Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:41:25.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

6 - Fixation and specimen processing

Gary W. Gill
Affiliation:
DCL Medical Laboratories, Indianapolis
Prabodh Gupta
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Zubair Baloch
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Fixation in the context of diagnostic cytopathology today traces its roots to Dr. Papanicolaou's use of equal parts of diethyl ether and 95% ethyl alcohol. He first described this fixative in a 1917 paper about the existence of a typical estrous cycle in the guinea pig – although there is no mention of that fixative in that paper. Thus, Papanicolaou published no rationale for his choice of alcohol and ether. This fixative became the standard in diagnostic cytopathology after Dr. Papanicolaou recorded its use in the 1942 monograph that he co-authored with Dr. Herbert Traut.

Papanicolaou did not publish his rationale for including ether in alcohol. Ether has no fixative properties. Since it is an effective fat solvent, ether may serve as an adjuvant, which speeds alcohol's penetration into cells. In blinded comparisons with cells fixed only in 95% alcohol, no discernible difference is evident.

Ether, of course, is highly volatile and explosive. More than a few non-explosion proof refrigerators have exploded when storing ether that was ignited by a spark. Consequently, its use was generally discontinued by the late 1950s, leaving 95% ethanol alone as the standard fixative for Pap smears (Figure 6.1). Indeed, the very first issue of Acta Cytologica published in 1957 included a write-in symposium that addressed “experiences with various methods of fixation of smears.”

In practice, a fresh cellular sample is spread onto a glass slide and immediately fixed by plunging it into alcohol (i.e. wet-fixation). Air-drying should not be allowed to occur either before, during, or after fixation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cytohistology
Essential and Basic Concepts
, pp. 148 - 161
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,21 CFR Chapter 1 (4–1–08 Edition), PART 21 – FORMULAS FOR DENATURED ALCOHOL AND RUM, pp. 530–60. Available at: http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=397749409919±1±1±0&WAISaction=retrieve. Accessed July 18, 2008.
Anderson, T. F. (1955). “Electron microscopy of microorganisms”. In: Oster, G. and Pollister, A. W., eds. Cells and Tissues, Vol. III of Physical Techniques in Biological Research. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 177–240.Google Scholar
Ayre, J. E. and Dakin, E.. (1946). “Cervical cytology tests in cancer diagnosis: glycerine technique for mailing”. Canad Med Assoc 54: 489–91.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R. (1966). Cytological Technique – The Principles Underlying Routine Methods, 5th edition. London, Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R. (1968). Principles of Biological Technique – A Study of Fixation and Dyeing. London, Methuen & Co. Ltd, reprint.Google Scholar
Beyer-Boon, M. E., Voorn-Den Hollander, M. J., et al. (1979). “Effect of various routine cytopreparatory techniques on normal urothelial cells and their nuclei”. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Section A 87(1): 63–9.Google Scholar
Bonime, R. G. (1966). “Air-dried smear for cytologic studies”. Obstet Gynecol 27(6): 783–90.Google Scholar
Carnoy, J. B. (1886). “Conférence donnée à la Société belge de Microscopie”Cellule 3: 1.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. L. (1851). “Researches into the structure of the spinal cord”. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 141: 607–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, S. H., DelVecchio, R. R., et al. (1957). “A method for preparing wound washings and bloody fluids for cytologic evaluation”. J Natl Cancer Inst 19(1): 115–21.Google Scholar
Dey, P. (2005). “Chromatin pattern alteration in malignant cells: an enigma”. Diagn Cytopathol 32(1): 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. A. (1969). “Hair spray: an inexpensive aerosol fixative for cytodiagnosis”. Acta Cytol 13(7): 416–9.Google Scholar
Gill, G. W., Miller, K. A., Frost, J. K., et al. (1973). “Cytomorphological consequences of fixation methods other than ethanolic wet fixation”. American Society of Cytology 21st Annual Scientific Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, November 8, 1973 (platform presentation).Google Scholar
Gill, G. W. (1998). “Air-dried and rehydrated cervicovaginal smears are different”. Diagn Cytopathol 18(5): 381–2.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S., Pushpa, S., et al. (2003). “Rehydration of air-dried cervical smears: a feasible alternative to conventional wet fixation”. Obstet Gynecol 102(4): 761–4.Google Scholar
Hajdu, S. I. (1983). “A note on the history of Carbowax in cytology”. Acta Cytol 27(2): 204–06.Google Scholar
Hanks, J. H. and Wallace, R. E.. (1949). “Relation of oxygen and temperature in the preservation of tissues by refrigeration”. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 71(2): 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, M. D. (1978). “The effect of distance in aerosol fixation of cytologic specimens”. Cytotechnol Bull 15(2): 25–7.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. (1976). “The effects of different fixatives and fixation methods on cell areas”. The Johns Hopkins Hospital School of Cytotechnology, Baltimore, MD, June 29,1976 (student thesis, Gill, G. W. and Erozan, Y. S., advisors).Google Scholar
Manosca, F., Schinstine, M., et al. (2006). “Diagnostic effects of prolonged storage on fresh effusion samples”. Diagn Cytopathol 35(1): 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikat, K. W. and Mikat, D. M.. (1972). “Tissue flattening – a method of enhancing histologic detail”. Lab Med 7(3): 41–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasuti, J. F., Fleisher, S. R., et al. (2000). “Semiquantitative analysis of the cellular preservation quality of Normosol® and Carbowax® solutions for thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens”. Diagn Cytopathol 22(5): 319–22.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, B. (1958). “The elimination of a ‘ribbing’ effect observed in cytologic smears”. Am J Clin Pathol 30(2): 143–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, R. R. and Pomerat, C. M.. (1956). “Electrolytes and plasma expanders. I. Reaction of human cells in perfusion chambers with phase contrast, time-lapse cine records”. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 45(1): 2–17.Google Scholar
Pundel, J. P., Ferreira, C. D. A., et al. (1957). “Experiences with various methods of fixation of smears”. Acta Cytol 1: 62–9.Google Scholar
Randall, B. and Amerongen, L.. (1997). “Commercial laboratory practice evaluation of air-dried and rehydrated cervicovaginal smears vs. traditionally-fixed smears”. Diagn Cytopathol 16(2): 174–6.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffe, B. D., Wagner, F. H., et al. (1979). “Heparinized bottles for the collection of body cavity fluids in cytopathology”. Am J Hosp Pharm 36(2): 211–4.Google Scholar
Saccomanno, G., Saunders, R. P., et al. (1963). “Concentration of carcinoma or atypical cells in sputum”. Acta Cytol 7: 305–10.Google Scholar
Sagi, E. S. and Mackenzie, L. L.. (1957). “The use of acetone in exfoliative cytological studies”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 73(2): 437–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockard, C. R. and Papanicolaou, G. N.. (1917). “The existence of a typical oestrous cycle in the guinea-pig – with a study of its histological and physiological changes”. Am J Anat 22: 225–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umlas, J. (1972). “Preparation of bloody specimens for cytologic examination using saponin”. Acta Cytol 16(2): 186–8.Google Scholar
Watson, P. (1966). “A slide centrifuge: an apparatus or concentrating cells in suspension onto a microscope slide”. J Lab Clin Med 68(3): 494–501.Google Scholar
Waymouth, C. (1970). “Osmolality of mammalian blood and media for culture of mammalian cells”. In Vitro 6(2): 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, M. (1955). “Problems of fixation in cytology, histology, and histochemistry”. Int Rev Cytol 4: 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G. C. H. (1994). “The mathematical basis for the increased sensitivity in cancer detection in air-dried cytopreparations”. Mod Pathol 7: 681–4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×