Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T11:27:08.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Jung and religion

the opposing Self

from Part 3 - Analytical psychology in society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2006

By
Ann Ulanov
Edited by
Polly Young-Eisendrath  and
Terence Dawson
Polly Young-Eisendrath
Affiliation:
University of Vermont
Terence Dawson
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Why Jung on religion?

How are we to respond to the twentieth-century phenomenon, which Jung noted with such alarm: that the collective containers of religious symbolism are weak, if not altogether gone? For centuries the symbols, rituals, and dogmas of religions, East and West, gathered the psychic energy of individuals and nations alike into traditions that bore witness to life's meaning and acted as underground springs nourishing different civilizations. Jung saw our century as one no longer in daily touch with the meaning of being which lies at the center of life. We have plumbed the resources of consciousness as best we could in our efforts to fathom and to control the contradictions and paradoxes of spirit that have remained to us, but we have lost touch with our roots and the symbolic life that they support and nourish.

Where are we now? What has happened to all the energy that is no longer channeled into religious containers? According to Jung, it has poured back into the human psyche with disastrous effect. Deprived of its proper outlet in religious experience, it assumes negative forms. For the individual, this misplaced energy can lead to neurosis or psychosis; in society, it can lead to all kinds of horrors, genocide, holocaust, and gulags. It can give rise to ideologies whose potential good is soured by the bullying of adherents into frightened compliance. Afraid of being swamped, we erect barriers of rigid rules and compartments against the negative barrages of psychic energy, creating religious, political, and sexual fundamentalisms that trap us in unyielding certainties.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Jung , pp. 296 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jung, C. G.(1932b). “Picasso.” CW 15, pp. –141.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1934). “A Study in the Process of Individuation.” CW 9.i, pp. –354.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1937). Psychology and Religion. 11, p. –105.
Jung, C. G.(1952a). “Reply to Martin Buber.” CW 18, pp. –670.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1952b). “Answer to Job.” CW 11, pp. –470.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1954). “Psychological commentary on The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation.” CW 11, pp. –508. (Written in 1939).Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1956). 5.
Jung, C. G.(1961). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Recorded and edited by Aniela Jaffé. Tr. , R. and Winston, C.. Revised edition. New York, NY: Random House/Vintage, 1989.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1967). 13.
Jung, C. G.(1968). , 2nd ed. 12.
Jung, C. G.(1970). , 2nd ed. 14.
Jung, C. G.(1973/76). Letters. Ed. Adler, G. and Jaffé, A., tr. Hull, R. F. C., 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kerényi, C. (1960). Eleusis: Archetypal Image of Mother and Daughter. Tr. Manheim, R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kirsch, T. (2000). The Jungians: A Comparative and Historical Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L. (1957). Louis Jouvet, Man of the Theatre. Foreword by Michael Redgrave. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1969). Antonin Artaud: Man of Vision. Preface by Anaïs Nin. New York, NY: David Lewis.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1984). A Jungian Approach to Literature. Carbondale and Edwardsville, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1985). Archetype, Architecture, and the Writer. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1988). Music, Archetype, and the Writer: A Jungian View. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1989). Machine, Metaphor, and the Writer: A Jungian View. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1991a). The Brontës: Branwell, Anne, Emily, Charlotte. Literature and Life. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1991b). Exile and the Writer: Exoteric and Esoteric Experiences: A Jungian Approach. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(1998). Women, Myth, and the Feminine Principle. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. L.(2003). French Fairy Tales: A Jungian Approach. SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis and Culture. New York, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Knellwolf, C. and Norris, C. (2007). The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 9: . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Tr. Fink, B., with Fink, H. and Grigg, R.. New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 2006.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1932). New Bearings in English Poetry: A Study of the Contemporary Situation. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.(1948). The Great Tradition. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Lotringer, S. (1977). “The Fiction of Analysis”. Semiotext(e), 2, pp. –189.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Tr. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B.. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. (1966). A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Martin, P. W. (1955). Experiment in Depth: A Study of the Work of Jung, Eliot and Toynbee. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Meurs, J. Van, with Kidd, J. (1988). Jungian Literary Criticism: 1920–1980: An Annotated, Critical Bibliography of Works in English. Metuchen, NJ and London: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Miller, F. (Miss). . (1906). “Some Instances of Subconscious Creative Imagination.” In Jung, 1956, pp. 445–462.
Muller, J. P. and Richardson, W. J. (1982). Lacan and Language. A Reader’s Guide to Écrits. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Muller, J. P. and Richardson, W. J.(1988). The Purloined Poe: Lacan, Derrida, and Psychoanalytic Reading. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2004). “A Bibliography of Jungian and Post-Jungian Literary Criticism: 1980–2000,” in Post-Jungian Criticism: Theory and Practice, ed. Baumlin, J. S., Baumlin, T. F., and Jensen, G. H.. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 263–295.Google Scholar
Odajnyk, V. W. (1976). Jung and Politics: The Political and Social Ideas of C. G. Jung. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Phillipson, M. H. (1963). An Outline of Jungian Aesthetics. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass.: Sigo, 1994.Google Scholar
Rank, O. (1907). The Artist. Expanded and revised as , tr. Atkinson, C. F.. New York, NY: W. W. Norton, 1989.Google Scholar
Rank, O.(1909). The Myth of the Birth of the Hero. Tr. Robbins, F. and Jeliffe, S. E.. New York, NY: Nervous & Mental Disease Pub. Co., 1914.Google Scholar
Riklin, F. (1908). “Wishfulfillment and Symbolism in Fairy Tales.” Tr. White, W. A.. New York, NY: Nervous & Mental Disease Pub. Co., 1915.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. (1999). C. G. Jung and Literary Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, S.(2002). Jung: A Feminist Revision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rowland, S.(2005). Jung as a Writer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuels, A. (1985). Jung and the Post-Jungians. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, A.(1993). The Political Psyche. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, A.(2001). Politics on the Couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Segal, R. (1999). Theorizing about Myth. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Segal, R.(2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. (1970). The Unholy Bible. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s.Google Scholar
Singer, T. and Kimbles, S. L. (eds) (2004). The Cultural Complex: Contemporary Jungian Perspectives on Psyche and Society. Hove, East Sussex: Brunner–Routledge.
Snowden, R. (2005). Jung. Teach Yourself. London: Hodder, 2005.Google Scholar
Sugg, R. P., ed. (1992). Jungian Literary Criticism. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Tacey, D. (1988). Patrick White: Fiction and the Unconscious. Melbourne and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tacey, D.(2006). How to Read Jung. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Ward, T. (1961). The Capsule of the Mind: Chapters in the Life of Emily Dickinson. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1958). Culture and Society, 1780–1950. New York, NY: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Williams, R.(1977). Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Wright, E. (1984). Psychoanalytic Criticism: Theory in Practice. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Alschuler, L. (1992). “Oppression and Liberation: A Psycho-Political Analysis According to Freire and Jung.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 32/2, pp. –31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, L.(1995). “Re-psychling: the Archetypal Image of Asklepios, the Wounded Healer.” International Journal of Comparative Religion and Philosophy, 1/2.Google Scholar
Alschuler, L.(1996). “Oppression, Liberation, and Narcissism: A Jungian Psycho-political Analysis of the Ideas of Albert Memmi.” Alternatives, 21/4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, L.(2007). The Psychopolitics of Liberation: Political Consciousness from a Jungian Perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1989). Power and Politics: The Psychology of Soviet-American Partnership. Boston, Mass.: Shambala Publications.Google Scholar
D’Lugin, V. (1981). “C. G. Jung and Political Theory: An Examination of the Ideas of Carl Gustav Jung showing their Relationship to Political Theory.” Doctoral thesis. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms.
Edinger, E. (1972). Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Franz, M.-L. von (1976). “Preface.” In Odajnyk, V. W., Jung and Politics. New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. xiii–xv.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Freire, P.(1974). Education for Critical Consciousness. New York, NY: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Gambini, R. (1997). “The Soul of Underdevelopment: The Case of Brazil.” In Matoon, M. (ed.), Zurich 95: Open Questions in Analytical Psychology. Einsiedeln: Daimon Verlag, pp. 139–148.Google Scholar
Gambini, R.(2000). Indian Mirror: The Making of the Brazilian Soul. Sao Paulo: Axis Mundi Editora.Google Scholar
Jacobi, J. (1967). The Way of Individuation. New York, NY: Meridian.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1934). “A Review of Complex Theory.” CW 8, 1966, pp. –104.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1937). “The Realities of Practical Psychotherapy.” CW 16, pp. –338.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1939). “Conscious, Unconscious, and Individuation.” CW 9.i, 1980, pp. –289.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1946). “Preface and Epilogue” to Essays on Contemporary Events. CW 10, 1966.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1949) Foreword to Erich Neumann, Depth Psychology and a New Ethic. CW 18, pp. –622.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G.(1953). Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. CW 7, 1972.
Jung, C. G.(1957). The Undiscovered Self. CW 10, 1990.
Mindell, A. (1995). Sitting in the Fire: Large Group Transformation Using Conflict and Diversity. Portland, Ore.: Lao Tse Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, E. (1966). “Narcissism, Normal Self-formation, and the Primary Relation to the Mother.” Spring, pp. –106.Google Scholar
Odajnyk, V. W. (1976). Jung and Politics: The Political and Social Ideas of C. G. Jung. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, J. W. (1970) “Emotions and Object Relations.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, 15/1, pp. –12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E. H. and Stephens, J. D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, A. (1986). Jung and the Post-Jungians. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Samuels, A.(1993). The Political Psyche. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, A.(2001). Politics on the Couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Sandner, D. F. and Beebe, J. (1984). “Psychopathology and Analysis.” In Stein, M. (ed.), Jungian Analysis. Boulder, Colo. and London: Shambala, pp. 294–334.Google Scholar
Singer, T. and Kimbles, S. L. (eds.). (2004). The Cultural Complex: Contemporary Jungian Perspectives on Psyche and Society. New York, NY: Brunner–Routledge.
Smith, W. A. (1976). The Meaning of Conscientização: the Goal of Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy. Amherst, Mass.: Center for International Education, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Steiner, M. (1983). “The Search for Order in a Disorderly World: Worldviews and Prescriptive Decision Paradigms.” International Organization, 37/3, pp. –414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A. (1989). The Roots of War: A Jungian Perspective. New York, NY: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Stewart, L. H. (1992). The Changemakers: A Depth Psychological Study of the Individual, Family and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitmont, E. C. (1978). The Symbolic Quest: Basic Concepts of Analytical Psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×