Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:15:52.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

3 - Genetics: information, access and ownership

Donna Dickenson
Affiliation:
University of London
Richard Huxtable
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Michael Parker
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The continuing development of genetics has profound implications for the future of medicine. Since the first edition of this book appeared in 2001, there have been important advances in understanding some of the genetic factors in common disorders. Much genetic research (‘genomic epidemiology’) is intended to lead to a better understanding of biological mechanisms such as immunity, which will help to understand disease progression. An example would be research in malaria, using genetic variation in populations as a way into understanding mechanisms which may prove helpful in the development of a vaccine. In the medium to longer term, the impact is perhaps most likely to be felt in the development of more effective treatments for the major diseases, including the use of medicines tailored to fit an individual's own genetic profile (‘pharmacogenetics’). Cheap and accurate sequencing techniques may conceivably allow everyone to know the full contents of their own genome, but that could be a double-edged sword, increasing the ethical, legal and social risks of genetic testing (Robertson, 2003).

What are these risks? And what are the practical ethical questions raised by genetics today? You have already encountered some of these issues in the previous chapter: for example, preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Here in Chapter 3 we will concentrate on the wider clinical aspects of genetics, outside the area of new reproductive technologies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1998). Mental Disorders and Genetics: The Ethical Context. LondonGoogle Scholar
,IHA and WFN Guidelines for the molecular genetics predictive test in Huntington's Disease (1994).Neurology, 44, 1533–6CrossRef
Alderson, P. (1993). Children's Consent to Surgery. Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. S. (1997). Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future. Hastings Center Report, 27(2), 7–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wertz, D. C., Fanos, J. H. and Reilly, P. R. (1997). Genetic testing for children and adolescents: who decides?Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(11), 875–81, at 878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, C. (1998). Wrestling with the future: should we test children for adult-onset genetic conditions?Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8(2), 111–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, M., Adam, S., Fuller, A.et al. (1993). Diagnosis of Huntington's disease: a model for the stages of psychological response based on experience of a predictive testing program. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 47, 368–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, H. T. (1993). DNA screening for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility based in linked markers – a family study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, 1979–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scourfield, J., Soldan, J., Gray, J., Houlihan, G. and Harper, P. S. (1997). Huntington's disease: psychiatric practice in molecular genetic prediction and diagnosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 144–9Google Scholar
Brandt, J. (1994). Ethical considerations in genetic testing: an empirical study of presymptomatic diagnosis of Huntington's disease. In Medicine and Moral Reasoning, ed. Fulford, K. W. M., Gillett, G. and Soskice, J., pp. 41–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M. (1998). Annotation: genetic research, family life, and clinical practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leikin, S. L. (1989). A proposal concerning decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment for young people. Journal of Pediatrics, 108, 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherer, D. G. and Repucci, N. D. (1988). Adolescents' capacities to provide voluntary informed consent. Law and Human Behaviour, 12, 123–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×