Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:39:46.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Applying the “Specificity” Test in Countervailing Duty Cases in the Context of China's Foreign Investment Policies

from Part IV - Law and Development in Regional Initiatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Xiaojie Lu
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University Law School, China
Yong-Shik Lee
Affiliation:
The Law and Development Institute, Sydney
Gary Horlick
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Won-Mog Choi
Affiliation:
Ewha Womans University School of Law, Seoul
Tomer Broude
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In constructing subsidy and countervailing duty (CVD) laws, the most difficult task is to distinguish between “legitimate” government activities on one hand, and trade distorting subsidies on the other. The difficulty can be inherent in light of the divergent views on the role of government involvement with industry and on the industrial policies of developing countries. At present, the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM) adopts the specificity requirement, which allows countervailing actions against government programs that aid local enterprises or industries in any manner that would harm foreign industries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

GATT 1987
Jackson, J. H.Davey, W. J.Sykes Jr, A. O.Legal Problems of International Economic RelationsSt. Paul, MNThomson West 2002 767Google Scholar
Wilcox, W. K.GATT-Based Protection and the Definition of a Subsidy 1998 16
2003
WTO 2004
Panel Report 2005
WTO 2005
USDOC 2007
World Bank Report 2007
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) 2006
WTO 1998
Agreement on Interpretation and Application of Article VI, XVI, and XXIII of the GATT 1980
Stewart, Terence P.The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1989–1992)Kluwer Law International 1993
Mavroidis, P. C.Messerlin, P. A.Wauters, J. M.The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTOCheltenham, EnglandEdward Elgar Publishing 2008 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J.Howse, R.The Regulation of International TradeNew YorkRoutledge 2005 254Google Scholar
GATT 1993
Jackson, John H.The World Trading SystemCambridge, MAMIT Press 1995 267Google Scholar
Southwick, James D.The Lingering Problem with the Specificity Test in United States Countervailing Duty Law 1988 72
Horlick, Gary N. 1985
1982
1982
1982
1982
2004
2003
USDOC 2007
U.S. GAOUS-China Trade: Commerce Faces Practical and Legal Challenges in Applying Countervailing DutiesWashington, DC 2005Google Scholar
USDOC 2007
ITC 2007
2008
USDOC 2007
USDOC 2007
2007
USDOC 2007
GATT 1987
1986
Mattoo, AadityaDealing with Monopolies and State Enterprises: WTO Rules for Goods and ServicesCottier, T.Mavroidis, P. C.State Trading in the Twenty-First CenturyAnn ArborThe University of Michigan Press 1998Google Scholar
WTO 1998
2007
UNCTAD 2007
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1980
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1987
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1987
Horlick, Gary N.Bello, Judith H.Levine, Michael K. 1985
Jackson, John HThe World Trading SystemCambridge, MAMIT Press 1995Google Scholar
Jackson, John HDavey, William JSykes Jr, Alan OLegal Problems of International Economic RelationsSt. Paul, MNThomson West 2002Google Scholar
Madrid, Gustavo EHernandez de, LuengoRegulation of Subsidies and State Aids in WTO and EC Law: Conflicts in International Trade LawAlphen aan den Rijn, the NetherlandsKluwer Law International 2007Google Scholar
Mattoo, AadityaDealing with Monopolies and State Enterprises: WTO Rules for Goods and ServicesCottier, T.Mavroidis, P. C.State Trading in the Twenty-First CenturyAnn ArborThe University of Michigan Press 1998Google Scholar
Mavroidis, Petros CMesserlin, Petrick AWauters, Jasper MThe Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTOCheltenham, EnglandEdward Elgar Publishing 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwick, James DThe Lingering Problem with the Specificity Test in United States Countervailing Duty Law 1988 72 Minnesota Law ReviewGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Terence PThe GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1989–1992)Kluwer Law International 1993Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J.Howse, RThe Regulation of International TradeNew YorkRoutledge 2005Google Scholar
United Nations 2003
United Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentFDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for DevelopmentWorld Investment Report 2006Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme 2002
U.S. Department of CommercePreliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Coated Free Sheet Paper from the People's Republic of China 72 2007
U.S. Department of CommerceFinal Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Coated Free Sheet from the People's Republic of China 72 2007
U.S. Government Accountability OfficeUS–China Trade: Commerce Faces Practical and Legal Challenges in Applying Countervailing DutiesWashington, DC 2005Google Scholar
Wilcox, William KGATT-Based Protection and the Definition of a Subsidy 1998 16 Boston University International Law JournalGoogle Scholar
World BankForeign Capital Utilization in China: Prospects and Future StrategyWorld BankBeijing 2007Google Scholar
World Trade Organization Appellate Body Report 1996
World Trade Organization Appellate Body Report 2004
World Trade Organization Appellate Body Report 2005
World Trade Organization Panel Report 2003
World Trade Organization Panel Report 2004
World Trade Organization Panel Report 2005
World Trade Organization Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment 1998

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×