Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-qmf6w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:25:01.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Inheritance and the Surviving Spouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Ronald J Scalise Jr
Affiliation:
Tulane University
Vernon Palmer
Affiliation:
Tulane University Law School
Elspeth Reid
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Inheritance laws affect everyone. That reason alone is sufficient for their study. By virtue of their broad application, the laws on inheritance contain significance that few rules of law can duplicate. Even aside from their scope of application, inheritance laws are equally significant in substance, as they “embody broad principles as to how a society considers property should be disposed of on death”. Although some have characterised the topic of intestacy as “unimportant” because “it is a mass of detail”, it is precisely some of that detail which must be examined to discern what value judgments are made by society, either for a decedent or in spite of him. From a comparative perspective, this is important because the laws of inheritance have the potential to reveal not only differences or similarities in black letter rules but also differences and similarities in the societal principles, mores, and values that underlie those rules.

Despite the broad application of these rules, scholars are not entirely in agreement on their purpose. In fact, inheritance laws serve many purposes. Some goals of inheritance law include “avoid[ing] complicating property titles and excessive subdivision of property”, “promot[ing] and encourag[ing] the nuclear family”, “encourag[ing] the accumulation of property by individuals”, and “produc[ing] a pattern of distribution that recipients believe is fair and thus does not produce disharmony”. Most commonly, however, the purpose of inheritance laws is to effectuate the intention or preference of the decedent (either actual or presumed) and to protect financially dependent members of the family.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mixed Jurisdictions Compared
Private Law in Louisiana and Scotland
, pp. 104 - 131
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×