Ahl, F. M. (1984). ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology 105: 174–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1977). Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter den Antoninen. Bonn.Google Scholar

Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990). ‘Pline le Jeune et le sublime’, Revue des Etudes Latines 68: 88–98.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2003). ‘“Aliud est epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere” (Epistles 6.16.22): Pliny the Historian?’, Arethusa 36: 211–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashfield, A. and Bolla, P. (1996) eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubrion, E. (1975). ‘Pline le Jeune et la rhétorique de l'affirmation’, Latomus 34: 90–130.Google Scholar

Balot, R. (2009) ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banti, A. (1983). I grandi bronzi imperiali 2.1. Nerva – Traianus. Plotina – Marciana – Matidia. Selezione di sesterzi e medaglioni classificati secondo il sistema Cohen. Florence.Google Scholar

Barbu-Moravová, M. (2000). ‘Trajan as an Ideal Ruler in Pliny's Panegyric’, Graecolatina Pragensia 18: 7–18.Google Scholar

Barone, P. (2004). Schiller und die Tradition des Erhabenen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. A. (2000). Caligula: The Corruption of Power. New Haven.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2006) ed. Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance. Aarhus.Google Scholar

Belloni, G. G. (1973). Le monete di Traiano: catalogo del civico gabinetto numismatico. Museo Archeologico di Milano. Milan.Google Scholar

Belloni, G. G. (1974). ‘Significati storico-politici delle figurazioni e delle scritte delle monete da Augusto a Traiano (Zecche di Roma e “imperatorie”)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2. 997–1144.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (1997). Trajan: Optimus Princeps. A Life and Times. London.Google Scholar

Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (2010) eds. Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (1981). The Fasti of Roman Britain. Oxford.Google Scholar

Birley, A. R. (2000). Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny: Letters and Panegyric. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1977). Education in Ancient Rome. London.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2000). ‘Literature and Sophistic’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 898–921.

Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (1996) eds. The Cambridge Ancient History 10. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Rathbone, D. (2000) eds. The Cambridge Ancient History 11. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (2003) eds. Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (1996). ‘The Solitary Feast: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braund, S. (1998). ‘Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric’, in Whitby (1998): 53–76. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).

Braund, S. (2009). Seneca, De Clementia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. (1994). ‘Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be Dated? Evidence and Historical Conclusions', Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 96: 251–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooke, E. (2009). ‘The authority of the dead among the living in Republican Rome.’ Dissertation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1954). ‘Tacitus and Pliny's Panegyricus’, Classical Philology 49: 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte: Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1972). Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1965). ‘The Fate of Pliny's Letters in the Late Empire’, Classical Quarterly 15: 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, B. (1975). ‘Who Were the “viri militares”?’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, C. (2007). ‘Epideictic Oratory’, in Worthington (2007) 236–52.

Carradice, I. (1983). Coinage and Finances in the Reign of Domitian: a.d. 81–96. Oxford.Google Scholar

Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E. (2003) eds. Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. and Giardina, A. (1989) eds. Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica 2: La circolazione del testo. Rome.Google Scholar

Cébeillac, M. (1972). Les ‘Quaestores Principis et Candidati’ aux ier et iième siècles de l'Empire. Milan.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. (1974). ‘The Chronology of Fronto’, Journal of Roman Studies 64: 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. (1980). Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Champlin, E. (1983). ‘Figlinae Marcianae’, Athenaeum 61: 269–78.Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. (2000). Livy's Exemplary History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, M. P. (1937). ‘The Virtues of a Roman Emperor: Propaganda and the Creation of Belief’, Proceedings of the British Academy 23: 105–33.Google Scholar

Chevallier, R. (1984) ed. Présence de Cicéron. Paris.Google Scholar

Chruzander, K. G. (1897). ‘De elocutione panegyricorum veterum gallicanorum quaestiones.’ Dissertation, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Cipriani, G. (1977). ‘La Pro Marcello e il suo significato come orazione politica’, Atene e Roma 22: 113–25.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2007). ‘The City in Epistolography’, Oxford University Research Archive. http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid%3Ace2ad6d6–5093-4c12-b5b1-fab38e4a826c.

Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (2002) eds. Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, G. (1990) ed. Reading the Past in Late Antiquity. Rushcutters Bay, NSW.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1999). ‘Sepulchrum: A. Hirtius’, in Steinby (1999) 290.

Coarelli, F. (2000). The Column of Trajan. Rome.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1986). ‘The Emperor Domitian and Literature’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32.5: 3087–115.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (1988). Statius Silvae iv. Edited with an English Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2000). ‘Latin Literature after ad 96: Change or Continuity?’, American Journal of Ancient History 15 [1990]: 19–39.Google Scholar

Colledge, M. A. R. (2000). ‘Art and Architecture’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 966–83.

Collins, A. (2008). ‘Sigerus and Satur: A Prosopographical Note on Dio 67.15.1 and Suet. Dom. 17.2’, Classical Quarterly 58: 388–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (1998). ‘The Moralising Message of the Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre’, Greece & Rome 45: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (2000). ‘The City of Rome in the Middle Republic (400–100 bc)’, in Coulston and Dodge (2000) 42–60.

Coudry, M. and Späth, T. (2001) eds. L'invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Coulston, J. and Dodge, H. (2000) eds. Ancient Rome: The Archaeology of the Eternal City. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cova, P. V. (1966). La critica letteraria di Plinio il Giovane. Brescia.Google Scholar

Craig, C. P. (2004). ‘Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof’, in Powell and Paterson (2004) 187–213.

Craig, C. P. (2007). ‘Self-Restraint, Invective, and Credibility in Cicero's First Catilinarian Oration’, American Journal of Philology 128: 335–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, O. C. (1941). ‘Laudatio funebris’, Classical Journal 37 (1941): 17–27.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. (2001). Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crook, J. (1975). Consilium principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. New York.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (2003). ‘Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1, 20 e 9, 26’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 95–122.

Damon, C. (2003). Tacitus, Histories Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Darwall-Smith, R. H. (1996). Emperors and. Architecture: A Study of Flavian Rome. Brussels.Google Scholar

Jong, I. J. F. (2004) ed. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

Maria, S. (1988). Gli archi onorari di Roma e dell'Italia romana. Rome.Google Scholar

Del Chicca, F. (2004) ed. Frontino De Aquae Ductu Vrbis Romae: Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Rome.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (2004). ‘Le sublime et Pline, ep. ix, 26’, in Nadjo and Gavoille (2004) 449–61.

Deroux, C. (2003) ed. Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11. Brussels.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. (1978). Dione di Prusa: un intelletuale greco nell'impero romano. Messina.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J. (2007) eds. A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (2009) eds. Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drerup, E. (1923). Demosthenes im Urteile des Altertums. (Von Theopomp bis Tzetzes: Geschichte, Roman, Legende). Würzburg.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2001). ‘How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality and Self-Fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, Classical Antiquity 20: 35–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durry, M. (1938) ed. Pline le Jeune: Panégyrique de Trajan. Paris.Google Scholar

Durry, M. (1972) ed. Pline le Jeune: Lettres (Livre x) Panégyrique de Trajan. Paris.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1985). ‘The Function and Persuasive Power of Demosthenes' Portrait of Aeschines in the Speech On the Crown’, Greece & Rome 32: 42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dyer, R. R. (1990). ‘Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero's Pro Marcello’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterling, P. (1999). ‘Actors and Voices: Reading between the lines in Aeschines and Demosthenes’, in Goldhill and Osborne (1999) 154–66.

Eck, W. (1980).‘Epigraphische Untersuchungen zu Konsuln und Senatoren des 1.–3. Jh. N. Chr.’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 37: 31–68.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1984). ‘Senatorial Self-Representation: Developments in the Augustan Period’, in Millar and Segal (1984) 129–67.

Eck, W. (1996). Tra epigrafia, prosopografia e archeologia. Scritti scelti, rielaborati ed aggiornati. Rome.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1997). ‘Rome and the Outside World: Senatorial Families and the World they Lived in’, in Rawson and Weaver (1997) 73–99.

Eck, W. (2000). ‘The Emperor and his Advisors’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 195–213.

Eck, W. (2002). ‘An Emperor is Made: Senatorial Politics and Trajan's Adoption by Nerva in 97’, in Clark and Rajak (2002) 211–26.

Eck, W. (2005). ‘Der Senator und die Öffentlichkeit – oder: Wie beeindruckt man das Publikum?’, in Eck and Heil (2005) 1–18.

Eck, W. (2010). ‘Emperor and Senatorial Aristocracy in Competition for Public Space’, in Ewald and Noreña (2010) 89–110.

Eck, W. and Heil, M. (2005) eds. Senatores populi romani: Realität und mediale Präsentation einer Führungsschicht. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Eck, W. and Pangerl, A. (2004). ‘Eine Bürgerrechtskonstitution für zwei Veteranen des kappadokischen Heeres. Zur Häufigkeit von Bürgerrechtskonstitutionen für Auxiliarsoldaten’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150: 233–41.Google Scholar

Ewald, B. and Noreña, C. (2010) eds. The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation, and Ritual. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1999). ‘Two Levels of Orality in the Genesis of Pliny's Panegyricus’, in Mackay (1999) 221–37. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).

Fears, J. R. (1981). ‘The Cult of Virtue and Roman Imperial Ideology’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.17.2: 827–948.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1989a). ‘Il Panegirico di Plinio nella critica moderna’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 387–514.Google Scholar

Fideli, P. (1989b). ‘I sistemi di produzione e diffusione’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina (1989) 343–78.

Fein, S. (1994). Die Beziehungen der Kaiser Trajan und Hadrian zu den litterati. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fell, M. (1992). Optimus Princeps? Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der imperialen Programmatik Kaiser Trajans. Munich.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2006). The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, M. (2007). Cicero's Philosophy of History. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, S. K. (1999). Der Diskurs des Erhabenen bei Gogol' und die longinsche Tradition. Munich.Google Scholar

Galán Vioque, G. (2002) tr. J. J. Zoltowski. Martial, Book vii: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2005) ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamberini, F. (1983). Stylistic Theory and Practice in the Younger Pliny. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

García Ruiz, M. P. (2006). Claudio Mamertino Panegírico (Gratiarum Actio) al emperadour Juliano. Pamplona.Google Scholar

Găzdac, Cr. (2002). Monetary Circulation in Dacia and the Provinces from the Middle and Lower Danube from Trajan to Constantine I (ad 106–337). Cluj-Napoca.Google Scholar

Gelley, A. (1995) ed. Unruly Examples: On the Rhetoric of Exemplarity. Stanford.Google Scholar

Gibbon, E. (1909–14) ed. Bury, J. B.. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2006). Statius, Silvae 5. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2010). ‘Unending Praise: Pliny and Ending Panegyric’, in Berry and Erskine (2010) 122–36.

Gibson, B. J. and Rees, R. D. (forthcoming) eds. Pliny the Younger in Late Antiquity. Arethusa.

Gibson, R. and Morello, R. (forthcoming) eds. Oxford Readings in Pliny's Letters. Oxford.

Gilby, E. (2006). Sublime Worlds: Early Modern French Literature. London.Google Scholar

Giovaninni, A. (1987a). ‘Pline et les délateurs de Domitien’, in Giovaninni (1987b) 219–48.

Giovaninni, A. (1987b) ed. Opposition et résistances à l'empire d'Auguste à Trajan. Geneva.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1994). ‘The Failure of Exemplarity’, in De Jong (2004) 51–73.

Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (1999) eds. Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge.

González, J. (2000) ed. Trajano Emperador de Roma. Rome.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1982). ‘History and Biography’, in Kenney and Clausen (1982) 639–66.

Gotoff, H. C. (1979). Cicero's Elegant Style: An Analysis of the Pro Archia. Chicago.Google Scholar

Gotoff, H. C. (1993). Cicero's Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Gotoff, H. C. (2002). ‘Cicero's Caesarian Orations’, in May (2002) 219–71.

Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grainger, J. D. (2003). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of ad 96–99. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (1991). The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2000). ‘Nerva to Hadrian’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 84–131.

Grig, L. and Kelly, G. (2011) eds. Two Romes: From Rome to Constantinople. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1991) ed. Sénèque et la prose latine: neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva.Google Scholar

Gsell, S. (1894). Essai sur le règne de l'empereur Domitien. Paris.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1956). ‘Tacitus’ Dialogus und der Panegyricus des Plinius', in Festschrift Bruno Snell zum 60. Geburtstag am 18. Juni 1956. Munich: 145–52.Google Scholar

Güngerich, R. (1980) (ed. Heubner, H.). Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (2007). The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Hagedorn, D. (1964). Zur Ideenlehre des Hermogenes. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haines, C. R. (1919) ed. and tr. Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Cambridge, MaSS.Google Scholar

Hardie, A. (1983). Statius and the Silvae. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Hartmann, P. (1997). Du sublime (de Boileau à Schiller). Strasburg.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (1999). ‘Longinus, On Sublimity’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, M. (2003). ‘Theon and the History of the Progymnasmata’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 43: 129–60.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2004). Menander: A Rhetor in Context. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellegouarc'h, J. (1963). Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1997). Figuring out Roman Nobility: Juvenal's Eighth Satire. Exeter.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002). Pliny's Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2006). ‘Oxford Reds’: Classic Commentaries on Latin Classics. London.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (forthcoming). ‘A Few Things Pliny Can't Help With: Pan. Lat. 11(3)’, in Gibson and Rees (forthcoming).

Hershkowitz, D. (1995). ‘Pliny the Poet’, Greece & Rome 42: 168–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. (2007) ed. Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (1999). The Anxieties of Pliny the Younger. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Hoffer, S. E. (2006). ‘Divine Comedy? Accession Propaganda in Pliny Epistles 10.1–2 and the Panegyric’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 73–87. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, T. (2006). Konfigurationen des Erhabenen. Zur Produktivität einer ästhetischen Kategorie in der Literatur des ausgehenden 20. Jahrhunderts (Handke, Ransmayr, Schrott, Strauß). Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houston, G. (1971). ‘Roman imperial administrative personnel during the principates of Vespasian and Titus (a.d. 69–81).’ Dissertation, North Carolina.Google Scholar

Humphry, J. H. (1986). Roman Circuses: Arenas for Chariot Racing. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2003). Theocritus, Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1993). Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal: A Critical Study. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (1995). ‘Rhythm, Style and Meaning in Cicero's Prose’, Classical Quarterly 45: 485–99.CrossRef

Jones, B. W. (1984). The Emperor Titus. London.Google Scholar

Jones, B. W. (1992). The Emperor Domitian. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1978). The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. (1997). ‘The Genres of Rhetoric’, in Porter (1997) 43–50.

Kennedy, G. A. (2003). Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (1982) eds. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Volume 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980). Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Kleiner, D. E. E. (1992). Roman Sculpture. New Haven.Google Scholar

Klotz, A. (1911). ‘Studien zu den Panegyrici Latini’, Rheinisches Museum 66: 513–72.Google Scholar

König, A. (2007). ‘Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts', in König and Whitmarsh (2007) 177–205.

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (2007) eds. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstan, D. (1997). ‘Friendship and Monarchy: Dio of Prusa's Third Oration on Kingship’, Symbolae Osloenses 72: 124–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körner, C. (2002). ‘Die Rede Eis Basilea des Pseudo-Aelius Aristides’, Museum Helveticum 59: 210–28.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. (2000). ‘The Path between Truculence and Servility’, in Taplin (2000) 154–83.

Kremmydas, C. (2007). ‘P. Berl. 9781 and the Early Reception of Demosthenes’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50: 19–48.Google Scholar

Kühn, W. (1985). Plinius der Jüngere. Panegyrikus. Lobrede auf den Kaiser Trajan. Herausgegeben, übersetzt und mit Erläuterungen versehen. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (1995) eds. Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langlands, R. (2008). ‘“Reading for the Moral” in Valerius Maximus: The Case of seueritas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lassandro, D. (1992) ed. xii Panegyrici Latini. Turin.Google Scholar

Lassandro, D. (2000). Sacratissimus Imperator. L'immagine del princeps nell'oratoria tardoantica. Bari.Google Scholar

Lassandro, D. (2003). ‘Il “concentus omnium laudum” in onore dell'imperatore nel “Panegirico” di Plinio e nei “Panegirici Latini”’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 243–55.

Bohec, Y. (1994) ed. L'Afrique, la Gaule, la religion à l'époque romaine. Mélanges à la memoire de Marcel Le Glay. Brussels.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1990). ‘The Politics of Self-Representation: Pliny's Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture’, Classical Antiquity 9: 14–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lepper, F. and Frere, S. (1988). Trajan's Column: A New Edition of the Cichorius Plates. Gloucester.Google Scholar

Levene, D. (1997). ‘God and Man in the Classical Latin Panegyric’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 66–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

L'Huillier, M. C. (1992). L'empire des mots. Orateurs gaulois et empereurs romans 3e et 4e siècles. Paris.Google Scholar

Librale, D. (1994). ‘L’Eis Basilea dello pseudo-Aristide e l'ideologia traianea', Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.34.2: 1271–313.Google Scholar

Litchfield, H. W. (1914). ‘National exempla uirtutis in Roman Literature’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 25: 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo Cascio, E. (2000). ‘Alimenta Italiae’, in González (2000) 287–312.

Long, A. A. (1995). ‘Cicero's Politics in De Officiis’, in Laks and Schofield (1995) 307–34.

Loraux, N. (1986). The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Lörincz, B. (2001). Die römischen Hilfstruppen in Pannonien während der Prinzipatszeit. Teil i: Die Inschriften. Vienna.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2007). ‘Making an exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus’, in Heyworth (2007) 91–112.

Lowrie, M. (2009). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRef

Ludolph, M. (1997). Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den ‘Paradebriefen’ Plinius des Jüngeren. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Lyasse, E. (2008). Le Principat et son fondateur. L'utilisation de la référence à Auguste de Tibère à Trajan. Brussels.Google Scholar

Mackay, E. A. (1999) ed. Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and its Influence in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden.Google Scholar

Malcovati, E. (1949) ed. Il Panegyrico Traiano. Florence.Google Scholar

Malcovati, E. (1976) ed. Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae. Turin.Google Scholar

Manolaraki, E. (2008). ‘Political and Rhetorical Seascapes in Pliny's Panegyricus’, Classical Philology 103: 347–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2007). Cicero, Philippics 3–9: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchesi, I. (2008). The Art of Pliny's Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattingly, H. (1926). ‘The Restored Coins of Trajan’, Numismatic Chronicle 5: 232–78.Google Scholar

May, J. M. (2002) ed. Brill's Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.CrossRef

May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) eds and trs. Cicero on the Ideal Orator. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (1991). ‘Roman Historical exempla in Seneca’, in Grimal (1991) 141–76.

Mayer, R. G. (2001). Tacitus, Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. G. (2003). ‘Pliny and gloria dicendi’, Aretheusa 36: 227–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCulloch, G. (1989). The Game of the Name: Introducing Logic, Language and Mind. Oxford.Google Scholar

Meiggs, R. (1973). Roman Ostia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Merrill, E. T. (1915). ‘The Tradition of Pliny's Letters’, Classical Philology 10: 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, N. W. (1975). ‘Cicero and early Roman invective.’ Dissertation, Cincinnati.Google Scholar

Mesk, J. (1910). ‘Die Überarbeitung des plinianischen Panegyricus auf Traian’, Wiener Studien 32: 239–60.Google Scholar

Mesk, J. (1912). ‘Zur Technik der Lateinischen Panegyriker’, Rheinisches Museum 67: 569–90.Google Scholar

Méthy, N. (2000). ‘Eloge rhétorique et propagande politique sous le Haut-Empire. L'exemple du Panégyrique de Trajan’, Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome. Antiquité 112: 365–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millar, F. (1993). ‘Ovid and the Domus Augusta: Rome Seen from Tomoi’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millar, F. and Segal, E. (1984) eds. Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1990). ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Society 6: 297–375.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (1989). ‘Le Panégyrique de Trajan: éloquence d'apparat ou programme politique néo-stoïcien?’, Latomus 48: 785–97.Google Scholar

Molin, M. (1994). ‘L'arc de Trajan à Bénévent: un monument de la première partie du règne’, in Le Bohec (1994) 716–22.

Morello, R. and Gibson, R. (2003) eds. Re-Imagining Pliny the Younger. Arethusa 36.Google Scholar

Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (2007) eds. Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morford, M. P. O. (1992). ‘Iubes esse liberos: Pliny's Panegyricus and liberty’, American Journal of Philology 113: 575–93. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, J. (1953). ‘The Consulate of the Elder Trajan’, Journal of Roman Studies 43: 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münzer, F. (1899). ‘Die Quelle des Tacitus für die Germanenkriege’, Bonner Jahrbücher 104: 67–111.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1985). ‘Pliny's Letters and the Dialogus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murison, C. L. (2003). ‘M. Cocceius Nerva and the Flavians’, Transaction of the American Philological Association 133: 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1964) ed. xii Panegyrici Latini. Oxford. Preface reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).Google Scholar

Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E. (2004) eds. Epistulae Antiquaeiii. Louvain.Google Scholar

Nauta, R. R. (2002). Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden.Google Scholar

Neesen, L. (1980). Untersuchungen zu den direkten Staatsabgaben der römischen Kaiserzeit. Bonn.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) ed. M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nixon, C. E. V. (1990). ‘The Use of the Past by the Gallic Panegyrists’, in Clarke (1990) 1–36.

Nixon, C. E. V. and Rodgers, B. S. (1994) eds. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2001). ‘The Communication of the Emperor's Virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2007). ‘The Social Economy of Pliny's Correspondence with Trajan’, American Journal of Philology 128: 239–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noreña, C. F. (2009). ‘The Ethics of Autocracy in the Roman World’, in Balot (2009) 266–79.

Oakley, S. P. (2005). A Commentary on Livy Books vi–x. Volume iii: Book ix. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ofenloch, E. (1907). Caecilii Calactini Fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1965). A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar

Orentzel, A. (1980). ‘Pliny and Domitian’, Classical Bulletin 56: 49–51.Google Scholar

Pabst, A. (1989) ed. Quintus Aurelius Symmachus: Reden. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Packer, J. E. (1997). The Forum of Trajan in Rome: A Study of the Monuments. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Paladini, V. and Fedeli, P. (1976) ed. xii Panegyric Latini. Rome.Google Scholar

Palombi, D. (1993). ‘Arcus Traiani’, in Steinby (1993) 112.

Paribeni, R. (1926–7). Optimus princeps: saggio sulla storia e sui tempi dell'imperatore Traiano. Messina.Google Scholar

Patillon, M. and Bolognesi, G. (1997) eds and tr. Aelius Théon: Progymnasmata. Paris.Google Scholar

Peachin, M. (2004). Frontinus and the curae of the curator aquarum. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Pernot, L. (1986). ‘Les topoi de l’éloge chez Ménandre le rhéteur', Revue des Etudes Grecques 99: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pernot, L. (1993). La rhétorique de l'éloge dans le monde gréco-romain. Paris.Google Scholar

Pernot, L. (2006). L'Ombre du tigre. Recherches sur la réception de Démosthène. Naples.Google Scholar

Peyrache-Leborgne, D. (1997). La Poétique du sublime de la fin des Lumières au romantisme (Diderot, Schiller, Wordsworth, Shelley, Hugo, Michelet). Paris.Google Scholar

Pferdehirt, B. (2004). Römische Militärdiplome und Entlassungsurkunden in der Sammlung des Römischen-Germanischen Zentralmuseums. Mainz.Google Scholar

Pichon, R. (1906a). Les derniers écrivains profanes. Paris.Google Scholar

Pichon, R. (1906b). ‘L'origine du recueil des Panegyrici Latini’, Revue des Etudes Anciennes 8: 229–49. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Picone, G. (1977). L'eloquenza di Plinio: teoria e prassi. Palermo.Google Scholar

Porter, S. E. (1997) ed. Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 b.c.–a.d. 400. Leiden.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J. J. (2006) eds. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford.Google Scholar

Quadlbauer, F. (1949). Plinius der Jüngere und der Begriff der erhabenen Rede. Graz.Google Scholar

Quadlbauer, F. (1958). ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.’, Wiener Studien 71: 55–111.Google Scholar

Race, W. H. (1987). ‘Pindaric Encomium and Isokrates’ Evagoras', Transactions of the American Philological Association 117: 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radice, B. (1968). ‘Pliny and the Panegyricus’, Greece & Rome 15: 166–72. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radice, B. (1969) ed. and tr. Pliny the Younger: Letters and Panegyricus. London.Google Scholar

Rambaud, M. (1984). ‘Le Pro Marcello e l'insinuation politique’, in Chevallier (1984) 43–56.

Ramelli, I. (1999). ‘Il concetto di “res publica” nei panegirici latini dell'età imperiale’, Rendiconti Istituto Lombardo 133: 177–97.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. and Weaver, P. (1997) eds. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ray, G. (2005). Terror and the Sublime in Art and Critical Theory: From Auschwitz to Hiroshima to September 11. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rees, R. (1998). ‘The Private Lives of Public Figures in Latin Prose Panegyric,’ in Whitby (1998) 77–101.

Rees, R. (2001). ‘To Be and Not To Be: Pliny's Paradoxical Trajan’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 45: 149–68.CrossRef

Rees, R. (2002). Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric 289–307 ad. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rees, R. (2004a). ‘Praising in Prose: Vergil in the Panegyrics’, in Rees (2004b) 33–46.

Rees, R. (2004b) ed. Romane memento: Vergil in the Fourth Century. London.Google Scholar

Rees, R. (2007a). ‘Panegyric,’ in Dominik and Hall (2007) 136–48.

Rees, R. (2007b). ‘Letters of Recommendation and the Rhetoric of Praise,’ in Morello and Morrison (2007) 149–68.

Rees, R. (2011). ‘Bright Lights, Big City: Pacatus and the Panegyrici Latini’, in Grig and Kelly (2011).

Rees, R. (forthcoming a). ‘Pacatus, a Poet Doing Plinian Prose’, in Gibson and Rees (forthcoming).

Rees, R. (forthcoming b) ed. Oxford Readings in Latin Panegyric. Oxford.

Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (2006). Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, Book 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. (1983) ed. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Richier, O. (1997). ‘Les thèmes militaires dans le monnayage de Trajan’, Latomus 56: 594–613.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1995). ‘Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye’, American Journal of Philology 116: 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riggsby, A. M. (1998). ‘Self and Community in the Younger Pliny’, Arethusa 31: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripoll, F. (2000). ‘Silius Italicus et Cicéron’, Les Etudes Classiques 68: 147–73.Google Scholar

Robertson, A. S. (1971). Roman Imperial Coins in the Hunter Coin Cabinet. Volume 2. Oxford.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A. (2002). ‘The Public Image of Trajan's Family’, Classical Philology 97: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roche, P. A. (2003). ‘Mixed Messages: Trajan and the Propaganda of Personal Status’, in Deroux (2003) 428–46.

Roche, P. A. (2006). ‘Selling Trajan's saeculum: Destiny, Abundance, Assurance’, Athenaeum 94: 199–229.Google Scholar

Roche, P. A. (2009). ‘The Ivy in the Conquering Bay: Quintilian on Domitian and Domitianic Policy’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche (2009) 367–85.

Rochlitz, S. (1993). Das Bild Caesars in Ciceros Orationes Caesarianae: Untersuchungen zur clementia und sapientia Caesaris. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Rodgers, R. H. (2004). Frontinus: De Aquaeductu Urbis Romae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Roller, M. B. (1998). ‘Pliny's Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roller, M. B. (2004). ‘Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, Classical Philology 99: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roller, M. B. (2006). Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values and Status. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronning, C. (2007). Herrscherpanegyrik unter Trajan und Konstantin. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1979). ‘Rhetors at the Wedding’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 25: 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, D. A. (1998). ‘The Panegyrists and their Teachers,’ in Whitby (1998) 17–50.

Russell, D. A. (1990a). ‘Aristides and the Prose Hymn,’ in Russell (1990b) 199–219.

Russell, D. A. (1990b) ed. Antonine Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. and Wilson, N. G. (1981). Menander Rhetor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rutledge, S. (2001). Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London.Google Scholar

Sailor, D. (2008). Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saller, R. (2000). ‘Domitian and his Successors: Methodological Traps in Assessing Emperors’, American Journal of Ancient History 15 [1990]: 4–18.Google Scholar

Salway, B. (1994). ‘What's in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Patterns from c. 700 b.c. to a.d. 700’, Journal of Roman Studies 84: 124–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schöffel, C. (2002). Martial, Buch 8. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Schouler, B. (1986). ‘Le déguisement de l'intention dans la rhétorique grecque’, Ktèma 11: 257–72.Google Scholar

Schuster, M. (1952) ed. C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum Libri Nouem, Epistularum ad Traianum Liber, Panegyricus. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Schwarte, K. H. (1979). ‘Trajans Regierungsbeginn und der “Agricola” des Tacitus’, Bonner Jahrbucher 179: 139–75.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven.Google Scholar

Seager, R. (1983). ‘Some Imperial Virtues in the Latin Prose Panegyrics’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 4: 129–65.Google Scholar

Seelentag, G. (2004). Taten und Tugenden Traians: Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Settis, S. (1988) ed. La Colonna Traiana. Turin.Google Scholar

Shaw, P. (2006). The Sublime. London.Google Scholar

Shelton, J. A. (1987). ‘Pliny's Letter 3.11: Rhetoric and Autobiography’, Classica et Mediaevalia 38: 121–39.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: A Social and Historical Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sherwin-White, A. N. (1969). ‘Pliny, the Man and his Letters’, Greece & Rome 16: 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidebottom, H. (1996). ‘Dio of Prusa and the Flavian Dynasty’, Classical Quarterly 46: 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. J. and Covino, R. (2011) eds. Praise and Blame in Roman Oratory. Swansea.Google Scholar

Sogno, C. (2006). Q. Aurelius Symmachus: A Political Biography. Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soverini, P. (1989). ‘Imperio e imperatori nell'opera di Plinio il Giovane: Aspetti e problemi del rapporto con Domiziano e Traiano’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 33.1: 515–54.Google Scholar

Spawforth, A. J. S. (2007) ed. The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stadter, P. A. (2006). ‘Pliny and the Ideology of Empire: The Correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus 32: 61–76.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. A. and Stock, L. (2002) eds. Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 ad). Leuven.Google Scholar

Starr, R. (1987). ‘The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World’, Classical Quarterly 37: 213–33.Google Scholar

Steel, C. E. W. (2001). Cicero, Rhetoric and Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stefan, A. S. (2005). Les Guerres daciques de Domitien et de Trajan. Architecture militaire, topographie, images et histoire. Rome.Google Scholar

Steinby, E. M. (1993) ed. Lexicon topographicum urbis Romae 1. Rome.Google Scholar

Steinby, E. M. (1999) ed. Lexicon topographicum urbis Romae 4. Rome.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. (1997). Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stout, S. E. (1955). ‘The Coalescence of the Two Plinys’, Transaction of the American Philological Association 86: 250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strobel, K. (2003). ‘Plinius und Domitian: Der willige Helfer eines Unrechtssystems? Zur Problematik historischer Aussagen in den Werken des jüngeren Plinius’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 303–16.

Suster, G. (1890). ‘De Plinio Ciceronis imitatore’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 18: 74–86.Google Scholar

Süss, W. (1975). Ethos: Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Aalen.Google Scholar

Swain, S. (1996). Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World ad 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1929). ‘The Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus’, Classical Quarterly 23: 129–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Syme, R. (1930). ‘The Imperial Finances under Domitian, Nerva and Trajan’, Journal of Roman Studies 20: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Syme, R. (1938). Review of Durry (1938), Journal of Roman Studies 28: 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Syme, R. (1958a). Tacitus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1958b). ‘Imperator Caesar: A Study in Nomenclature’, Historia 7: 172–88.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1977–91) eds. Badian, E. and Birley, A. R.. Roman Papers (7 volumes). Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1980). ‘Guard Prefects of Trajan and Hadrian’, Journal of Roman Studies 70: 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Syme, R. (1985). ‘Curtailed Tenures of Consular Legates’, Zeitschrift fur Papyrologie und Epigraphik 59: 265–79.Google Scholar

Talbert, R. J. A. (1984). The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Taplin, O. (2000) ed. Literature in the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1983). ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices and Roman Poetry’, Classical Quarterly 33: 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, L. (1984). ‘Domitianus Dominus: A Gloss on Statius Silvae 1.6.84’, American Journal of Philology 105: 469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Till, D. (2006). Das doppelte Erhabene. Eine Argumentationsfigur von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trapp, M. B. (1990). ‘Plato's Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature’, in Russell (1990b) 141–73.

Tuck, S. (2005). ‘The Origins of Roman Imperial Hunting Imagery: Domitian and the Redefinition of Virtus under the Principate’, Greece & Rome 52: 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turcan, R. (1987). Vivre à la cour des Césars d'Auguste à Dioclétien (ier–iiie siècles ap. J.-C.). Paris.Google Scholar

Turcan-Verkerk, A. M. (2003). Un poète latin chrétien redécouvert: Latinius Pacatus Drepanius, panégyriste de Théodose. Brussels.Google Scholar

Berg, C. (2008). ‘The pulvinar in Roman Culture’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 138: 239–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hout, M. P. J. (1988). M. Cornelius Fronto: Epistulae. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hout, M. P. J. (1999). A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto. Leiden.Google Scholar

Varner, E. R. (2004). Mutilation and Transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden.Google Scholar

Vereeke, E. (1975). ‘Le corpus des Panégyriques Latins de l’époque tardive: problèmes d'imitation', L'Antiquité Classique 44: 141–60. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Veyne, P. (1976). Le pain et le cirque. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vidman, L. (1957). Fasti Ostienses. Prague.Google Scholar

Vollmer, F. (1925). ‘Laudatio funebris’, RE 12: 992–4.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1981). ‘The Emperor and his Virtues’, Historia 30: 298–323.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). ‘Ciuilis princeps: Between Citizen and King’, Journal of Roman Studies 72: 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1996). ‘The Imperial Court’, in Bowman, Champlin and Lintott (1996) 283–308.

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2005). ‘Mutatas formas: The Augustan Transformation of Roman Knowledge’, in Galinsky (2005) 55–84.

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008). Rome's Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wardman, A. E. (1967). ‘Description of Personal Appearance in Plutarch and Suetonius’, Classical Quarterly 17: 414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waters, K. H. (1969). ‘Traianus Domitiani continuator’, American Journal of Philology 90: 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971). Divus Julius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whitby, M. (1998) ed. The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1970). ‘Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic’, in Wimmel (1970) 286–90.

Wilson, M. (2003). ‘After the Silence: Tacitus, Suetonius, Juvenal’, in Boyle and Dominik (2003) 523–42.

Wilson, S. (1998). The Means of Naming: A Social and Cultural History of Personal Naming in Western Europe. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wimmel, W. (1970) ed. Forschungen zur römischen Literatur: Festschrift K. Büchner. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Winterling, A. (1999). Aula Caesaris: Studien zur Institutionalisierung des römischen Kaiserhofes in der Zeit von Augustus bis Commodus (31 v. Chr.–192 n. Chr.). Munich.Google Scholar

Wolff, E. (2004). ‘Pline et Cicéron: quelques remarques’, in Nadjo and Gavoille (2004) 441–7.

Woodman, A. J. (1977). Velleius Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative (2.94–131). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (1988). Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. London.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (2009a). ‘Tacitus and the Contemporary Scene’, in Woodman (2009b) 31–43.

Woodman, A. J. (2009b). ed. The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (forthcoming a). ‘The Preface to Tacitus’ Agricola', in Woodman (forthcoming b).

Woodman, A. J. (forthcoming b). ed. From Poetry to History. Oxford.CrossRef

Woolf, G. (1990). ‘Food, Poverty and Patronage: The Significance of the Epigraphy of the Roman Alimentary Schemes in Early Imperial Italy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 58: 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolf, G. (2006). ‘Pliny's Province’, in Bekker-Nielsen (2006) 93–108.

Worman, N. (2008). Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worthington, I. (2007) ed. A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woytek, E. (2006). ‘Der Panegyricus des Plinius: Sein Verhältnis zum Dialogus und den Historiae des Tacitus und seine absolute Datierung’, Wiener Studien 119: 115–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zima, P. V. (2002). La Négation esthétique. Le sujet, le beau et le sublime de Mallarmé et Valéry à Adorno et Lyotard. Paris.Google Scholar

Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London.Google Scholar