Skip to main content Accessibility help
Pliny's Praise
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Pliny's Panegyricus (AD 100) survives as a unique example of senatorial rhetoric from the early Roman Empire. It offers an eyewitness account of the last years of Domitian's principate, the reign of Nerva and Trajan's early years, and it communicates a detailed senatorial view on the behaviour expected of an emperor. It is an important document in the development of the ideals of imperial leadership, but it also contributes greatly to our understanding of imperial political culture more generally. This volume, the first ever devoted to the Panegyricus, contains expert studies of its key historical and rhetorical contexts, as well as important critical approaches to the published version of the speech and its influence in antiquity. It offers scholars of Roman history, literature and rhetoric an up-to-date overview of key approaches to the speech, and students and interested readers an authoritative introduction to this vital and under-appreciated speech.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Ahl, F. M. (1984). ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology 105: 174–298.
Alföldy, G. (1977). Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter den Antoninen. Bonn.
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1990). ‘Pline le Jeune et le sublime’, Revue des Etudes Latines 68: 88–98.
Ash, R. (2003). ‘“Aliud est epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere” (Epistles 6.16.22): Pliny the Historian?’, Arethusa 36: 211–25.
Ashfield, A. and Bolla, P. (1996) eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge.
Aubrion, E. (1975). ‘Pline le Jeune et la rhétorique de l'affirmation’, Latomus 34: 90–130.
Balot, R. (2009) ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Oxford.
Banti, A. (1983). I grandi bronzi imperiali 2.1. Nerva – Traianus. Plotina – Marciana – Matidia. Selezione di sesterzi e medaglioni classificati secondo il sistema Cohen. Florence.
Barbu-Moravová, M. (2000). ‘Trajan as an Ideal Ruler in Pliny's Panegyric’, Graecolatina Pragensia 18: 7–18.
Barone, P. (2004). Schiller und die Tradition des Erhabenen. Berlin.
Barrett, A. A. (2000). Caligula: The Corruption of Power. New Haven.
Bartsch, S. (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, Mass.
Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2006) ed. Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance. Aarhus.
Belloni, G. G. (1973). Le monete di Traiano: catalogo del civico gabinetto numismatico. Museo Archeologico di Milano. Milan.
Belloni, G. G. (1974). ‘Significati storico-politici delle figurazioni e delle scritte delle monete da Augusto a Traiano (Zecche di Roma e “imperatorie”)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2. 997–1144.
Bennett, J. (1997). Trajan: Optimus Princeps. A Life and Times. London.
Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (2010) eds. Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Cambridge.
Birley, A. R. (1981). The Fasti of Roman Britain. Oxford.
Birley, A. R. (2000). Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny: Letters and Panegyric. Leipzig.
Bonner, S. F. (1977). Education in Ancient Rome. London.
Bowie, E. (2000). ‘Literature and Sophistic’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 898–921.
Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (1996) eds. The Cambridge Ancient History 10. Cambridge.
Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Rathbone, D. (2000) eds. The Cambridge Ancient History 11. Cambridge.
Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J. (2003) eds. Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden.
Braund, S. (1996). ‘The Solitary Feast: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41: 37–52.
Braund, S. (1998). ‘Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric’, in Whitby (1998): 53–76. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Braund, S. (2009). Seneca, De Clementia. Oxford.
Brink, C. O. (1994). ‘Can Tacitus’ Dialogus be Dated? Evidence and Historical Conclusions', Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 96: 251–80.
Brooke, E. (2009). ‘The authority of the dead among the living in Republican Rome.’ Dissertation, Cambridge.
Bruère, R. T. (1954). ‘Tacitus and Pliny's Panegyricus’, Classical Philology 49: 161–79.
Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte: Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.
Cairns, F. (1972). Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh.
Cameron, A. (1965). ‘The Fate of Pliny's Letters in the Late Empire’, Classical Quarterly 15: 289–98.
Campbell, B. (1975). ‘Who Were the “viri militares”?’, Journal of Roman Studies 65: 11–31.
Carey, C. (2007). ‘Epideictic Oratory’, in Worthington (2007) 236–52.
Carradice, I. (1983). Coinage and Finances in the Reign of Domitian: a.d. 81–96. Oxford.
Castagna, L. and Lefèvre, E. (2003) eds. Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit. Munich.
Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. and Giardina, A. (1989) eds. Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica 2: La circolazione del testo. Rome.
Cébeillac, M. (1972). Les ‘Quaestores Principis et Candidati’ aux ier et iième siècles de l'Empire. Milan.
Champlin, E. (1974). ‘The Chronology of Fronto’, Journal of Roman Studies 64: 136–59.
Champlin, E. (1980). Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, Mass.
Champlin, E. (1983). ‘Figlinae Marcianae’, Athenaeum 61: 269–78.
Chaplin, J. D. (2000). Livy's Exemplary History. Oxford.
Charlesworth, M. P. (1937). ‘The Virtues of a Roman Emperor: Propaganda and the Creation of Belief’, Proceedings of the British Academy 23: 105–33.
Chevallier, R. (1984) ed. Présence de Cicéron. Paris.
Chruzander, K. G. (1897). ‘De elocutione panegyricorum veterum gallicanorum quaestiones.’ Dissertation, Uppsala.
Cipriani, G. (1977). ‘La Pro Marcello e il suo significato come orazione politica’, Atene e Roma 22: 113–25.
Clark, A. (2007). ‘The City in Epistolography’, Oxford University Research Archive.–5093-4c12-b5b1-fab38e4a826c.
Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (2002) eds. Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford.
Clarke, G. (1990) ed. Reading the Past in Late Antiquity. Rushcutters Bay, NSW.
Coarelli, F. (1999). ‘Sepulchrum: A. Hirtius’, in Steinby (1999) 290.
Coarelli, F. (2000). The Column of Trajan. Rome.
Coleman, K. M. (1986). ‘The Emperor Domitian and Literature’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.32.5: 3087–115.
Coleman, K. M. (1988). Statius Silvae iv. Edited with an English Translation and Commentary. Oxford.
Coleman, K. M. (2000). ‘Latin Literature after ad 96: Change or Continuity?’, American Journal of Ancient History 15 [1990]: 19–39.
Colledge, M. A. R. (2000). ‘Art and Architecture’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 966–83.
Collins, A. (2008). ‘Sigerus and Satur: A Prosopographical Note on Dio 67.15.1 and Suet. Dom. 17.2’, Classical Quarterly 58: 388–93.
Cooley, A. E. (1998). ‘The Moralising Message of the Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre’, Greece & Rome 45: 199–212.
Cornell, T. J. (2000). ‘The City of Rome in the Middle Republic (400–100 bc)’, in Coulston and Dodge (2000) 42–60.
Coudry, M. and Späth, T. (2001) eds. L'invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique. Paris.
Coulston, J. and Dodge, H. (2000) eds. Ancient Rome: The Archaeology of the Eternal City. Oxford.
Cova, P. V. (1966). La critica letteraria di Plinio il Giovane. Brescia.
Craig, C. P. (2004). ‘Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof’, in Powell and Paterson (2004) 187–213.
Craig, C. P. (2007). ‘Self-Restraint, Invective, and Credibility in Cicero's First Catilinarian Oration’, American Journal of Philology 128: 335–39.
Crawford, O. C. (1941). ‘Laudatio funebris’, Classical Journal 37 (1941): 17–27.
Cribiore, R. (2001). Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.
Crook, J. (1975). Consilium principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. New York.
Cugusi, P. (2003). ‘Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane: Epistulae 1, 20 e 9, 26’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 95–122.
Damon, C. (2003). Tacitus, Histories Book 1. Cambridge.
Darwall-Smith, R. H. (1996). Emperors and. Architecture: A Study of Flavian Rome. Brussels.
Jong, I. J. F. (2004) ed. Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.
Maria, S. (1988). Gli archi onorari di Roma e dell'Italia romana. Rome.
Del Chicca, F. (2004) ed. Frontino De Aquae Ductu Vrbis Romae: Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Rome.
Delarue, F. (2004). ‘Le sublime et Pline, ep. ix, 26’, in Nadjo and Gavoille (2004) 449–61.
Deroux, C. (2003) ed. Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 11. Brussels.
Desideri, P. (1978). Dione di Prusa: un intelletuale greco nell'impero romano. Messina.
Dominik, W. J. and Hall, J. (2007) eds. A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. London.
Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (2009) eds. Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden.
Drerup, E. (1923). Demosthenes im Urteile des Altertums. (Von Theopomp bis Tzetzes: Geschichte, Roman, Legende). Würzburg.
Dugan, J. (2001). ‘How to Make (and Break) a Cicero: Epideixis, Textuality and Self-Fashioning in the Pro Archia and In Pisonem’, Classical Antiquity 20: 35–77.
Durry, M. (1938) ed. Pline le Jeune: Panégyrique de Trajan. Paris.
Durry, M. (1972) ed. Pline le Jeune: Lettres (Livre x) Panégyrique de Trajan. Paris.
Dyck, A. R. (1985). ‘The Function and Persuasive Power of Demosthenes' Portrait of Aeschines in the Speech On the Crown’, Greece & Rome 32: 42–8.
Dyer, R. R. (1990). ‘Rhetoric and Intention in Cicero's Pro Marcello’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 17–30.
Easterling, P. (1999). ‘Actors and Voices: Reading between the lines in Aeschines and Demosthenes’, in Goldhill and Osborne (1999) 154–66.
Eck, W. (1980).‘Epigraphische Untersuchungen zu Konsuln und Senatoren des 1.–3. Jh. N. Chr.’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 37: 31–68.
Eck, W. (1984). ‘Senatorial Self-Representation: Developments in the Augustan Period’, in Millar and Segal (1984) 129–67.
Eck, W. (1996). Tra epigrafia, prosopografia e archeologia. Scritti scelti, rielaborati ed aggiornati. Rome.
Eck, W. (1997). ‘Rome and the Outside World: Senatorial Families and the World they Lived in’, in Rawson and Weaver (1997) 73–99.
Eck, W. (2000). ‘The Emperor and his Advisors’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 195–213.
Eck, W. (2002). ‘An Emperor is Made: Senatorial Politics and Trajan's Adoption by Nerva in 97’, in Clark and Rajak (2002) 211–26.
Eck, W. (2005). ‘Der Senator und die Öffentlichkeit – oder: Wie beeindruckt man das Publikum?’, in Eck and Heil (2005) 1–18.
Eck, W. (2010). ‘Emperor and Senatorial Aristocracy in Competition for Public Space’, in Ewald and Noreña (2010) 89–110.
Eck, W. and Heil, M. (2005) eds. Senatores populi romani: Realität und mediale Präsentation einer Führungsschicht. Stuttgart.
Eck, W. and Pangerl, A. (2004). ‘Eine Bürgerrechtskonstitution für zwei Veteranen des kappadokischen Heeres. Zur Häufigkeit von Bürgerrechtskonstitutionen für Auxiliarsoldaten’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 150: 233–41.
Ewald, B. and Noreña, C. (2010) eds. The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation, and Ritual. Cambridge.
Fantham, E. (1999). ‘Two Levels of Orality in the Genesis of Pliny's Panegyricus’, in Mackay (1999) 221–37. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Fears, J. R. (1981). ‘The Cult of Virtue and Roman Imperial Ideology’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.17.2: 827–948.
Fedeli, P. (1989a). ‘Il Panegirico di Plinio nella critica moderna’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 387–514.
Fideli, P. (1989b). ‘I sistemi di produzione e diffusione’, in Cavallo, Fedeli and Giardina (1989) 343–78.
Fein, S. (1994). Die Beziehungen der Kaiser Trajan und Hadrian zu den litterati. Stuttgart.
Fell, M. (1992). Optimus Princeps? Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der imperialen Programmatik Kaiser Trajans. Munich.
Flower, H. (2006). The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.
Fox, M. (2007). Cicero's Philosophy of History. Oxford.
Frank, S. K. (1999). Der Diskurs des Erhabenen bei Gogol' und die longinsche Tradition. Munich.
Galán Vioque, G. (2002) tr. J. J. Zoltowski. Martial, Book vii: A Commentary. Leiden.
Galinsky, K. (2005) ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.
Gamberini, F. (1983). Stylistic Theory and Practice in the Younger Pliny. Hildesheim.
García Ruiz, M. P. (2006). Claudio Mamertino Panegírico (Gratiarum Actio) al emperadour Juliano. Pamplona.
Găzdac, Cr. (2002). Monetary Circulation in Dacia and the Provinces from the Middle and Lower Danube from Trajan to Constantine I (ad 106–337). Cluj-Napoca.
Gelley, A. (1995) ed. Unruly Examples: On the Rhetoric of Exemplarity. Stanford.
Gibbon, E. (1909–14) ed. Bury, J. B.. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London.
Gibson, B. J. (2006). Statius, Silvae 5. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.
Gibson, B. J. (2010). ‘Unending Praise: Pliny and Ending Panegyric’, in Berry and Erskine (2010) 122–36.
Gibson, B. J. and Rees, R. D. (forthcoming) eds. Pliny the Younger in Late Antiquity. Arethusa.
Gibson, R. and Morello, R. (forthcoming) eds. Oxford Readings in Pliny's Letters. Oxford.
Gilby, E. (2006). Sublime Worlds: Early Modern French Literature. London.
Giovaninni, A. (1987a). ‘Pline et les délateurs de Domitien’, in Giovaninni (1987b) 219–48.
Giovaninni, A. (1987b) ed. Opposition et résistances à l'empire d'Auguste à Trajan. Geneva.
Goldhill, S. (1994). ‘The Failure of Exemplarity’, in De Jong (2004) 51–73.
Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (1999) eds. Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge.
González, J. (2000) ed. Trajano Emperador de Roma. Rome.
Goodyear, F. R. D. (1982). ‘History and Biography’, in Kenney and Clausen (1982) 639–66.
Gotoff, H. C. (1979). Cicero's Elegant Style: An Analysis of the Pro Archia. Chicago.
Gotoff, H. C. (1993). Cicero's Caesarian Speeches: A Stylistic Commentary. Chapel Hill.
Gotoff, H. C. (2002). ‘Cicero's Caesarian Orations’, in May (2002) 219–71.
Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory. Cambridge.
Grainger, J. D. (2003). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of ad 96–99. London.
Green, R. P. H. (1991). The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.
Greenblatt, S. (1980). Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago.
Griffin, M. (2000). ‘Nerva to Hadrian’, in Bowman, Garnsey and Rathbone (2000) 84–131.
Grig, L. and Kelly, G. (2011) eds. Two Romes: From Rome to Constantinople. Cambridge.
Grimal, P. (1991) ed. Sénèque et la prose latine: neuf exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva.
Gsell, S. (1894). Essai sur le règne de l'empereur Domitien. Paris.
Güngerich, R. (1956). ‘Tacitus’ Dialogus und der Panegyricus des Plinius', in Festschrift Bruno Snell zum 60. Geburtstag am 18. Juni 1956. Munich: 145–52.
Güngerich, R. (1980) (ed. Heubner, H.). Kommentar zum Dialogus des Tacitus. Göttingen.
Habinek, T. (2007). The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore.
Hagedorn, D. (1964). Zur Ideenlehre des Hermogenes. Göttingen.
Haines, C. R. (1919) ed. and tr. Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Cambridge, MaSS.
Hardie, A. (1983). Statius and the Silvae. Liverpool.
Hartmann, P. (1997). Du sublime (de Boileau à Schiller). Strasburg.
Heath, M. (1999). ‘Longinus, On Sublimity’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 43–74.
Heath, M. (2003). ‘Theon and the History of the Progymnasmata’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 43: 129–60.
Heath, M. (2004). Menander: A Rhetor in Context. Oxford.
Hellegouarc'h, J. (1963). Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.
Henderson, J. (1997). Figuring out Roman Nobility: Juvenal's Eighth Satire. Exeter.
Henderson, J. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.
Henderson, J. (2002). Pliny's Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter.
Henderson, J. (2006). ‘Oxford Reds’: Classic Commentaries on Latin Classics. London.
Henderson, J. (forthcoming). ‘A Few Things Pliny Can't Help With: Pan. Lat. 11(3)’, in Gibson and Rees (forthcoming).
Hershkowitz, D. (1995). ‘Pliny the Poet’, Greece & Rome 42: 168–81.
Heyworth, S. J. (2007) ed. Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler. Oxford.
Hoffer, S. E. (1999). The Anxieties of Pliny the Younger. Atlanta.
Hoffer, S. E. (2006). ‘Divine Comedy? Accession Propaganda in Pliny Epistles 10.1–2 and the Panegyric’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 73–87. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Hoffmann, T. (2006). Konfigurationen des Erhabenen. Zur Produktivität einer ästhetischen Kategorie in der Literatur des ausgehenden 20. Jahrhunderts (Handke, Ransmayr, Schrott, Strauß). Berlin.
Houston, G. (1971). ‘Roman imperial administrative personnel during the principates of Vespasian and Titus (a.d. 69–81).’ Dissertation, North Carolina.
Humphry, J. H. (1986). Roman Circuses: Arenas for Chariot Racing. Berkeley.
Hunter, R. (2003). Theocritus, Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Berkeley.
Hutchinson, G. O. (1993). Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal: A Critical Study. Oxford.
Hutchinson, G. O. (1995). ‘Rhythm, Style and Meaning in Cicero's Prose’, Classical Quarterly 45: 485–99.
Jones, B. W. (1984). The Emperor Titus. London.
Jones, B. W. (1992). The Emperor Domitian. London.
Jones, C. P. (1978). The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, Mass.
Kennedy, G. A. (1997). ‘The Genres of Rhetoric’, in Porter (1997) 43–50.
Kennedy, G. A. (2003). Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta.
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (1982) eds. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Volume 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge.
Kierdorf, W. (1980). Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.
Kleiner, D. E. E. (1992). Roman Sculpture. New Haven.
Klotz, A. (1911). ‘Studien zu den Panegyrici Latini’, Rheinisches Museum 66: 513–72.
König, A. (2007). ‘Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts', in König and Whitmarsh (2007) 177–205.
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (2007) eds. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.
Konstan, D. (1997). ‘Friendship and Monarchy: Dio of Prusa's Third Oration on Kingship’, Symbolae Osloenses 72: 124–43.
Körner, C. (2002). ‘Die Rede Eis Basilea des Pseudo-Aelius Aristides’, Museum Helveticum 59: 210–28.
Kraus, C. (2000). ‘The Path between Truculence and Servility’, in Taplin (2000) 154–83.
Kremmydas, C. (2007). ‘P. Berl. 9781 and the Early Reception of Demosthenes’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50: 19–48.
Kühn, W. (1985). Plinius der Jüngere. Panegyrikus. Lobrede auf den Kaiser Trajan. Herausgegeben, übersetzt und mit Erläuterungen versehen. Darmstadt.
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (1995) eds. Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.
Langlands, R. (2008). ‘“Reading for the Moral” in Valerius Maximus: The Case of seueritas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–85.
Lassandro, D. (1992) ed. xii Panegyrici Latini. Turin.
Lassandro, D. (2000). Sacratissimus Imperator. L'immagine del princeps nell'oratoria tardoantica. Bari.
Lassandro, D. (2003). ‘Il “concentus omnium laudum” in onore dell'imperatore nel “Panegirico” di Plinio e nei “Panegirici Latini”’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 243–55.
Bohec, Y. (1994) ed. L'Afrique, la Gaule, la religion à l'époque romaine. Mélanges à la memoire de Marcel Le Glay. Brussels.
Leach, E. W. (1990). ‘The Politics of Self-Representation: Pliny's Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture’, Classical Antiquity 9: 14–39.
Lepper, F. and Frere, S. (1988). Trajan's Column: A New Edition of the Cichorius Plates. Gloucester.
Levene, D. (1997). ‘God and Man in the Classical Latin Panegyric’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 66–103.
L'Huillier, M. C. (1992). L'empire des mots. Orateurs gaulois et empereurs romans 3e et 4e siècles. Paris.
Librale, D. (1994). ‘L’Eis Basilea dello pseudo-Aristide e l'ideologia traianea', Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.34.2: 1271–313.
Litchfield, H. W. (1914). ‘National exempla uirtutis in Roman Literature’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 25: 1–71.
Lo Cascio, E. (2000). ‘Alimenta Italiae’, in González (2000) 287–312.
Long, A. A. (1995). ‘Cicero's Politics in De Officiis’, in Laks and Schofield (1995) 307–34.
Loraux, N. (1986). The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge, Mass.
Lörincz, B. (2001). Die römischen Hilfstruppen in Pannonien während der Prinzipatszeit. Teil i: Die Inschriften. Vienna.
Lowrie, M. (2007). ‘Making an exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus’, in Heyworth (2007) 91–112.
Lowrie, M. (2009). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.
Ludolph, M. (1997). Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung: Untersuchungen zu den ‘Paradebriefen’ Plinius des Jüngeren. Tübingen.
Lyasse, E. (2008). Le Principat et son fondateur. L'utilisation de la référence à Auguste de Tibère à Trajan. Brussels.
Mackay, E. A. (1999) ed. Signs of Orality: The Oral Tradition and its Influence in the Greek and Roman World. Leiden.
Malcovati, E. (1949) ed. Il Panegyrico Traiano. Florence.
Malcovati, E. (1976) ed. Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae. Turin.
Manolaraki, E. (2008). ‘Political and Rhetorical Seascapes in Pliny's Panegyricus’, Classical Philology 103: 347–94.
Manuwald, G. (2007). Cicero, Philippics 3–9: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Berlin.
Marchesi, I. (2008). The Art of Pliny's Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge.
Mattingly, H. (1926). ‘The Restored Coins of Trajan’, Numismatic Chronicle 5: 232–78.
May, J. M. (2002) ed. Brill's Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden.
May, J. M. and Wisse, J. (2001) eds and trs. Cicero on the Ideal Orator. Oxford.
Mayer, R. G. (1991). ‘Roman Historical exempla in Seneca’, in Grimal (1991) 141–76.
Mayer, R. G. (2001). Tacitus, Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge.
Mayer, R. G. (2003). ‘Pliny and gloria dicendi’, Aretheusa 36: 227–34.
McCulloch, G. (1989). The Game of the Name: Introducing Logic, Language and Mind. Oxford.
Meiggs, R. (1973). Roman Ostia. Oxford.
Merrill, E. T. (1915). ‘The Tradition of Pliny's Letters’, Classical Philology 10: 10–25.
Merrill, N. W. (1975). ‘Cicero and early Roman invective.’ Dissertation, Cincinnati.
Mesk, J. (1910). ‘Die Überarbeitung des plinianischen Panegyricus auf Traian’, Wiener Studien 32: 239–60.
Mesk, J. (1912). ‘Zur Technik der Lateinischen Panegyriker’, Rheinisches Museum 67: 569–90.
Méthy, N. (2000). ‘Eloge rhétorique et propagande politique sous le Haut-Empire. L'exemple du Panégyrique de Trajan’, Mélanges de l'Ecole Française de Rome. Antiquité 112: 365–411.
Millar, F. (1993). ‘Ovid and the Domus Augusta: Rome Seen from Tomoi’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 1–17.
Millar, F. and Segal, E. (1984) eds. Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford.
Moles, J. L. (1990). ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Society 6: 297–375.
Molin, M. (1989). ‘Le Panégyrique de Trajan: éloquence d'apparat ou programme politique néo-stoïcien?’, Latomus 48: 785–97.
Molin, M. (1994). ‘L'arc de Trajan à Bénévent: un monument de la première partie du règne’, in Le Bohec (1994) 716–22.
Morello, R. and Gibson, R. (2003) eds. Re-Imagining Pliny the Younger. Arethusa 36.
Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (2007) eds. Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford.
Morford, M. P. O. (1992). ‘Iubes esse liberos: Pliny's Panegyricus and liberty’, American Journal of Philology 113: 575–93. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Morris, J. (1953). ‘The Consulate of the Elder Trajan’, Journal of Roman Studies 43: 79–83.
Münzer, F. (1899). ‘Die Quelle des Tacitus für die Germanenkriege’, Bonner Jahrbücher 104: 67–111.
Murgia, C. E. (1985). ‘Pliny's Letters and the Dialogus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 171–206.
Murison, C. L. (2003). ‘M. Cocceius Nerva and the Flavians’, Transaction of the American Philological Association 133: 147–57.
Mynors, R. A. B. (1964) ed. xii Panegyrici Latini. Oxford. Preface reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, E. (2004) eds. Epistulae Antiquaeiii. Louvain.
Nauta, R. R. (2002). Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden.
Neesen, L. (1980). Untersuchungen zu den direkten Staatsabgaben der römischen Kaiserzeit. Bonn.
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1961) ed. M. Tulli Ciceronis in L. Calpurnium Pisonem Oratio. Oxford.
Nixon, C. E. V. (1990). ‘The Use of the Past by the Gallic Panegyrists’, in Clarke (1990) 1–36.
Nixon, C. E. V. and Rodgers, B. S. (1994) eds. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Berkeley.
Noreña, C. F. (2001). ‘The Communication of the Emperor's Virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–68.
Noreña, C. F. (2007). ‘The Social Economy of Pliny's Correspondence with Trajan’, American Journal of Philology 128: 239–77.
Noreña, C. F. (2009). ‘The Ethics of Autocracy in the Roman World’, in Balot (2009) 266–79.
Oakley, S. P. (2005). A Commentary on Livy Books vi–x. Volume iii: Book ix. Oxford.
Ofenloch, E. (1907). Caecilii Calactini Fragmenta. Leipzig.
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965). A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.
Orentzel, A. (1980). ‘Pliny and Domitian’, Classical Bulletin 56: 49–51.
Pabst, A. (1989) ed. Quintus Aurelius Symmachus: Reden. Darmstadt.
Packer, J. E. (1997). The Forum of Trajan in Rome: A Study of the Monuments. Berkeley.
Paladini, V. and Fedeli, P. (1976) ed. xii Panegyric Latini. Rome.
Palombi, D. (1993). ‘Arcus Traiani’, in Steinby (1993) 112.
Paribeni, R. (1926–7). Optimus princeps: saggio sulla storia e sui tempi dell'imperatore Traiano. Messina.
Patillon, M. and Bolognesi, G. (1997) eds and tr. Aelius Théon: Progymnasmata. Paris.
Peachin, M. (2004). Frontinus and the curae of the curator aquarum. Stuttgart.
Pernot, L. (1986). ‘Les topoi de l’éloge chez Ménandre le rhéteur', Revue des Etudes Grecques 99: 33–53.
Pernot, L. (1993). La rhétorique de l'éloge dans le monde gréco-romain. Paris.
Pernot, L. (2006). L'Ombre du tigre. Recherches sur la réception de Démosthène. Naples.
Peyrache-Leborgne, D. (1997). La Poétique du sublime de la fin des Lumières au romantisme (Diderot, Schiller, Wordsworth, Shelley, Hugo, Michelet). Paris.
Pferdehirt, B. (2004). Römische Militärdiplome und Entlassungsurkunden in der Sammlung des Römischen-Germanischen Zentralmuseums. Mainz.
Pichon, R. (1906a). Les derniers écrivains profanes. Paris.
Pichon, R. (1906b). ‘L'origine du recueil des Panegyrici Latini’, Revue des Etudes Anciennes 8: 229–49. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Picone, G. (1977). L'eloquenza di Plinio: teoria e prassi. Palermo.
Porter, S. E. (1997) ed. Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 b.c.–a.d. 400. Leiden.
Powell, J. G. F. and Paterson, J. J. (2006) eds. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford.
Quadlbauer, F. (1949). Plinius der Jüngere und der Begriff der erhabenen Rede. Graz.
Quadlbauer, F. (1958). ‘Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.’, Wiener Studien 71: 55–111.
Race, W. H. (1987). ‘Pindaric Encomium and Isokrates’ Evagoras', Transactions of the American Philological Association 117: 131–55.
Radice, B. (1968). ‘Pliny and the Panegyricus’, Greece & Rome 15: 166–72. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Radice, B. (1969) ed. and tr. Pliny the Younger: Letters and Panegyricus. London.
Rambaud, M. (1984). ‘Le Pro Marcello e l'insinuation politique’, in Chevallier (1984) 43–56.
Ramelli, I. (1999). ‘Il concetto di “res publica” nei panegirici latini dell'età imperiale’, Rendiconti Istituto Lombardo 133: 177–97.
Rawson, B. and Weaver, P. (1997) eds. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. Oxford.
Ray, G. (2005). Terror and the Sublime in Art and Critical Theory: From Auschwitz to Hiroshima to September 11. New York.
Rees, R. (1998). ‘The Private Lives of Public Figures in Latin Prose Panegyric,’ in Whitby (1998) 77–101.
Rees, R. (2001). ‘To Be and Not To Be: Pliny's Paradoxical Trajan’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 45: 149–68.
Rees, R. (2002). Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric 289–307 ad. Oxford.
Rees, R. (2004a). ‘Praising in Prose: Vergil in the Panegyrics’, in Rees (2004b) 33–46.
Rees, R. (2004b) ed. Romane memento: Vergil in the Fourth Century. London.
Rees, R. (2007a). ‘Panegyric,’ in Dominik and Hall (2007) 136–48.
Rees, R. (2007b). ‘Letters of Recommendation and the Rhetoric of Praise,’ in Morello and Morrison (2007) 149–68.
Rees, R. (2011). ‘Bright Lights, Big City: Pacatus and the Panegyrici Latini’, in Grig and Kelly (2011).
Rees, R. (forthcoming a). ‘Pacatus, a Poet Doing Plinian Prose’, in Gibson and Rees (forthcoming).
Rees, R. (forthcoming b) ed. Oxford Readings in Latin Panegyric. Oxford.
Reinhardt, T. and Winterbottom, M. (2006). Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, Book 2. Oxford.
Reynolds, L. D. (1983) ed. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.
Richier, O. (1997). ‘Les thèmes militaires dans le monnayage de Trajan’, Latomus 56: 594–613.
Riggsby, A. M. (1995). ‘Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye’, American Journal of Philology 116: 123–35.
Riggsby, A. M. (1998). ‘Self and Community in the Younger Pliny’, Arethusa 31: 75–98.
Ripoll, F. (2000). ‘Silius Italicus et Cicéron’, Les Etudes Classiques 68: 147–73.
Robertson, A. S. (1971). Roman Imperial Coins in the Hunter Coin Cabinet. Volume 2. Oxford.
Roche, P. A. (2002). ‘The Public Image of Trajan's Family’, Classical Philology 97: 41–60.
Roche, P. A. (2003). ‘Mixed Messages: Trajan and the Propaganda of Personal Status’, in Deroux (2003) 428–46.
Roche, P. A. (2006). ‘Selling Trajan's saeculum: Destiny, Abundance, Assurance’, Athenaeum 94: 199–229.
Roche, P. A. (2009). ‘The Ivy in the Conquering Bay: Quintilian on Domitian and Domitianic Policy’, in Dominik, Garthwaite and Roche (2009) 367–85.
Rochlitz, S. (1993). Das Bild Caesars in Ciceros Orationes Caesarianae: Untersuchungen zur clementia und sapientia Caesaris. Frankfurt.
Rodgers, R. H. (2004). Frontinus: De Aquaeductu Urbis Romae. Cambridge.
Roller, M. B. (1998). ‘Pliny's Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304.
Roller, M. B. (2004). ‘Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’, Classical Philology 99: 1–56.
Roller, M. B. (2006). Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values and Status. Princeton.
Ronning, C. (2007). Herrscherpanegyrik unter Trajan und Konstantin. Tübingen.
Russell, D. A. (1979). ‘Rhetors at the Wedding’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 25: 104–17.
Russell, D. A. (1998). ‘The Panegyrists and their Teachers,’ in Whitby (1998) 17–50.
Russell, D. A. (1990a). ‘Aristides and the Prose Hymn,’ in Russell (1990b) 199–219.
Russell, D. A. (1990b) ed. Antonine Literature. Oxford.
Russell, D. A. and Wilson, N. G. (1981). Menander Rhetor. Oxford.
Rutledge, S. (2001). Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London.
Sailor, D. (2008). Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge.
Saller, R. (2000). ‘Domitian and his Successors: Methodological Traps in Assessing Emperors’, American Journal of Ancient History 15 [1990]: 4–18.
Salway, B. (1994). ‘What's in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Patterns from c. 700 b.c. to a.d. 700’, Journal of Roman Studies 84: 124–45.
Schöffel, C. (2002). Martial, Buch 8. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.
Schouler, B. (1986). ‘Le déguisement de l'intention dans la rhétorique grecque’, Ktèma 11: 257–72.
Schuster, M. (1952) ed. C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum Libri Nouem, Epistularum ad Traianum Liber, Panegyricus. Leipzig.
Schwarte, K. H. (1979). ‘Trajans Regierungsbeginn und der “Agricola” des Tacitus’, Bonner Jahrbucher 179: 139–75.
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven.
Seager, R. (1983). ‘Some Imperial Virtues in the Latin Prose Panegyrics’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 4: 129–65.
Seelentag, G. (2004). Taten und Tugenden Traians: Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat. Stuttgart.
Settis, S. (1988) ed. La Colonna Traiana. Turin.
Shaw, P. (2006). The Sublime. London.
Shelton, J. A. (1987). ‘Pliny's Letter 3.11: Rhetoric and Autobiography’, Classica et Mediaevalia 38: 121–39.
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966). The Letters of Pliny: A Social and Historical Commentary. Oxford.
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1969). ‘Pliny, the Man and his Letters’, Greece & Rome 16: 76–90.
Sidebottom, H. (1996). ‘Dio of Prusa and the Flavian Dynasty’, Classical Quarterly 46: 447–56.
Smith, C. J. and Covino, R. (2011) eds. Praise and Blame in Roman Oratory. Swansea.
Sogno, C. (2006). Q. Aurelius Symmachus: A Political Biography. Michigan.
Soverini, P. (1989). ‘Imperio e imperatori nell'opera di Plinio il Giovane: Aspetti e problemi del rapporto con Domiziano e Traiano’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 33.1: 515–54.
Spawforth, A. J. S. (2007) ed. The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge.
Stadter, P. A. (2006). ‘Pliny and the Ideology of Empire: The Correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus 32: 61–76.
Stadter, P. A. and Stock, L. (2002) eds. Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 ad). Leuven.
Starr, R. (1987). ‘The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World’, Classical Quarterly 37: 213–33.
Steel, C. E. W. (2001). Cicero, Rhetoric and Empire. Oxford.
Stefan, A. S. (2005). Les Guerres daciques de Domitien et de Trajan. Architecture militaire, topographie, images et histoire. Rome.
Steinby, E. M. (1993) ed. Lexicon topographicum urbis Romae 1. Rome.
Steinby, E. M. (1999) ed. Lexicon topographicum urbis Romae 4. Rome.
Stewart, A. (1997). Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.
Stout, S. E. (1955). ‘The Coalescence of the Two Plinys’, Transaction of the American Philological Association 86: 250–5.
Strobel, K. (2003). ‘Plinius und Domitian: Der willige Helfer eines Unrechtssystems? Zur Problematik historischer Aussagen in den Werken des jüngeren Plinius’, in Castagna and Lefèvre (2003) 303–16.
Suster, G. (1890). ‘De Plinio Ciceronis imitatore’, Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 18: 74–86.
Süss, W. (1975). Ethos: Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Aalen.
Swain, S. (1996). Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World ad 50–250. Oxford.
Syme, R. (1929). ‘The Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus’, Classical Quarterly 23: 129–37
Syme, R. (1930). ‘The Imperial Finances under Domitian, Nerva and Trajan’, Journal of Roman Studies 20: 55–70.
Syme, R. (1938). Review of Durry (1938), Journal of Roman Studies 28: 217–24.
Syme, R. (1958a). Tacitus. Oxford.
Syme, R. (1958b). ‘Imperator Caesar: A Study in Nomenclature’, Historia 7: 172–88.
Syme, R. (1977–91) eds. Badian, E. and Birley, A. R.. Roman Papers (7 volumes). Oxford.
Syme, R. (1980). ‘Guard Prefects of Trajan and Hadrian’, Journal of Roman Studies 70: 64–80.
Syme, R. (1985). ‘Curtailed Tenures of Consular Legates’, Zeitschrift fur Papyrologie und Epigraphik 59: 265–79.
Talbert, R. J. A. (1984). The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton.
Taplin, O. (2000) ed. Literature in the Roman World. Oxford.
Thomas, R. F. (1983). ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices and Roman Poetry’, Classical Quarterly 33: 92–113.
Thompson, L. (1984). ‘Domitianus Dominus: A Gloss on Statius Silvae 1.6.84’, American Journal of Philology 105: 469–75.
Till, D. (2006). Das doppelte Erhabene. Eine Argumentationsfigur von der Antike bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen.
Trapp, M. B. (1990). ‘Plato's Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature’, in Russell (1990b) 141–73.
Tuck, S. (2005). ‘The Origins of Roman Imperial Hunting Imagery: Domitian and the Redefinition of Virtus under the Principate’, Greece & Rome 52: 221–45.
Turcan, R. (1987). Vivre à la cour des Césars d'Auguste à Dioclétien (ier–iiie siècles ap. J.-C.). Paris.
Turcan-Verkerk, A. M. (2003). Un poète latin chrétien redécouvert: Latinius Pacatus Drepanius, panégyriste de Théodose. Brussels.
Berg, C. (2008). ‘The pulvinar in Roman Culture’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 138: 239–73.
Hout, M. P. J. (1988). M. Cornelius Fronto: Epistulae. Leipzig.
Hout, M. P. J. (1999). A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto. Leiden.
Varner, E. R. (2004). Mutilation and Transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden.
Vereeke, E. (1975). ‘Le corpus des Panégyriques Latins de l’époque tardive: problèmes d'imitation', L'Antiquité Classique 44: 141–60. Reprinted in Rees (forthcoming b).
Veyne, P. (1976). Le pain et le cirque. Paris.
Vidman, L. (1957). Fasti Ostienses. Prague.
Vollmer, F. (1925). ‘Laudatio funebris’, RE 12: 992–4.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1981). ‘The Emperor and his Virtues’, Historia 30: 298–323.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982). ‘Ciuilis princeps: Between Citizen and King’, Journal of Roman Studies 72: 32–48.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1996). ‘The Imperial Court’, in Bowman, Champlin and Lintott (1996) 283–308.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2005). ‘Mutatas formas: The Augustan Transformation of Roman Knowledge’, in Galinsky (2005) 55–84.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008). Rome's Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.
Wardman, A. E. (1967). ‘Description of Personal Appearance in Plutarch and Suetonius’, Classical Quarterly 17: 414–20.
Waters, K. H. (1969). ‘Traianus Domitiani continuator’, American Journal of Philology 90: 385–404.
Weinstock, S. (1971). Divus Julius. Oxford.
Whitby, M. (1998) ed. The Propaganda of Power: The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Leiden.
Wilkinson, L. P. (1970). ‘Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic’, in Wimmel (1970) 286–90.
Wilson, M. (2003). ‘After the Silence: Tacitus, Suetonius, Juvenal’, in Boyle and Dominik (2003) 523–42.
Wilson, S. (1998). The Means of Naming: A Social and Cultural History of Personal Naming in Western Europe. London.
Wimmel, W. (1970) ed. Forschungen zur römischen Literatur: Festschrift K. Büchner. Wiesbaden.
Winterling, A. (1999). Aula Caesaris: Studien zur Institutionalisierung des römischen Kaiserhofes in der Zeit von Augustus bis Commodus (31 v. Chr.–192 n. Chr.). Munich.
Wolff, E. (2004). ‘Pline et Cicéron: quelques remarques’, in Nadjo and Gavoille (2004) 441–7.
Woodman, A. J. (1977). Velleius Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative (2.94–131). Cambridge.
Woodman, A. J. (1988). Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. London.
Woodman, A. J. (2009a). ‘Tacitus and the Contemporary Scene’, in Woodman (2009b) 31–43.
Woodman, A. J. (2009b). ed. The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. Cambridge.
Woodman, A. J. (forthcoming a). ‘The Preface to Tacitus’ Agricola', in Woodman (forthcoming b).
Woodman, A. J. (forthcoming b). ed. From Poetry to History. Oxford.
Woolf, G. (1990). ‘Food, Poverty and Patronage: The Significance of the Epigraphy of the Roman Alimentary Schemes in Early Imperial Italy’, Papers of the British School at Rome 58: 197–228.
Woolf, G. (2006). ‘Pliny's Province’, in Bekker-Nielsen (2006) 93–108.
Worman, N. (2008). Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens. Cambridge.
Worthington, I. (2007) ed. A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Oxford.
Woytek, E. (2006). ‘Der Panegyricus des Plinius: Sein Verhältnis zum Dialogus und den Historiae des Tacitus und seine absolute Datierung’, Wiener Studien 119: 115–56.
Zima, P. V. (2002). La Négation esthétique. Le sujet, le beau et le sublime de Mallarmé et Valéry à Adorno et Lyotard. Paris.
Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.