Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:41:42.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Learning from failure and strategies for recovery in business process outsourcing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ronan McIvor
Affiliation:
University of Ulster
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Senior executives continue to express disappointment with outsourcing, and fail to achieve the anticipated benefits despite considerable investments of time and effort. Many organisations have found that outsourcing has increased complexity and costs, and required a wider range of management competencies than initially anticipated. Business process outsourcing (BPO) is one area where organisations have had difficulties and encountered failure. BPO involves transferring responsibility for delivering and managing a business process to an external vendor. Rather than involving the relatively smooth transfer of standard processes with clear interfaces to a vendor, BPO arrangements are often characterised by a high level of complexity and uncertainty. The business processes involved are tightly coupled with other organisational processes, and complexity arises from outsourcing the technological, workflow and human resource elements. The presence of both idiosyncrasies and inefficiencies in the processes transferred makes it difficult for the vendor to achieve anticipated cost savings and performance improvements. Uncertainty and changing requirements from the client further increase the difficulties for the vendor, and often lead to costly contract renegotiations.

This chapter considers common causes of failure in BPO and outlines a number of strategies for recovery. The analysis is presented through outlining the experiences of a global software provider in a major BPO arrangement. The company initially outsourced its revenue processing services to three vendors. However, over time the BPO arrangement failed to deliver the desired results.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mani, D., Barua, A. and Whinston, A. (2006). Successfully Governing Business Process Outsourcing Relationships. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(1), 15–29Google Scholar
Tan, C. and Sia, S. (2006). Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(4), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. and Sheehan, T. (2002). Managing the Knowledge Life Cycle, Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 75–83Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Management's Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel, Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71–80Google Scholar
Hansen, M., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999). What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?Harvard Business Review, 77(2) 106–16Google ScholarPubMed
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppo, L. and Zenger, T. (2002). Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, D., Barua, A. and Whinston, A. (2006). Successfully Governing Business Process Outsourcing Relationships. MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(1), 15–29Google Scholar
Tan, C. and Sia, S. (2006). Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(4), 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. and Sheehan, T. (2002). Managing the Knowledge Life Cycle, Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 75–83Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Management's Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel, Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71–80Google Scholar
Hansen, M., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999). What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?Harvard Business Review, 77(2) 106–16Google ScholarPubMed
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppo, L. and Zenger, T. (2002). Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×