Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:31:28.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Servitudes: Extinction by Non-Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Roderick R M Paisley
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Vernon Palmer
Affiliation:
Tulane University Law School
Elspeth Reid
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This chapter examines servitudes and their extinction by non-use. The type of right investigated is limited to “praedial” or “predial” servitudes benefiting a plot of land, known in Scotland as “the dominant tenement” and in Louisiana as “the dominant estate”. Although it will touch upon “legal” servitudes the coverage will exclude “natural” servitudes that are implied by law from a certain state of affairs without reference to the will of the owners of the dominant and servient tenements. As “negative” servitudes have been abolished in Scotland but not in Louisiana, this chapter concentrates on the common element: servitudes which afford the dominant proprietor the right to carry out certain activities on the servient tenement. These are known in Scotland as “positive” servitudes and in Louisiana as “affirmative” servitudes. The doctrine at the heart of the analysis is known in Louisiana as extinction by “prescription of non-use”, and in Scotland as “negative prescription”, or more anciently as “prescription of liberty”.

POLICY OF EXTINCTION

Prescription by non-use in Louisiana and negative prescription in Scotland, albeit existing in statutory form, are ultimately both generated by public policy. They ensure the marketability of land by freeing it from useless and unused restrictions. Grounded as they are in the general public interest, the doctrines are intended to override the will of individuals in specific cases. Consequently, in Louisiana parties may not by agreement renounce a prescription before it has occurred.

Type
Chapter
Information
Mixed Jurisdictions Compared
Private Law in Louisiana and Scotland
, pp. 67 - 103
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×