Available at: .

Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2005 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers. Washington, DC: United States Government, 2005.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. OECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentThe Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentMagnitude of counterfeiting and piracy of tangible products: an update. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar

United Nations International Law Commission. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’,report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Geneva: United Nations, 2006.Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘Generic Drugs: UN Expert on Health Hails European Parliament’s Rejection of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, 9 July 2012. Available at: .

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. ‘Culture: a driver and an enabler of sustainable development’, Thematic think piece, UN System Task Team on the post-2015 UN Development Agenda. Paris: UNESCO, 2012. Available at: .Google Scholar

United Nations International Law Commission. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’,report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Geneva: United Nations, 2006.Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘Generic Drugs: UN Expert on Health Hails European Parliament’s Rejection of Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, 9 July 2012. Available at: .

United States Committee on Armed Services. Inquiry into the Counterfeit Electronic Parts in the Department of Defense Supply Chain. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate, 2012. Available at: .Google Scholar

United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Intellectual Property Rights – Fiscal Year 2011 Seizure Statistics, report prepared by CBP Office of International Trade. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security, 2012. Available at: .Google Scholar

United States Economics and Statistics Administration and United States Patent and Trademark Office. Intellectual Property and the US Economy: Industries in Focus. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, 2012.Google Scholar

United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator. U.S. 2011 Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Annual Report on Intellectual Property Enforcement. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2012.Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization. ‘Counterfeiting and Piracy Endangers Global Economic Recovery Say Global Congress Leaders’, WIPO Press Release PR/2009/621, 2009.

World Summit on the Information Society. Tunis Agenda for the Information Society. United Nations, Tunis, 2005.Google Scholar

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 8–9 June 2010 Meeting, IP/C/M/63, 4 October 2010.

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 26–27 October 2010 Meeting, IP/C/M/64.

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 26–27 October 2010 Meeting, IP/C/M/64, 17 February 2011.

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 24–25 October 2011 Meeting, IP/C/M/67, 15 February 2012.

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 28–29 February 2012 Meeting, IP/C/M/69, 15 May 2012.

World Trade Organization, TRIPS Council, Minutes of 5th June 2012 Meeting, IP/C/M/70, October 2012.

ABC News. ‘Julian Assange to Run for the Senate’, ABC News, 19 March 2012. Available at:

Amnesty International. ‘EU urged to reject international anti-counterfeiting pact’, AI News, 10 February 2012. Available at:

Anderson, Nate. ‘Son of ACTA: meet the next secret copyright treaty’, Ars Technica, 11 March 2011. Available at: arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/son-of-acta-meet-the -next-secret-copyright-treaty.ars?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=rss

Bason, Tamlin. ‘Wyden, Issa Say Digital Bill of Rights Needed to Prevent New Versions of SOPA’, Bloomberg BNA, 12 June 2012. Available at:

Bloomberg Businessweek Magazine. ‘Fakes!’, 6 February 2005. Available at:

Cahir, John. ‘High Court Approves File Sharing Settlement – ISP Addresses not Personal Data’, Ireland’s IP & Technology Law Blog, 8 May 2010. Available at:

Carter, Zach. ‘Obama Trade Document Leaked, Revealing New Corporate Powers and Broken Campaign Promises’, The Huffington Post, 13 June 2012. Available at:

De Winter, Brenno. ‘Dutch internal ACTA-documents’, Bigwobber, 25 February 2010. Available at:

Dean, Owen. ‘ACTA – a sting in the tail for IP rights enforcement’, The Anton Moster Chair of Intellectual Property Blog, 7 October 2011. Available at:

Engström, Christian. ‘Introducing CETA, the ACTA Zombie’, article from the author’s blog (2012):

EurActiv. ‘ACTA activates European civil society’, EurActiv News, 2 February 2012. Available at:

EurActiv‘Lawmakers call for halt to ACTA deal’, EurActiv News, 5 October 2010. Available at:

Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure. ‘Copyright Criminal measures in ACTA’, ACTA Blog, 8 October 2010. Available at

Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure‘EU Commission propaganda on ACTA’, ACTA Blog, 26 January 2012. Available at:

Geist, Michael. ‘ACTA Ultra-Lite: The U.S. Cave on the Internet Chapter Complete’, article from the author’s blog (2010):

Geist, Michael‘Here Comes ACTA: Canadian Government Introduces Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement’, article from author’s blog (2013):

Geist, Michael‘Toward an ACTA Super-Structure: How ACTA May Replace WIPO’, article from author’s blog (2010):

Geist, Michael‘U.S. Intellectual Property Demands for TPP Leak: Everything it Wanted in ACTA But Didn’t Get’, article from author’s blog (2011):

Goldsmith, Jack and Lessig, Lawrence. ‘Anti-counterfeiting agreement raises constitutional concerns’, The Washington Post, 26 March 2010. Available at:

Graeber, Charles. ‘Inside the Mansion – and Mind – of Kim Dotcom, the Most Wanted Man on the Net’, Wired Magazine, 18 October 2012. Available at:

Hilvert, John. ‘Government Eyes Cost-Benefit Analyses for ACTA, TPP’, IT News, 14 August 2012. Available at:

Inside U.S. Trade. ‘Consumer Groups Fear ACTA Could Encourage Generic Drug Seizures’, Inside U.S. Trade’s NewsStand, 30 April 2010.

Inside U.S. Trade‘De Gucht Lashes Out at US over ACTA, Geographical Indications’, Inside U.S. Trade’s NewsStand, 16 July 2010.exercises?’, joint letter to U.S. Trade Representative, 21 July 2009. Available at:

Knowledge Ecology International. ‘ACTA is secret. How transparent are other global norm setting exercises?’, joint letter to U.S. Trade Representative, 21 July 2009. Available at:

Kuhn, Mart. ‘ACTA means trouble, but don’t take our word for it’, Public Knowledge Policy Blog, 10 June 2010. Available at:

Lee, David. ‘European Parliament rapporteur quits in Acta protest’, BBC News Technology, 27 January 2012. Available at:

Lee, David‘Acta protests: Thousands take to streets across Europe’, BBC News Technology, 11 February 2012. Available at:

Llewellyn, Howell. ‘‘‘Three-Strikes” Off Anti-Piracy Agenda In Spain’, Billboard, 22 June 2009. Available at:

Love, James. ‘KEI comment on US signing of ACTA’, Knowledge Ecology International, 3 October 2011. Available at:

Love, James‘What’s Still Wrong with ACTA, and Why Governments Should Reject the Illegitimate Treaty’, Knowledge Ecology International, 26 February 2012. Available at:

Macpherson, Andrew. ‘EU crossed wires over ACTA’, Iptegrity.com, 11 July 2010. Available at:

MarkMonitor. ‘Traffic Report: Online Piracy and Counterfeiting’ report January 2011. Available at:

MarkMonitor‘Seven Best Practices for Fighting Counterfeit Sales Online’, report September 2010. Available at:

Martin, Peter. ‘Emerson Chasing Deals That Look Like Sellouts’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 7 August 2012. Available at:

Martin, Peter‘Plain Packs: The New Kines of Attack. Big Tobacco Tries the WTO and TPPA’, The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald, 20 August 2012. Available at:

Martin, Peter‘What’s Our Trade Minister Up To? What’s He Signing in Our Name?’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 7 August 2012. Available at:

Martin, Peter‘Why Do We Negotiate Free Trade Agreements in Secret?’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 22 May 2012. Available at:

Masnick, Mike. ‘Leaked State Department Cables Confirm That ACTA Was Designed to Pressure Developing Nations’, Tech Dirt, 4 February 2011. Available at:

Masnick, Mike‘USTR Refuses to Release Congressional Research Service Study on Legality of ACTA’, TechDirt, 28 March 2011. Available at:

Mannheim, Markus. ‘Top Customs Executives to Bear the Brunt of Cuts’, The Canberra Times, 27 February 2012. Available at:

Mbatiah, Suleiman. ‘Kenya: Pharmaceutical Companies Pushing Anti-Counterfeit Law’, Inter Press Service News Agency, 14 June 2010. Available at:

McCullagh, Declan. ‘Copyright Treaty is Classified for “National Security’’’, CNET NEWS, 12 March 2009. Available at: news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10195547-38.htm

Oberti, Charlotte. ‘Hadopi: La police du Web Fliquée par Aurélie Filippetti’, France24, 3 August 2012. Available at:

Pirate Party Australia. ‘Government Should Follow EU in Rejecting ACTA, says Pirate Party’, Pirate Party Website, 21 June 2012. Available at:

Rimmer, Matthew. ‘A Mercurial Treaty: The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the United States’, The Conversation, 15 June 2012. Available at:

Rimmer, Matthew‘Opening Pandora’s Box: Secret Treaty Threatens Human Rights’, The Conversation, 4 April 2012. Available at:

Rimmer, Matthew‘The High Court and the Marlboro Man: The Plain Packaging Decision’, The Conversation, 18 October 2012. Available at:

Rimmer, Matthew‘The Two Treaties: Obama, Trade, and the State of the Union’, The Conversation, 14 February 2013. Available at:

Schaake, Marietje. ‘FAQ: Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)’, Marietje Schaake official website,

Schaake, Marietje‘We Need Copyright Reform, Not ACTA!’, TorrentFreak, 4 February 2012. Available at:

Schaffarczyk, Karl. ‘Can Kim Dotcom’s Mega Beat the Law Where Megaupload Failed?’, The Conversation, 29 January 2013. Available at:

Schusterman, Michelle. (2011). ‘How ACTA will take down the Internet, healthcare, and farming’, Matador Network, 27 February 2012. Available at:

Souppouris, Aaron. ‘ACTA Unlikely to Happen, Says European Commissioner’, The Verge, May 7, 2012. Available at:

Sutton, Maira. ‘Secretive Copyright Negotiations Continue at the 16th Round of TPP Talks’, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 4 March 2013. Available at:

The Guardian. ‘US embassy cables: Italy, the EU and the Anti-Counterfeit Trading Agreement’, US embassy cables: the document series, 22 December 2010. Available at:

The Guardian‘US embassy cables: Sweden’s concerns about Anti-Counterfeit Trading Agreement negotiations’, US embassy cables: the document series,22 December 2010. Available at:

Ulanoff, Lance. ‘ACTA is more dangerous than SOPA’, Mashable Social Media, 26 January 2012. Available at:

Wallach, Lori. ‘Can a “Dracula Strategy” Bring the Trans-Pacific Partnership into the Sunlight?’, Yes Magazine!, 21 November 2012. Available at:

Wortham, Jenna. ‘A Political Coming of Age for the Tech Industry’, New York Times, 17 January 2012. Available at: