Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:04:35.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

2 - Reproduction: decisions at the start of life

Donna Dickenson
Affiliation:
University of London
Richard Huxtable
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Michael Parker
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Of all the issues in medical ethics, probably none is more frequently in the news than reproductive ethics – construed broadly to include such controversial issues as: abortion and selective termination of pregnancy; sale and donation of gametes (sperm and eggs); surrogacy or contract motherhood; ‘therapeutic’ and reproductive cloning; non-consensual use of gametes and embryos; rights for children born as a result of sperm or egg donation to trace their genetic parents; sterilization of young people with learning disability or physical handicaps; enforced caesarean sections; ‘designer babies’ (the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for social rather than therapeutic purposes, such as sex selection for which there is no clinical need, (e.g. not involving a sex-related genetic condition); egg freezing and other uses of in vitro fertilization (IVF) to allow women to have children after the normal age of child-bearing; the commercial market in private banking of umbilical cord blood for the child's later use; ‘reproductive tourism’, in which people travel to other countries to obtain reproductive tests or services unavailable in their own nations.

In writing a chapter about reproductive ethics, we have thus faced a dilemma about which of the vast range of issues to include, using our criterion of direct clinical relevance to everyday practice. This chapter therefore omits some issues, such as cloning and surrogacy, which at the time of writing were unlikely to be encountered in the course of ordinary practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brazier, Margaret, ‘Reproductive rights: feminism or patriarchy?’. In The Future of Human Reproduction, ed. Harris, J. and Holm, S.. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
2. ,This view is forcibly argued by Elizabeth Brake in her paperFatherhood and child support: do men have a right to choose?Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(1), 2005.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, R. L., Lynch, I., Stone, J. and Alvarez, M. (1996). The current status of multifetal pregnancy reduction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174 (4), 1265–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mary, B.Mahowald, (1982). Concepts of abortion and their relevance to the abortion debate. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 20, 195–207Google Scholar
Mahowald, M. B. (1993), Women and Children in Health Care: An Unequal Majority. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–90Google Scholar
Rorty, M. V. and Pinkerton, J. V. (1996). Elective fetal reduction: the ultimate elective surgery. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 13, 55Google ScholarPubMed
Christine, Overall (2002), ‘New reproductive technologies and practices: benefits or liabilities for children?’ Originally appeared as ‘Do new reproductive technologies benefit or harm children?’ In Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson, D. L., pp. 305–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Mary, Mahowald (2002), ‘The fewer the better? Ethical issues in multiple gestation’. In Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson, D. L., pp. 247–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Francoise, Baylis and Susan, Sherwin (2002), ‘Judgements of non-compliance in pregnancy’. In Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson, D. L., pp. 285–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gillian, M. Lockwood (2002), ‘A case study in IVF: problems of paternalism and autonomy in a ‘high-risk pregnancy’’. In Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson, D. L., pp. 161–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×