Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T14:06:32.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Evolution of Public Finances in Nineteenth-Century Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

José Luís Cardoso
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa
Pedro Lains
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In contrast to many other countries of nineteenth-century Europe, Germany was not a nation-state until the unification of 1871. In 1789, Germany consisted of more than three hundred territories that were formally subjected to the emperor in Vienna but were in practice independent. Under the pressure of Napoléon, Germany was mediatized, a policy that was continued by the Congress of Vienna. The central European political landscape that emerged in 1815 was dominated by the Habsburg Empire and Prussia, followed by a number of midsize states, which were, ranked by population, Bavaria, Hanover, Württemberg, Saxony, and Baden. What was later to become imperial Germany (excluding Alsace-Lorraine) consisted of altogether thirty-five states, Frankfurt am Main, and three Hanseatic cities. Figure 4.1 depicts Germany in the boundaries that emerged after the Congress of Vienna.

In terms of public finances, a formal and a material criterion each highlight the most important differences among these states. The first is whether the public finances were based on a constitution. Although the three southern German states adopted constitutions quite quickly after 1815, most northern German states were reluctant in this respect, with Prussia being the most prominent example. Whether a state was based on a constitution roughly coincided with a specific tax structure, which might serve as an alternative, material criterion. The tax systems of the southern states – Bavaria, Württemberg, and Baden – were primarily based on impersonal taxes on land, buildings, and business, as in France.

Type
Chapter
Information
Paying for the Liberal State
The Rise of Public Finance in Nineteenth-Century Europe
, pp. 103 - 131
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andic, S. and Veverka, J. (1964) “The growth of government expenditure in Germany since the unification,” Finanzarchiv, 2nd ser., 23, 169–278.Google Scholar
Blankart, C. B. (2007) Föderalismus in Deutschland und in Europa. Wiesbaden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, R. (1995) “Revenues,” in Bonney, R. (ed.) Economic Systems and State Finance. Oxford: Clarendon, 423–505.Google Scholar
Bonney, R. and Ormrod, W. M. (1999) “Crises, Revolutions and Self-Sustained Growth: Towards a Conceptual Model of Change in Fiscal History,” in Ormrod, W. M., Bonney, M., and Bonney, R. (eds.) Crises, Revolutions and Self-Sustained Growth. Stamford, CT: Shaun Tyas, 1–20.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. A. and Musgrave, R. A. (1999) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dumke, R. H. (1976) “The Political Economy of Economic Unification: Tariffs, Trade and Politics of the Zollverein Era.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Ferguson, N. (1994) “Public Finance and National Security: The Domestic Origins of the First World War Revisited,” Past and Present, 142, 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, N. (1998) The Pity of War. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fremdling, R. (1980) “Freight rates and state budget: The role of the national Prussian railways 1880–1913,” Journal of European Economic History, 9, 21–39.Google Scholar
Gerloff, W. (1916) Die steuerliche Belastung in Deutschland während der letzten Friedensjahre. Gutachten dem Staatssekretär des Reichsschatzamts erstattet. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Gerloff, W. (1929) “Der Staatshaushalt und das Finanzsystem Deutschlands,” in Handbuch der Finanzwissenschaft, vol. 3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1–69.Google Scholar
Goldscheid, R. (1926) “Staat, öffentlicher Haushalt und Gesellschaft. Wesen und Aufgabe der Finanzwissenschaft vom Standpunkte der Soziologie,” in Handbuch der Finanzwissenschaft, vol. 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 146–84.Google Scholar
Gömmel, R. (1979) Realeinkommen in Deutschland. Ein internationaler Vergleich (1810–1914). Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Guinnane, T. W. (2003) “Population and the economy in Germany, 1800–1990,” in Ogilvie, S. and Overy, R. (eds.) Germany: A New Social and Economic History, Vol. 3, Since 1800. London: Arnold, 35–70.Google Scholar
Hefeker, C. (2001) “The agony of central power: Fiscal federalism in the German Reich,” European Review of Economic History, 5, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, W. G. and Müller, J. H. (1959) Das deutsche Volkseinkommen 1851–1957. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, W. G. et al. (1965) Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruedener, J. (1987) “The Franckenstein paradox in the intergovernmental fiscal relations of imperial Germany,” in Witt, P.-C. (ed.) Wealth and Taxation in Central Europe: The History and Sociology of Public Finance. New York: Berg, 111–23.Google Scholar
Krüger, K. (1987) “Public Finance and modernisation: The change from the domain state to tax state in Hesse in the sixteenth and seventeeth centuries,” in Witt, P.-C. (ed.) Wealth and Taxation in Central Europe: The History and Sociology of Public Finance. New York: Berg, 49–62.Google Scholar
Lee, W. R. (1975) “Tax structure and economic growth in Germany (1750–1850),” Journal of European Economic History, 4, 153–78.Google Scholar
Lundgreen, P. (1973) Bildung und Wirtschaftswachstum im Industrialisierungsprozeß des 19. Jahrhunderts. Methodische Ansätze, empirische Studien und internationale Vergleiche. Berlin: Colloquium.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1992) Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1993) International Historical Statistics: Europe 1750–1988, 3rd ed. New York: Stockton, 912–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, A. (1971) Reichsfinanzminister Matthias Erzberger und sein Reformwerk. Bonn: Stollfuss.Google Scholar
Nützenadel, A. (2007) “Taxation, electoral system, and citizenship in nineteenth-century Germany,” in Nützenadel, A. and Strupp, C. (eds.) Taxation, State and the Civil Society in Germany and the United States, 1750–1950. Wiesbaden: Nomos, 113–24.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. L. (1975) “From domain state to tax state: Synthesis and interpretation,” Scandinavian Economic History Review, 23, 116–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recktenwald, H. C. (1970) “Staatsausgaben in säkularer Sicht,” in Haller, H. et al. (eds.) Theorie und Praxis des finanzpolitischen Interventionismus: Fritz Neumark zum 70. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 407–30.Google Scholar
Recktenwald, H. C. (1977) “Umfang und Struktur der öffentlichen Ausgaben in säkularer Entwicklung,” in Handbuch der Finanzwissenschaft, vol. 1, 3rd ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 713–52.Google Scholar
,Reichsschatzamt (1908) Denkschriftenband zur Begründung des Entwurfs eines Gesetzes betreffend Änderungen im Finanzwesen, 3 vols. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Ritschl, A. and Spoerer, M. (1997) “Das Bruttosozialprodukt in Deutschland nach den amtlichen Volkseinkommens- und Sozialproduktsstatistiken 1901–1995,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, no. 2, 27–54.Google Scholar
Schissler, H. (1982) “Preußens Finanzpolitik nach 1807. Die Bedeutung der Staatsverschuldung als Faktor der Modernisierung des preußischen Finanzsystems,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 8, 367–85.Google Scholar
Schmoller, G. (1877) “Die Epochen der preußischen Finanzpolitik,” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft, 1, 33–114.Google Scholar
Schremmer, E. (1985) “Föderativer Staatsverbund, öffentliche Finanzen und Industrialisierung in Deutschland,” in Kiesewetter, H. and Fremdling, R. (eds.) Staat, Region und Industrialisierung. Ostfildern: Scripta Mercaturae, 3–65.Google Scholar
Schremmer, E. (1987) “Die badische Gewerbesteuer und die Kapitalbildung in gewerblichen Anlagen und Vorräten in Baden und Deutschland, 1815 bis 1913,” Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 74, 18–61.Google Scholar
Schremmer, E. (1989) “Taxation and public finance: Britain, France, and Germany,” in Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–494.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1918) “Die Krise des Steuerstaates,” Zeitfragen aus dem Gebiet der Soziologie, 4, 3–74. (English translation: “The Crisis of the Tax State,” International Economic Papers, 4 [1954], 5–38).Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (1990) “Tax harmonization and tax competition in Europe,” European Economic Review, 34, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoerer, M. (1997) “Taxes on production and on imports in Germany, 1901–13,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, no. 1, 161–79.Google Scholar
Spoerer, M. (2002) “Wann begannen Fiskal- und Steuerwettbewerb? Eine Spurensuche in Preußen, anderen deutschen Staaten und der Schweiz,” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, no. 2, 11–35.Google Scholar
Spoerer, M. (2004) Steuerlast, Steuerinzidenz und Steuerwettbewerb: Verteilungswirkungen der Besteuerung in Preußen und Württemberg (1815–1913). Berlin: Akademie. [English summary: “The political economy of taxation in 19th century Germany,” in Nützenadel, A. and Strupp, C. (eds.) (2007) Taxation, State and the Civil Society in Germany and the United States, 1750–1950. Wiesbaden: Nomos, 51–65].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoerer, M. (2008a) “The Laspeyres-paradox: Tax overshifting in nineteenth century Prussia,” Cliometrica, 2, 173–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoerer, M. (2008b) “The revenue structures of Brandenburg-Prussia, Saxony and Bavaria (fifteenth to nineteenth centuries): Are they compatible with the Bonney-Ormrod model?” in Cavaciocchi, S. (ed.) Fiscal Systems in the European Economy from the Thirteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries. Prato: Istituto Datini, 785–95.Google Scholar
Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsche Reich (1880–1914). Ed. by ,Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt. Berlin: Puttkammer.Google Scholar
,Statistisches Reichsamt (1930) Die deutsche Finanzwirtschaft vor und nach dem Kriege nach den Hauptergebnissen der Reichsfinanzstatistik. Berlin: Hobbing.Google Scholar
Thier, A. (1999) Steuergesetzgebung und Verfassung in der konstitutionellen Monarchie. Staatssteuerreformen in Preußen 1871–1893. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Thier, A. (2000) “Steuergesetzgebung und Staatsfinanzen in Preußen 1871–1893,” in Lingelbach, G. (ed.) Staatsfinanzen, Staatsverschuldung, Staatsbankrotte in der europäischen Staaten- und Rechtsgeschichte. Cologne: Böhlau, 311–33.Google Scholar
Thier, A. (2009) “Traditions of wealth taxation in Germany,” in Tiley, J. (ed.) Studies in the History of Tax Law, Vol. 3. Oxford and Portland: Hart, 73–88.Google Scholar
Ullmann, H.-P. (2005) Der deutsche Steuerstaat. Geschichte der öffentlichen Finanzen vom 18. Jahrhundert bis heute. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. (1863) Die Ordnung des österreichischen Staatshaushaltes, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf den Ausgabe-Etat und die Staatsschuld. Vienna: Gerold.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. (1904) Die finanzielle Mitbeteiligung der Gemeinden an kulturellen Staatseinrichtungen und die Entwickelung der Gemeindeeinnahmen: Mit besonderem Bezug auf preussische Verhältnisse. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Weitzel, O. (1967) “Die Entwicklung der Staatsausgaben in Deutschland: Eine Analyse der öffentlichen Aktivität in ihrer Abhängigkeit vom wirtschaftlichen Wachstum,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg.
Ziegler, D. (1996) “Eisenbahnen und Staat im Zeitalter der Industrialisierung.” Die Eisenbahnpolitik der deutschen Staaten im Vergleich. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×